Tank Strength by Country (3D REAL SCALE) 

Japan mustn't like water much

@@rishabhrawat7856 That counts dimensional neighbors too. Have you *seen* how often they get invaded? Their media reporting is WILD.

Yeah I mean no one chooses to get along with the us we just kinda force it on everyone, and I mean we don’t have the most but even if we had half our numbers ours would still stomp on all the rest

Oh yes, especially North Korea

@@rishabhrawat7856 The Japanese Tanks are to fight off Godzilla's frequent attacks.

Exactly. For instance, Greece's 1335 MBTs are mostly 1960s vintage M48 and Leopard 1s (and 100 1950s vintage M60s!) which essentially useless on a modern battlefield. The Brits' 250 odd Challenger IIs, in normally configured battle groups, would destroy them piecemeal such would be the scale of the over-matching. This is where infographics can be pretty - and pretty much worthless.

@@mrcloudiesbestfriend the other ones are burning in fields at the moment.

@@mrcloudiesbestfriend russia has 25000 tanks in total. These 12000 are the ones that are operational

@@Ingens_Scherz Quality over quantity :) I was actually hoping the UK would be low down on the list too, rarely will you ever see dozens of tanks rolling into one operation at once regardless. Plus there are just so many anti-tank weapons, you need top notch machinery to stand against them.

americans being mad lmao (not saying your wrong)

Das stimmt

LoL

This is so true lol

I don't understand why the Netherlands has so few, been in the heart of Europe with it's past and less tanks than Somalia, that`s sad...

@@ernestodiaz7669 thats treu it is all about money. I hope it will chance

MBT number is meaningless - Some of the countries with large MBTs are actually mostly vintage - It means the older generation MBTs are actually completely useless in modern warfare. You have to look at their number of 3.5 generation modern MBT numbers to see their true MBT capability.

huh ?

Itt cawsing é slipé joint erth qwakes tbuogh

You know what it take to sink a island ?😂

​@@kingartison you know what a joke is?

they are also VERY old (50/60 years old) tanks. Useless in warfare but great for "scaring the peasants" and keeping the population in fear.

fewer, not less

@@matthouston4068 there's actually no strict rule for few vs less usage. Use what you like and don't be an internet snob or you'll have less friends.

@bryred9299 I bet he has "fewer" friends than a person who isn't correcting others' grammar.

@@bryred9299 You mean there's no strict rule for few vs less usage for American yahoos.

Russians object against this there was more russian t34s than germans had shells in some battles 😃. It was like 41 t34s for every 1 tiger

Like look at russias tanks like half the roofs are gone

I have a 50 pennies... Oh yeah? I have 1 dollar.

@@piecesofone4854 the old Russian tanks have an autoloading system, all their ammo is stored under the turret in a circle. Consequently, when the hull is breached everything blows and pop-goes-the-weasel. 💥

@@scld4649 Uh well most of the Soviet tanks were destroyed before 1945, and most of the time the soviets could only have a couple thousand tanks due to issues with reliability and soft factors, Tiger 1's were one of the rarest tanks in the war, compared to panzer 3,4. Most tanks were lost to attrition, not in battles. The designer of the t-34 died in one from phenomena due to the horrible conditions. So no more isn't better quality is always better than quantity and history has proven this.

Neutral doesn't mean defenseless. Switzerland has some of the strongest defenses of any country, natural or man-made.

That's where the leaders of the deep state lives.

It sounds paradoxical at face value. But think about it this way: If Switzerland is neutral, it has no "allies" to speak of. It must rely on itself. Completely, 100% self reliant in a military sense. That isn't to say no one would come to their aid. I am sure someone would. Because only a despot would attack a historically peaceful, neutral country like Switzerland. But the Swiss aren't NATO members. They aren't even members of the EU. They have no mutual defense pacts with any other countries. They remain completely neutral. Meaning all they can really count on is themselves and some historically defensible geography.

well only a few % are really in use. Most of them are mothballed.

