That 90's Show is utterly bizarre... 

Seems normal to me. Anything you might want to see has to be on different channels to increase the flow of your cash out of your wallet. It's like a law or something.

Whenever netflix makes a reboot or sequel to something, they dont have the original. Because then you'd watch the original.

They have it on the uk Netflix

@@errorsinconduct this made sense lol that's why it looks like a different kind of show

@@errorsinconduct Except when it's an anime remake but anime is animation so it's for kids and it's safe to make a remake. That's my best shot to figure out their logic behind it.

They will be 16 in new series

I think they're thinking long-term as per usual with modern things. So down the line they will probably grow faster in that universe than in that 70's show

Agreed, they seemed to be making the spinoff more kid friendly. While some of the acting felt straight out of a Disney or Nickelodeon sitcom, they got more comfortable in their roles as the show progressed.

They were also 17 for like 2 years. So starting them a bit younger makes a bit more sense.

Older? They were high schoolers at the beginning of that 70s show and they are the same age at the beginning of this. Also it wouldn't make sense for them to be older based on when it starts and how old Leia is. Donna already has to have to been pregnant with her relatively soon after the end of the original. And before anyone says they could have started it later in the 90s: that's deliberate so they can keep the show running for multiple seasons like that 70s show where each season for this show is a summer

I don´t think thats that big of an issue, the main cast is brand new and probably havent worked together before, how could they have chemestry, without knowing each other? Also I think the later episodes of the season are quite entertaining, maybe not as entertaining as 70s, but again its a new cast and new writers. I´d like to see the series develop for at least another one or two seasons . I think it might be/become a good show.

Sad. The clips look so funny with the original cast. Too bad they didn't focus on the original cast, where they are years later, and just have some kids as background characters. I'm afraid that this is going to be more of a rip-off of that 70s show but with some cameos by original actors, much like the sequel star wars movies, ironically.

@@davidm4566 some jokes are funny, but i don't know if it's the script, the actors, the directing or a mix of all of the above, but most of times feels forced, with the original cast it really feels like they were friends or hanged out pretty much since the start of their show

@@nichubi2822 you don't have to know someone to have chemistry with them. I doubt the original cast knew each other that well before the pilot of that 70's. But when it's there, it's there. When it's not, it's awkward.

@@nichubi2822 the only thing is like the show had to be more censored because of current times, so it feels very disney like... before, that 70s show was racist, misogynistic, and lots of drugs... I still think they did a good job for their first season.

So true. I wish I could like your comment 500 times.

A lot of TV and movies feel that way now. Like studios hired a bunch of kid writers to save money without anyone experienced leading the writing room.

I’d watch that instead of this Disney-eque nonsense.

And be more expensive

100%. all the fans just wna see the OG cast

Yess!! I’m not a huge fan of watching the “new gen” of sequels. I don’t care about the kids I want my og cast 🤣

Except, not really. The whole point of That 70's show, was what it was like to grow up in the 70's. A 90's show about 40 year olds, would just be what, Friends? lol

tbf it is all these actors first major role so the feeling will probably improve with more seasons

I’m going to give them a chance and hope the show and acting gets better in season 2. Sitcoms usually have bleh acting and ups and downs in the show during the first season. So I hope Netflix doesn’t count it out like it usually does with sitcoms after season 1

It's easier for 18 year olds in the 90s to act like they're in the 70s than it is for teens in 2020 to act like they're in the 90s.

@@Mason-is4mr for real. Probably because of how much we progressed in those 20 years

I think that was intentional, they are trying to get some viewers from Disney

Tbf her name is Leia Anne. Leia Tatooine was a joke.

@@nifferwolf Not that Eric agreed with that.

Well whaddaya know, context matters! 😅

@@SmallSpoonBrigade I am sure that Donna didn't care.

Leia is still a dumb name knowing why he named her that (no offense to actual Leia's) I get that Eric loved Star Wars but I feel like he definitely would have been shot down by Donna who kept him grounded. It just feels dumb that Eric and Donna, who were not stupid, would be the parents to name their kid after a Fictional charcater.

Kitty still looks the same too :0

IKR 🤣🤣🤣

He's a vampire.

