There are no emergency powers granted by constitution for ANY suspension of constitutional restraints on government. Those in government who pretend to impose such preposterous suspensions have perjured their oath and make war on the People. The People must remove them IMMEDIATELY from office. Failure to do so is an unwarranted further breach of the peace and enables others to indulge in such tyranny. This is not a partisan issue. Fidelity to the Constitution is not optional. IT IS MANDATORY.
They started with the lock down and masks. They are testing to see how far they can control the people. I don't know any legal gun owner that's gotta give their guns up
Heck I'm sitting on porch, carrying. If me or my daughter could afford a firearm for her she would be carrying too. Can't be too safe in Albuquerque nowadays
I live in Texas and I can walk around without being armed. I actually don’t live too far from Albuquerque, but I also didn’t know it was that dangerous there. I’ve heard about their not so good cops with the Public, better to stay here instead. It is a shame that people feel they have to be armed. Texas has Constitutional Carry, which now kinda makes you Carry, when you normally wouldn’t. Like, let’s get ready for Church and spread Jesus’s love and message, but let me get my gun, because Jesus might not be there to save me. That is a typical false trust in God that most of us have. But I know strong men who don’t carry because they fear God more than Man, and you never see anyone bothering them. Their protector is better than Smith, Wesson, Ruger, Winchester, or others.
You're a little given to drama, aren't you yeah you are. But you can't find any urgency about a rapist lifelong criminal, cheat and traitor heading toward your party's nomination for 2024, can you. 😂😂😂
If New Mexico residents allow her to get away with this, the door will be wide open for her to step on more rights in the future as she chooses…SHE’s NOT A “MONARCH”. She swore an oath that she is now violating… IMPEACH her now!
Her executive order is in blatant disregard for Bruen. She needs to be held accountable for stripping the God-given rights of millions away with the stroke of a pen
It's sad that you get more upset about not being able to carry a gun (in a place where you'll never need one) than you do about the carnage all the guns produce. Catch22. More guns more shooting 🔫
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
so true. it only matters when it affects them and their beliefs, like guns are a god given right . . . and NO they are not. your rights can be taken away. given how you rejects been acting the past 20 years, Id say its about god damn time! @@robertirvine6307
@@robertirvine6307uhm, literally in this video. And forever ago. Yet Dems.... clearly, hate the 1st and 2nd amendment. So...... no need to argue those facts.
When the NM governor was asked if criminals would stop carrying guns on the streets of Albuquerque for 30 days she replied no. Law abiding gun owners are Not the Ones Who Are Committing the Crimes.
A 'good guy' doesn't feel the need to walk around in public carrying an AR or a Glock. Mentally disturbed people do this and mentally disturbed people are morally unpredictable.
Not the lawful gun owners again. How about going after criminals and soft on crime prosecutors, DA's, and judges. Get criminals off our streets, and out of our government.
This is the dumbest argument I've ever heard. The armed security guards and secret service are licensed to carry with strong controls on safeguards when storing, have undergone background checks, and have an incredible amount of training. They exemplify the epitome of what the Left wants to see for gun regulations.
@@IRNoahBody the constitution states we have the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. She has no right to take that away therefore, she is the criminal not the law abiding 2nd amendment citizens.
shall not be infringed by Congress, SCOTUS 1876 ? How did congress infringe? The 2A prevents Congress from infringing, Open and concealed carry are State issues.
@aolvaar8792 It violates Federal Law: 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution The Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Clause 2) Article 18 USC 241 (Conspiracy of Rights) Article 18 USC 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law) It violates New Mexico State Constitution: New Mexico Bill of Rights, Article 2, Section 6 Article 19 Concealed Handgun Carry (It states CCW holders are allowed to Carry Concealed) New Mexico Civil Rights Act Just name a few of the Federal Laws and New Mexico State laws that are being violated. She can legally be arrested for this.
The governor by this illegal and unconstitutional action has revealed herself to be a domestic enemy of the Constitution. The oath of enlistment for the US armed forces, and the oaths of office for police officers, government officials, state, federal and local, all state in some form: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;..." The day we had hoped would never arrive is here and it is now time to fulfill those oaths. This domestic enemy of the Constitution needs to be removed from office immediately and taken into custody to await trial on charges of sedition.
