Supreme Court 'Dealt The American People A Blow' By Killing Chevron Doctrine: Democracy Forward CEO 

Congress passes laws and the court interprets those laws, the president is supposed to execute those laws... your exactly right! This is a good thing and a major win for the people

For those who know nothing about EPA, FDA and other regulatory agencies, they are rules . And Congress wouldn't know the difference between a fish and a frying pan in a scientific technical discussion. They can't even pass an Appropriations Bill. When judges and Congress are all expert scientists in the vast array of drugs regulation, clinical trials, statistical science, environmental science, etc., let me know.

@@cecilelaforce3686 this

@@cecilelaforce3686 they don't have to be experts, and that is where this decision is taking us: that the Judicial and Legislative branch can now dictate how the Executive branch shall do its job. Well intentioned public service for the good of the American people isn't a thing anymore, it's all about whom is in control and how they can corrupt the system for their advantage.

@@cecilelaforce3686 How did science work out for you on Covid? Science told you that red meat was bad. "Trust the science" is for fools

Well, things changed over a couple of hundred years. Technology occured. In fact, since 1984 America has added 100 million people to the population. STEM began to flourish. Prolific knowledge greatly out-pased the awareness of your basic politician. Common sense deduced that teams of nonpolitical experts were worth being part of the decision process. But fascists hate that truth.

She is not confused. She simply does not care about freedom. She does not care about rights. She cares about government being enabled to force the submission of the people to whatever governmental policy is in vogue because she expects that she and her political allies will be the ones directing those government policies. And she doesn't want Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel to be able to block those policies on the "technicality" of their unconstitutionality.

@@situational.analysis That argument doesn't hold an ounce of water. Population has nothing to do with enforcing Constitutional principles. Fascism is authoritarian and dictatorial in nature...taking that authoritative ability away from unelected radical bureaucrats is actually the opposite of fascism. Send it back to the legislators where it belongs. The "experts" (like the people who predicted an ice age in 1970) can certainly make recommendations and advise lawmakers, but laws need to be passed by the legislative branch which consists of democratically elected representatives operating within the constraints of the Constitution.

@@situational.analysissmd

@nickspeakstruth133 That you can't write a cogent sentence defending your dissenting opinion just confirms both your obtuseness and my accuracy. That's ok. I already knew I'm much, much smarter.

Mental. Acrobatics.

Jesus Christ, that's a Hell of a way to go.

That’s the first example I thought of. ATF abuses their power. EPA is another example.

​@@grey5751That's what it takes to be an ATF prosecutor

Anybody else notice the airport he was in charge of for many years is Mena Airport?…if you know the name Berry Seal and have heard about the cocaine smuggling operation run by the CIA which led to the Iran/ Contra scandal then you know what went down there behind closed doors. Point being this guy had been privy to some really dark sh*t throughout his career and all during Bill Clinton's tenure as the Governor... Anyone ever heard the term "Clinton Body Count"?... Just saying

Boom. Exactly right.

Yep!

This was evidently lost on the woman in the interview.

@@stewhobson9748 Doubtful. More than likely she resents having to get her agenda past a multipartisan congress before she gets to impose it on the American taxpayers for her own personal benefit.

Legislation would be nice. Not much happening on that front these days.

If a meat inspector sees gangrene, the inspector can no longer condemn that meat - there must now be a full blown trial, with pretrial motions, hearings, lawyers and judges, depositions, etc. is this progress? I kinda want meat inspectors to act when they find gangrene.

Well said

@@henrybutchy3242 More gaslighting, the Federal government meat inspector can contact state and local government inspectors, you have other branches of government like state and local that have inspector’s that can stop the distribution of the meat, then the federal government takes them to court if they need to be taken to court.

​@@henrybutchy3242that is the biggest strawman I've seen in a while. The decision doesn't take away the ability for an agency to do its job. It takes away the ability to make up new rules and interpretation from nothing. Stop making up lies.

​@@henrybutchy3242 you really shouldn't say things when you have no idea what you are talking about!

I know right. Say it ain't so!

Corporate lobbies that put shareholder profits above human interest get to do so instead. Oh joy.

@@northside4767why would you think a bunch of do nothing bureaucrats looking for their big payday in industry would give that up for the citizens whom they despise

@@northside4767, How does requiring a court decision have anything to do with lobbyists or corporations?

@mikemorgan8588: Wow. You're new to this whole "life" thing, aren't you?

@doneyandassociates correct! It also states the two other branches are to work as checks to them as well. Funny there are no ethics rules for the highest court of the country haha.

I think it would have been more unsettling if it had been 9-0.. if the democrat judges had actually voted for what was good for the american people, I'd know something was up.

