Talks With SRI RAMANA MAHARSHI - Muslim Visitors 

This video was very enlightening sir. 🙏🏽

​@@SanatanHindu-pp6lr Jesus did not let His devotees run from town to town begging to seek punniya but instead He did punniya by taking punishment for their sins upon Himself on the cross.

@savedchristian4754 Firstly, that's nothing to brag about. It also signifies that Jesus probably found his disciples and devotees incompetent to do any spiritual practice so He had no option to undergo the pain of crucifixion by taking their sins and cause their spiritual advancement. So really, it just shows your spiritual incapabilities whenever you brag about Jesus taking sins upon himself. Moreover, if we go your way and acknowledge what Jesus did as something great and special, then do know that Jesus isn't the only one to do that "sin-taking" thing. What Jesus did, every other Hindu sage did (that too without making a big fuss out of it). It's just a yogic method (which Jesus learned after visiting Indian subcontinent during his lost years) which is employed by the sages and seers, by taking upon the paap (negative) karmas of their devotees and disciples, out of compassion, so as to bless them and help them pave way to their liberation. Sri Ramana Himself did so. The miracles Jesus performed are not even a big deal in front of the Hindu sages, because guess what, they all have performed numerous much higher mind-blowing miracles (these are called yogic siddhis). Those around Jesus may have gotten shocked by his display of those miracles as there was hardly another genuine sage over there, but really, it's just a common thing here in Hinduism which has produced 1000s of enlightened sages and rishis. Moreover, that sin-taking which Jesus did, applies to only those who were present there at that time. Doesn't apply to any of us. Otherwise Bible wouldn't say "we're born sinners" if Jesus really took everybody's sins who weren't even born then. We're all responsible for our own karmas and have to pave way to our liberation from samsara. Besides Spirituality and Spiritual means and practices existed thousands of years before Jesus even came. Jesus, with all due respect to him, isn't the only way and the world, as you may believe isn't just 6000 years old. 😇

​@@HinduismAsItIswell said, couldn't have been articulated in a better way. Sick of these blind fanatics spewing their crap everywhere!!

Glad to hear you feel so too. Sri Ramana's words are always eye-opening. It's a blessing to read Him. Please also feel free to watch other videos on this channel. 🙏🏻😇

Many thanks! Glad to hear that you felf blissful while going through the video. Maharshi's words are pearls of widdom indeed. Please also feel free to watch the other videos on this channel as well. 🙏🏻😇

Haha, yes, the visitors asked good questions and like you said, Maharshi guided them very beautifully. 😇🙏🏻

😂

​@@HinduismAsItIs Jesus did not let His devotees run from town to town begging to seek punniya but instead He did punniya by taking punishment for their sins upon Himself on the cross.

​@@savedchristian4754 if your ill, it is you who should take the medicine, not Jesus nor anyone.

@@dudewith_noname4702 Jesus is the medicine. So when you believe in Him, you gain eternal life.

Absolutely, well said. 🙏🏻✨

@@HinduismAsItIs 🙏

​@@cssuntherrao Jesus took punishment for human sins upon Himself on the cross & gave us peace.