@@IRNoahBody "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Note the parts about "bear" and "shall not be infringed". She is a state official who swore to uphold and defend the Constitution and instead she seeks to subvert it. She is committing sedition, just like the Jan 6 insurrectionists and shall be subject to the same penalties. 20 years should do it.
Here's a guy who wants to dismantle the constitution. WASHINGTON (AP) - Former President Donald Trump faced rebuke Sunday from officials in both parties after calling for the “termination” of parts of the Constitution over his lie that the 2020 election was stolen. Trump, who announced last month that he is running again for president, made the claim over the weekend on his Truth Social media platform. “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” he wrote. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
@@AdamGrundlefuck-qp8ci Nah, prison. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race. Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Yes! Holding my breath right now for Brandon’s federal government to step in and do what it’s actual job is and protect citizens constitutional rights. Lmfao
Why? Did she get indicted for defrauding her constituents? Tell me,did she lie and say she was building a wall, but then used that money for personal gain? Has she been indicted in excess of 91 times did she align herself with criminals and over fifty people that was in her cabinet that have been indicted? Did she have over 29 sexual assault depositions filed against her? Did our son-in-law receive over 2 billion dollars from the Saudi government? Did she hide nuclear secrets? Did she inspire an uprising at the Capitol? Did she take the side of a Russian dictator over U.S intelligence? Did she threaten private citizens,federal judges and prosecutors? Was she indicted and found liable of rape and defamation? Well, if you are okay with putting a person on the ballot who has done all of these things,but are critical of Grisham then you are the epitome of hypocrisy!
@@andicantu6490 It absolutely is is. Chicago implemented strong gun control laws to combat the growing problem of gun violence. Without the regulations they have things would be MUCH WORSE. Whenever a judge has overturned gun control in Chicago violence quickly worsened. Another problem is Cook County does not control the gun laws in other jurisdiction. Most guns come from outside Chicago in places like Wisconsin or other surrounding counties in Illinois. This is a great argument for why the Fed needs to step in with consistent laws across the entire country. If criminals do not recognize state boundaries then laws need to adapt similarly.
The second amendment doesn't exist for hunting or self defense. If you know what the second amendment is for, then you also know what to do if you live in New Mexico.
@@IRNoahBody Forgot the "Bear" part? It says to keep and bear arms. Bearing arms means carrying or bringing to bear like a naval gun for instance. Having access to arms and not being able to exercise the right with the express purpose to defend life, liberty, and property would render the whole amendment moot. It absolutely was meant for the average citizenry to be able to carry arms to protect themselves. What you view your rights to be has no standing when it comes to denying another's right to carry a weapon for protection. This was enshrined as number two on the bill of rights that's how critical they thought it was, the only thing being more inportant is the right to speech. Most people who carry weapons legally or not keep them hidden anyways so why does it bother you? Guess women are wimpy for wanting somthing to even odds out a little huh?
@@IRNoahBody You were so incredible wrong and yet you did get one thing right. First, I don't know how you missed it but in the second amendment is say we have a right to bear arms. That means carry. That is my right to go in public with a gun. However you do get some points for saying that my rights cannot infringe on your rights. However where that goes wrong is that my right is not infringing on your rights unless I use that gun against you. Simply carrying a gun does not infringe on your rights so that destroys your whole point in that regards.
Prohibiting law abiding citizens from exercising a constitutional is insane. Willful violation of a constitutional right is a criminal offense. Lock that crazy up.
@@JamesNoBrakes Perhaps that’s true. But the point is the governor is clearly violating the constitution. That should be unacceptable under any circumstances. I say this with all due respect.
it applies to only to two counties that have the highest rate of gun violence .. the requirments is if you want to carry all you have to do is have a trigger lock
Unless you know why NM Gov did that, and unless you live there, don't judge. Her state does more for people than the red states. If you have a child and in need of food, the state immediately helps you. As for guns, there are plenty of areas where guns are carried openly.
Really now? I'm sure all those people murdered by gun-toting maniacs (like all those kids who are killed in school shootings) would disagree with you. GET REAL, PAL! WAKE UP AND SMELL THE ROTTING CORPSES OF THOSE MURDERED BY PEOPLE WHO SHOULD NEVER BE TRUSTED WITH FIREARMS!
Her brilliant idea will backfire, she'll be hold up in her mansion with her armed security while the citizens of NM continue to be the victim. Unfortunately, NM voted for her again, like it changed?
