Supreme court should have taken into consideration timing of its ruling - Dr. Yamson |Agenda on TV3 

This is the most thought provoking and insightful panel of discussion I have watched. The old men must be brought to the table to counsel the atmosphere. Truly these MPs have failed us. SEE HOW HE SPEAKS WITH PRIDE. Can’t you explain the point without a touch of Pride?

THE SPEAKER HAS DONE HIS WORK AND NO COURT SHALL OVERTURN THE HIS DECLARATIONS

THE SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT HAS DONE HIS DUTY AND IS RIGHTFULLY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE LAND SO TELL THIS NPP LAWYER TO SHUT UP,HYPOCRITES

Nimako, you are bjayers

Nimako, you're a hypocrite.

Nimako, read article 97, 99 and 115 very well and stop this emotional, hypocritical and dishonest delivery.

THE SPEAKER DOES NOT NEED ANY SUPREME COURT INTERPRETATION TO DO HIS PARLIAMENTARY WORK,NONSENSICAL STATEMENT

WE SHOULD BE BOLD ENOUGH TO CALL THE SPADE A SPADE ♠️ AND NOTHING MORE ,WHEN IT DOES NOT GO THEIR WAY THE NPP HAVE ITS OWN INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION

It's even better to have opposition majority in parliament to check this wasteful governance

Lawyer Nimakoh, the Hansards you referred to is not yet satisfied because Parliament will sit on Tuesday to now make any corrections and ommissions and will then be accepted ny the House of Parliament as a working Hansard on documents for the Thursday's Sitting.

Afenyo action is like my 3yrs daughter crying over food before the food is even cook. He run to court before even parliament sit.

SC interpretations are binding but not stupid orders directing a constitutional body from performing its functions. The SC politics is simply freezing political decisions of the executive and legislature for the benefit of the executive. That's stupidity, which can lead to serious national security issues.

The speaker is responsible for all these confusion. He shouldn't have declared the 4 seats vacant

Dr Yamson, your views are prejudiced 😂😂😂

The basic tenet of democracy is that power is obtained from the people. The speaker cannot narrowly interpret the Constitution to gain advantage for his party. Majority in parliament should be obtained through the polls not through a preferential interpretation of the Constitution. If the speaker was unbiased, he could’ve sought interpretation of the Constitution from the Supreme Court before acting. The host is too biased for the discussion. An objective host should not be seen to lean left or right on issues.

The rush to the court was a result of the biased partisan ruling of the speaker. So I beg to differ from Mr Yamson

Dr Yamson, your thoughts are mediocre.

The speaker has indeed done his job; NPP they ran to the Supreme Court knowing that CJ belongs to the NPP as she was nominated by Nana Akkufo- Addo

The security must search anyone who goes to the Parliament tomorrow. Some NDC MPs have categorically stated that they are ready to fight any orders and arrangements that they disagree with. It will be either their way or no way. This is a declaration of chaos. The security body should not allow it. They must maintain order.

Court have right not speaker

THE SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT HAS DONE HIS DUTY AND IS RIGHTFULLY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE LAND SO TELL THIS NPP LAWYER TO SHUT UP,HYPOCRITES