your videos are the best at providing actual good info and specs. putting the watches on ur wrist for reference is very helpful.keep up the great videos!👍🏼
Had a look at these a couple of weeks ago. The shade of blue on the GMT is much nicer than the one of the diver. It also makes the wave pattern a bit more subtle than on the diver. I think it would've been a better idea to use the GMT shades on the divers as well. The GMT arrow could've been made a bit bigger and the base of the GMT hand near the pinion left unpainted so it's not so noticeable. Considering it's a comissioned movement, they should've went for a traveller GMT, but apart from that you really can't complain. The dial, in person is much much nicer than the BB Pro and GMT, no matter what the Tudor fan boys says.
Totally agree with you. It is subjective but I like the dial and like how it is a little bit darker and subtle on GMT versions. My only complaint is the bezel not being totally steady (it is wobbling left-right a little bit too much than I expected). Maybe this is normal for bi directional bezels, I am not experienced with watches at this price point.
I hadn’t paid much attention to the Aquaracer until I tried one on my wrist a few weeks ago. This watch is beautiful. But the caller GMT movement is a joke. Tag Heuer didn’t even mention it in their product announcement. I sold a watch I loved (Oris Aquis GMT) because the caller GMT is a POTA to use, especially if you’re used to a true GMT function.
This watch combines the bezel of Rolex GMT Master II and the dial of Omega Seamaster Diver 300. 😂 At this price, it ought to be an in-house calibre, not a sourced Sellita or ETA movement. Even the Tudor Black Bay in this price bracket is manufacture calibre.
