(November 24th, 2018) A unbelievable, record-setting 7-overtime night condensed into less than 30 minutes as the Aggies finally beat LSU. I do not own any of this video. It is the property of ESPN and the SEC Network.
Brilliant editing work. This was real work to crunch a near 5hr game in to less than 30min. Epic game! One of the best roller coaster rides I've ever been on. Thanks
I was at this game. It was fantastic! We didn't get out of the stadium till midnight and I didn't get back to Houston until almost 3AM. Both teams played great. If Burrow wasn't the QB it wouldn't have been close. He kept LSU in the game. Hell of a player! Gig 'em Ags!!
Hey Woodland, when will the full condensed game be up? I know its a lot of work, because the game went on forever, but I am really looking forward to it, as I imagine a lot of other people are, because I don't have SEC Network. Thanks, and keep up the good work!!
I know LSU got tired of hearing Rodgers name. Lol. Good game tho. I didn't know the Aggies had won until a coworker told me and of course i went straight to RU-vid highlights
They can rush for the 2 but you really wouldn't want to unless you were within a yard like in 7OT. Unfortunately they got called for false start and had to revert to a pass play.
@JbBoss I wouldn't say it's riskier, just less likely to get it in. Passings is always seen as riskier because an interception can happen. Rushing will get fewer yards though which is why you wouldn't rush on a 2 unless you're within inches.
Marion Church lol yeah. Considering ncaaf is only really watched and followed by us Americans and the absolute plethera of sports out there across the globe.. well yeah you get the idea.
is it just me or was that really PI on the last 2pt conv. try for Texas AM. Looked to me the WR grabbed the DB and if so I'd be pretty upset to like the DB was. I think the refs decided one way or another the game wasn't going into another OT' lol. That said what a game and Congrats to Texas AM for pulling out one heck of a win from what looked at the end of the 4th to be a sure Defeat. I remember turning the game of when I saw the pick, boy did I miss a hell of a finish, SMH mad props to Texas AM for never giving up...
Yes Brandon, I did!. At church the next morning someone told me the Aggies won. "They did not" I said, "I watched the game and they lost". "No, the score was 74, to 72." "You must mean a basketball game" "No, that was the football game". "Who do you think you are fooling?" "No, Mond's knee was down, there was no interception". "Oh no ... I missed the greatest game ever played"!
That rule means if the clock is stopped at less than 3 seconds. Since the clock was stopped at 3 seconds after the first down, then it is a legal spike.
You would have been correct a couple years ago, but they made a change to that. This is the rule as of 2017. It was a legal spike. "If the clock is stopped with three or more seconds remaining in a quarter, and the clock will start on the Referee’s signal, the Offense may spike the ball and if executed properly could have time remaining for another play. If the clock is stopped with 2 or 1 seconds in a quarter and will start on the Referee’s signal, there is only enough time for one more play."
Why did A&M try a 2-point conversion on the 5th OT when they could have easily broken the tie by kicking a PAT? Somebody, PLEASE explain the logic...or complete lack thereof.
Brucev7 30 points isn’t that much and that what each team had at the end of regulation. Both were gassed by OT. Big 12 gives up 100 points combined by end of regulation.
Cinema 6R good to see that gator fans are certified experts. Oh and no, no it wasn’t. Ball was clearly moving after the catch. There was no control. There is absolutely nothing there to suggest that call would have been overturned.
Robert Byrd you need to watch the full game. The ball was wobbling in his arms the whole time. Not to mention it is a 50/50 call and there is absolutely no way they would overturn that. There is no indisputable evidence he ever gained possession.
@@BoomerG21 nope you can't see through the receiver. It was belatedly called an incompletion, which cannot be challenged. If it had been properly called a fumble, that could be challenged by Fisher. But the fumble would not have been over turned.
Robert Byrd do your homework. Steve Shaw agreed that the catch was incomplete and confirmed the call was reviewed and the review indicated the exact same thing. Receiver never had control. The director of officials agrees that you’re making a lot of excuses.
I remember after this game everyone was mad about “he didn’t get a first down did you see the yellow line” and mad because kellen had his knee down. 🤷♂️ Sorry guys you lost and no amount of complaining can change that
I'm a Clemson fan, so of course I want our win our A&M to look better, but seriously...how much did the aggies pay those refs? There was NO way LSU was leaving Kyle field with the win on that night....
which call are you talking about? I agree that there were a lot of close calls, but I didn't think any of them were bad calls, and an ex-NFL official said they were all legitimate calls. Lucky for A&M? Sure. But there was no paying the refs lol.
From NCAA Rule book: he must maintain complete and continuous control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or in the end zone. This is also required for a player attempting to make a catch at the sideline and going to the ground out of bounds. If he loses control of the ball which then touches the ground before he regains control, it is not a catch. Replay showed it they got the call right.
What happened in 19 and 21 and will happen in 23? 🐯🐯🐯🐯 oh we have national titles y’all ain’t won shit even with all them great recruiting classes including the best class of all time