Man still gets carded buying beer ngl

Yeah, Eric & Kitty look the exact same. & of course Mila & Ashton aged like fine wine, they both just got better with time

Good point. It would need to be produced by 80s babies.

yes exactly!

That's it exactly.

Me, my brother & our mother watched that 70s Show. My mom loved it because of how damn accurate it was. She naturally grew up during the 70s. The props, themes, slang, references, etc., were so on point. She'd get so excited & laugh & say "I remember that!" With this show, it really is like they saw Girl Meets World & thought "Yea. We can do that." I noticed how on That 70s Show 97% of the music was from the 70s. They ended That 90s Show's season finale with Kids in America... which was the 80s. Not mention I noticed a distinct lack of butterfly clips in this, lol.

Oh yeah. I grew up in the 90s and...that's so absolutely not it.

I definately enjoyed the first season, but Kitty and Red really did carry the show. Personally I hope they get enough seasons for the new characters to improve, so the show can feel like more than just a That 70's Show reunion.

They definitely carried the old show after a lot of the main cast left. The writers at least knew that Kitty and Red would be the biggest draw for fans of the original to come back.

I said the same thing the pilot was very flat but Red and Kitty definitely carried lmao overall it was cute but it would’ve been better if it just focused on the old characters and gave the kids like side stories I give it like a C- 😂

*their

I feel like Topher Grace seriously stood out he was the one that was acting PERFECTLY, as if no time passed. That was talent. Like he just didn't miss a beat or was awkward with a single line. chef's kiss

That joke has layers since Hyde's actor is one of them.

​@@dansmith1661 you spell his nsme wrong, his name is Rapeist

Couldn't agree more ❤

Never got what the big deal was about the show until I started watching it. So many old sitcoms get an "eh" from me but this one actually clicked. Enjoying every episode.

I can't really watch it now, without thinking about Hyde being a rapist, and Donna and Kelso and Jackie sticking up for him in RU-vid videos.

Smoking weed and talking about sex?

@@healthiswealth1452 It was Disney acting and fake awkwardness.

@@Aster_Risk not sure what disney acting is.. Its typical sitcom acting, with references to drugs and sex in every episode

I looked it up the reason they bring that energy is because the group of kids are literally all kids except for on of the guys who's 18 everyone else is 15-17 years old.

@@danielpruitt8550 i know, and I've got no issue with the actors, but it's worth noting that Mila Kunis was 14 when she starred on the original show, and she absolutely lived her role from start to finish

Donna surprised him by dressing up as Leia once before they slept together lol

TBH, all these years, I never disliked Eric Forman until he addressed his daughter, "Leia Tattooine Forman..." and BAM just like that I really saw his dopey face and blank eyes and understood Red's disgust for his son completely.

to be fair, Eric said in the original show he wants to name his kids Luke and Leia

It's actually really common for people to name their kids after ex girlfriends/boyfriends, so it not that odd, in my opinion

@@JP-ve7or oh my god lmfao

Exactly

Yeah, maybe it's me, but I don't recall "hooked us up" as something one would say in that time.

That 70s show was closer to how 90s teenagers where lmao. I remember in the 90s teenagers smoke cigarettes where more homophobic and rebellious 😂😂😂. This gen Z Disney show is horrible 😂😂

It’s not that it’s just back in the 90s and 2000s writers had more freedom now they basically have to adhere to certain social constructs

@@geekbro6265 That's why 90s show seems even more cheesy and fake, these kids act like 2020 zoomers in the 1990s. Any millennials know how things would be like if there was friend group that has a fat gay kid.

@@geekbro6265I think they still have freedom I mean look at euphoria or even grownish the writings just bad

Bold of u to assume writers EVER knew how to write teens

​@@Sarah_9132 characters on that 70s show are relatable and they remind me of my own friends, does that not make them well written or is it deeper than that?

I was a fan. They had their share of cringe moments back in the day. Leia socially is like Eric lol. I'm hoping the longer it goes on the better and smoother the new kids will get.

During the first season of That 70s Show, many of the young actors had little acting experience, and they got criticized for smirking when someone made a joke. But that actually gave the show realism.