@@djmccullough9233very true

Chevron is the old decision that was reversed btw. But I know what you mean. 👍

Yeah the freedom to poison our water supply and pollute our air.

I thought that’s what I heard.

The bottom line is a huge win for 'we the peopje' .

Notice how she never really discussed the basis for the ruling. She is just a PO'd socialist. This really is a big win for America.

Big Pharma and FDA a prime example...

Yep

That was my thought. But I’m just an RN. 😉😇

until you’re negatively impacted a lot of dummy’s will think this way

Forbes is a chinese owned company.

​@@mustbtroublethe EPA has done a lot of negative.

@@mustbtrouble Until YOU are negatively impacted. This is called argument from anecdote.

@@mustbtrouble Yea well..., atleast we're not the 'dummies' that need day care... and a baby sitter to decide for us what we should eat.

LOL

Do not worry they will soon mandate that you have a live-in government advisor to help you out.

@@armastat From Iran.

Much more Relaxed!

Happily.

Where do they find these people with useless rhetoric opinions. I agree kinda pathetic

She's a leftist. Constitution doesn't mean anything to her.

​​@@cindydufala7646 finally a stand against marxist indoctrination via university brainwashing. The Dunning-Krueger association. Sorry but no cheese with that whine!

Any one of the "elite" colleges. Take your pick.

Actually it’s just about any college and public school in the United States.

The Just-us *are* the corrupt government taking bribes in order to rule in favor of corporations

Exactly! 👉👃

Absolutely massive win because they are massively melting down. Reddit is full if 2025 blueanon conspiracy theories right now LOL

@@jurpo6 Which, to be honest, actually sounds pretty good...

One big reason is that the DEA can't say drugs are illegal because they say so anymore. Now, a lawsuit can bring in a medical doctor and scientist into court that say an illegal drug has a medical benefit. Previously, the Judge would say science has no meaning because the DEA has the final say under Chevron. Now, the judge has to listen to the experts instead of the DEA. This is going to effectively end the War on Drugs by giving power back to the States.

Read "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair to appreciate the benefits of a powerless bureaucratic state.

@nukembear2345 they don’t “rule”, they set health and safety standards.

@beehappyalways correct the line that made the milk industry what it is now and now mercing Americans left and right with what's put in it. Not to mention, the Supreme Court is appointed not elected to interpret the laws.

Bc it’s the government who protects the people. 6 unelected republican justices serving lifetime appts who r in the pockets of conservative elites and corporate shareholders.

@@beehappyalways well when a bureaucrat decides that you will get 20 years in prison for owning an item that was completely legal for the last 20 years I think you have a problem.

I love the sweet tears of these socialists crying about losing their tyrannical power.

This encompasses all administrative agencies, not just the ATF.

Yes. Her attitude shows me that she does not even belong in this country. Perhaps the EU would be more to her liking.

Leftists believe that their Ends ALWAYS justify ANY means.

Corporations aren’t citizens, they are for profit companies. They will poison you to make more money. That’s why we have the epa. 🤯🤯

The supreme Court is unelected and unable to be held accountable

Agreed

It's them giving them selves the right. You can also vote to give yourself the right. It's called yes or no in an interaction backed by willingness and readyness to enact force soon an aggressor

Agreed!!!

They're just mad they can't force feed us their agenda anymore.

Absolutely nailed it! 🎯🎯💯👍

Yes!

I absolutely trust corporations to have the best interests of the individual in mind.

@@omicron2018 your sarcasm font isn’t working. But in still understand. Corporations are accountable to the consumer and their suppliers. Bureaucrats are accountable to nobody, and we’re not elected. So they have no place making rules and imposing fines. Corporations are not ideal, but they can be held accountable.

Nailed it.

you're like hardcore anti judge? wild

@@satec77 I see what you did there. Justices are provided for in the constitution. Bureaucrats are not.

100%. People on both sides of the aisle should be upset at the amount of tax money, special interest money, and insider trading being done by their congresspeople only for them to barely pass a budget with every other issue stapled on via quid pro quo favors. Congress needs to figure it out and get functional again or get replaced.

Pretty sure they're practicing doublespeak for the ongoing 1984 transition.

I'm sure she gets a hefty paycheck in those 9000 page continuing resolutions as an unnamed NGO

"Democracy" is the codeword Marxists use to push communism

Misnomer. Very much like the so-called inflation reduction act. Purposeful, Dem strategy to fool their lol info, voters.

Mr Tyler..... everything they title is named the opposite of what it actually does. social media. The cares act... are examples.

Not crazy, corrupt.