@savedchristian4754 Firstly, that's nothing to brag about. It also signifies that Jesus probably found his disciples and devotees incompetent to do any spiritual practice so He had no option to undergo the pain of crucifixion by taking their sins and cause their spiritual advancement. So really, it just shows your spiritual incapabilities whenever you brag about Jesus taking sins upon himself. Moreover, if we go your way and acknowledge what Jesus did as something great and special, then do know that Jesus isn't the only one to do that "sin-taking" thing. What Jesus did, every other Hindu sage did (that too without making a big fuss out of it). It's just a yogic method (which Jesus learned after visiting Indian subcontinent during his lost years) which is employed by the sages and seers, by taking upon the paap (negative) karmas of their devotees and disciples, out of compassion, so as to bless them and help them pave way to their liberation. Sri Ramana Himself did so. The miracles Jesus performed are not even a big deal in front of the Hindu sages, because guess what, they all have performed numerous much higher mind-blowing miracles (these are called yogic siddhis). Those around Jesus may have gotten shocked by his display of those miracles as there was hardly another genuine sage over there, but really, it's just a common thing here in Hinduism which has produced 1000s of enlightened sages and rishis. Moreover, that sin-taking which Jesus did, applies to only those who were present there at that time. Doesn't apply to any of us. Otherwise Bible wouldn't say "we're born sinners" if Jesus really took everybody's sins who weren't even born then. We're all responsible for our own karmas and have to pave way to our liberation from samsara. Besides Spirituality and Spiritual means and practices existed thousands of years before Jesus even came. Jesus, with all due respect to him, isn't the only way and the world, as you may believe isn't just 6000 years old. 😇

@@savedchristian4754 We respect your personal beliefs but those remain just beliefs. You are entitled to it. There are many different beliefs of many others in many religions. This is not a space to impose or counter or debate. Posts here relate to spiritual seeking & enqiries, which Truths are to be realized within. True spiritual teachers like Ramana, the Buddha, Christ, only guide & point the way and not to indoctrinate, command, dictate, impose beliefs & proselytise, which organized religions do (not the original teachers of each). Peace is found within.🙏

Many thanks for your support. Really appreciated. Please feel free to watch other videos on this channel. 🙏🏻😇

Pleased to hear that you felt so. All Maharshi's Grace. And yes, Sri Ramana is the divine incarnate for sure! 🙏🏻✨

Glad to know you feel that way. 🙏🏻😇 Happy to make these videos and serve others spiritually. Bhagavan's Grace is on us all. ✨

Thanks for your warm and kind remarks! Much appreciated. By God's Grace, this work will keep going. 🙏🏻😇✨

It's my absolute pleasure, mitra. Thanks for your kind words. All Maharshi's grace. Please feel free to check out other videos on this channel too. 🙏🏻😇

Yes. Sri Bhagavan always answers beautifully. 🙏🏻😇

Glad you felt so. Namo Ramanaya! 🙏🏻😇✨

Bruv most indian or rather punjabi sikhs know about mansour more than muslims ,

Yes, I'm aware. It's really unfortunate that the ones who know the truth and speak it out get silenced by the ignorant majority, in one way or the other.

Question why this happened to him also lies in the answer for the question whom am I

Question why this happened to him also lies in the answer for the question whom am I

Great, much appreciated! Namo Ramanaye! 🙏🏻😇

Glad to hear you feel that way. It's all Lord's Grace indeed. 🙏🏻😇✨

Om Namo Bhagvate Sri Ramanaya! 🙏🏻✨

Thank you! Namo Ramanaye 🙏🏻😇✨

Many thanks for your warm and kind remarks. Your support keeps us going 😇🙏🏻

Thank you! And yeah, Maharsi's eyes are a reflection of sheer Love and Godliness. 😇✨

The pleasure is all mine! 🙏🏻😇

All His Grace! Glad you liked the video. Thank you 🙏🏻😇

The pleasure is all mine, brother. 😇 All Sri Ramana's Grace! 🙏🏻✨

Jai Guru! 🙏🏻

Thank you so much 🙏🏻😇

🙏🏻😇✨

🙏🏻😇

🙏🏻😇✨

🙏🏻😇

Thank you! Yes, many of the terms are traditional sanskrit terms which a lot wouldn't be aware of. Feel free to ask those terms over here in the comments, if you need clarity. Or they could be googled as well. 🙏🏻😇

🙏🏻😇✨

Hari Om Namah Shivaye! Ofcourse, a great number of yogis and sages stay aloof, isolated and remain unknown to us. Many live in the society without anyone becoming aware about their divinity at all. Now, they can be as advanced as the greatest yogis or rishis that are mentioned in our scriptures and history. There's no certain way or method to meet them. If it's your destiny, you will, not otherwise. They only choose whom they should reveal themselves to. All you can do is to keep doing your sadhana as usual. If you're meant to, you'll meet them. But even if you meet them, they'll mainly ask you to turn within and know who you are. So it's wiser and better to spend time doing sadhana than finding them.