@@NJGuy1973 too bad modern writers/directors/editors don't understand charm

I felt this too. The show was always such a vibe. It perfectly captures a bunch of teens hanging around doing the same old thing. It's feels so natural. Like they've really been friends for decades and this is just another day. And maybe becuase I saw the show when I was 6 for the first time, but the cast was just insanly cool. They weren't really popular or outcast, just a really cool group of kids. The only show in the last 10 years that's captured teenage interactions perfectly is grand army.

kids are too young, the original cast were already in their early 20's (except jackie) they had years of acting experience already.

Fez was hands down the best part of this show 😻😻

leia i can see that, but jay? nah he looks nothing like jackie or kelso

The instant I saw the trailer I went "Red and kitty are gonna be the best part".

That chick playing Leia looks nothing like Eric or Donna

@@misssteak1290 yeah I noticed that too

I think it's worth noting how corporate heavy-handedness in recent media has taken a toll on these creative processes (directing, writing, editing) as well. We have generated media for adults and teens/children that is shaped more by investor returns than entertainment. While I am aware that this has been true throughout this history of film/television, its just so much more obvious.

You need to give them some space to grow my friend instead of twisting their lemon about everything! How the Huckleberry do you expect them to get better when they have to deal with so much pressure?

@@NotoriousLightningOkay….

@@shayla106 That's not cool what you just did. Dismissing people like that can really hurt their feelings, my friend! Fortunately I'm made of sterner stuff, but you need to think about this stuff before going postal as they say.

You're literally judging a 10 episode show. Not only that, but the kids in that 70s show literally grew up together since they were really young. Like kindergarten I believe. Imagine if the creators of that 70s show said they had 10 episodes to tell their story. It would have been way, way different, there's no time to really develop any characters. And I said before it's easier for 18 year olds in the 90s to act like they're in the 70s than it is for 18 year olds in 2023 to act like they're in the 90s. Plus they're actually younger actors, and they did get better by the end of the season, which in terms of progression, is better than the acting 10 episodes in the first season of that 70s show.

@@Mason-is4mr That's what he does dude.... its like the whole point of his channel. Watch movies/tv shows and judge them and make entertaining commentary. If you don't like it, watch something else. OR maybe you're just taking offense cause you enjoy the show and he didn't

Ikr

Agreed, same with Alex's review of "Girl Meets World." He showed some clips from the original show to prove just how superior it was! 😍

9:11 what happened?

@@isaacgodby9848 Hyde's actor, Danny Masterson, got arrested for having sexually assaulted many women, and his trial was on around the same time this show was produced and filmed.

@@trinaq K Thanks.

Probably because these are kids and only young one in og was mila.

Yeah agreed. I like alot of the new cast (Lelia, and the siblings most) but they definitely could do more bonding outside the show to build up that legendary chemistry the OG cast had!

When watching That 70s Show, I really feel that the cast didnt get into their groove until mid way through season 2. In season one, of the kids, Topher and Danny were the only ones that could actually act. Mila and Laura were terrible early on. And Ashton and Wilmer were not very good either. But, they got better. So I think its only fair to give this new cast some time. The acting and the chemistry will most likely get much better the more they work together.

I feel like the chemistry is much better in season 1 of 90's than it was in season 1 of 70's

To be fair, the new cast has a lot more pressure to meet the nostalgia standard. The old cast didn't really have that.

I mwan 70s mostly felt like the 70s becuase most of us were not alive in the 70s. We have reference for the 90s but i think they did a decent job

Definitely doesn't help that that 90's show uses sets from that 70's show...

Yes, a recent show that is set in the 90’s and really feels like it is Everything Sucks (I’m still mad at Netflix for cancelling it)

Seems pretty woke for the 90s

First of all i guarantee a small town in Wisconsin doesn’t have as much diversity as they have in this new cast.

Uhhh no, the first episode was best. Or least worst. Then all the old characters barely appear and they go into character development of the new empty characters with fake laugh tracks behind every cringe line.

Bruh it felt like Disney Channel

Im at episide 2 and allready im pondering if i will make it to episode 3...