Armed neutrality is the only neutrality that has ever worked.

Me, a mexican, thinking "we sure as hell are the ones or some of the ones that have the least amount of tanks" and mexico did not even show up... Nailed it lol

Canada is a part of NATO and should be spending 2% of GDP on their military - uk bc they put their signature on the form. They get a free ride while your PM acts like he knows the meaning of life while sniffing his own farts. You seem to have the opposite issue - but vote that douche out for the rest of the world.

@@albertocontreras3202 Mexico may not have any tanks, but there are a hell of a lot of great Mexican Americans serving in American tanks. I can personally vouch for that.

@@jasonk6321 fr bro the latinos operate tanks with like + 25% efficiency

I am Russian, no comments😁

lol

I thought it was an IS-3 but yea, apparently everyone is using the same tank

@@tagKnife IS 3 is different VERY DIFFERENT

I tought they are gonna use T54/55 as models tho but they used IS 8

Average War Thunder lobby

bro we dont care

@@asgerlaursen8319 Shuddup.

This is actually interesting. Thanks!

Your government wants to throw you into a war that isn't directed towards you for the sake some people who want to dominate Russia.

MBT number is meaningless - Some of the countries with large MBTs are actually mostly vintage - It means the older generation MBTs are actually completely useless in modern warfare. You have to look at their number of 3.5 generation modern MBT numbers to see their true MBT capability.

lol Clever.

They just need to produce 9 more.

Some time the discount is given to developing nations in order to wage proxy wars.

Russia has 12,000 tannks because majority of them are old Soviet tanks. There are basically useless in battle. You can use them in one conflict and never use them again. It takes a lot of money to repare so they don't really report the tanks either.

@@gby1320 they will take like 400 years to make a new armory ig

DEpend on geograpghic of each nation

mostly because having planes and missiles is tactically far more superior

Nepal probably. We only have tractors and tippers..😄

@@ShushiG2022 and sadly those tippers probably have a higher kill count

@@hamburgjanny possibly NZ haha

Bro US Airforce has the most planes and US Navy has the 2nd most planes lol.

@@hammerhand5059 Yeah lol its actually funny And America overpays for everything Imagine if they spent their money wisely.

my thoughts exactly...

Yeah does not seem like there are many of those Ukrainian tanks left, i remember watching a documentary back years ago that showed the Ukraine had lots of tanks but most did not run and were in large scrap yards. Now with the war i wonder what is left that still works.

@@ATomRileyA I was really surprised at some of the numbers on here a small island has more than a big country.

Ukrainians farmers top of the list now!!

@@ATomRileyA they're taking the Russian tanks as the cowardly bastards flee😂

Which one shocked you the most? North Korea?

Well keep in mind that this video doesn't mention the quality of each nation's tanks and whether they would be modern enough to have any chance of survival on today's battlefield, nor does it clarify how many are operational vs mothballed in storage somewhere. Also, several countries' tank inventories are much lower than they were a year ago (Russia, Ethiopia and Eritrea come to mind).

@@JohnFrost-gt1cs for me, it's Greece. Why in the hell they have so many of them?

@@ChR0nos_7734 Because Turkey is on the other side .

they used to have two batallions (120+ tanks in total), then 2008 they decided nope tanks are too expensive and sold pretty much everything of to finnland. Then crimea happend and yeah the plan to have zero tanks changed and the last 18 tanks got transfered to germany for upgrades to A7-versions and integration into the german army. So curently 16 tanks are still operated by the Dutch as part of the germanjoint Tank Battalion 414 (part of 43 Gemechaniseerde Brigade), to ease german manpower problems. It goes even further the dutch 43 Gemechaniseerde Brigade, ist part of the german 1.Panzerdivison... So the netherlands has tanks leased to german batallion with dutch/german crews, which is part of an dutch brigade, wich is part of a german divison. So they operate under foreign command... and were part of a mutinational NATO Battlegroup Lithuania in the 2021 rotation. I think most people don't have any grasp how interconnected militarys in euope actually are, especiall german and the netherlands: Netherlands for example also provide a lot of support for the german navy. The HNLMS Karel Doorman is activly used by german units. The plan is that the german batallion will be permanently attached and stationed in the netherland under dutch command, currently not the case (as far as I am aware of).

