Tesla Bot Is OFFICIALLY Ahead Of Boston Dynamics! 

😂 ikr

its just computer generated garbage like most Tesla videos.

​@@Withnail1969You are one of those people who say every year that Tesla will go bankrupt and 'somehow' it never actually happens lmao

​@@davidkosiba624he isn't wrong though. To he fair, musk is the one who is saying tesla will go bankrupt if they don't finish FSD soon.

Way ahead.

@@Withnail1969 yep. These Tesla/Musk videos are just for the obsessed Musk fans to fondle themselves over. They get clicks so they keep being made.

Vidio plz

@@highspeedpiTV Faked

I know lol😂

Also, that screenshot of the hockey stick attack was a joke cgi video. There was a real video with a hockey stick but it was not used to beat the Atlas, it was just used to move a package it was trying to pick up.

@@highspeedpiTV : CGI

He specifically said Boston Dynamic's Atlas ... not BD robots in general. Hopefully BD will leverage ChatGPT into Atlas as well.

@@MaximGhost OMG dude, Atlas does it too, this whole video's premise is wrong and the creator should feel foolish

​@@HyphenVM ​ Then Boston Dynamics has been playing catch up. Boston Dynamics, first and foremost, was never an AI company. For that matter, neither was Tesla. However, Elon Musk did co-found OpenAI and was its initial significant investor. Musk even placed OpenAI's cheif scientist, Ilya Sutskever, at OpenAI back in 2015. Even recently, Tesla's former Director of AI, Andrej Karpathy, is now working at OpenAI, specializing in deep learning and computer vision. So, Tesla, through Musk's own egghead network, has a direct pipeline to the leading AI scientists on the planet, bar none. Frankly, what Musk is doing now with his Tesla bot is what Google should have done at Boston Dynamics after Google initially purchased it in December 2013. Apparantly Google's leaders didn't have the perseverence to force Boston Dynamic's hardware eggheads to work with Google's AI software eggheads ... so Google simply sold Boston Dynamics to SoftBank in April 2019. Softbank in turn sold BD to Hyundai, it's current parent. More importantly, do you know Hyundai as being an AI expert let alone a software expert? Right, neither do I. As industrial robotistist Scott Walker, PhD, has said multiple times on other channels, anyone can build robots these days but the "secret sauce" that has been lacking all this time has been self-learning software to make bipedal co-robots an every day sight on the factory floor. He also added that Tesla's other advantage with their own co-robots is that they are the only manufacturing company that are able to develop and test their own AI-enabled bipedal co-robots on their own factory floors instead of going through customer's who may or may not see the need yet for bipedals. Let's face it. Boston Dynamics had 10+ years to make Atlas prolific on their customers' factory floors. The fact that the world isn't looking to Boston Dynamics to make any more ground-breaking products of PRACTICAL use is proof that they make interesting stuff, but not useful stuff. If you REALLY want me to change my mind about that, then show me videos of Atlas working on a factory line instead of videos of it doing cute dances or parkour. That stuff doesn't generate revenue. If it did, then Google or SoftBank would still own Boston Dynamics as a BUSINESS interest, dude.

@@HyphenVM You are speaking the truth! Boston dynamics can easily add an AI layer into their system. They can even use their existing code to train an AI layer how to walk and move in the same way. It's similar to how tesla cars are trained using human driving behavior. Or how AI image generation is trained using human art styles. Boston dynamics can benefit greatly from their already well working system.

@@UnidudeNine Which realistically would be a massive waste of their time as Atlas isn't made for mass production. Its a show piece, a good show piece, but thats what it's built for. BD (MD or CEO, I can't recall which) have stated that they don't have the budget for a billion dollar super-computer or mass manufacturing facility to do the things Tesla is doing. Thats why they developed and market Spot. Even then they're 70-100k each, with the arm that looks like a neck. They're either remote controlled or pre-programmed.

At the same time it's a 6 month old baby 😅

It will get better.

Asimo was a way better than that 13 years ago.

​@redgeciccone8218 And nothing comes out that... all demonstration of its agility but no real-world application. Why do you think that is?

A superior elder indeed to Boastin' Dodonamics' "Alsdard:" bot, which rolls in on four wheels and waves its big blurry fists in high velocity circular attack spins in convincing workplace warehouses. The velocity is superior to any comparable speed, rate of travel or pace of motion known to movers.

The Teslabot can't even barely do chores, it can't do them at all. The robot was under remote control by humans when it was carrying out tasks in the videos.

Too early to judge. But the speed Tesla bot has been developed is impressive

​@SkylinesAerialProductions it's not even up to date with modern robotics lol...and it's not like they are starting from scratch here

Boston Dynamics bots are like soldiers.. Dead? RIP Atlas 🫡

Well it was animated * (The software not the robot) to look like it does

@@NumberBreak Well, the movement is derived from how humans move, right?

Ummmmmm.... What?? That is some serious cope! What could possibly be the "consumer product"? I can think of one thousand things for a pre-programmed robot. But something that "learns" very poorly and might not do what you want it to....... Like their horrible cars. Nope.... Can't think of anything besides a neat toy

If i were betting on robots - Atlas would be my bet! I wonder if Elon approached B.D. to try to collaborate. That would have been the best of both worlds!