Yeah it did not get better. I thought there were very little differences between Gwen and the new 'Jackie' and their characters were both boring anyway. The main character is not a good person since she cant decided if she likes boy A and then suddenly has a connection with boy B (cant remember names lol) (Actually felt a smidge more chemistry between Leia and Boy B and wish they'd just started with them to begin) Boy A couldn't seem to figure out what stereotype he was doing. He was the smart kid but also a Kelso... So acting dumb and making stupid choices but doing well in school.... I wasn't really getting it. And the rest of the characters were kinda forgettable. I only laughed when the old characters came back.

I thought the same. I was telling my friend this reminds me of late 2000s Nickelodeon or Disney!

i'm 19, i loved that 70s show and rewatched the crap out of it, i wasn't expecting much out of this. i immediately noped out after the first gwen and leia scene

@Maximus_W it rly did give off some i carly vibes. Hopefully, by s2, the cast gets more adjusted into their roles and the jokes hit better. I remember the first couple eps of 70s show had some p corny as hell moments as well

It's filmed like a sitcom but the acting feels forced and hackey, which afds to the nick at night feel. There's moments when the teens act like real kids that show potential but then it's goes back to "OMG look how zany we are it's the 90s." I was expecting a my so called life, Dawson's creek type of vibe but it feels like a one off live reunion.

@@thechuube8442 I'm curious too, pilots and early season 1 of almost every show ever are nowhere near the quality the show ends up being

The new show was pretty decent for an og watcher, but you really cant beat the original show. Literally every main characters acting is incredible, and their timing for being so young is amazing, they seem like seasoned actors. Especially Kelso and Eric

I'm a fan of That's 70's show and I was hating just this 11 minutes of the new show. The old actors still have their chemstry and charm, but the new ones are stiff and spouting alot of word vomit instead of actual real dialogue.

@@Cloud-dt6xb they are kids... relax a bit

@@nbassasin8092 No word vomit means all of their dialogue is overly long and convoluted, which leads to the scenes feeling like their dragging out. Which is not good writing especially for a comedy where timing is a key factor. I'm not mad at the kid actors I'm mad at the crap writing. The older actors still have the snappy timing and chemstriy in their dialogue which makes me think they were allowed to improv alot.

@@Cloud-dt6xb Fair, I thought the hating and the stiff parts were directed towards the kids. I am not saying they are amazing, far from it, but they have a lot of time to develope

That doesn't explain the lack of chemistry between the actors. The actors of 90s show were just as new to each other as the actors of That 70s Show. Fez was a new friend to them, but the chemistry was still there.

This ! 👏👏👏

I agree. When I was watching it I was trying to give it a break by thinking that the 70s show was not the greatest piece of tv ever and the reason why it was so good was because of the vibe and how they captured it. Nothing about the new show feels like it's about the 90s. literally nothing. Im not asking for references out the wazoo, but that 70s show you knew it was the 70s.

@@seth1665 The 90s reference felt super forced and in the realm of Family Guy's "remember that time" style. In the original I felt like the call backs and vision sequences actually played a purpose, but this time around it felt like they were trying to seem cool by just being knowledgeable? IDK, even the 90210 reference felt super forced and weird. Another issue I found, which nobody is talking about, is the fact that the show REALLY doesn't lend itself to the binge format. With That 70s Show, airing weekly actually helped it feel like REAL time passed with the characters. If Jackie said something like "It's been a week since Hyde and I broke up" you actually felt it because it HAD been a while since we last saw the characters. That 90s Show tried to do the same, but since we all binged it in a day or 2, it threw the pacing off imho. Sure, there were through lines in the plot, but I almost wish they did weekly releases. If they did, then maybe the **SPOILERS** cliffhanger with Leia and Nate wouldn't have felt so forced and out of nowhere since the audience hadn't JUST seen her with Jay in the previous episode. I still liked the show, and I hope it gets a solid 4-5 seasons (long haul by today's standards), but they for sure need to make it feel more 90s going forward. And if you want a great show that really felt like the 90s, I highly recommend "High School" on Amazon Freevee.

Bruh that’s expressive as hell and they didn’t have the biggest budget.