😊time for the people to stand up for their rights and carry irregardless of an unconstitutional law and if they try to arrest anyone who is carrying that's where the citizens need to say no!! Hell no!! And vote her out. Just my opinion Nothing more..
@@IRNoahBody Nope. She’s violated the 2nd amendment. The citizens are the militia. Your babbling about a standing army. Make it easy for you. Molon Labae
The outrage from New Mexicans and Americans across the country reveals how precious our rights are and we will not back down from defending and fighting for what makes the United States of America a unique experiment. This country and our state were founded on principles of freedom and democracy, and one political figure will not erase our shared history.”
Get over it. She banned guns in public spaces which is just an extension of guns being banned in public buildings and universities. You don't need a gun at a park playing with your kid. A deranged gunman would take out a few kids and adults before the good guys with guns even noticed. We need gun regulation.
@@fallen4life080 Why do you fear freedom?! It's a fundamental human right to protect with a firearm, one's family, whether at home or away. A public park or playground is one of the most important places to protect children from violence because deranged people know they'll find children there. _We need more criminal control- do it for the children!_
@@bikeracerdude why do you fear the freedom to be safe within your country? You have a right to walk outside with your family and have a good time without wondering if the good Samaritan that just moved in next door isn't deranged and has a million guns that he can just open up on your family with. Living in fear isn't freedom, that's the lie the NRA and politicians have fed you to KEEP YOU SCARED
@@fallen4life080 Who and how would this be regulated exactly?... by what means? In addition, you said it yourself, a "deranged" gunmen would never listen to regulation, so why use a flawed means of control to disarm and regulate only those who would follow it, where in turn be compromised by the very thing that was meant to control an incontrollable outcome.
@@natrious9601 Look up Switzerland laws on regulation, they're pretty complex and strict and they work to keep guns out of most criminals hands. Not to mention that this would also have to be combined with better healthcare access to all. This country's "personal responsibility" doctrine just means everyone for themselves and if your child gets kiIIed well TS for you.
It’s like their oath means nothing to them. I guess it’s been too long. If only an example were made so everyone could once again remember what it means. 😂
As an Albuquerque resident, violence is a direct result in the amount of drugs and drug related crime in the city. MLG even admitted criminals wouldn't follow the law, but also at the same time, she groups law abiding carriers, criminals too.
Horrendous I feel horrible for you. Everyone should be allowed to carry that is legal to do so. Whether you are straight or gay whatever I don’t care( in that situation) If you are a law abiding citizen and not mentally unstable everyone should own a gun. I say that as someone who is a devout Catholic who does not approve of that lifestyle, but still supports their right to defend themselves.
@@bigk4026 it's really bad. Like reaaaallly bad in the city. Almost anytime you hear about violent crime it's committed a previous offender with a long record, the courts catch and release criminals all day. We had a child murder suspect live out on bail for years. People in ABQ that carry, carry because the city keeps feeding the flames and APD is an absolute joke of a department. Tl;Dr ABQ is a vile cesspool of drug related violence and catch and release criminals, the police don't or are unwilling to do anything so now because of all this me as a citizen can't carry to protect myself
@@truth4004No it doesn't. The innocent people will be disarmed while the criminals get to keep their firearms. Not to mention, it's a gross violation of the Constitution. If you all don't like the 2A, then you should convince the people to ratify its repeal through the Constitutional process.
@mrbeez8631, I was just joking. Obviously the threat of penalty has dissuasive power. Otherwise laws wouldn't work. Not sure where you actuality stand.
