Systems Thinking Ep. 1: Lists & Models (Learn to think like a genius)

Подписаться 13 тыс.

Просмотров 45 тыс.

50% 1

www.skool.com/...
🚀 Welcome to the New Era Pathfinders Community! 🌟
Are you feeling overwhelmed by the AI revolution? You're not alone.
But what if you could transform that anxiety into your greatest superpower?
Join us on an exhilarating journey into the future of humanity in the age of AI! 🤖💫
🔥 What is New Era Pathfinders? 🔥
We are a vibrant community of forward-thinkers, innovators, and lifelong learners who are passionate about mastering the AI revolution. From college students to retirees, tech enthusiasts to creative souls - we're all here to navigate this exciting new era together!
🌈 Our Mission 🌈
To empower YOU to thrive in a world transformed by AI. We turn AI anxiety into opportunity, confusion into clarity, and uncertainty into unshakeable confidence.
🧭 The Five-Pillar Pathfinder's Framework 🧭
Our unique approach covers every aspect of life in the AI age:
1. 💻 Become an AI Power-User
Master cutting-edge AI tools and amplify your productivity!
2. 📊 Understand Economic Changes
Navigate the shifting job market with confidence and foresight!
3. 🌿 Back to Basics Lifestyles
Reconnect with your human essence in a digital world!
4. 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Master People Skills
Enhance the abilities that make us irreplaceably human!
5. 🎯 Radical Alignment
Discover your true purpose in this new era!
🔓 What You'll Unlock 🔓
✅ Weekly Live Webinars: Deep-dive into each pillar with expert guidance
✅ On-Demand Courses: Learn at your own pace, anytime, anywhere
✅ Vibrant Community Forum: Connect, share, and grow with like-minded pathfinders
✅ Exclusive Resources: Cutting-edge tools, frameworks, and insights
✅ Personal Growth: Transform your mindset and skillset for the AI age
🚀 As You Progress 🚀
Unlock even more benefits:
🌟 One-on-One Mentoring Sessions
🌟 Exclusive Masterclasses
🌟 Advanced AI Implementation Strategies
💎 Why Join New Era Pathfinders? 💎
🔹 Expert-Led: Founded by a leading AI thought leader, connected with top researchers and innovators
🔹 Holistic Approach: We don't just teach tech - we prepare you for life in an AI-driven world
🔹 Action-Oriented: Real skills, real strategies, real results
🔹 Community-Driven: Join 300+ members already navigating this new era
🔹 Cutting-Edge Content: Stay ahead of the curve with the latest AI developments and strategies
🔥 Don't just survive the AI revolution - lead it! 🔥

Опубликовано:

29 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 87

@safrim-zf7yn 8 месяцев назад

My obsession with lists, hierarchies, models and structures just got a social validation. Thanks for the video.

@chopinDC Год назад

Recently found out I'm a hypersystemizer. I also read SBC's book and it was like learning how my brain works. Glad I found this video. Keep it going.

@alexkaa Год назад

Hi David, just wanted to tell you that, here in my place in southern Germany, near Stuttgart, your voice has been filling my rooms for uncounted hours already - and I, intellectually and often empathically, enjoyed every one of them. Please continue your works - you are a fresh thinker!

@hilmarhoffmann8963 9 месяцев назад

I also really enjoy your input. What distracted me a little, was that you needed to tell us, that psychology is a pseudo-science (1:56). While you gave some context (american(?) establishment, american(?) academic), for me that wasn't enough at all to not see this statetement as an overgeneralization. And it triggers some follow-up questions: What makes a pseudo-science? Are there branches of psychology or different camps that are not pseudo-science? Is the field that psychology is exploring not worth of exploring at all or should it be simply done in a different way?

@filiphere 7 месяцев назад

I'd love to know as well.

@akhilnandakumar3564 2 месяца назад

psychology often does not meet the five basic requirements for a field to be considered scientifically rigorous: clearly defined terminology, quantifiability, highly controlled experimental conditions, reproducibility and, finally, predictability and testability. Hence it's considered pseudoscience.