​@@HinduismAsItIsThank you so much for your answer 🙏

Yeah, right, they asked nice things :) Glad to hear that you liked the video! Namo Ramanaye! 🙏🏻😇

It is Ramanaya..

Not all, but I get you. To each their own. Karma always comes back anyways. 😇

Beautiful. 🙏🏻😇

He usually never identified himself with Hinduism, although the stuff he said was purely based on Gyana Yoga. Will see and try to make something on Him in the future. 🙏🏻

@@HinduismAsItIs but essence is the same. Gyan is the pure thing that krishna, Raman Mahashi all said. It's helpful for humanity if they listen about jk. Truth has no hindu, muslim it's for all

That's there, but the channel is about exploring the truth from the lens of philosophies and practices of Sanatan Dharma. The "truth" is being talked about by western scholars and some non-hindus too, but I won't post that here, given the channel subject. The purpose of this channel is to spread the awareness of Hindu philosophies and practices among the masses. Sri Krishna, Sri Ramana, essentially upheld Hindu concepts like "tradition", "Guru", "rituals", "yoga", etc. JK mostly never acknowledged any of those outwardly, so there's difference there for sure in the way of explaining stuff. However, I have taken your request into consideration and will try to make something on JK in the future. Thanks for your inputs. 🙏🏻

Soham! 😇✨

The book name's "Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi". Absolutely worth reading. 🙏🏻😇

Not only god, you are also formless. If you are doing so many things, why not god.

Just like how formless water creates forms like ice, waves, bubbles, drops, ripples etc., Formless God assumes Form causes the appearance of this world of forms through it's own power of Maya. 😇

Yes, both form and formlessness belong to God. He has no limits or constraints of any kind. 🙏🏻✨

Maharshi always tries to direct the attention of the seeker to the core of one's being. 🙂 Yes, you rightly said, majority of Christians and Muslims won't acknowledge that "all paths lead to one". However, there are certain minor sects and schools of Muslims (Sufis) and Christians (Christian Mysticism), which do acknowledge non-duality with God and oneness of everything. Their thoughts and ideas to some extent correlate with Advaita Vedanta school of Hinduism. But their count is minimalistic and their thoughts and teachings often suppressed by mainstream Christianity and Islam, which is very much dualistic in nature.

Yes you can "join" our channel to support us and become the channel member. 🙏🏻😇

Care to elaborate? 🙂

"I" is the indeed the name of God. It's His very essence. 🙏🏻✨

Well, this is no a biology or human anatomy class. This is the place to discuss/learn philosophical and spiritual wisdom of Sanatan Dharma. What is being discussed and shared, is far deeper, subtler and more profound than what some medical devices, scientific gadgets and arrogant/ignorant/biased/closed minds can fathom or perceive. That's all. If you're open and humble enough to discuss and let go of the rigid/closed mentality and baseless conclusions that you have formed, then we can discuss more. Otherwise, I have nothing more to say.

Do you practice them?

"Know the Self and be done with speculation", beautiful words of Sri Ramana.

No, he meant formless reality can also appear with form like how we being formless spirit can get identified with a form of flesh and bones.