Most guns from Chicago used in gang violence come from legal purchases from Indiana. Most illegal guns from Mexico come from the states. Makes you wonder. And however you look at the gun situation it's pretty clear that the country with the most guns has by far the most gun violence, mass shootings, etc. I'm not saying we should take away all guns, but something needs to be done
@@Tmhoop91 you snoozing like Joe. I guess you never heard of guns made illegally in the Philippines and shipped to the US. The 1911 model is the most popular to produce. Look it up
@@Tmhoop91 First the US doesn't lead any list on list of most gun violence. Also many of those lists they're near the top because of their population. If you go by a per capita they drop down the list quite a bit. An important statistic is that minus LA, Chicago and New York the US drops way down on that list of gun violence even further. Those are cities that have some of the highest gun violence and yet have some of the toughest gun laws. Also the states that you mentioned where they get their guns from do not have the nearly the high levels of gun violence that that Chicago does. It seems a bit curious that the states that actually sell those guns don't have the same gun violence problems as the states that you suggest they are talking those guns to. Also most of those guns are not purchased legally in other states unless they're being purchased there by legal gun owners and then they're being stolen and sold to gangs because most gang members do not carry guns they legally purchased and in mast cases are not able to purchase legal guns. What this all comes down to is that it's a people problem. It's not the laws. No law is absolute. Murder is illegal and yet people commit murder. Drugs are illegal and people still buy, sell and use drugs. Drunk driving is illegal and people still drive drunk. Why? Because no law 100% prevents anything. We don't create laws with the idea that they won't be broken. We create laws to make them illegal. Gun laws are the only laws that people think they need to keep adding to in order to stop the crime. Imagine if they took the same approach to drunk driving. Nobody would be able to buy or drive a car because they've regulated them to such a degree that nobody could buy them.
She swore and oath to the constitution so it looks like she broke her own oath, so why is she still there and our second amendment rights shall NOT BE INFRINGED UPON by nothing or anybody
I'm just glad that the Police Chief and Sheriff both went on the record saying they wouldn't enforce the edict in NM. Glad some LEOs have heard of the Constitution...
If any Law enforcement officer obeys That unlawful order from the Governor to suspend the 2A should have their Badges Revoked, and innocent people will get hurt on all sides of that coin..
Uhhh ohhhh she publically openly knowingly willingly committed ( TREASON ) for all to see make it viral . She willingly knowingly violated her oath of office and for this her bonds should be revoked / suspended for Fraud and delegate of duty by committing an open display of treason for the world to see.
@@IRNoahBody "the right of the people to keep and BEAR Arms, shall not be infringed" I am pretty sure the constitution wasn't talking about being able to wear tank tops.
That would make them un-American and a terrorists! Disarm an American makes you un-American. Don't comply with the Democrats taking away your constitution! Evil people do that
@IHaveNoLife-nc8wj What's wrong with California? It's an economic driver of the entire country. If California was a country it would be the 5th highest GDP in the world.
Dude, every single time state and city governments impose license requirements for firearms, they are telling you that you only have rights with their explicit permission and if you pay for them in cash.
Data on the use of firearms in public protection of innocents by citizens has been suppressed to say the least. Saving lives should be the goal, not putting people at more risk.
You can not imagine the amount of death that we would have without the 2nd am. Do you enjoy not getting invaded like Ukraine? You enjoy not living under feudalism? You are spared so much death and destruction because of the protections granted to you by all the other people in your community being armed, and because you have always been protected by it,you have no idea about the dangers it has kept from you. If you want less people dying,keep your firearms,if you want more death than you have ever seen,get rid of the firearms.
I will agree that studies by non partisan institutions have not been given the adequate resources to study the impact of guns on American society, such as the CDC. However, there are plenty of organizations that conduct studies on the defensive use of fire arms for years. The evidence is mixed and doesn't paint a clear picture over how much of a positive or negative impact guns have on the general population from a defensive standpoint.
@@michaeljames2349 a little late for that, plus CDCs own studies showed up to 2.5 million defensive uses of firearms with positive outcomes, many with zero fatalities
Yes! The people in New Mexico better hurry and take a stand, taking it to the highest court in the land in order to defend their rights. If they do not, then the only people there with arms will be the cartel and the elite and it is completely game over.
When the forefathers wrote the 2nd amendment, we had muskets that took 1 minute to load with 1 round, but now there are automatic weapons and 357's, so the 2nd amendment is no longer relevant either. @@MrEkzotic
@@mrbeez8631 so I bartend 600 feet from the White House. SS are good customers. I asked them about what you wrote, no offense, and none of them disagreed with you. Thought you should know. ✌️ 2A every day. 🇺🇸
Thank you, Govenor DeSantis! From NM. She has violated more than our Second Amendment rights! Her Red Flag law is also dangerous for abused women! Fentynal flows freely in NM.
Screw their “public health emergency”. She is violating the people of New Mexico’s rights, and the legal 2A conceal carriers should strap on their guns and proudly open carry to the governor’s house for a nice and friendly protest.