Most Def, this title should be inversed. Backflipping, balance recovering from the hard kick robots are from Boston Dynamics. I hate liars, who is or are the "Future Mission"

@@selocan469 I think that this video has the opposite purpose than what it's title says. It is designed to have people protest that the B.D. robot is actually far superior which it obviously is (for now). I was embarrassed for Tesla when it show-cased the silliness of the Optimus robot. The whole world was embarrassed for Tesla when the human in the robot costume thing happened. Hopefully soon things will switch around and Optimus will become a real boy but for now it's a pretty silly thing.

@@tralfazy for now, and most likely for later B, D. will be better one. This is just another marketing and advertesment trick of Elon Musk. Such announcement will keep Tesla Stocks warm and cozy for a while and that is that

Its just an chat GPT video

Poor take buddy

@@sa34w you up for a bet? $1000 bucks says Tesla is worth 1/5 or less than what it is now in 5 years?

Sure if it can identify a human being on its own, avoid obstacles and identify the best path for safety. Tesla has a better chance at this than BD

@@sa34wjust wow😂😂

Atlas is dead

and as jam-solving as the tunnel :)

FSD is quite successful tho, its the leading technology in self driving cars. And now we got Gen 2 video which puts Tesla Bot way ahead of Boston Dynamics.

ahead? 😂 they still need stabilizing cables to not fall

@@nightowl0815 Who needs stabilization cables? Boston dynamics and Tesla bot, both no longer uses those, for quite some time by now. So what are you talking about here?

Atlas is semi-automatic. Basically the engineer would work out the kinks for each behavior like jumping and rolling, but only for one specific model case. To account for variations in the actual run, the controller software adapts the numbers on the fly based on stuff like Atlas's current speed, footing, surrounding obstacles, platform height differences, etc. So all the driver needs to do to get Atlas to do parkour is guide it through the track and Atlas works out the details on its own. (Scott Kuindersma, Atlas' control team lead, explained the technical stuff in great detail on a Robotics Today seminar in 2020, available on YT.) I think this approach is much better in achieving the level of reflex and dexterity required to do accurate back-to-back stunts compared to the AI approach, since the adjustments are much faster. I also believe there is an article about the dance video featuring one of their engineers stating that they streamlined the preprogramming process so they didn't have to manually compute too much stuff, which dramatically sped up the video production.

@@iyafath Huh. The more you know. Thanks for the interesting tidbit, internet stranger.

Don't get mad at AI, it's pointless. This one will keep pumping out videos to anyone that can press the Subscribe button.

@@AC-qe1io you're so right

The only educated and intelligent comment on this video. People who comment on topics of robotics and AI are usually the least qualified bigots.

I do understand what you are saying, and there is definitely impressive work that went into optimus. However, you can't simply compare the boston dynamics robot to what optimus will be (might be ) (might not be) (probably wont be) in the future. Im hopeful for the future too, but hopes don't beat reality.

Tesla works with Ai constantly The robot uses the same navigation system as the cars dont they Boston dinamics has self balancing Robots Spots can scan facilities climb stairs at amazing speeds and is very very effective in my opinion Tesla is trying to make Ai Boston Dinamics wants Robots We canot compare them

what your saying is the robot will logically think the problem with the house keeps on being untidy is the human, get rid of human , problem solved A.I THINKING.

Preprogrammed will only work on a case by case, very expensive. And if the environment changed, it won't know what to do. If you parked a forklift in front of the Boston Dynamics box picker it will just sit there. Tesla Bot already knows how to interpret different objects and work around them.

I think you're selling the Atlas bots programing a bit short. Boston Dynamics original design purpose was for nuclear power plant disastears. Tesla bot can barely stand on it's own.@@zigadabooga

What you said is the opposite

It will absolutely make a difference.

But the brain is controlling the movement, that is the point of having an AI controlled robot rather than programmed. This is why Tesla's robot was quite shaky at first, the AI was still learning how to control the actuators, as it learns fine control will steadily improve to the point it becomes fluid movement.

The brain is by a vast margin , more important than the rest. Atlas is an advanced toy. Atlas is like a retarded athlete. Optimus is like a nerd who is learning how to improve his physical abilities. I know which one I would want.

And your idea has a single point of failure.

@@tedmoss He also believes Elon is really going to build a Mars colony.

@@tedmoss Well, no. Just using a centralized drive unit, doesn't mean that it can fail all at once. It may be reduced in output, but won'completely fail, unless completely destroyed, which is ultimately always possible. Many small engines can each fail, but none of the functioning ones will allow operation of the failing engine. A centralized engine system can be damaged and yet remain operational, because it's better shielded on a per weight basis, while the output is greater than each separate engine. Let's consider a single squeeze pulp from an orange. One engine would have to exert a power of 1 to squeeze for the pulp. For each joint you'd have similar engines all powered 1, like 20. For the centralized version, you'd have one engine power 10, which could operate each joint at power 10, while having twice the shielding. Same weight, better shielding, like 10 times much. Or, you can have an engine like power 5, with 15 times the shielding, still outperforming each single engine power 1.

No, it looked like it because it was like 2 years into making while Atlas is like 20 years. But now... Atlast is heavily preprogramed robot, we had those decades ago. Tesla Bot is actually autonomous one.

At the moment AI is really basic and would not require any specific rules to not hurt humans, it can have basic rule to not cause damage to surroundings and that's that. We are still ways to go before we get to actual AI which would need any of those rules.

There of course is no Tesla phone and never will be.

They don’t want to go to war with apple