@@Stories_4_Everyone the cost of Fuji lenses is relatively cheap by comparison to Sony Canon and Nikon When you sell third party lenses you get nothing for them so you save now and loose latter The only time I would consider them is when original lenses are too expensive, large, heavy or not available in the current line up - Leica L mount would fit into this category I’d buy second hand original lenses if cost is a big issue for you over new third party ones any day for quality and resale Good luck
@@ronaldsand3000 because as good as fuji lenses are for photo, they suck at video AF and reason why many stick to Sony with whack colors and Canon with cripple hammer. Fuji have old lenses and AF is so unreliable in video. Plus doesn't have many lenses at cheaper price like Fujifilm 16 f1.4 is $1000 and sigma 16 f1.4 for Sony e mount (apsc) is like $300.
The only lenses I'd call affordable are the XC 35mm f2 and the 15-45mm kit lens. The rest are too expensive for me, since I don't have a source of income yet and anything over 10 000 Kč is too expensive for a birthday present, which means, that I'll have to stick with the Viltrox or Sigma, if I wanna get an AF prime.
