Тёмный

Targeted Universalism 

Othering & Belonging Institute
Подписаться 10 тыс.
Просмотров 62 тыс.
50% 1

Targeted Universalism is a different way -- a powerful way -- to make the transformational changes we need. Changes we need to improve life chances, promote inclusion, and enhance and sustain equitable policies and programs. To better understand a targeted universalism framework, please enjoy this brief animated video, which explains the difference between targeted universalism and more traditional policy approaches. To learn more about Targeted Universalism, please visit belonging.berkeley.edu/targeteduniversalism
Video Transcript:
What is the most effective and sustainable policy response to problems in our society?
Universal approaches are widely used in order to package policies for broad appeal.
Universal policies such as Social Security and minimum wage laws provide the same benefits or minimum protections to everyone, regardless of status or group membership.
But by treating everyone the same, Universal approaches can't root out group-based discrimination, and may actually deepen inequality between groups rather than reduce it.
And by providing benefits or protections to everyone, resources that could be targeted to groups worse off instead flow to those who are better off.
In contrast to universalism, targeted approaches are commonly used.
Targeted policies provide benefits or protections based on group membership or status.
Snap, the food stamp program, conditions benefits on income level.
The Americans with Disabilities Act requires public accessibility for disabled groups.
And affirmative action focuses on historically disadvantaged groups.
Targeted approaches are vulnerable to the critique that they unfairly favor constituent groups over the public good by directing resources to marginalized groups who are already subjected to unfair stereotypes.
But Universal and targeted approaches are false choices.
There is a third way: Targeted Universalism.
Targeted Universalism means setting universal goals that can be achieved through targeted approaches.
This approach targets the various needs of each group while reminding us that we are all part of the same social fabric.
This can be accomplished by following these five steps:
First set a universal goal. For example 100 percent proficiency in eighth grade math.
Second measure how the overall population fares relative to the universal goal.
In this example we might discover that only 80% of eighth graders are proficient in eighth grade math.
Third measure the performance of population segments relative to the universal goal.
So although 80% of all eighth graders are proficient we might find that only 70% of Latinx students are proficient.
Fourth understand how structures and other factors support or impede groups’ progress toward the universal goal.
For our Latinx students, classroom instruction materials and lessons designed for English speakers may impede learning including math proficiency.
Finally implement targeted strategies so that each and every group can achieve the universal goal based upon their needs and circumstances.
This may take the form of ESL-specific math tutoring for our Latinx students while another group may require a completely different strategy to achieve the same universal goal.
Targeted Universalism rejects a blanket universal, which may be indifferent to the reality that different groups are situated differently relative to the institutions and resources of society.
By aspiring toward shared universal goals, Targeted Universalism empowers targeted strategies capable of achieving those goals, while moving us beyond concerns over disparities alone, and toward our highest aspirations for all.

Опубликовано:

 

14 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 12   
@NickApex
@NickApex 3 года назад
A good start for targeted universalism may be to understand that LatinX is not a something that the overwhelming majority of our hispanic community considers a thing.
@NickApex
@NickApex 3 года назад
@Carlos R Yes, if the majority of the hispanic community finds issue with the term that means something. To ignore it and let it creep into the language as it has here while bringing the inevitable weight of grievance studies will end up as compelled speech over time. I find it beyond frustrating a majority of the people I see pushing this are NOT spanish speakers and often our white community who're sitting around trying to be inclusive and therefore broadly using the term as the new pronoun placeholder, this is idiotic at best. Least we forget the attempt at including womxn into the culture war vocabulary. So if a person who's not gender conforming uses the term to refer to themselves or another person who's of equal mind I'm all for it, no complaints, please be yourself. But this video is a prime example of its adoption as language replacement not person specific usage, to add insult to injury it's in and english speaking presentation. A person of influence recently said their pronouns are tree, treeself, and so on, so there is a bit of theater going on here and we must be adult enough to speak about things as such specifically when the conversation is centered in education. So using the term generically in a professional settings and/or literature as the substitute for the standard spanish is just cultural marxism ruining a language by people who don't speak the language by way of compelling speech over time. As a spanish speaker, yes, I find it harmful to the language and understand what the significance of doing such things represents. If you don't understand, that's ok too, I'm not here to argue about right or wrong, you asked it matters and if it's negative, I believe it is. If you would like to go down the road as to why exactly this should not be tolerated we can. You'll need a framework of post modernism, critical theory, the Frankfurt school, Jacques Derrida, Black Feminism, how it all comes into play as to why this all matters as much as it does and why it's not "just being inclusive".
@rossgooding7423
@rossgooding7423 2 года назад
@@NickApex Nailed it precisely. But I suspect these white liberal elitists will want to cancel your opinion and existence.
@farahhuq5086
@farahhuq5086 2 года назад
@Carlos R I think I read somewhere that latine (and "e" at the end of gendered adjectives instead of "o" or "a") is used more commonly in latin american countries, and "latinx" is an example of white academics unnecessarily reinventing the wheel
@MegaRedstoneMiner
@MegaRedstoneMiner 3 года назад
Amazing art and graphic design on this!!! (and animation too :)
@lisafujieparks168
@lisafujieparks168 Год назад
Right? OBI folks, who did the design/art/direction for this video?? We need more of these types of videos that can explain complex issues in an absorbable way.
@markuswierzoch2386
@markuswierzoch2386 Год назад
🎉
@rossgooding7423
@rossgooding7423 2 года назад
Would the well-intended but destructive welfare policies of the 60s be considered targeted Universalism? Sure seems like it. How did that turn out?
@itszachyabish9796
@itszachyabish9796 Год назад
HOLDING THE GAS COMPANIES AND MONOPOLIZED INSTITUTIONS ACCOUNTABLE. BUT NAY ITS TOO LATE
@t.isurvivalist7537
@t.isurvivalist7537 2 года назад
And then they all get regular jobs at Walmart, and the fast food joint.
Далее
Flipping Robot vs Heavier And Heavier Objects
00:34
Просмотров 36 млн
КТО БОИТСЯ КЛОУНОВ?? #shorts
00:20
Просмотров 488 тыс.
TV 2 | All That We Share
3:00
Просмотров 10 млн
Universalism vs. Relativism: Human Rights
7:35
Просмотров 64 тыс.
How to Write a Paper in a Weekend (By Prof. Pete Carr)
11:39
Our Hidden Biases
4:45
Просмотров 622 тыс.
What is Transference And Why It Matters
5:01
Просмотров 430 тыс.
How Can We Make The Perfect City? ft. Real Engineering
3:39
What Is Privilege?
4:00
Просмотров 4,5 млн
john powell keynote: The Mechanisms of Othering
26:18
Putting Yourself in Someone Else's Shoes
2:58
Просмотров 777 тыс.