Yeah keep friendship with usa and europe will have 0 tanks as its their goal to demilitarise u 1st and deindustrialize 2nd)

You actually hit the nail on the head with that last remark. You will tend to find that european nations have differing forces and focuses depending on their location. Nations to the eastern borders of europe tend to have heavy tank and land armies, such as Poland and Germany. Nations a little further in focus on specialised fields that support those to the east and compliment them well, Netherlands possibly falls in this category. And nations in far safer areas such as France and ol' blighty have expeditionary forces that, while less ground heavy, are highly specialised and can be deployed anywhere in the world for small scale specific use

Active defense systems, like "Trophy", will be in demand for sure.

Yes there system that will be on every modern tank. trophy APS.

Tank doctrine is going to change a bit for sure. They were always vulnerable to ambushes by anti-tank weapons if you don't protect them, but the lethality of modern rockets is crazy. It was always kinda strange how tanks counter infantry when used right, but infantry counter tanks when used right, and now that's only gotten more extreme.

Something tells me ukraine gained a few tanks recently.

@@TheKronnoz Maybe it was the NYT?

@@TheKronnoz yea, a few, and lost much more.

А few is about 1200+)

@@Alex_Reitmar and Ukranian lost is more then 3000

MBT number is meaningless - Some of the countries with large MBTs are actually mostly vintage - It means the older generation MBTs are actually completely useless in modern warfare. You have to look at their number of 3.5 generation modern MBT numbers to see their true MBT capability.

Every country has the same problem.

So you korean? More than half of the countries in the vedio have the same problem, it is a video for reference not an analitical artical about the international ground force comparison

Those k2 tanks are awesome 👌. I watched a video on them and was super impressed with their performance compared to other main battle tanks. Good to know we are allies with south Korea 🇰🇷 🇺🇲

@@taylormajors5677 I think so too. proud to be an ally of the United States. we go together.

@@Gandago2 LOL koreans are the biggest suckups

Yeah but every tank has an L plate on it still 🤔

More than half those 12k will never run again. They are just spare parts.

@@moshunit96 and lots of them were destroyed in Ukraine

@@MrNoob0305 With your logic, then Ukrainian tanks should not remain at all

@@moshunit96 Did you see?

Keep calm. Russia is still on the first place.

The Ukrainian tanks have seriously gone to almost non existent. You want to beat Russia, out produce Russia. Quantity is a quality all on its own.

yeah they know have more

Basically said everything I came to the comments to say lol

Said everything I was going to say except light, cheap drones and satellite intel have severely limited tanks abilities in the last decade or so

Bullshit

Logistics is the only thing I would add to this, tanks need fuel, LOTS of fuel.

The arabs where with t34s and su 100s against mbts of the time the 6 day war was overkill. And also russian tanks are doing fine in ukraine theyre losing some too because fighting in defensive stances is easier than offensive And russia isnt even nearly using all its tanks

Yeah, all running on fat beef.

they are made out of jello and their fees are so sensitive

😄

Well for England or Australia, which are both surrounded completely by water, it wouldn't make much sense to invest into land warfare. I'm betting they have some of the best naval fleets of the world though, or like you said, air. Very unreliable way to measure a countries "strength," even if we're only talking military strength.

@@elijahcriswell1658 Yeah Australia has more fighters jets than tanks. As when your country is 4000 km wide and 5000 ish long, tanks are a bit useless....

an ak47 still works, a middle eastern tank still works, the idea that newer technology is a game changer is laughable, this is not a video game that statistics matter, the taliban won without any of that gear.

its more important what kind of tanks then how many, North Korea have old tanks, but more then 6 000 of them including old T-34's !!!!!!!!!