While giving billions freely to Ukraine instead of supporting American fishermen simply trying to make a living.

Bs! The heads of these agencies APPOINTED.

@@bizygirl1 Appointed - and those they hire - aren’t Elected and many stay there decades long.

@@rickstokes2239 Of course they do. They’re subject matter experts in their fields. Their scientists, doctors, biologists, attorneys, public health experts, IT professionals, etc. who’ve spent years studying and working in their departments knowing the ins and outs of laws, policies, treaties, data, studies. They have knowledge and Trump wants to throw them out. They’ll get replaced with people beholden to Trump who don’t know crap. The ripple effects will be insurmountable. Lawsuits, deregulation, safety hazards, catastrophic accidents, and huge losses to the people of this country in health, finance, work safety, job protection, child labor laws, housing, consumer affairs, on and on.

​@@bizygirl1Being "appointed" doesn't mean they are right for the job, or even capable. How many got the positions they are in because of who they know, not what they know? It's common practice, especially in government work.

Hopefully we get new better people in congress

And what was food safety like for people in those previous 200 years? What was workplace safety like? What was drinking water like? What was air pollution like? Who looked out for people when they were taking advantage of a huge financial organizations?

@@craig8638 Only Congress can make laws and regulations, not some unelected agency.

@@craig8638 Cook your steaks well-done and thoroughly wash your fruits and vegetables. Oh, and stop whining.

​@@craig8638Most of those categories, mostly better. Food, for instance. You grew it, raised, slaughtered it, reaped it, or traded neighbors for it. Because it was in your control, you knew what went it and what didn't. No plastics. No forever chemicals. No dyes. No extra hormones. No Genetical Modified plants. No human made meats. No "artificial" inside the packaging. In short, healthier. And people have gone generations with an EPA or FDA to tell them to be on the lookout for argot poisoning. Or mold. Today those organizations would tell you the fake and man made meatsare healthy, that chemicals everywhere are better than natural, or that sugar cereal is somehow healthier than eggs and red meat.

@@craig8638food all across the world is made by the same brands but we have completely different, very unhealthy ingredients.

Can we put CSE in there? They are killing me fr

Yes they did..if not nothing will get done and everything will bog down in court. It’s away for people who do not like certain laws to challenge them indefinitely. We the corporations you mean. GTH.

Big business will fight everything. In court Little can’t afford to fight that way. Loses

​@@cs292 they absolutely did not. They would abolish all those agencies.

@@cs292 In that event then Congress can modify the law to include what they want it to be. Not some unelected agency. The way it was allowed the executive branch to bypass congress.

Absolutely! It should reduce the needed unelected swamp creatures needed to rip off America.

@dasjuggernaut1 taken by a group appointed not elected interpreting law based in a lot of times with religious beliefs. Not a good thing at all lll

Bullseye!

Wrong. The legislative process is (and has been since 1946) the Administrative Procedures Act. Such as, from several tickets, you accumulate enough points fir a suspensiin. The suspensionbis not automatic, the APA requires notice and a hearing. The hearing is at the MVA, and it is limited to (1) was it you, (2) was it X points. Now, no more administrative hearings - it all goes before local court judges. Pretrial procedure, depositions, motions, hearings, lawyers. It is soooo stupid. Take America Back to 1932!

There is no legislative process now! How is that a good thing?? Seriously?

@@carolnelson8459 That is why we have CONGRESS! Seriously?

@@henrybutchy3242How is it taking America back to 1932 with SCOTUS overturning a decision made in 1984?

You are pro the super rich and the powerful companies being able to do whatever they want to do nearly unchecked even if their actions harm the public......not sure I'd be celebrating that if I were you.....

Wow. Again, I see how the education system has failed. Seriously, you are putting your welfare to the whims of the courts with the companies hiring their lawyers. Welcome to your dystopian existence.

@@Jsee66 Just one step closer to enacting project 2025...consolidation of power into the elected president (in this case, trump), get rid of FBI, CIA, etc. is next. Weird move for the long run, as having everything run through the judicial branch until the power consolidation occurs in the executive...one thing trump will not need anymore is a supreme court.

We’ve got some water we saved special just for you.

@@Jsee66 Agencies never should have had the power to do what Congress was given the power to do. Which is make the laws !!

Exactly

This woman is obviously Pro government overreach and anti freedom.

Why do liberals want the federal government to have total control

So you won’t mind lead pipes and asbestos in your children’s world? You have no idea where this will lead. This is the biggest LOSS for Americans. Be careful, now you won’t know what’s in the cereal you’re serving for breakfast.

