A 100 years ago, the Wright Bros were ecstatic to fly for a 100 feet or so, and now we have this beautiful aircraft doing maneuvers so majestically. Kudos Sukhoi!
It’s sad what these aircraft are built for but they’re all beautiful marvels of engineering. Sukhoi makes some of the prettiest fighters in the world for sure.
Damn, you can see the shockwaves of sound breaking in the wings and pulsating in sync with 24fps from the camera. Incredible. Nice footage man. Nice camera work, the clear weather must have helped.
This is so beautiful. It's so impressive that it turns me on! SU57 is so sleek and agile. And that speed! But so special is its sound when it flies over. It sounds dangerous and lovely at the same time!❤
Truly amazing design. If the Russians had the American technology or the Americans had this talent in design, imagine what marvels we'd be seeing flying around.
С чего вы решили что у русских нет технологий? Самолеты, Атомные электростанции, Космические спутники по вашему из дерева и гвоздей делаются? Кстати, Россия сейчас единственная страна открывшая технологию замкнутого ядерного цикла - Вечное ядерное топливо.
The USSR was the first to develop stealth technology! But the technology was very expensive to produce, and it was cheaper to develop missiles that shoot down stealth! After which the technology was planted on American spies. Americans spent a lot of money on stealth aircraft. But when they came to bomb Serbia... an ordinary USSR missile easily shot him down!Since then, Americans have not used stealth aircraft where there are Soviet missiles.😜
@@donkoltz1 Ukraine isn't worth it, they haven't even used their best troops and material there as well. They're probably waiting for bigger things to come
@@webber7117 That's a lot of cope. The reality is this wanna-be F35 would be a pile of charred metal on the front lines, just like all of Russia's supposed wonder weapons.
Presumably these beautiful and excellent low-speed maneuvers in today's war are of no use. Now the war of stealth, firepower, range, radar detection power, among others, is very important.
У электроники есть такая дурная привычка *Ломаться* . А геометрия крыла и самого планера корпуса СУ-57 позволит выкрутиться из *ЛЮБОЙ СИТУАЦИИ* в Ближнем бою 🤘🏻👀✔️💯🔥
Yeah, this kind of low speed handling and maneuverability are rarely needed, if ever. It's 1950s thinking baked into a modern(ish) design. Also, it's only slightly stealthier than a Super Hornet-- and that's not me saying that, that's on *Sukhoi's* own webpage about the Su-57. Like the majority of the contemporary russian military, it's whole job is to look like it's dangerous. Scratch below the surface, and you'll see it's not, or at least, it would have been dangerous... ...in 1988.
@@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders Why don't you ask Chat GPT "Why does a fighter plane need high maneuverability when long and medium-range air-to-air missiles exist?" and see what it says.
Why? It would just say "If @@0000Duke0000 can't see why it's a terrible idea to design a not-very-stealthy aircraft for close quarters combat in an era of of highly reliable medium and long range range missiles against an opponent (the West) who's *entire combat doctrine* is about engaging at long and medium range with said highly reliable missiles and avoiding dogfights then he should just stick to War Thunder".
Stealth fighter jets are extremely expensive to created and maintain, so if you see 100 Su-57 coming at 20 Raptors in the sky…who will win? Both jets are deadly. Winner take All!
I genuinely hope that Russia fixes the Su-57 and makes its stealth capabilities on par with other 5th gens. I don't want to see such a beautiful design go to waste.
@@lukigensfm Had you read my comment and utilized your basic comprehension skills, if they do exist, you’d realize that the Su-75 is literally a smaller version of the Su-57! It’s not designed from scratch and it incorporates most of the Su-57 features with the exception that it’s single-engine, smaller and stealthier. So the assumption that they’d struggle to do that, is unequivocally asinine. I’d understand if you made that argument about their Mig-41 6th generation, sure. But this, is very doable.
This doesn't beat the Su-33 in anything. But costs 300% as much or smth. The only advantage I see is the speed of reacting to threats over their large country, but this is a strategic advantage, not tactic.
