@@mostlypostie1 I'd wait a little bit on these. They need to up quality control a little bit first. Just because one person says "same as bird" doesn't reflect other users comments. I don't think the price is a bargain either because it's micro-sized. Cost to manufacture is prob only 20% of what is sells for too. NAFTA is what killed good o'l USA Electronics engineering. Tired of crap imports ESPECIALLY FROM CHINA.
@@RogerBrenon let me clarify that. It is as accurate as a Bird 43, a brand new calibrated Spectrum Analyser, and a new LP-100a. Also, it's made in Australia. It's a quality device that has been in the market for a few years already. 73.
I've had one of these for about a year. What it really does for me is give me an indication my radio(s) and amp are working/responding as expected. I acknowledge the values may be/are off, but it still provides useful indications, especially peak-hold. I’m still liking and using the K-PO DX5000 plus I got from you almost two years ago. The DX5000 shines on FM and I can’t ever see buying another radio without NR. David E.
Hi Mike. I have the exact same meter here. And i really like it. I find it accurate as well . Best 73s hope to talk to you on the band again soon . WR456🇬🇧 Richy.
Thank you for this Mike. I have been eying this meter and the big "true peak" MFJ meter. My only requirements are a decent powered pep reading and swr readings for 6m too.
I have a 901 for a while, I do like it. I think there is a delay adjustment on the back for the peak and hold function. I could be wrong. If it does, I never messed with mine. It does have to have power for the PEP function to work, and on mine I think it has to be on AVG for it to read SWR. Or maybe I have that backwards? I got it for under 180$ a few yrs ago for the larger scale. I still have my CN-501H which is inline currently, it does have a PEP/AVG but no hold. Its good from 1.3-150mhz Its has the smaller scale. It seems to be a little more "accurate" in its readings VS the 901. But like your saying, great for a monitoring device that's "fairly" close. Now come to think of it, I may have the 901 HP and not the HP3? I'll have to look now..lol Its packed away from a previous relocate/move. This might be the difference in that powered Peak hold, no swr reading function? and they changed it so it does (HP3)
In theory it sounds doable. But in reality the Diawa meter is not designed to be as accurate as a LP 100A. Same as when people say they calibrate a meter to a bird 43p. You can't recalibrate a meter with a poorly designed peak detection circuit to a meter with a quality peak detection circuit.
I got a small MFJ meter like that. reads about the same. maybe a tad better. I don't care about precise numbers. the reflect power to me with the power forward has more info to me on how my antenna is doing. just a glance tells me if radio power or reflect is bad. 73'
Nice meter , I have a MFJ 30- 3000 and it seems to act funny . Seems to be fine on peak , but when I push the average power button it goes crazy and makes my radio go off frequency. Any ideas ? Not to much money but has me wanting a new one . 73ZZzzz Sir love your videos
Yes the calibration is lacking. +/- 10% really isn't the best. It does work how it's intended based on its specification. I think the Ameritron meter I mentioned in the video is a more accurate meter from my experience.
Dosey test center lol, I had one, and what a can of mess that was , I got 2 bird meters and definitely love the LP 100, well you have to start somewhere lol
I used to use a Dosy Test Center in my younger days. If only they would put a real peak circuit in those meters. They do look great, but they don't measure peak power.
