#Tesla 

Really liked the info about the back passenger. If people don't watch the whole video basically the front passengers are completely fine in this crash, but the back passengers got it really bad.

I appreciate the opportunity to view crash tests from countries outside the USA. Exposure to different testing analysis enables the consumer to make an informed buying decision. Thank you for sharing this test.

In 2019 i rear ended a Nissan Juke with my then 2004 Volvo V70 D5 at about 20 mph/ 30 Kph. Airbags went off and no much damage as such other than the windscreen and some cracked plastic. The insurance took the car as the cost to replace airbags and seat pretentioners would cost more than the value of the car. The Nissan Juke had to go in for repairs for about £3000. So regardless of the age of a Volvo, a 10 - 15 year old Volvo will still be safer than many new cars. Also, nobody has ever died in a Volvo XC90.

The Volvo is on a platform designed in 2014 and the Tesla on one designed much more recently, but still is designed with much more redundancy. Volvo for life!

Many useful information, instructive video. Insane amount of work. Thx💯

Great video! thanks God for the air bags….and the closed captions. 😊

Just wondering. What about the rear passenger's head hitting the front seat in a Tesla? How it influenced results? Could this have caused the neck and head bending numbers to be distorted because the head was stopped by hitting the front seat? It was not mentioned in results of rear passengers. For me it seemed like the most dangerous thing on this crash test but no one focused on that. Can we assume that higher chest pressure of belt in Volvo might caused that rear passenger was protected of hitting to the front seat? Comparing green numbers and discussing whether Tesla or Volvo has smaller or higher numbers in the event that it means nothing for the health of the crew seems pointless to me. I would like to hear a more detailed explanation about the results of the rear passengers, because we could clearly see that in the case of the Tesla there was a head impact. Could it have been fatal? But great video, finally someone compared head to head Tesla and Volvo cars in crash test.

We need more focus on rear passengers. It seams rear passenger in Tesla bashed his head and got a concussion! Both back passengers got a neck injury and maybe a broken rib! What concerns everyone more is how safe are tall drivers and passengers?! Safety standards seem seriously outdated!!! What if rear passenger is 200cm (6,6ft) even greater injury! 🤯😱 It is obvious now rear part of front seat needs an airbag!

Fantastic video, guys! Very very informative! Insane amout of work! Ps: Volvo for life

Would like to know more about the rear passenger. Why is it safer to be in the front? Is it because of a lack of frontal airbags from the rear compartment? Isn't that against the traditional thinking that rear seats are safer? Maybe we should put a single child in the front seat for safety? What if we repeated the test but with child sized dummies? Also the video notes that there is no standard for rear seat crash limits, yet the numbers were shown in red. Red compared to what? Are they using the same numbers are the front seats? Anyway I give the video 5 stars.. amazing amount of work, even if it took me a while to understand the subtitles.. Chinese is a fast language when read thru English subtitles!

Im in my 2nd XC60. Got tee boned my 1st at about 60 kmh. On passenger side. Definitely get the Volvo at least I know it won't catch fire and doors can open in a nasty accident so you can get out.

美國坦克vs瑞典坦克，看來是美國坦克略勝一籌

Volvo fanboys trying to hold their breath

Can you use china BYD to do a safety testing. Thank

非常值得參考的好節目！另外就是台灣有出現幾場事故是model Y高速側撞之後斷成兩截，不知道有沒有辦法針對這個問題進行測試，謝謝！

it would be nice to have proper English sub-titles. A bit of the detail goes missing with the RU-vid sub-titles.

합하면 128km속도인데 운전자들이 살아있다니 헐..

Türkçe altyazı gelirse çok güzel olur

Most safe Chinese car is Chery amulet.

The production value of this series is insane. However the relative speed is not 128kmh as started in this video at 4:01. Mythbusters already corrected and proven this in a special episode.

Too slow, only 64kph? I'd expect it to be at least 50mph (80kph)

Volvo for life!

Great video, but incomplete. It's missing information on the injuries of the rear passengers

That poison gas venting to Model Y cabin is no good. And you could see that passenger whiplash was not survivable. But it is good to know that the low tire pressure alarm was working.