@spazefalcon2794 Месяц назад

⭐⭐⭐⭐ - 💛 this series. You probably know, linguistics & language... As major factor - human intelligence. It is my favorite study. ✌️😃🚀

@user-yl7kl7sl1g 9 месяцев назад

I probably have autism, so this kind of thinking is useful for me. I've never been diagnosed, probably because I'm so good at masking, but the way I learned social skills and to read people, was insanely systematic, where I drilled each micro-expression one at a time, and read tons of books. I do take notes, but I hadn't thought of the power of lists before this video. But now that I think about it, Mr. Bezos came up with the idea for Amazon with a list comparing business ideas for the internet, and costs, and revenues. Warren Buffet also used lists to compare investment opportunities, comparing variables.

@YawAgyenim 7 месяцев назад

I do not wish to be that particular someone to say such a thing yet I believe you to be particularly lucky. I honestly wish I had autism without any of the downsides, due to all the geniuses which arose/formulated through it.

@H3XED_OwO 9 месяцев назад

I recommend the book "the art of thinking in systems" by Steven Schuster

@nuvotion-live Год назад

Glad to see comments aren’t disabled

@Systems.Thinking Год назад

The AI channel is a bit more unruly... this channel by definition is a bit more zen

@JenniferPowers-o3k 9 месяцев назад

Hi Dave. I've just watched your ST episode 1. I'm a woman in my late 60's and am 'coming to terms' with recognizing that I've spent most of my life unaware that I struggle with both ADHD and autism. I salute your recommendations for using lists to organize thinking. Doing so has been a lifelong practice for me and has helped my thinking to stay better organized and focused. An even more important process for me, however, over the past few years of coping with my particular neuro-divergent biogenetic existence, is journaling. It has proved a remarkable aid in grounding my experiences in reality, reflecting on interactional dynamics, and capturing a snapshot of self and others. Maybe that is part of your note-taking process? Would enjoy knowing your thoughts about journaling.

@andrewvideos3404 7 месяцев назад

Man, u giving away so much VALUE it's insane! I absolutely love ur work. Thanks for making an impact on humanity in a positive way!

@kellykramer7629 7 дней назад

Just bought the book ‘Thinking in Systems’ by Meadows. Highly suggest this book. High level thinking but very readable and approachable.

@danielschroeder1449 5 дней назад

WTF? Your definition reads: a set of skills that allow you to blah, blah, blah. You don't even say anything about what those skills are. I just stopped listening after that. Maybe you ought to think a bit about language and how to say what you mean.

@the_potmo 13 дней назад

Of course anyone can improve their knowledge of a subject and practice skills to reach a stronger level, but if you restrict the definition of intelligence to cognitive abilities like memory and reasoning, while certainly some people are strong in one area and weak in another, there is a demonstrably strong correlation between them. So, in general a person in the upper percentile of one dimension of intelligence is likely to be up there in the other dimensions as well.

@MAHINDRA10 4 месяца назад

many thanks for this priceless series

@chandrikadaswani3696 6 месяцев назад

“Psychology is a pseudo science” I’d love it if you could please expand on this

@jonlittle5032 4 месяца назад

If he had said it was an immature science, it might be accurate. But the statement is dismissive and intrinsically arrogant, so you are not likely to get a response ... because it isn't worth his time - his words, not mine. After 2 months and only 60 comments, and no like from him, that is self-evident.

@brunoedson7330 Месяц назад

I was like: DAYUM! hahaha!

@edheldude Месяц назад

It's originally a philosophy but now veiled in scientism. They can't replicate the main studies that are the foundation of their dogma.

@jonlittle5032 Месяц назад

@@edheldude Your statement is a perfect example of scientism.

@jonlittle5032 Месяц назад

@@edheldude When was psychology ever a philosophy?

@AaronForum-o7w 2 месяца назад

Reverb is separate from initial sound transmission. Reverb is a reflection, right?

@mimameta 7 дней назад

Psychology is a pseudo-science, we starting strong here 😂

@Carrymejane 8 месяцев назад

I'm glad ur channel come to my page, ur information is really amazing ❤

@GeorgeBakalovPRO Год назад

This was great! A confirmation of things I already had come to anyway and some great tips for further study. Waiting for part 2!

@eazypeazy8559 Год назад

Nice. Understood, that I have natural willing to categorize everything. Struggled for some time because this thing is kind of imperative. But now I have a balance, and I feel that inner model which I use to interpret reality is actively developing. I want to use it more on practice and then write a post about it. I've even created name for it: "Thinking in terms of the processes, states and spaces". Thanks for your work!

