Being honest i thought the first one was farrr better until i heard that Superman speech....goddamnit the last confrontation between Beatrix and Bill has to be the best dialogue i’ve ever seen in an action movie
My favorite piece of dialogue from Quentin has to be O-Ren’s monologue. It established to me not only how ruthless she was, she’s fiercely proud of her heritage and she’s willing to kill anyone who tries to degrade her because of it.
@@mr.dr0bot731 Not really. She decapitates the Yakuza boss because he undermines her authority based on her ethnicity. I'm the right context that could work for a white character.
Every single word written by Tarantino has a purpose. Every time you hear a line that makes you think "what the hell you're talking about?" you will get, sooner or later, why it was there.
That Superman story. Only he... And I know how he does this too. He dives deeper than almost everyone. Man doesn't write characters. He lives with them.
When I was a young teen and first getting into film, Kill Bill was the first Tarantino film that I saw. And kill bill vol. 2's ending taught me early on that scenes with dialogue can be just as engaging if not more so than action scenes when it comes to concluding a story. I love me a good action climax, but Most of the time, simple human drama can be all you need to get the point across. It can pay off to take chances and to do the unexpected thing and not follow the cliches of storytelling
Like I was editing a scene in Kill Bill for a project but then accidentally ended up watching the entire movie... Truly keeps you hooked great job Tarantino 👏
The last half hour of Kill Bill volume 2 might be my favorite ending to any movie ever. And the fight scene was only about 20 seconds long. The dialogue between Kiddo and Bill and what made it so incredible. The music by RZA was incredible too.
I used to like Vol. 1 better when they came out. But after growing a little bit and seeing movies through a different lense made me appreciate Vol. 2 how it should be. That last half hour with just 20 secs of fighting disappointed me on first viewing. Now it's one of my favorite sequences, it deserves all of the praise it gets. Just great Tarantino dialogue as usual. The conversation is the fight, that's why it's great. Also, there's a version of the movie that only exists on DVD (there is apparently a bootleg version on Blu-ray) that's called The Whole Bloody Affair. It's one 4h movie, including the uncensored Japanese version of the fight against the Crazy 88. That's the way I watch it, just one story, one movie and it's amazing. Cheers from France! 🍻
Wow has time flown. When I watched Kill Bill I had no children, now I have two daughters and I can't stop tearing up. It says I'm a bit of a masochist I'm going to now have to watch Kill Bill again. This film is to good.
Kill Bill 1 & 2 are without a doubt my favorite Tarantino movies. Really the only movie he’s made I didn’t enjoy was Reservoir Dogs... just thought it was so fuckin boring
Brad Pitt's speech in Inglorious Bastards is pure music "a Word of Warning to all you Would-be Warriors" "the Disemboweled, Dismembered, Disfigured Bodies of their Brothers we leave Behind us"
Y’all have truly gave me the confidence to write long dialogue scenes, as I’ve always been full of words and expression in life and when I’ve written, but now you guys have broken down the necessary process to making this move efficient! God bless y’all! Killing the cinema education game!
Tarantino’s structure for dialog is sometimes repetitive and unnatural. It can be very flowery and all his characters speak and sound like him. They all adhere to that same structure. Like at times too detailed. But I love about 80% of it. A true gem.
@Christian Tompkins oh absolutely. The analysis he has of Kiddo is dead on, again I however don't believe Superman views the human race as weak......I wonder if he wrote for the DCCU before he had his heart exploded 😂
I guess the idea was imply these two are kind of elite, and alien, from all the little people. Plus Superman had his costume right from being a baby, and spent his whole life trying to fit in, so I can't think of a more suitable comic book character for his anecdote. As you say, seeing humans as weak, is merely Bill's take on it, which adds something to his characterisation.
@chubbyurma Eh, I disagree. Clark dresses like a nerd so that he's a far cry from what people expect of Superman, which allows him to maintain his Superman status as a secret. If he walked around in clothes that showed off his huge muscles, and didn't wear those goofy big glasses, it'd be tougher to justify why people don't immediately clock who he is. It's really nothing to do with how he sees the average person; he raised by, and grew up with, "average humans". For all intents and purposes, aside from how his body reacts to the yellow sun, he pretty much IS human himself.
And I just finished binge watching all of Studiobinder's videos! Feel like I have accomplished something... gained so much knowledge... (even though I do not sound like Tarantino :-P )
I love Tarantino films but in kill bill there were many scenes that are "out of logic" and many mistakes but he hides them with his raw style making and strong screenplay, Eg: That Fight between crazy 88 (Wow..What a Women.. Ahh wait a minute Wtf ?) My Reaction while watching those scenes but I loved all the characters. Any Relatable Reaction Guys..😅
We talk about Tarantino's amazing dialogues and we forget to mention that he was initially writing dialogues with Roger Avary. Which has totally determine his style.
🧐 That is way too much intellectualisation for Tarantino, I’m sure. That is not how he works. He is much more intuitive than that. He just puts his characters in a situation, let them talk and have them revile the outcome. And that’s how I do it to.
But how to become intuitive? either; 1. read/watch and write a lot until it clicks through trial and error until mastery 2. start with a formula (based on what others have made = read/watch) and imitate and adapt it until mastery
@@Ruylopez778 Tarantino did both I assume . On RU-vid Tarantino says he was in acting class and filled in the blanks with original Tarantino dialogue for scenes from movies that he couldn't accurately remember . And Tarantino is a movie film nerd who reuses tons of famous shots from movies. So I conclude qt did both of your points to become a movie genius
Love the dialogue in Once Upon A Time In Hollywood.....Don’t cry in front of the Mexicans, The three Georges Peppard, Maharis and Chakiris, YOUR’E THE BLIND ONE!!!!
