I mean both are low priced suv to start with and if someone is taking a low priced one he is in budget and would definitely give more importance to space and size than looks,looks wise nexon is the top here
Looks bigger as it's wider but definitely not better. In reality, Nexon looks much cleaner with consistent design language from front to back and even in interior. 3X0 is a mish mash pattern and clearly looks a cut down version of Tivoli
Look 3xo in white colour or purple you will love it on another level. My thoughts were same as yours but trust me this mustard colour is just eww and makes whole car look boxy.
@@AshishSingh-qu3ns tru 😂,par Mahindra ki gadi to jal jata hai,tata ki cars bhi showroom se aate hi kharab ho jata hai lekin kamse kam jal to nahi jata
Nexon possess front ventilated seats, 2 more speakers with better & slightly crispier audio quality, paddle shifters, air purifier, bigger boot space, better clarity 360° camera which also make it a better choice over 3XO. Actually, it depends on the requirements & user ability of different customers which basically decide that which car will be a better option to pick over the other. According to my needs & preferences, I will choose Nexon.
Took a test drive today of 3XO. Major problem with the car is - the position of the driver vs orvm (outside rear view mirror). Orvm block the view for the driver. It comes at the eye level, there by creating a blind spot. I drive Ecosport, and in this car my eye is much-much above (almost a feet above, I guess) than orvm level. Pickup was good, but the lever of Automatic car was bit hard. Overall, I had to reject this car due to these reasons. Nexon - I hit my head to the roof while entering the car, roof is low. So, don’t want to go for Nexon either. I am 5’ 10” only.