@volkerengels5298 Год назад

Diversification is a result of evolutionary processes. May be -> The 'inner life of the human being' (perception & interpretation and processing of data to come up with a good answer) is both individual and type-dependent, Did the Industrial Modernity conduct **intelligence measurements to filter* people for various work processes? ___yes/No ? ;-))) Intelligence is in deed measured as speed - but also by memory_performance for -> *text!!* (Audio/Video)! If one imagines intelligence as a contribution to CreativeLife in the social and physical world, our intelligence measurements are absurdly simplifying. *Intelligence measurements: By this I don't just mean explicit intelligence tests - they are carried out quite rarely. (((After all, the extremes of the bell curve are very rare - most are by definition: mediocre. By definition!!! ;-))) *All tests in school* are rough intelligence tests. *Literally rough* The filter "Great stamina for stupid work at low wages" is not science fiction.

@Haiyugin Год назад

The door to ... the KEYS to the Keys to ... the keys to ... ANYTHING ... to Anything to anything

@AJGoldie Год назад

The taxonomy concept has really been helping me with self learning python libraries and modules. The way my brain works, I have a lot of anxiety unless I can orient myself within a universe of concepts. People always make fun of the sprawling, immature nature of the JavaScript ecosystem- but the world of packaging, distribution, and environment management within Python is exhausting. I wasted a week of my life trying to get pipenv to work. Lol

@Systems.Thinking Год назад

Mental models FTW!

@clevelandsavage Год назад

YES, I was thinking about this in a completely unrelated context( physics and engineering) this morning coincidentally.

@Jorge-xf9gs Год назад

Is there enough scientific evidence for intelligence being divided into a systemathizing and empathizing component?

@Systems.Thinking Год назад

Simon Baron-Cohen thinks so. While there may be statistical categories for this, I don't believe the underlying neurology is understood well enough. This is why I call psychology a pseudo-science. It's basically just behavioral statistics.

@thesimplicitylifestyle 7 месяцев назад

In lists, a repository of the mind, Each item stored, a thought forever bound. An external brain where knowledge is lined, A sanctuary where ideas are found. In ordered rows, the chaos is contained, A map of thoughts, by lists, we are sustained.

@tessafelice2181 11 месяцев назад

How to remain intelligent dynamically, while maintaining empathetic in composure and identity.

@Dan-oj4iq Год назад

Personally, while agreeing with this entire concept and believing it to be true and helpful: I have had a life long problem with my handwriting. It's a mess and always has been a mess. So in my case that is like saying that if I lose my eye glasses I'm going to have a serious problem with following even the best advice if seeing is a must.

@Systems.Thinking Год назад

That's fair. It also doesn't apply to people with dysgraphia and other issues.

@timfoote1859 Год назад

Great video Dave. Some nice validation in there for me haha. Maybe you could touch on how the flow of systems thinking works, ie Lean, and practical approaches to applying systems thinking.

@Systems.Thinking Год назад

Yeah will think of future topics. Systems thinking is huge. I have a list with 18 different aspects...

@megageektopus Месяц назад

It’s interesting to note that some of the most effective methods of managing mood and addiction issues that can plague certain neurodivergent individuals, include list making and note writing .

@davonbenson4361 Месяц назад

1:50.

@denisecaskey1493 5 месяцев назад

The cognitive architecture model at the end is interesting if you think about it in terms of birds such as crows and ravens who have been shown to exhibit incredible problem solving abilities and executive function higher than most other birds.

@dudalojogrme 7 месяцев назад

Hello David thanks for sharing, I'm watching in from Uganda. I just got into systems thinking probably this January that just passed after listening to a talk by Peter Senge, then other recommendations came up including yours. I did find 1. Example of Systems thinkers 2. Myths about Intelligence 3.lists and checklist and the book recommendation 4. Models and the guy who came up with those animal taxonomy thing useful. Regards

@ArcRCG 9 месяцев назад

Hi, I am a completely admired viewer of your talks. I'm also autistic and I like to view everything strategically, systematically, complexity focused, divergent and I'm really happy to know there are people like me that like to view the profound madness of things. Have you tried nodal/systemic tools like plectica, heptabase or figjam? I think they go beyond lists and make the complexity more reasonable because you can view systems inside systems and how systems interacts with other subsystems. I'm working in a fully navegable map of information with drag and drop functionally and the ability to easily navigate in one single canvas how all the information. Perhaps is a dream, but I hope if it now me someone will make that amazing tools. Again, you inspire me a lot.