@@marza339 Its all dezinformation anyway, Croatia have about 25 tanks, 75 nowhere to be found.

Not really, it was a political decision. Anyone who thinks that Russia can't rustle up a few tanks for a parade is sorely mistaken. They have 12,000 T-55's just in storage alone.

How many have they lost?

Not just destroyed but they have had to break down 100s if not 1000s for spare parts.

Yeah, and how many of those T-55's in storage are actually operational? Even for a parade.

@@MrLeadb1 t 55💀💀its even not the last lvl in world of tanks_ Game about old tanks. И этот танк даже не на последнем месте в вар тандер в прокачке. а лишь на седьмом с конца что невероятно плохо учитывая что гибнут люди живые а не в игре

And also, in case of war all the developed countries could outproduce very easily the other countries.

@@uvuvwevwevweonyetenyevweug5884 They get all their resources from the "other" countries, lole. On an unrelated note, good luck paying your gas bill this winter, Anglos!

@@Ved000000Thanks man. By the way I live in France, where the vast majority of our energy is produced by nuclear power.

@@uvuvwevwevweonyetenyevweug5884 Smart. I hear Belgium had to cancel shutting down an old power plant to make up for the losses, too. Hopefully they don't have a meltdown anytime soon.

@@Ved000000 well, given that the Belgians actually have safety standards, that won't be a problem. Enjoy your sexless life eating hot pockets in your mom's basement.

Take into consideration that the majority of Russia's tanks are outdated, UK only uses state of the art equipment (USA too) and also tanks can be easily dealt. Actually their only use would be for defense, clearly nowadays there are many situations in which a tank offense won't have the desired outcome.

The number is meaningless - Some of the countries with large MBTs are actually mostly vintage - It means there are actually completely useless in modern warfare you have to look at their number of 3.5 gen MBT numbers

@@senseislancer9697 were you the one that outdated the Russian tanks? Idiot

@@bennadinayandex1207 Explain why Russian tanks are useless after one shell shot. Explain why fucking tractors can move them up, explain why the Russian tanks have no automation systems and are like cans. Explain it to me.

@@senseislancer9697 outdated but still function

use google bard to play with this type of data

DUDE let the T34s alone ALL OF THE VARIENTS ARE 80k (produced dunno how many left) AND Just fuel consuming also plain useless against modern standards 12950 is prob Cold era tanks

and most of them are not working and many are destroyed because of ukraine

If you want to count all stocked Russian tanks, there will be like around 200k+

well most of their tanks are from Soviet Union .

well those ukrainian farmers are trained by the west and get billions of dollars worth of weapons.

​@@user-dn9vj3qs8q сейчас с Европы.

If they need to go to war, they'll just build more Bob Semple tanks, the best tank ever. :))

the USSR had 50,000 tanks

Russia is doing a great job of re supplying Ukraine with used T72s

You are forgetting one thing. Since the beginning of the war Armed forces of Ukraine has captured almost 3k russos Tanks, Fighting Vehicles, Armoured Personnel Carriers and etc. There are plenty of videos on youtube when russians's tanks stopped working at the beginning of an each battle, relocation and etc. Sometimes a crew must leave a tank just on the middle of field. Usually there are 6-7 out of 10 tanks are not in a working condition.

​@@maxgromov2011Твои мечты, как хохла, объяснимы, но читать это, все равно смешно

@@maxgromov2011 3K all vehicles, but only 350-400 MBT

An excellent point.

so far the ukraine war proves otherwise.

Same thing in Belgium

Yep, when 1 modern tank.will wipe put many ww2 relics. And an A10 or an f35 will wipe them out even easier.

@@TheLiamis The A10 can litterally shread armour like its paper on water

​@@itsalmostfun8567 A10 is overrated and impractical. Murica has far superior air capabilities. It do go brrrrrrt tho

the germans thought that too with their king tigers until america with the shermans and russia with the t34s were mass produced.