@@AndrewJames-uq8ds But we don’t worship our flesh and bones as deities… Even Jesus, though manifested as flesh, is not worshipped as such… Even cross which is a symbolic expression is not worshipped as a deity… In chaityas/stupas where Buddha’s relics are buried underneath them… are just symbols… not worshipped as deities… May be he meant something more … which we… at least I could not comprehend…

1. People obviously cannot worship their own physical bodies. Reasons - because they're not all-powerful, all-knowing Ishvara and are ignorant of the truth. They're called the "Jivas", therefore and are limited and under the bondage of Maya, unlike God. So obviously Maharshi in no way meant we should worship ourselves. That'd be completely absurd. 2. Physical form is finite and has a lifetime, true, but God's form isn't mere physical one like ours. God assumes the "chinmaya-shareera" which has no limitations at all and He can assume those (and many more) forms anytime to bestow Grace and Guidance to the seekers and devotees. God's form and body is thus not at all comparable to limited human form and body. 3. The point was just as simple as - how we being the formless spirit are now identified with a particular body, similarly formless God can also assume forms and body (which can be worshipped mentally or through murtis). But nowhere it said God's body = Human body, or that we can worship ourselves. The comparison was to establish the simple fact that if we (being essentially formless) can have a form, God too (being essentially formless) can have a form. That's it. 4. Other religions and cultures don't really have the concept of all-pervading God which is one with the creation. Hinduism has. All that exists, is essentially pervaded by Him, although, it needs to be realized as well. Moreover we have the concept and science of prana-pratishtha in the murti, which awakens the essence and energy of God within that particular murti (which is then worshipped). Hope this clarifies! 😇

@@HinduismAsItIs Okay… I still have some questions… but at least I now understood your/his perspective… thanks for taking the time to answer my queries…

Oh, have done it. How many have you planted? 🙂

Yes, both form and formlessness belong to God. He has no limitations of any kind but many fail to understand this simple truth and try their level best to impose their beliefs upon us. 🙏🏻

Yeah, Hinduism As It Is - hope you liked the name. 😇

Yes, infact both "form" and "formlessness" is essentially God. Shruti says that "Sarvam Khalvidam Brahman", i.e. All this (existence) is Brahman. Just like how same water appears in various forms of glacier, waves, ripples, bubbles, foam etc., God appears in various forms (as mentioned in the scriptures and even more) in order to bestow Anugraha on the devotees. Essentially even murtis and non-different from God, as everything appears out of Him only and that He's all pervading. Lord Narsimha appearing out of pillar to save Bhakta Prahalada is a great example which shows how God resides within everything. So Murtis are essentially God too (not mere hollow personifications), especially more so after the avesham or descending of the deva into the Murtis, after prana pratishtha. There are mutliple ways, means, practices and paths to realize God, to cater to all kinds of aspirants and sadhakas, based on their varying capabilities, inclinations and samskaras. 😇

Didn't get that (?)

Yeah. Says the one who understands nothing about spirituality, sagehood, karmas or deliverance. Jesus has my respect but really, you all don't even get him. Infact, your ignorance and hollow, baseless confident claims which lack common sense, are appallingly painful to read.

@@HinduismAsItIs You are begging the question. Learn about how to answer questions instead of posting circular arguments. And you agree that sages are useless to deliver us from karma.

​@@HinduismAsItIs please don't bother with such comments, they are generated by AI bots. Can't argue with a robot. Just leave it be, i had some incidence with a bot some time ago. And even if he's a human, Christ will surely show him the path eventually. Everyone will be delivered ultimately.

​@@savedchristian4754Latest example is of Ramakrishna Paramhansa who took upon himself all the sins of his Shishyas and suffered throat Cancer himself. If you really want to know the truth you can read books like Sai Sat Charitra, Ramakrishna's life story, Guru charitra and many more to understand how they have helped their shishyas.Jesus is not the 'only' one as you claim. There are many others too in every religion and land.

​@@HinduismAsItIs do not follow the sages then, do not invest your time reading what they have said, put your hundred percent in Jesus and Christian saints, and even after then you still have so much to argue, then the problem lies nor in sages neither in Jesus but in your mentality. You have hate in your heart towards a certain identity or a sect.

With Maharshi, the discussion that happened was quite philosophical and insightful. 😊

Haha, but how do you think it will be of any help? :)

Yeah well, I mean it's still fine as long as they carry on with their lives and not cross their line or have the audacity to tell others that they're wrong or doomed to eternal hell. Sheer arrogance and utter ignorance to believe that there's just 1 prophet, 1 book, 1 method to Heavens (which came up only 2000, or 1400 years ago) in this history of this vast and diverse universe.