@@tayawalter4741 I was with you till you said you wanted 4- 5 seasons 🤦🏾😹

episodes were 20 minutes this one each episode is an hour

It's like a poorly engineered rollercoaster just flopping up and down with no suspense or emotion whatsoever. I mean in the TINY amount of time they were allotted they decided to rush a relationship from cringy flirting to mad obsessive infatuation to then have it crash and burn. Only for it to resurface and settle and finally have it capsize and board a new ship (to follow an apt metaphor there lmao) as the credits roll. It is such inexcusable, sloppy and lazy excuse for writing. I understand that they possibly had time constraints and want to make a bombshell plot impact upon the first season to lure people in and convince Netflix producers it was not a waste of money, but it spends absolutely no time developing character, it doesn't even subtly try to speed it up it straight up rams it from 0 to 60 without warning into a wall. I mean even the immediate switch from what's-her-name (example of how unmemorable the characters are) and Leia becoming "best friends", followed by a petty argument leading to an obviously ephemeral seperation and are immediately back to being as thick as thieves. The whole point of the show is lost on me, it seems to have thrown 100 shots in the dark and missed every target audience in a futile attempt to appease them all. The bad acting, writing/pacing, awkward laugh tracks and induced awkwardness holds it back... in other words EVERYTHING. Literally the only salvageable thing here (maybe) is the concept. If executed entirely differently it may work... but even then it feels like the main cast were mentally checked ou from the get-go, and I wasn't convinced of their roles and characters like I was in the past. Especially Donna and Michael + Jackie... felt like they were there for courtesy to the seminal point in their respective careers or a hefty wad of cash. Either way I am sad it was so poorly executed and I will 100% finish it, for research purposes, no fr it may get slightly better but I doubt it with such a weaksauce first season.

I think it's like an extended pilot. I think if we get a season 2 it will be a lot more "situated"

@@imanevilbunneh whatt? each episode was like 20-30 mins

@iLLest Villain great take I usually dint read long comments but that was pretty good

Yea but the only thing would be that there’s no way Topher Grace would do it

@@israelrocha2878 why? Because he doesn't have time?

A full season of him as a father would be great for his career, if they did it properly. Honestly it'd be great for all the 70s casts careers. Even the ones who are doing incredibly.

i personally had enough of Eric the first time around. why is there a problem with having a whole new set of characters? It's refreshing.

Eric and Laurie were my absolute favorite characters! The Formans are epic! I would love to see the show around them and Eric being married to Donna (Even though I love him equally on Home Economics)

Nobody asked

Weed loses half it's potency in just 5 years, and that's if it's dried and stored properly - i.e. in air tight glass containers in a climate controlled space. Stored in an old paper bag hidden in a board game box in a musty attic or basement? Yea, that stuff is gonna be as weak as smoking herbal tea, and that's assuming mold and mildew didn't destroy it.

yeah as a stoner myself (i live in a legal state) if i let weed sit for even a month without smoking it, it gets nasty and less potent

I did like the upstairs circle 🤣 you're upstairs people now 🤣 the old cast were classic!

Yeah the only reason it was good was Red Kitty and the original cast making appearances.

I agree its the same thing i said. It definitely gets better as the season went on. They made the cast different enough that it dont feel like oh this just that 70s show all over again. I think we want copies of the old so much we dont give things chance to evolve i was laughing straight through

I totally agree too, I genuinely laughed at some scene, I wasn't bothered by the old cast not really coming back, the new kids are all very charming and have good character traits, some have more chemistry then others, but I liked seeing new faces, and old places / characters I loved !! Yes, some dialogues were corny, but I absolutely didn't mind, the actors look their age (because they actually are) thank you Netflix for putting teen as teen!! Also; I loved the cameo, Brian Austin Green and Jim Rash were so fun to watch. But like, the hightlight is Kitty and Red, they didn't age a single bit and they are so fun to watch play off of each other

They already *minor spoilers* had Kitty become the school nurse, so Leia is most likely going to attend school and live with Kitty/Red, not just visit. The cast really grew on me after about four episodes in. I enjoyed it pretty well. No major red flags on production either which was a good sign

Not if people keep beign overly negative about season 1. It's Netflix remember that, they'll only continue the show is they see enough dollar signs potential

And that one did alright both in terms of fan service and in terms of making it into multiple seasons. I'm a bit curious why they opted for Eric and Donna to have a daughter, but I can't imagine it really mattering too much, but it does allow for some different plot lines in the future.

