Swan Ganz Numbers: presented by Dr. Gallagher's Neighborhood 

Been an IR RN for 12 years and am transitioning to the Cath lab...this is a great educational video ..Thanks and Cheers from NYC!!

This has been incredibly helpful during my transition to CVICU. Thank you!

Thank you for explaining this so well, I was pulling my hair for the past few days trying to understand the purpose of PAPs

Very nice presentation. Thank you, Sir.

How's my heart? Doc: Ok.

Thank you for this, it’s very concise and informative

Thanks! Beautiful video!

Thank you for your magnificent video. During swan ganz placement do you have any recommendations to increase the likelihood of placing the catheter in the pulmonary artery? 1. Should you thread the catheter slowly? 2. Should you place the patient supine or upright?

@4:57 "Oops stupid me I gave a bunch of Neo" priceless

Excellent Presentation!

Thank you for breaking this down and explaining it from a physiologic stand point. Much appreciate it!

I'm trying to determine the necessity of this. I was informed of the RHC, but not keeping this device in my body for over three days

God bless you- cardiac nurse

Great video very informative!

Thanks for the video. The concept of the ratio was very useful. My queries. So if the ratio is maintained and patient is hypotensive giving more fluids should help? Likewise if the ratio is bad inotropes or mechanical supports would be necessary?

Dr. Gallagher Thank you for the video. Could I ask you a little bit to understand more? If the ratio systemic/pulmonic is bad then the starling curve is bad...meaning even increase volume the cardiac output would not increase? Anything else? Any advice on topic I could read? Thank you very much

Can we get this video updated with a clearer camera?

Nice presentation thank you sir.

so good, thanks

Please,clearly explain and point to specific figures

I like my ratio swan numbers at all the time

Need clarity on how to calculate the ratio…

Thank you, Not sure how you got the ratio? Can you explain?

Thank you for your video. The amount of times you said "ok" I found to be a little distracting, but overall good material.

Ok!

Not a great talk, unfortunately. Needs some differentiation vis a vis the fact that pressure is not synonymous with filling because compliance is variable. Any swan talk nowadays needs to include concepts like RV luxury perfusion in diastole, post vs pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension, interventricular dependence, how PAD is only a rough surrogate for wedge pressure, continuous vs cold injectate cardiac output measurement, complications, limitations, etc

can you say "ok" a few more times...?

Politically correct.

Ok

ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok

Ok