No a failure

Now a random judge and private companies will self-rule on what's safe for you. Congrats! Have fun trusting Boeing next time you take a plane trip.

Yeah because boing was doing such a great job 🙄​@@OmnipotentO

​@@OmnipotentOBwahaha, we can't trust them now!

Could not agree more HVAC guy. I trust private citizens a hell of a lot more than government.

@@wolfgang1496 if you thought that was bad just you wait lol With this new ruling they now they have nothing to worry about. its about to get 100x worse. I work in a hospital lab and the FDA is literally what keeps things like blood banking and transfusion practices safe.

I think it is more of since it was decided by judges who Trump appointed (ignoring that 6 of the 9 of them were not) that they have to be against it. and then they do mental gymnastics to somehow justify their position, even if it doesn't make sense. This is their mental illness - they have no ability to discriminate between logical and illogical.

Looks like she's an Administrative Law attorney. Her income might be threatened if it's harder for un-elected administrative bureaucrats to make their own laws.

She is probably just another leftist who left true religion to make govt her god. We all have to worship something.

What's sad is that the SCOTUS must waste their time on garbage like this, which is strictly unelected officials giving themselfs more and more power, which our Constitution does not give them!

It's always interpret, then enforce. You forgot the thinking part of the process. Well, we can see why you shouldn't have the job. LOL!

@ywtcc no, executive does not interpret. It is simply to do. If there are questions, go back to those that wrote it. If the agencies have further concerns about constitutionality of said legislation, that's where the judicial interprets legislative intent vis a vi the USC.

But therein lies the problem when they got that little bit of power it went to their heads and then they thought that they could just start making laws and taking over and hold people accountable while they're not

@@Kainis80 If you don't interpret, then you don't attach meanings to words. Even machines need to interpret languages. And that's a machine language, that's greatly simplified! English is much worse to mechanize - the words don't even necessarily have one meaning associated with them. Regardless, you're definitely not understanding the law if you're not interpreting it. You're just bad with language and kidding yourself. Also, you're refusing to tell me how you're interpreting the language, and you're hiding your intentions by doing so. You need some self awareness, and some more honesty in your arguments. Also, you really need to just listen to the smart people, sometimes. It shows real immaturity to fail to do so.

Well Said!!

All I can say is right on. Nailed it!

You need to read it. Chevron is going to pollute our environment

Amen.

Yes not sure why so many are triggered that scotus is doing their job as they should

How would you ever agree with dictatorial regulations, not based on any law?

Our Republican legislature in GA has been lowering taxes and giving us back some of our lost freedoms. They aren't perfect, but they try hard to do what is right. Please vote Republican this November.

Amen, All Chevron Deference did was guarantee any Government entity,were going to get away with whatever Crimes, they've committed against anyone Scotus has Finally made a Perfect Decision

How is unelected people making decision for us a Win?

​@@salvyballacc you forget that elected people appoint the Supreme Court. Oh wait you know that and your gaslighting us.

@@salvyballacc I think you misunderstood what he said

@@AetherialDreamsOfficial I said Unelected

So big corps essentially wrote laws with limited restrictions to ensure little to no competition??? Did i get that right

They are clearly accountable to congress.

She said that they overturned 40 years of precedent but failed to mention that 40 years ago the court overturned 210 years of precedent. The American people won.

@@TSlick2 no they aren’t. Congress can hold hearings and expose them but nothing else.

@@TSlick2 Now they are.

@@andrewgrey1930 No. They were before. That oversight has been removed and replaced by unelected judges.

Bingo! Corporations are people too.The court had ruled.

Small business and farms are being ruined by monopolies that will benefit from this decision.

@@craig8638 Small businesse and farms now have the due process and protection of law that they should have always had when being attacked by overreaching federal bureaucracies. Chevrons benefit nobody but the bureaucracies utilizing them.

@@kraftzion So small business’ and farms aren’t being put out of business by monopolies?

@@craig8638 Sure they are. One of the ways is by paying bribes to federal bureaucracies to use chevrons to exert pressure and take money through fines.

@@craig8638 Not relevant to this. In this case, the agency did not have the budget to do the level of regulation the agency aspired to do and also pay staff. So the agency set up a billing department and sent out invoices to the businesses they regulated to fund their budget... Unreal tyranny.

Hooray, a return to lead gasoline… you are insane if you think this is a positive

They’re puppets of the give the hive does agree.

​@@daryno9048 govern me harder daddy

@@daryno9048 if i understand correctly it is the opposite of that

@@P4NxC4K3what is wrong with you ppl? What do you think the government is there for? Why do you want more poisons in everything you come in contact with?

That's easy. Everyone quit paying taxes

We did fine for the first 140 years without federal taxes.