@@HinduismAsItIs I am 100% with you. That is exactly my point. They have been doing "shove Islam in the face of kaafirs" recently and very viciously too. I follow IRPC, Mohammad Hijab, Ali Dawah, Smile to Jannah channels like these. These folks don't have anything but to dismiss my methods of prayer and diss my enlightened masters saying that they will all burn in hell fire for an eternity. These fools have the audacity to dismiss anybody, the likes of Swamy Vivekanand, Ramana Maharshi etc.., because their methods are not in the HOLY BOOK, which was narrated by an illiterate pedophile prophet who ofcourse is the ideal person for humanity and that too till the end of time.

Namo Ramanaya! 🙏🏻😇

Firstly, you have 0 clue as to what Maharshi did and is still doing to thousands across this globe. His words appear empty talks to those who're themselves empty. To those who are genuinely spiritually mature, they cannot deny glory and life-changing eternal presence of Sri Ramana (and thousands of other Hindu sages and rishis). Secondly, Jesus isn't the only one to do that "sin-taking" thing. What Jesus did, every other Hindu sage did (that too without making a big fuss out of it). It's just a yogic method (which Jesus learned after visiting Indian subcontinent during his lost years) which is employed by the sages and seers, by taking upon the paap (negative) karmas of their devotees and disciples, out of compassion, so as to bless them and help them pave way to their liberation. Sri Ramana Himself did so. The miracles Jesus performed are not even a big deal in front of the Hindu sages, because guess what, they all have performed numerous much higher mind-blowing miracles (these are called yogic siddhis). Those around Jesus may have gotten shocked by his display of those miracles, but really, it's just a common thing here in Hinduism. However, that sin-taking which Jesus did, applies to only those who were present there at that time. Doesn't apply to any of us. Otherwise Bible wouldn't say "we're born sinners" if Jesus really took everybody's sins who weren't even born then. We're all responsible for our own karmas and have to pave way to our liberation from samsara. Besides Spirituality and Spiritual means and practices existed thousands of years before Jesus even came. Jesus, with all due respect to him, isn't the only way and the world, as you may believe isn't just 6000 years old. 😇

@@HinduismAsItIs Jesus has delivered me from karma by His blood. The blood of Jesus is upon you.

@@HinduismAsItIs you are a slave of karma. If you believe in Jesus, He will deliver you from karma.

@@savedchristian4754 Now you're just making stuff up out of your blind indoctrination. Firstly if Jesus really is a son of God, if He never really died on the cross, if He is beyond karmas, as you all say, then really His blood is on nobody. Use some common sense, how can the blood of the one who never died be on someone's hand? But well, I understand it's too high level for your brain to comprehend and understand. Moreover, I wasn't even ever born in those dark lands bereft of spiritual light, where Jesus had to set foot, so really his blood can never be on me. Secondly, you know really nothing about me to say whose slave I am or what I need for deliverance. Is judging others and making hollow, baseless assumptions out of limited intellect a habit of every Christian? You believe you're delivered from karma and speak of peace, but really you're just getting agitated and reacting compulsively to the truth being spoken here. Clearly shows a lot about how peaceful you are and how much redeemed and delivered you are. Haha, you yourself are a slave of karma, otherwise you wouldn't even bother to comment here. Good luck deceiving the ignorants into guilt-tripping and fear. Won't really work here.

@@HinduismAsItIs Jesus paid the price by His blood on the cross. sages did nothing & only talk talk talk. karma is destroyed in the name of Jesus for those who believe. better repent before its too late in eternal hell.