Tesla never wins in the test but always wins in reality.

Amazing!

頂尖對決

是哪个车结果比较好呢？

I am guessing this Tesla is a RWD version? If so we can expect it not to catch fire during a front collision as there's almost no HV parts in the front crump zone. However the result could be different if it's an AWD version with HV wires and motor at front. This type of textbook collision test would not be a problem to most Teslas or EVs. However some non-textbook accidents could be quite fatal. For example a road hazard that can deform the battery from bottom, or a T-bone collison. With today's Autopilot and collision prevention technologies front end collison is happening less and less often. Tests on EV fire safety should focus more on those type of non-textbook accidents. A little more explanation: Test designers should focus more on the nature of the vehicles. They are quite different. As an example on ICE cars it's very easy to increase range however not easy to increase power, so traditionally power is a top measure of an ICE car. However on EVs it's just the opposite -- it's very easy for EVs to increase power however quite difficult to increase range. So on EVs range becomes a top metric. Similarly on safety tests EVs with flat battery at bottom would perform completely different than ICE cars with engine in the front. This should be taken into consideration when designing the tests.

As a swedes and Tesla fan, Volvo i still nr1 in safety,

Obviously according to the explanations, the Volvo did better und would be able to sustain a crash at even higher speeds, whereas the (newer!) Model Y's structures were close to snapping completely

VOLVO BEST !!!! tesla beeee fuuuuu

$$$👍👍👍。

Stupid when using 2 cars with similar color, don’t understand what are you talking about about.

這種測試裡面放假人不夠準確啊 下次請真人下去做測試好嗎!

Tesla weighs thousands of pounds more then xc60 so it did really well

ahaha=)) if two cars collides at 64km/h each it doesn't sum up to 128km/h=)))) learn basic physics, China professionals... but so glamour....

Volvos platform of this car is from 2014 and doing this much better then Tesla. Crazy how good Volvo is. ❤ Volvo FOR LIFE!!!❤

Volvo car from Sweden are the best. Never buy one from outside Sweden.

Both cars did really well. I own both, but the X instead of Y.

Volvo will forever be the goat of cars.

Fantastic video! You should try an "old/new" car crash. I don't know how an 2010 Volvo S80 (for example) will perform in situations like this Thanks again!!

I am not a fan of tesla products and I don't trust their hype 😂

Amazing test, collected a lot of data and for us viewers it was a great show !

English please

Nice

Great. You are best👏👏💪. Love from Romania. 👏👏👏

8:30 шее кабздец

more cinematic than ncap 🗿

Should have run an XC90

Amazing test

很難得的實車測試，彌足珍貴。讚❤

you should compare model x if you take xc90, in other hand volvo has an engine, tesla - empty front😂

感谢分享❤

Can someone tell what drivetrain was in the XC60? I'm curious because of the weight comparison where they are so similar.

Good show 👍

One question regarding comment at 8:38, that Volvo rear seat belt pre-tension did not deploy. Is it a malfunction or by test design?

круть! жгите ещё!

If you ever get T-boned, pray and hope you are in a Volvo and not in a Lexus or any other car.

นี่ถ้าเทสล่าชนในความเร็วที่มากกว่านี้อาจเกิดการลุกไหม้ของแบ็ตเตอร์รี่

珍貴的影片、科學的實測👍👍👍👍👍 期待後續數據分析評測🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

这种速度碰撞，2车后排的乘客都死了（脖子脊椎都断了）

Seems like a paid advertisement from Volvo. The rear dummy moved so bad, there is no way it was getting better reads. The door was not opening properl, but had been explained...

Tesla 💪🏻

The Tesla dummies had better protection scores but the presenter argues the Tesla has some risk concerns..... Hmmm ok....

Add 10kmh and Tesla would be a meatball.

Which won?

Tesla's battery will explode in a similar crash at 80 km/h. The Tesla is plagued with errors.

TESLA best ........Volvo is Sh#t

When i saw this, i know already the rear passenger in Tesla died on the spot for cervical spine fractures. RIP TESLA

怎么不和相同是电车的小米su7对撞测试一下呢？