But you know it's QT shoehorning in comic book references. At some point, QT's dialogue being unpredictable and seemingly random, makes it predictable.
Someone help me explain this. I heard that dialogue is about context. For the scene in Pulp Fiction about the Royale with Cheese scene. Despite it not having to do with the context of the following moment, why is it still memorable?
Kind of a late reply, but I think it has to do with the fact that it introduces the characters as humans, having a very fun and interesting conversation before they go into character to get a job done later. It's also funny because you can see that the 2 guys are obviously killers but they're talking about burgers... which so happens there's a half-eaten burger in the next scene that Jules takes a bite off. It's just amazing how it all ties up and gets us hooked.
It's like the the tip scene at the start of reservoir dogs. I forget the exact name but it's like an introduction to the characters even though it doesn't relate much to the story it's just a way for authors to show us the characters and even foreshadow events that happen in the movie with benign little things in the character introduction scene that turn into on second reading or viewing oh this character did this in the intro that's why in he told or is shrewd or whatever the charavters personality type is later on in the movie This is a long winded way of saying the character introduction scene is about showing their personality and linking those actions in the intro scene to later critical events in the story
I love the beginning of Reservoir Dogs. There seems to be an odd pointlessness to that scene in the restaurant and the truth is if you remove it, it wont make the difference to the story. However, I think there are four purposes to the scene. First it introduces us the characters in style. Second, its sets the tone of the story. It allows us to make up our minds about how we feel about them. Here's how I feel about the characters. I like the father and son because they consider paying a tip to the waitress almost a duty. The son collects the tips and the father checks the total. So even though they are thieves, they still have principals that I respect. The babbling idiot who is speaking nonsense and who is inconsequential to the mini plot of the scene is oddly enough, Quentin's character. It will mirror his pointlessness in the overall story. Even when he speaks here he seems to be ignored. The one that ratted out Mr Pink when the old man asked who didnt tip, is the overall rat in the story. The one that I hate is the man who is stealing his money rather than earning it but is not generous enough to leave a tip. Mr White's ability to confiscate the old man's book and still live to tell the tale shows that the old man has heart is a father figure to most of these people. Other than Pink everyone else has heart and compassion. However the fourth purpose is subversion of expectation. Even though we are being shown that they are nice people, what happens afterwards, spins our opinion of them on its head. Awesome opening.
I think Tarantino uses dialogues correctly, they are narrative tools, like a camera movement, or a shot. The content of the dialogue doesn't really matter as much as its context in the narrative.
You cant have a particuler structure in mind while writting, its just how you hook them and you can do it by practicing and trying to develop your own style instead of following someone
I understood the gold watch was all but roger averys, but Tarantino injected his own pacing and some changes to it, in order to have the final pulp fiction section?? I could be wrong. Could you possibly do a Tarantino/Avery dialogue analysis.. to see how we got the final product of pulp fiction, as to be fair to Avery he rarely gets any notice at all. Thanks for this video. Very good.
10:29 "The Superman speech is pure Tarantino" I love him, but he stole that whole speech lol It was always a monologue that stood out to me, not how he would write, really. Then I found out it was copied almost verbatim from Jules Feiffer’s 1965 book, The Great Comic Book Heroes.
7:00 is ああそう not ah so! in Japanese: humorous, derogatory. Used in representations or imitations of Japanese and (by misidentification) Chinese speech, especially to express affirmation, acknowledgement, understanding, or realization
@@katrinadomi1 While Joker has a lot of things to say, and has a lot of small details, the dialogue could be a rather on the nose at times. I would like to know what they had in the other take of the TV show scene, because apparently there was a better speech that simply didn't fit in the edit.
@@Ruylopez778 the exposition about Arthur and Sophie not really being together was also unnecessary; but I think they just did it to make sure people like Nat S could understand what's going on.
This is not necessarily accurate saying act one is physical should be replaced with act 1 is responsible for hooking you and show you in a loud defining way the types of characters your dealing with 2 uses the hook to explain the character and grows the cobversation throughout the scene 3 is the culmination of the argument/conversation and follow under that structure an air of conflict that ypu wont understand how to implement if you dont specifically study it in films or any other story based medium. Act 1 show the characters act 2 explain the characters act 3 decipate the inter character conflict. I've never made a screenplay or film so........ Do with that what you will
I hope you learned something about how Tarantino structures his dialogue scenes. And this video would be a scene analysis as well. Thanks for watching! 😊✌🏻🎬
❤😂🎉, Итак на старые берега вернулись я сыграл дерево... Халк Ударил Капитана Америку... Билл пульнул дротиком, ну тебе же нравится убивать мамба... Там играла музыка когда она зашла не при детях
I see the point with Hateful Eight, since that movie needed great fuckin’ dialogue to work. Thing is, in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood it wasn’t the driving force of it. It was a hang out movie and it was just two fun people interacting with each other. It’s not the best thing he has written not by a long shot BUT I do love it none the less
@@afonsolucas2219 that's why I liked Once better, but it still wasn't all that interesting to me for a Tarantino outside maybe the beginning sequences and the Italy parts. H8 was lacking something heavy and I do think it was the dialogue