They actually do that. however one the law is passed they go crazy on and bend that law completely out of shape.

​@@armastatThey DO NOT SUBMIT REGULATIONS TO CONGRESS FOR APPROVAL. Congress puts "the Secretary Shall" in EVERY BILL, thus FORFEITING IT'S LAWMAKING AUTHORITY TO THE BUREAUCRACY. It's not debatable. IT'S FACT. LOOK IT UP.

@@davidnichols6971 Of course they don't. What they do is have public hearings to get input from those effected before making it official... I am not debating you. PS: the method you are complaining about - and one NOT changed by the Supreme Court's ruling - is that Congress passes a law explaining what an agency has oversight over and for what Purpose they have that oversight. The agency is expected to perform that duty and stay with in the bounds of that mandate. All this ruling does is allow Judges to disagree with the government if they disagree with what the agency thinks they are allowed to do or not. Before now they were not allowed to legally disagree. This is a really big thing - since government has lately been coloring outside the lines, but you are still over complicating the issue.

They've been coloring outside the lines my whole life, 6 decades, and before. We are NOT supposed to be governed, or ruled, by Washington. We are a Federal Republic. We have state governments for a reason. DC NEEDS TO BE CLEANSED, and returned to it's original, constitutional purpose. That purpose does not include using it's power to turn the entire country into The Democratic Republic of Californis. Which is what the present regime is doing.

Yes, no substance, all opinion slanted in one political direction, in lock step with 95% of the major media.

Very well put!

Be nice if this was an end to "Corporate Capture", but I dunno about Congress.

According to these 2 geniuses it’s the other way around. Sadly congress is more like these fools than not. They just want to throw out a hollow suggestion and let the back room dealers of what ever in charge party sort it out. Unfortunately the “it” in that sentence is our freedoms and lives.

​@@geoffwidmier3714 Supreme Court doesn't write laws. Go back to civics class.

@@williemurray2523 They aren't writing the law, but they are legislating from the bench by making decisions that set precedence. This has long been a part of western law, and is not a thing one side or the other does more of. It's just the fact that a ruling sets a precedent other lawyers will point to for interpretation later.

Your congress works for corporations and makes laws that benefit corporations only. Regulating what corporations can and cannot do benefits the people, but you been brainwashed to think that regulating corporations is attack on your personal freedom.

Yeah I totally want to be able to set my tap water on fire and let corporations run the show. Air isn’t that big of a deal anyway.

Just like Roe

​@@mariner1952yeah I totally want OSHA mandating experimental gene therapies.

@@jeffcook2570 ? Yeah they don’t do that, they haven’t included cell and gene therapy agents to the hazardous drug list. Do you want people to be exposed to hazardous materials? Because this could be a possibility now….

@mariner1952 the "vaccine" is a gene therapy that they already tried to mandate but thanks for playing.

lol when has the idea of "providing for the people" ever been a goal of the giant, for profit corporations?

@@KennethHill-fo6nc hmmmm....where do you get your food 🤔

@@ladydi4537 From the grocery store as I assume you and most Americans do. Not sure what you are trying to get at with that question. The point I was trying to make is that the scientific experts will no longer be allowed to determine what pesticides should or should not be sprayed on our food because those decisions will be left up to clueless and unqualified legislators like MTG, Ted Cruz, and Tommy “I can’t correctly name the three branches of the Federal Government.” Tuberville.

@@KennethHill-fo6nc if you add Schumer, Nadler, Pelosi ("have to pass it before you can read it") AOC, Bush, Omar, etal the Squad, Newsome, & Fauci I may agree with you. Legislators bring in experts to craft laws. Bureaucrats making Rules are NOT laws. Get most of my food from the ranch. Beef, chickens, pork , apples, apricots, grapes etc & veggies. Also from locally grown organic farmers.

What do you think congress’s approval rate is? How about their ability to operate quickly to address the needs of their citizens? You might not want to be vulnerable to their inaction when you find PFAS in your water and microplastics in your body. What then, are you going to sue DuPont and win? Not a chance. You going to sit back and have the same lawmakers that couldn’t agree on funding 9/11 first responders treatment come to your aid? They won’t. You need the regulatory bodies to come in a constrain the people with all the money and power. There is a reason we had to make these entities.

Getting the sense this is setting the stage for a Javier Milei-esque policy change by Trump, to help pay off the national debt just like Javier. But I could be wrong.

Liberal word salad to voice their bias opinion as fact.

Thought I was the only one who caught that.... that is the baffle them with bs strategy

She's disappointed because the alphabet soup agencies will have less or no power to make laws going forward.