Firstly, it's just your assumption to say "no one knows the exact form". Maybe you don't know, which is fine. But to assume what you don't know, nobody else could know, is sheer arrogance. Secondly, there are no "imaginary" forms, all the forms that appear in/as the Murtis, are the ones revealed by God Himself to the Hindu Rishis and Sages. The scriptures are the authority for this and they clearly mention these forms. Having said that, it's much more disrespectful to assume God is confined to just one form (or formlessness alone) and that He (being all-powerful) is incapable to appear in the form which His devotee chooses to worship Him. All forms are "essentially" His, because as per Hinduism, He alone has appeared as all that exists. At the beginning of creation, God alone was. If that's true, it means that this existence too has come out from Him only (as He alone existed at first) and thus (this existence and all the forms) is essentially Him only. You may still choose to disagree, which is fine. But as Maharshi said, if a person (essentially who's just a subtle formless spirit) identifies with a form of flesh and bones (and believes himself to be this gross body), then there's also not at all any problem or issue in worshipping God in/as some or the other form which is dear to one's heart. 😇

First understand the difference between belief vs reality, believing vs experiencing. Then you can comment on Maharshi.

See you can say that god has no form...we also say the same...but if you say that god CANNOT take any form...who are you to say so....are you limiting god's power... God is formless and also can take form if he wishes as he is all powerful

Well said. It's difficult and fruitless to educate the indoctrinated gross mind. A mind which is holding to a religios believe that's always looking outwards will never be able to grasp sublime truth.

Yeah, people like you would also say, "there's a wooden table but no carpenter". It's hilarious to see a random person every now and then, who doesn't even know 0.000000000001% of the universe, giving confident conclusions and judgements (ofcourse basless as always) on God, the source of the universe, that too after reading a couple of books and watching a few random videos online. Ego likes to assume things and form stupid conclusions but doesn't like to acknowledge that "I don't know". Yours is just the same case, a perfect blend of arrogance, ignorance, lack of receptivity and openness towards life and reality as a whole. Shut the wandering of mind, be still and turn inward, God will shine forth within you without any speck of ambiguity and all such ignorant, baseless ideas that you've gathered will drop away.

😂

@@p.k.sureshkumar6859 Jesus who is God's own Son, incarnated 2000 years back but He is the pre-existing Son of God. On the cross, Jesus earned deliverance from karma for all human beings also. They are in prisons & not sent to eternal hell because they expected Jesus to come & die in order to deliver them from karma. Rig veda talks about nishkalanga purush the prajapati who would sacrifice His life. Ashwametha & gometha sacrifices pointed to Jesus on the cross. Without believing in Jesus' name, you will certainly regret in eternal hell.

@@p.k.sureshkumar6859 Jesus who is God's own Son, incarnated 2000 years back but He is the pre-existing Son of God. On the cross, Jesus earned deliverance from karma for all human beings also. They are in prisons & not sent to eternal hell because they expected Jesus to come & die in order to deliver them from karma. Rig veda talks about nishkalanga purush the prajapati who would sacrifice His life. Ashwametha & gometha sacrifices pointed to Jesus on the cross. Without believing in Jesus' name, you will certainly regret in eternal hell.

Sages only talked? Jesus is prajapati? I want to know what crap you smoke before writing such nonsense. This is exactly how fanatic brainwashed bigots sound like. Rig Veda doesn't revolve around Jesus or any other Abrahamic preacher. There is not a single mention of Jesus there. Don't even talk about it. Vedas are way above your league and much more glorious than what your tiny little brainwashed head can assimilate or comprehend.

