Maybe there should be ICC central contracts, especially for players in nations not in the big 3? Where say a Zimbabwean player gets paid from the ICC. With different levels of payment for their position in the team. So, the main players get x amount, fringe a different amount, and bonuses for performances. And have a payment for touring sides to cover costs.
It's amazing that for all the criticism American sports leagues get from outside the US they are so far ahead on the revenue sharing front. I think the Green Bay Packers in the NFL are always already in profit prior to the season starting just on account of revenue sharing.
Last idea, the big 3 should help support teams around them. For instance, England should help support Ireland, Scotland, and the Netherlands. India should help Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and Nepal. Australia should support WI and maybe Zimbabwe. I know they are really near Australia, but they are the ones that need the help
@@PoetofHateSpeech what joke? How many times Australia and england tour zimbabwe? Or even hosts bangladesh, Afganistan? It’s easy to blame BCCI on everthe truth is without BCCI money. Cricket wont survive. India alone generates 83% revenue.
Regarding Michael Pepper's fantastic 100 against Sussex, worth mentioning 19 year old Charlie Allison who scored 44 off 26 and shared in the match winning unbeaten 121 run partnership. Not 100% sure that Pepper will play for England, but there is no doubt that Allison will.
Success in their own backyard against very weak westindies side and poms getting berserk like they won everything. Calm down. England is still an average team. Can’t win against india and Australia. What kinda bazball is this where opposition hot 3 times more sixes than you.
@@priyanshuverma2749 no other team won or draw as many abroad series as india did. Don’t know how you label india as an average team after winning 2 consecutive BG in Australia, draw 5 match series in England. Look at what england and austria did in india they both lost.