I remeber in one thematic atlas there were sizes of armies and navies, it was in the 90's, and regarding nuclear subs in Russia: 200 (7 sailworthy)...

Russia is cranking out T-90s day and night. Don’t believe the lying western media and politicians.

Moldova too, but, then again, Moldovans are Romanians.

Those are not tanks. They are called armored vehicles.

Actually we don't have a tank.

These are probably MBT (Main Battle Tank) numbers - What you saw were the armored infantry vehicle not MBT But, even the MBT number is meaningless - Some of the countries with large MBTs are actually mostly vintage - It means the older generation MBTs are actually completely useless in modern warfare. You have to look at their number of 3.5 generation modern MBT numbers to see their true MBT capability.

@@deltacharlieromeo8252 yes we do have 7 units of fv101 scorpion light tank. Those were to be decommission soon and to be replaced by sabrah light tank

It does

To keep away Godzilla!!

@@umamigo1 😂😂❤

@@aspectd7084 nor did Japan aginst one Little Boy oops, wrong spelling

It makes sense

These are made in Unreal Engine.

@Floron Don't spread false information dude. France has a bit over 200 LeClercs and is modernizing those. But not buying additional ones. Also: What for? Russia, the only threat to security for Europe, is currently running an aggressive disarmament program. A couple hundred tanks are okay, because those are top notch. And we're not alone, were part of NATO and the EU. Everyone throws in a few and suddenly you've got thousands of modern MBT's.

@Floron I hope they don't. France and Germany grew closer than they've ever been since Charlemagne thanks to the EU. The alternative is a splintered Europe with wars down the road...

​@@patta8388 Россия угроза Европе? да вы сами себе угроза😂. Всё ваши прозападные политики и приведут Европу к краху.

@@dimonlyshev Dude, if you're gonna share with the group, do it in English

Climate change transforms tanks into violins burning on the deck of the Titanic.

You mean the modern Western junks that rot in Ukrainian fields? 😂😂😂😂

중국때문에

Literally none of these were surprising or unexpected. You not gonna name which ones you found surprising so someone can tell you why?

@@Yamezzzz for me it is, because I never ask myself « how many tanks has each army in the world » When I clicked on the video I was supposing that « lower » countries (like some asian and african countries) would be at the bottom, and « healthier » countries like european would be on higher ranks. That would be maybe truth if we set a top like these « which countries has the most hightech tanks? » probably…

@@jojoledesma7303 Think about it, most African countries have ongoing civil wars right now and unrest. Rebel groups and terrorist groups. Countries that have had wars in the past 40 years will still have their tanks leftover. Countries with unfriendly bordering countries need more tanks for defence. Countries that are land based need them whereas island nations don't need any. The "healthier" European countries, what would they need tanks for? No civil unrest, no neighbouring countries invading them. What would be the point? There isn't a very meaningful difference in how "high tech" the tank is. All tanks are built for a certain job and they all do that job to a reasonable extent. 1 brand new 2022 tank is still worse than 2 tanks from the 1960s. T'es fr ? Je vois les guillemets fr

@@Yamezzzz lol oui je suis fr. Non mais oui comme je disais, en cliquant sur la vidéo je ne m’étais pas posé la question. Mais en réalité c’est logique ;) Ah bon, je ne m’y connais pas en armemant. Qu’est-ce qu’il ne va pas sur les tanks récent?

Ну вот сейчас идет война. И сколько же у России танков 50-х годов (40-х! ЛОЛ)?? Да в СВО есть танки 70-х годов (Т-62), но они: во-первых, были быстро модернизированы; во-вторых, против них воюет тоже не самая новая техника; в третьих, используются не на самых ответственных участках (в тылу). На ответственных участках фронта применяются новейшие Т-72Б3М, Т-80БВМ, Т-90М Прорыв; в четвертых, Россия бережет самые современные танки для возможного конфликта с НАТО; в пятых, Россия сейчас вышла на выпуск четырех танков в день. Всего в 2023 году будет выпущено 1500 танков. Таков план и госзаказ.