Because they didn't have to die! They could solve the problems of the living by being alive. They didn't have a martyr complex!! If you give any sincere thought to Christian "Saviour" philosophy, or the Abrahamic concepts of Life, Death, God and Heaven, you will realise that they are extremely imbalanced. One "Saviour" dying at a given point in time doesn't solve anything! If it does, then think about absolutely unfair / unjust it is. If for example, a serial Child rapist, who hasn't been caught by the law, towards the end of his life, genuinely accepts Christ as his saviour and becomes a Christian, where does he do when he dies?! Heaven right? Is that a just result of his atrocities on this planet? Is it justice to all those unfortunate souls who suffered at his hands? It is an absolute Karmic injustice! Not just that, it flouts the laws of conservation in many ways. The human life is a finite quantity, the actions he commits is also a finite number, but the end result, i.e. Heaven or Hell are INFINITE. That is to say for a finite number actions in one's life, he'll either get infinitely roasted in hell or infinitely be rewarded in heaven! How the heck does that make any sense whatsoever??? Abrahamic faiths are incomplete and see only a slice of the whole truth. Do not even attempt to compare them with the depths to which eastern religions, specifically Hindu / Buddhist thoughts have gone to.

@savedchristian4754 Firstly, you have 0 clue as to what Maharshi, Buddha, Mahavir did and is still doing to thousands across this globe. Their words appear empty talks to those who're themselves empty. To those who are genuinely spiritually mature, they cannot deny glory and life-changing eternal presence of Sri Ramana, Buddha, Mahavir (and thousands of other Hindu sages and rishis). Secondly, Jesus isn't the only one to do that "sin-taking" thing. What Jesus did, every other Hindu sage did (that too without making a big fuss out of it). It's just a yogic method (which Jesus learned after visiting Indian subcontinent during his lost years) which is employed by the sages and seers, by taking upon the paap (negative) karmas of their devotees and disciples, out of compassion, so as to bless them and help them pave way to their liberation. Sri Ramana Himself did so. The miracles Jesus performed are not even a big deal in front of the Hindu sages, because guess what, they all have performed numerous much higher mind-blowing miracles (these are called yogic siddhis). Those around Jesus may have gotten shocked by his display of those miracles, but really, it's just a common thing here in Hinduism. However, that sin-taking which Jesus did, applies to only those who were present there at that time. Doesn't apply to any of us. Otherwise Bible wouldn't say "we're born sinners" if Jesus really took everybody's sins who weren't even born then. We're all responsible for our own karmas and have to pave way to our liberation from samsara. Besides Spirituality and Spiritual means and practices existed thousands of years before Jesus even came. Jesus, with all due respect to him, isn't the "only way" and the world, as you may believe isn't just 6000 years old. 😇

​@@HinduismAsItIsignore this poor soul. He's good for nothing and probably earns a few bucks to say this nonsense.

​@@HinduismAsItIsignore this poor soul. He will take 100 more lifetimes to understand even the "H" of Hinduism. Probably earns a few bucks and supports his livelihood by spewing venom, hate and nonsense online.

Did humans stopped having problem after that? Ironically most problematic area of the world is Middle East, birth place of jesus

Eternal hell is listening to radicals, hatefuls, closed-minded, arrogants and indoctrinated ones like you. I regret people have to go through your basless and hollow statements, which are nothing but farthest from the truth.

😂

We use the term "murti" or "vigraha" instead of "idol" (as the word doesn't capture the essence properly). Also, rightly said, both rupa and arupa aspects belong to God. There are multiple ways, practices and means to Him, in order to cater to all kinds of minds, as many cannot relate to the formless. 😇

@@HinduismAsItIs I thank you so much for you answer, I'm studying very hard indian philosophy and I now that is considered crazy here by I belong to Bharat and my heart is forever in Kashi Viswanath and in Sri Hit Premanand Govind

My pleasure. You have Lord's Grace, brother. It's great to hear that. Keep going with full faith and dedication and I'm sure you'll be guided. Also keep an eye out for my upcoming videos and feel free to watch other videos on this channel. I'm sure you'll find it helpful and beneficial. 🙏🏻😇

Still they were willing to learn. 🙂

@@HinduismAsItIs I dont think so. they pretend to be learning. but their book ll not allow to do so.

@@nikhilpitti3957 Generally yes. But some exceptions are there. Few (very few) of them interpret the book differently and aren't rigid or extremist in terms of exploring spirituality.

🙏🏻😇✨