Swing or seam: which is more effective in England? 

Misfortune of Umesh explained nicely....

Umesh Yadav is lord in those pitches

🤣😂

Not in india, its made in pakistan

😂😂

Lmao

How can IND won WTC final ? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PIc3dVKaV9s.html

Exactly brother..his honesty let him down...the man who did commentary in so many years now BCCI consider Murali Karthik ahead of him thats sad .

😆😆😆😆

@@rajdeepdas4079 Then why he was criticized about jadeja's bits and pieces remark?

He was probably the only Indian commentator alongside harsha bhogle who I liked. All others are too boring.

@@trollnehru8102 bro as a analyst he can criticize anyone when someone doesn't play well irrespective of how big the name is.

Even Stuart Broad is a seam bowler but very effective in England

@@chiranthsanketh562 Yes but his action also allows him to swing the ball both ways. With shami u can also get that at times but with Bumrah his arm goes just 1 way and because of that he finds it difficult to bring the ball back into the batsman. Also Stuart broad is used to bowling on these conditions so yes that is an advantage for him.

I do not think that the reason for the failure in the lack of genuine swing bowlers, look at Glenn Mcgrath and pat cummins for example, both never tried to swing the ball but have excellent numbers in England, in fact the only genuine swing bowler for aus is starc yet they were quite clinical with the ball in England and starc only played one game in that series, it was a matter of line and length nothing else, bumrah was all over the place and he was tghe sole weak link whereas every kiwi bowler was on point right from the get go and it's not like bumrah cannot swing the ball, he was hooping it the very next match at trent bridge. I think the sole reason we lost was because of poor batting, nz had the advantage with the toss we were 140/3 and collapsed to 210, a worse collapse happened in the 3rd innings, if we had scored at par we could have managed to at least draw the game, whenever the opposition puts you in to bat first you really need a 300+ score which seals the game but that did not happen

@@satyarth5747 That can also be a point. Also NZ are England conditions are very similar so NZ knew how to bat on that kind of a pitch which bounced and swung a bit more. In india the bounce is pretty low compared to England and NZ so that could also be another reason for their failure

Common kid , Ishant is a seam bowler . Go to school .

How can IND won WTC final ? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PIc3dVKaV9s.html

1:32 -1:50 - he's talking rubbish

@@neoandleia how?

@@commentor2614 he's saying the ball moves in the air if the pitch is green. And his definition of a cutter.

Because he is a horrible commentator. Don’t doubt his knowledge. He was a very good batsman too, but just doesn’t do it in the commentary box for me

They are c grade bowler

When you use your fingers to turn the ball either way when there is no swing.

Maybe...he has a sort of odd action..they also said play kumble like an inswing bowler. The ball can swing even if the pace is less. Sachin used swing balls both ways. Kohli may not have had that consistency.

@@tapashnandy3594 Kohli doesn't swing the ball, he goes to one corner of the crease and delivers it with an angle into the right hander.

Best seam bowler was Mohammad Asif 🔥 Sad he destroyed his career!!

@@mithunsl574 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@mithunsl574 What about bowlers like Shoaib Lee or steyn? Are they seam bowlers.???

@@mithunsl574 And what about Bumrah?

you forgot about Curtly Ambrose he was also the best seam bowler

Tum to pahunch hi gye the