The new generation fighter jet is intended for testing multiple new technologies that can be later used in other models. SU57 is a base model for future unmanned jets. It also getting new engines with new tech that can be used to upgrade existing models like SU-30, SU-34, SU-35
the su57 will beat the f22 in a dogfight any day, too bad that the only way for those two to even get near each other without the su57 becoming a fireball is catastrophic human failure lmfao
While fun to watch at *airshows,* exactly NONE of these low-speed, high-alpha maneuvers would do anything to "confuse" Western air-to-air (or SAM) missiles--in fact it would guarantee the Su-57 gets killed. However, IF, somehow, opposing jets both ran out of missiles and ammo, and got to within *handgun range* of each other, THEN these maneuvers would be of great benefit to the Su-pilot! 🤣🤣🤣🤣😁🙃
It is obvious that you don't have a clue what are you talking about! These maneuvers are not meant to "confuse" western air to air missiles, they are meant to provide the first shoot capability because the turn radius and nose pointing capability of the Su-57 is drastically superior to any western fighter plane and provides you possibility to turn inside the opponents circle, where you can point planes nose first and launch the missile under few times more favorable angle, because firing the missile at high of bore sight close to 90° will significantly reduce the missiles Pk. Having the plane that can give you opportunity to turn faster and fire first the HOBS missile is the plane that is going to grant you a win in a dog fight. If you want to learn more about it I will provide you links where you can read all about within visual range dynamics.
@@jimiboi87 In a 15 km radius it doesn’t need to point its nose to shoot the target since it has 360 deg. targeting capability and HOBS missiles, but in a close quarters dog fight you definitely need to turn and burn since the missiles don’t have the capability to turn for you in highly dynamic situations at unfavorable angles and the missiles field of view is also limiting factor. 60 deg. of bore sight is as far as you can go with acceptable probability of kill. So, if you have two planes crossing each other at high speed head on, the pilot that can turn faster and tighter will be able to use its helmet mounted sight first to point its missile homing head at opponent. Also, if the turning room is very tight, you can’t launch the missile, and you are left with the gun. In any scenario, the plane with superior turning rate and nose pointing capability is having huge advantage.
Then,explain why are US pilots trying to make similar maneuvers at airshows using F35,F22 and the rest of fighters! I watched many attempts to make exactly same maneuvers and succeeding in looking amateurish comparatively! F35 pointing nose at 75° but not stalling and moving backwards, or F22 doing much better than F35,yet not nearly as well as Sukhois,from SU27-SU57! I bet you were out of your seat when Maverick said, I'm gonna pull the brakes and he's going to fly by! That was a Cobra manuver used in a dog fight!
Wow, the combustion process of these engines is crap. You won't see dark smoke trails like that coming out of the back of any western fighter jet. Also parachutes for landing , really ?
Man, It hurts just to watch the punishment these pilots endure in extracting this almost unbelievable performance from these Superb Aircraft, the Su-57. American jets do a 900 mph straight and level flyby and the crowds go "Wow, look at'em go !" Melt USA jets down and make beer cans out of them !
Not bad... not bad... still doesn't have anything on the RAPTOR.... the F-22 Raptor takeoff is better for sure... Definitely a bit more violent at times than the RAPTOR... I wonder if the RAPTOR could also do some of those but just was never given the green light.
The Su-57 has sufficient thrust vectoring for post-stall yaw maneuvers (thrust vectoring in the yaw axis). The F-22 lacks this capability and would therefore struggle to perform some of the acrobatics displayed in this video. However, the usefulness of post stall yaw control in combat is questionable at best.
The Sukhoi Su-57’s millennium science school education name ‘shrieker’ why? Because of the problems of the plane Also it is not rubbish it is Fast,sleek,Advanced,stealthy, and Manoeuvrable
@@kylietravers3466 nah, its stealth is kinda bad, because the estimated (RCS) size of f22 is about 0.0001m and 0.001, while estimated (RCS) size of the SU-57 has 0.01m and 0.1m. Which means theoretically, the su-57's (RCS) is 100x larger than f22's.
