The 35mm Tissot PRX - Smaller but Still Packs A Similar Size Punch 

My first mechanical watch was a Seiko SNK807K2, 37mm. I like how it looks on my 6,5(165mm) wrist better than any other 40/41mm watches I have.

@@ZeroneRaven Mine was a junghans max bill 34mm. It has virtually no bezel so the dial real estate is actually closer to most 40mm watches. It's a relatively small watch that appears much larger than it actually is.

Also, there are more men in the world with smaller wrists suitable for 35-38mm

because large wrist ( above 7 inch ) mean you having a foreams of a man look . small wrist always look girly no matter how small and big watches sit on them .

@@nguyenuchuy8807 Not really.. big wrist surrounded by fats does not look manly while small wrist on a muscular tough forearm looks manly..

I too am enjoying the small watch renaissance and hopefully it has more staying power than the oversized watch craze

Have they improved the alignment issues?

@@davidcrandall4958 the same movement is used so the best bet is send it to watchmaker to realign the second hand as much possible because it won't hit the indices 100% all the time.

@@davidcrandall4958 from what I've read about quartz movements not lining up properly; it's a real challenge to ensure for every production piece and the cost/benefit ratio doesn't make sense in the price point most companies are targeting for their quartz lineups. So I think it's a problem that won't be fixed in this price range anytime soon.

What is the max bracelet length though? Will it fit a 7.75 inch wrist out of the box?

@dream honestly I find it pairs with most things I wear. I love the watch so I wear it everyday with every outfit. Looks great with a suit but also with casual clothes

Yes. And give the raised honeycomb motif a miss.

Such a shame its limited to only the fluted design version 😢

There is, nobody is talking about it, but I found two from certified dealers. Blue and green.

It doesn’t show in the website, which is weird

@@ofirshachamorov5979 what you're talking about is most likely the 35mm quartz PRX with the smooth dial, right? As of now the only automatic 35mm PRX is the one with diamonds on the dial.

getting green too 😁

what are you planning for? personally i like the light blue colour but it’s actually way too girly irl😂. i think i’ll go for the classic green or blue

@@lalruatdika2052 I ordered the silver with rose gold hands and indices. I like the blue on the 40mm but the 35mm blue is a tad too vibrant for me. My other reason for choosing the silver dial is because of the date window. Because the date window isn't framed like in the powermatic 80 version, I just feel like the white of the date wheel blends better with the silver dial. A vibrant dial color paired with an unframed date window just rubs me the wrong way personally haha 😂

I may make that happen on my channel in the coming weeks thanks for the idea

You and me both. Have they said that was going to happen?

@@turnbasedtoddy7664 nothing official yet

@@turnbasedtoddy7664 they will definitely do it...just a slower roll out...all part of their marketing strategy..... most likely by the end of this year we will have some idea about the 35 mm automatic prx....

any idea if it will be released?

@@ssskincare I have no clue. Hopefully it’s released before the year is up. 🤞🏾🤞🏾

Yes! Same!

your local ad should, mine already has this under retail

Given an apposite budget I wouldn’t mind owning _both_ a quartz designated as a ‘daily beater’, as well as a Powermatic version.

@@fletcherhamilton3177 I guess that's what Tissot wants, with the way they are releasing them - to impinge the quartz to the people that in reality wanted the auto but simply can't wait. Gives them extra money and keeps the interesting going for longer. But no, not for me. I have no interest in getting two "equal" watches. Nor to resale the quartz and loose money on it. An automatic can be easily worn everyday, at least with my lifestyle - and I prefer it. Nothing against quartz, I own several. But if given a choice and a watch exists with both, I prefer the auto. I have plenty of watches and at this point I only buy what I really want, even if that means having to wait and not enjoy a watch for a few years. At least I know that when I get the one I want, I'll be happy with it and it will be a new experience.

@@tiagodvt - I see your point, but I’d be fine with a quartz piece if only for the low maintenance and high accuracy it would afford me. But it’s only very recently I’ve come around to accepting the ‘quality’ of quartz watches, so I totally see it your way too.

@@fletcherhamilton3177 oh quartz has various advantages over automatic/mechanical, no doubt. I have nothing against them - I own several. I mean..we can even argue automatic watches make no sense..one has to be crazy to own a mechanical less accurate piece, right? And even pay more for it..or having to spend even more on the "maintenance". It's one of those "romantic" things. watches aren't even necessary nowadays. I guess if it brings us some joy, that's what matters in this world.

@@tiagodvt - I can’t disagree with anything you just said . . . except that watches don’t constitute a necessity . . . I’d posit that they _do_ still do so, ‘cos I’m terms of fashion they still look good, they’re still useful and they do tend to break up an otherwise symmetrical look. I’d even go so far as to say that they can both augment the feminine for a woman and the masculine for a man, but even just on a practical level they afford the wearer a bit of a professional mien about his or herself. In terms of automatic . . . I suspect that a strong case could be made that a hella decent mechanical watching starting at / around the $1,000 mark - definitely within the arena of $2,000 - is going to be of sufficient accuracy that it’s really ‘pointless’ to put any more money down on something in the range of $10,000 like a Rolex or a Patek. But I also understand that you’re not only buying accuracy at that price range but also technical aptitude and superior engineering, so . . . 🤷‍♂️

A smaller automatic with dial texture would be a buy for me.

I have same size wrist as u. I thought 40mm was large too. Saw the 35mm and its too small. And i tried the 40mm again, when the bracelet is fit snug, the fit is actually nice. Try it, I guarantee it. 35 really does look like a ladies watch. Or should i say, wheb u wear it, u look like u r wearing ur mom’s watch

Try having a 6.0 inch wrist lol

@@ohkayw Disagree. That would mean every man out there in the 50’s looked like that had a woman’s watch on. That literally used to be the only size men wore.

I have a 6.4” wrist and the PRX35 wears like a dream! Definitely try it out at your AD.

@@ohkayw Nah, 40 mm looks like dinner plate. Even the legendary Rolex Explorer 124270 / 14270 looks amazing in 36 mm

yeah me too