@lionorlopez8802 5 месяцев назад

Whats your iq

@Systems.Thinking 5 месяцев назад

more than 5

@Andrew-rc3vh 8 месяцев назад

Regarding IQ and speed, the IQ is measured on the speed of solving a problem, but in real life problems are more complicated than their skinned down theoretical models used in questions. To solve a problem often needs knowledge, so the more relevant knowledge you have in relation to the problem the longer it is going to take to find your best solution, but also the better the problem is solved. So even this far we see IQ is one dimensional and really we should be thinking in two dimensions: the speed of execution and the performance of the solution. Also a related issue with maths is most maths you learn at school is a narrow subset of all of maths, where we have neat solutions, e.g. the equation of how to find the roots of a quadratic is neat, but what they don't tell you is the cubic solution is highly ugly, and beyond that you can't, or at least not in the way you were taught for quadratics.

@RebeccaEWebber 2 месяца назад

My husband just sent me this video. So excited!

@fabriai Год назад

Interesting video, David. Thanks for suggesting bibliography.

@zilatheartist 8 месяцев назад

Just to let you know, there are people who are so lazy that their brains have adapted to not having to take notes. Instead, they rely on recall and associate notes with shapes or symbols rather than paragraphs. So they only remember vital information and nothing that could just be looked up. What type of thinking would that be called? So I can research it and improve it.

@Systems.Thinking 8 месяцев назад

I dunno but that's what I do. I focus on embedding concepts rather than memorization. Distilling principles and concepts so you can derive anything from it later

@Jack-RichardViri-od9gd 7 месяцев назад

Love ur videos man but not everyone who listens to your brilliance isn't autistic so weird when you talk like everyone is. Keep up the great work tho. Peace.

@Systems.Thinking 7 месяцев назад

Everyone has some autistic traits.

@koliom 11 месяцев назад

Thank you for your contribution to the humanity! Great work!

@brunoparente4953 8 месяцев назад

That last model is awesome, I'm excited to use it already! Thanks

@kaveinthran368 Год назад

Can you put all the recommended resources and descriptions for easier access?

@mordicai4296 Год назад

"Here we are a couple million species later". LOL!

@madelynmills712 Год назад

Appreciate this and am following!

@HappyLightLove909 7 месяцев назад

Thank you. Yes this value 👍🏼

@BakoZoltan Год назад

What is that walrus doing in ursidae? 9:39

@jdxtube68 10 месяцев назад

Outstanding! Thank you.

@TheREAL.BrandOnShow Год назад

Great Series! Thanks David!

@bjklein444 3 месяца назад

It's nice to know there is a subject known as "systems thinking." It makes sense to me. It unties the knots and reweaves the "fabric" of brain function and productivity.🪢

@shinn-tyanwu4155 Год назад

You are genius 😊

@Valere-1 7 месяцев назад

Thanks man

@kaveinthran368 Год назад

Is there any bibliography that I can refer?

@Systems.Thinking Год назад

There would be too many to list.

@SO-vq7qd Год назад

Thanks

@allynnamccleod8862 Год назад

You're on a roll today, Dave.

@allynnamccleod8862 Год назад

Yeah, what she said!

@johnandersson8258 Месяц назад

Could we please treat this notion that psychology isn’t a science just because it isn’t a natural science in a bit more nuanced manner? The foundation of science, since Socrates onwards, is to not claim to know more than you do. Now, experiments in psychology have made it possible to say a lot of things about the world, not just with the same certainty as physics or chemistry. But the focus on the replication crisis and quack science often makes it hard to see what’s in front of our eyes because it’s so self-evident. Will two days sleep make your memory formation and reaction time better or worse? Are you more or less likely to learn if your teacher has high but not unrealistic expectations? Do you have a bigger or lesser chance of alleviate symptoms of borderline personality disorder with dialectical therapy? And so on. Now, there are always outliers and exceptions when it comes to humans, but that doesn’t mean we can’t say anything. Some things we can even say for certain when it comes to the aggregated level, though not the individual one. If you make a hierarchy of sciences in terms of replicability surely psychology isn’t in the top tier, but it certainly isn’t astrology or homeopathy either. Besides that, thank you for an interesting video. I will watch the rest of the series 🙂

@Systems.Thinking Месяц назад

Psychology today is behavioral statistics. There's a reason that Jungian psychology is coming back. Behavioral statistics is pretty much useless. Modern psychology has nothing to say about archetypes, unconscious, subconscious, etc. It has prematurely declared most of the brain "irrelevant."