It’s unconstitutional and she knows it… how about reform the bail laws and harsher sentences for crimes and those who use guns when committing a felony(s) ….. it’s all about controlling the lawful citizens!
@@IRNoahBodyI don't know where or how you got your information on the constitution to interpret it how you do, but you are wrong in your interpretation. It is blatantly unconstitutional and there isn't any argument anyone can make to say otherwise unless they deliberately choose to read it different than it's wrote. "....The right of _THE PEOPLE_ to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT be Infringed" is pretty clear and to the point. There isnt any room to interpret it other than what it is, which is the people have an ultimate right to own and carry whatever arms they may have (which should and does include machine guns, grenade launchers, etc) without any interference by the government, except for a small number of places such as courts, jails, schools without permission, and the like but not much more than that. I don't know what you think infringe means when defined, but it pretty much means to lessen, limit, or undermine in way. Put that with the right for the people to keep (own) and bear (carry with/on or inside of) arms (weapons of the current day and age). So this is very much so a undeniable violation of the 2nd amendment, which is treason or at the very least the deprivation of rights under tyrannical force by someone who does not have the authority to do so and deserves to see a prison cell for a minimum for as long as I've been in this earth for. My age is literally one year over the number of years that 1st degree murders often sentence people for and is followed by to life.
@@IRNoahBody Ahem. "Thomas' majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, effectively rendered public carry a constitutional right under the Second Amendment. Thomas wrote, "The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not 'a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.' We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need." You can't use a gun for self defense if it's in a locked case with a locked trigger, therefore this is unconstitutional.
@@IRNoahBody same thing 2A she cannot restrict our rights…. period…. she needs to focus on the courts and the criminals… not the law abiding s citizens…you don’t want or like guns that’s your right…but that’s don’t follow their ideology.. cause that’s what this is all about oiss poor leadership has caused all of this!
@@elloowu6293 Oh really. So a retired person at 60 years of age is supposed to "find another way" against a 20 year old criminal because the governor is an authoritarian? That is the stupidest idea I've ever heard of.
@@elloowu6293 How many times have I needed my seatbelt? ZERO. How many times have I needed a fire extinguisher for a house fire in my life? ZERO. Does that mean I should not wear a seatbelt and not have a fire extinguisher in my home? Because I haven't needed them yet?
The 2A is to prevent things just like this. Your right to keep and bare Arms is not to be abridged. You have a Constitutional responsibility to use your Arms to stop this infringement.
Why isn't everyone calling this woman's office demanding she be removed? She just straight told us she's not following her own oath of office. Disgusting. She's acting like all legal gun owners are crazy criminals.
Send U.S. Marshalls to arrest her for violating the Citizens rights and her oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution.. Felony commited voluntarily.
All she is saying is that, She upholds the right to squeeze the Constitution and commit an treasonous act of tyranny upon the people and jeopardize their lives under her leadership and that the United States Supreme Court has NO authority whatsoever. I mean, who are they to interfere with her decisions? She's the governor. Very much respect for Governor DeSantis!!!
@@bellabonnie3141 Then perhaps when Republicans take power and use "public health emergency" to ban abortions and take rights from you that aren't even constitutionally protected, somehow you'll change your tune, right?
1. Title 18 U.S.C section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights 2. Title 18 U.S.C section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law@@bellabonnie3141 What don't you understand about the Constitution? Our rights are not granted to us by the govt.
"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
The governor of New Mexico should be removed from office. It can be done and must be done as example to all Democrats. They just think they have the power to do anything they damn well want! Damn Democrat politicians!!!
it would seem the nutz are running the peanut farm, and there is no shortage of them! Yup. we will have to place them on permanent ignore ! I mean who listens to Crazy !??
I think banning guns in public only takes guns from people who SHOULD have them, bc people who shouldn't have them will simply ignore that ban, meaning law abiding citizens will have no way to protect themselves and their families, or to protect others if put in a bad situation with bad people who have nefarious intentions toward others.
That is simply nonsense. You may have a gun in your home to protect yourself and your family. Laws like this are meant to prevent gunfights in public, which sometimes cause collateral damage.
@@darryldunmore5184 If you watch the video the County Sheriff destroys your nonsensical opinion with facts and history. Your opinion is based on emotion and nothing else.
