the paint of the su-57 > the paint of any other fighter jet edit: im not saying that the stealth factor is great, im trying to say that the paint looks great appearance wise
@@Tanari-alsotanari Yes because black paint is completely invisible against a bright blue sky and white clouds 😒 Stealth planes are not supposed to be hard to see to the naked eye, they are mostly trying to hide from radars.
@@lukasgaminglife9790 Because Sukhoi stated the Stealth Capabilities of the Su 57 in their Patent which is between 0.1m² to 1m² RCS (Radar Cross Section). Now for comparison that's the same stealth level as an F-18E/F Super Hornet, an upgraded version of the F-18. It's on the same Stealth level as a non Stealth 4.5th Gen fighter (this is also why I and many others don't consider the Su 57 a 5th Gen fighter). Also, the F-22's publically released All aspect stealth value lies at 0.0001m², so only a literal thousand times stealthier. However, the actual RCS (for all planes) depends on which angle the radar hits the plane. Too long didn't read: Released Documents for both planes give us a rough estimate, Su 57 is about as stealthy as a 4.5th gen, F-22 is way stealthier.
A majestic aircraft of immense-scope for Mother Russia. The West talk of game changers well, the Russian Federation produce them and here lay-the-truth….. My respect to Russia, 🫡🕯️🇬🇧🇷🇺🕊
Hate to be the ‘well actually’ guy, but it’s the Su-57, the SU-57 is a tank from WWII. Still Soviet, but still. Anyway, this is an awesome edit, and people should stop hating the aircraft, hate the people who built it. It’s built now, and looks cool, even if it’s not stealth.
@@anigmaYT Yes yes whatever you say, Also the fact that the F-15 has not been shot down It reinforces the theory that say "it's not the plane, it's the pilot".
Russia's response to F-15 was Su-27 that is much better. Su-27 won all drill fights against F-15. Check interview with american and Russian pilots that were invloved in that in 90s. Americans copied Mig-25 and created F-15. Su-57 is not response to anything. Su-57 is simply the best jet fighter on planet and it will be it next couple decades.
@@SpaceTV504 fr I don’t like some Russian aircraft but I do really like the su 37 and su 35 and of course su 57 although one I do absolutely hate is the su 75
less stealthy than a brick wall* at it's average but the f22 and f35 aren't that stealthy all the time, at its minimal it's less than a coin but at the average it's probably a higher RCS
The Russian developer used this figure as F-22+F35=SU-57, he beats them both, and why are you so skeptical about its capabilities? The Indians are already regretting that they left the project (on the advice of the United States) when it was created, and now that the Russians have created a new engine that meets all the requirements of the 5th generation, they are eager to purchase it.
@@opairsoft8100 Ok, if I need to take medicine, then you all need to sober up, the world does not stand still, dude, your F-22 is already 20 (!) years old, when meeting with the SU-57 it will not go unnoticed, the launch range of air-to-air missiles the SU-57 has a range of up to 400 km, in addition to the radar in the fairing, 5 more radars are integrated into its hull skin, the speed in non-afterburning mode is 2M (two speeds of sound). We must admit that the F-22 is already an old man.
@@vasiliyivanov9826 again how many 57’s have been produced vatnik? Oh that’s right, 32…… How bad do you have to be to produce only 32 airframes in 14 years…..which is also funny because that’s only 6 years less then the F22 that you called old….. Imagine thinking the 57’s good when Russia barely has enough airframes for a single fighter squadron of 18-24 aircraft….after 14 YEARS of production… How will your 35 Su57’s fair against 195 F22’s…..let alone 1000+ F35’s…. Stay coping that you don’t have industries like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Pratt and Whitney, Raytheon, and McDonnell Douglas.