Precisely, all of the new kids are actual teenagers, and they really got the awkward vibe down well. I can't wait to see how they'll grow in new potential seasons.

i only really like Leia. all of the other teens feel pretty flat and one dimensional. plus leia's actress definitely is the best out of the bunch. she makes the character's schtick work pretty well. but just watching the pilot and episode 2 and the season preview that comes on after the pilot, i really don't care for the other characters. it seems like they really don't change.

The original cast weren't awkward in the beginning though they all played their characters well. Big difference between a Fresh Prince Will Smith who's role was played the way it was portrayed because it was his first acting gig, and just bad acting.

Agree. They’re kids actually played by kids-I kinda liked that they were a little awkward instead of having euphoria/gossip girl style teenagers.

I thought the new kids were fine except for the asian kid. His lines nor his deliveries were funny to me at all. Gwen was meh but not annoying like the other kid. The other couple I thought was funny and played well off of each other, same with Jay and Leia.

I was kind of disappointed that the show seemed to have forgotten about Laurie

@@justwannafreefx9419 That’s an issue I had with the handling of the original cast in general, which I really picked up on when Kitty sees Pastor Dave in the adult section of the video store. They’re constantly taking jabs at and undoing growth from the previous series. Kelso is back with Jackie after she abused him, and he had learned to grow up and take responsibility for his life through his daughter and Brooke. Jackie apparently is back to being just as awful as she was in the early seasons of That 70s Show, negating her growth in the later seasons. Fez’s heart and innocence is completely stripped, leaving a sleaziness to everything he does and says. He feels more like Barney from How I Met your Mother. Hyde and Laurie aren’t even mentioned. It goes on, and the original series had its share of disrespecting characters, (R.I.P Charlie) But I’d prefer the show to make more efforts to show how the original cast has improved for the better, as opposed to devolving them, or keeping them pathetically the same.

@@justwannafreefx9419 I'm not sure how they're going to handle that as one of the two actresses that played her died. Unlike the other cast members that died, only one of the actresses who played her died, so whatever they do is going to be kind of a knock at one of them.

@@SmallSpoonBrigade I mean isn't it strange that it's 4th of July and one kid has brought the entire family but the other kid isn't even mentioned? It's not going to be easy, but I'm sure there are ways to address this I felt this particularly hard in the episode where Red helps the blonde lady (can't remember her name) ride a bike. It felt like the perfect opportunity for something genuine and heartfelt, where he could help another woman who was so much like his daughter. Just one mention of her would have made it so much more rewarding

@@travis_mitchell yeah I feel like they just watched the first two seasons of that 70s show and built it all around that almost.

Allegedly. He hasn't been proven guilty

Fez was proven guilty for his past but he was in it Danny should've had a cameo

@@tlbryant4697 what was he convicted for?

@@stephengrigg5988 He was breaking labor laws. Not giving breaks and not paying people. That was in 2015. I just think it's bs that Danny has not been proven guilty for anything. I think it's the church of scientology purposely using false accusations to diminish his acting career

There is absolutely no way that I believe Leia wouldn't have at some point met Jay before this. Like even if for some reason Eric and Donna didn't stay friends at all with Kelso and Jackie they would have at least had their kids that are the same age play together as kids or hang out at some holiday function or something. (Maybe they do say that at some point, I also haven't finished it.)

Gwen and nate are siblings, nate and jay have been friends for 12 years, nate and Nikki have been dating for 6 months, Gwen met Ozzie in detention the previous year. I enjoyed it. I feel like it should have been set in 97 or 98 instead of 95 but that's for continuity. I would have also liked to have seen the "romance" "will they, won't they" dragged out to the season finale

I had the same feeling. She just met these people and, all of the sudden, they're her best friends, she wants to live with her grandparents so she can hang out in their drafty basement. The only reason to watch is for Red and Kitty and the cameos from the original cast.

