1) field of view of at least 110 meters. 2) shorter focus with more resistance. 3) extra coating ( HD or ....coating and little contrast and sharpness in the center). and at least 40 gram lighter. A nieuw Swarovski 10x25 with these improvements would be great!! I would still go for this one, because there is no better 10x25 binocular yet.)
Love your reviews! A small succestion though: you never seem to talk about the apparent field of view. It's an important aspect of the overall experience of the binoculars.
Honest review, as already had these and others like Zeiss. However, do not wear glasses and found the diopter very stiff as perhaps brand new. Perhaps too much to ask but Zeiss a far far older company going back 1860s got the diopter right as can lock it with readings on the scale for different users. Good some scale on the diopter, but so stiff reluctant to move it when it was correct. The diopter so important re focus and initially considered a return to sender as without it crap.
How does this compare to Leica 10x25 Ultravid ? Here in Canada there about the same price. Very difficult to chose between $1100.00 CDN Dollars PREMIUM binoculars. I thank you.😊
The weakness of Swarovski is the price. Even second hand Swarovski is so ridiculously overpriced that you will hard time to sell them, because if someone has so much money they'll just buy a new one.