Gwen is the absolute WORST🙄 she's the only one that didn't grow on me.

@@divinelyprotected144 Gwen is okay by me, especially considering she lets Leia know that being herself is enough when they first met. But my worst pick is definitely Ozzie. They just haddd to make the gay character corny as hell..though I do love the scene with him and Kitty!

@Cee Lee I hate ozzy so much. He just sits there being snarky and obnoxious. I mean yeah, that's a lot of 14 year olds. Doesn't make it nice to watch.

@@johnindigo5477 Yes! I'm really hoping they add more depth to his character if they make season two. But mostly all we got so far is Snarky Comment, Gay Comment, rinse and repeat.

I agree completely. The pilot especially made me think I might not enjoy the show but I got more and more invested the further I got into the show. Watching literal children in sexual situations made me feel very uncomfortable, however. I feel that if they used older actors and aged up the characters a couple of years it would’ve improved things a lot.

And Red and Kitty will still be in it

that 2010s show

@@Shiirow NOOOOO

@Don't Read My Profile Photo 🤓

Leia was pretty good in my opinion I could see how in 2 3 seasons once she's grown into the role more.

i hate the jokes

Ehh the whole younger cast got better as time went on. Took about till episode 7 where they stop over acting. Idk felt like the old show and I liked it. Hope it gets a season two.

I agree with Alex of the chemistry of the actors, in that 90's show is just not there. It feels they are reciting and the laugh tracks just make it worse. Some times the joke lands but usually for it didn't. Though Rex an Kitty killed it ❤

Easily impressed.

@@UltrafineDeluxe no, just more positive than most :)

Because filming a TV show in the 90s was astronomically different than filming a TV show in 2020

It doesn’t feel like that 90’s though. There’s very few 90’s references now. It seems like a shoe horned show of modern references placed in the 90’s

Except Mila who was like 14 when she auditioned and lied about her age lol.

Same! It felt too short. I was enjoying it so much .

@@mothergaia549 for sure! I think the cast being awkward is normal because of their ages and characters

@nathanhoodie7334 best thing is that they weren't too reliant on the cameos

@@cky7765 true!

Same

I am a big fan of that 70's show and this new show was painful to watch. I am sure it was written for a pre-teen Disney crowd

I haven't seen it yet but I actually like the comparison. I was a fan of 70s show and I like that the kids are doing similar things to what the previous cast did. I think it will age okay if it's given a chance. 😁

I think it would of worked better if they actually used the original cast more than they did

so you had to sit through the entire season until it starts to get funny? Not really a good thing for a sitcom

I totally agree, the characters and friendship felt forced in the beginning of the reboot but it did get better! As a fan of the og too, I loved the character build for Fez, Red and Kitty

@@Zahok1 it’s like ten 20 min episodes, not much to “get through”

@@anonelle28 It's not a reboot.

@@Zahok1 Nah, it really only feels like that for the first episode or 2, after that it got a lot better.

Fun fact the PlayStation was made out of spite

Good is a matter of opinion. It feels very much like what I was personally doing that summer in roughly the same part of the country, so I'm going to be in favor of it, even if people with less of a connection don't care for it. I do think it's worth recognizing that not everything needs to be for everybody and there's probably more episodes that will drop later this year, so who knows where it goes from here. This is probably just the start and the start of That 70's Show wasn't really that great.

@Don't Read My Profile Picture we never wanted to

Was it?

Weirder than the 70s?

the 80s was the weirdest, bar none

As a 90's kid this is not the 90's.

Yessss... Finally😂🙊

Precisely, it felt like they were trying to go for a shock, cliffhanger ending, but it just felt too out of left field!

she had more chemistry with gwyn tbh. if they wanted to pull a love triangle outta nowhere it woulda made more sense / been more interesting if it was between leia, gwyn, and jay

Here's a better question, Red and Kitty caught the kids with pot in the orignal show. How come they did'nt sweep the basement for more when everyone finally moved out? Red especially would've done that once Hyde left.

That's why it's so weird Netflix doesn't own it. Isn't half the point of rebooting that you spike views of the og?