Ancient Africa in World History: Invention, Innovation, Impact Huggins Lectures by Christopher Ehret Nov. 5, 4pm: Center for African Studies, 1280 Massachusetts Avenue. 3rd Floor “African Historical Firsts”
TRUTH BE TOLD The History Channel is clearly part of the crafty council confederate with Arab and Hagerene nations to HIDE the truth about black history. THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS WERE BLACK , apart from when they were invaded by Arabs, Greeks and Romans. Then the modern day corrupt scientist use the mummies of these invaders and say that the DNA testing proves Egyptians were caucasians. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UZGk0FIKaQ8.html
Rasaan Shakur, whether they like it or not, our ancestors most likely foresaw this and they casted their images in huge stoneworks and monuments....no wonder they keep knocking off their broad noses and thick lips. Also, the earliest remains of our desecrated ancestors, feature melanated attributes and appearances...and if these so called Egyptologists or tomb raiders really wanna prove that the greatness of Egypt was white, why can't they also dig up their Neanderthal ancestors in the caucasus mountains and study the hell out of them brainless remains...why come to Africa and spend decades, trying in futility to steal what belongs to us?
@@amenrakwamehotepporchprima9307 Delusions of grandeur. LMAO! Caucasians and Arabs inhabited Egypt long after the fall of Kemet (KMT). Black genes are supreme. Why? Two caucasians cannot sire and bring forth a melanated child but the reverse is true. Boo hoo.
@@Dosadniste2000 Sue him for WHAT? speaking the truth? They can't sue because they know they're inposters. The predominant population in Egypt are invader Arab and their offsprings. Modern Egyptian look nothing like the true progenitors. Just like the dominant population in Australia New Zeland North & South America look NOTHING like the original peoples of these lands. Egypt is no exception. The true athochonous inhabitants still live in Aswan to the south to this very day.
While I appreciate that truth about the Africanness of KMT / Egypt is finally seeing the full light of day, I am aggrieved that the suppression of this information has caused incalculable psychological damage to people of African ancestry.
And it was intentional ! they knew they were stealing, they're been going around the World killing and stealing for the last 600yrs...we're getting our stuff back.
@@manitheman0806 aww, the curmudgeon makes blithe commentary, truly a dismal display of apparent depth...into the welcoming arms of stupidity, enjoy..."[y]ou still have hope you dope"
We Africans know our history. We never forgot it. Egypt had kings who ruled the lands all the way to the Congo for over 150,000 years consecutively and it’s written in stone. Too much for the brain of the white man to comprehend because it might explode. Even the giants were still alive when we arrived in West Africa because of global warming. I have over 4 dynasties of the pharaohs of Egypt in my blood and I am 99.9 percent native African. No Arab or Europeans who didn’t even exist as a race when our kind were building cities of stone and writing on stone calendars or studying the stars for over 65,000 years consecutively before they passed on the knowledge. How old is NASA? We Africans are tired of white peoples validating our very existence. I respect Caucasian scholars like this intelligent gentleman. Dr Henry Clark already did all of these studies with facts only there wasn’t DNA earlier on in his time and he was denied that on his old age but they didn’t find out pharaohs to be Africans with Melanin in their skins. Next door neighbours of ancient Egyptians are still there to this day with dark burnt skin in the Sudan. How can France and Britain exist from the dawn of time and France is white and the UK is genetically black? Is such a thing even possible? Only very racist, whites supremacist idiots with very low intelligence can say such BS and abs believe it because their puny little brains can not comprehend or understand the truth even when you slap them on the face with it. Such people are too dumb and lesser evolved intellectually for us Africans to waste our energies on them. Only ignorance can be excused but not stupidity.
It's crazy how simple things get all screwed up when Europeans get involved. Here you are on the African continent and we are arguing about whether Egypt is African.
Another interesting observation I have noticed recently is the Egyptians of today (non -black) calling or identifying themselves as African(s) kind of connecting themselves to the continent. Just a few years ago, the same people would be quick to say to you they are Asian. Funny world, regardless - they are welcome to enjoy life in Africa🤔
The Bible literally tell you that Mitzraim-Egypt is the son of ham ... For some reason now HAM father's white people, asians, Indians, cats and dogs everything except the black man wow ..🤣
He goes against the Eurocentric grain. That's quite a feat in itself.. we applaue his effort to restore Afrikah and Afrikans back to proper commentary. He's simply here to truly reducate us and to perhaps lessen his own people's cultural arrogance. He's like the Gerald Massey..Albert Churchward.. Godfrey Higgins & Basil Davidson of this time. We applaud him. He seems genuine.
@@lailaq5738You mean the black African slaves of the Egyptians. Millions of black Africans came to slave markets of Egypt and North Africa primarily in the last 700 years, as slaves. Not Kangz! Slaves!
A Nilo-Saharan and an African civilisation. Ancient Egypt shared many cultural and linguistic ties with African communities along the Nile Valley. Some are still alive and being used or practiced to this day. We need to document and preserve them
This absolutely a lie ! Ancient Egyptians had absolutely nothing to Nilo saharan people. Even Nubians were not Nilo saharan. Egyptians were the same people with ancient middle eastern and Asia Minor. There was absolutely no legacy of ancient Egyptians in subsaharan Africa. Subsaharan Africans didn’t know that ancient Egypt even existed before early 20th century when western civilization introduced it to them during colonial era. Also Egyptians and later Nubians were using chariots and wheels since at least, 1600BC . In subsaharan Africa the wheel was almost totally unknown until 19th when western colonialism introduced it to them. That proves there was absolutely no connection between those people. Do not write nonsense here!
The Egyptians were not middle eastern peoole and many of the animals portrayed in Egyptian were from black Africa. 95% of Egyptian mummies skulls tested matched them with Sub Saharan Africans.
@@brandonray4379 My friend, when Pyrrhus of Epirus landed in Italy in third century BC , he too had many elephants 🐘 with his army . Pyrrhus was illyrian - Greek king . Does the fact that he had elephants in his army means Greeks and illyrians were black Africans too ?! People would bring animals through trade roads from Asia, subsaharan Africa and other regions. In Ancient Rome there were plenty of tropical animals in Italy and other territories of empire. That doesn’t mean they were black Africans. What skull matched with subsaharan Africans?! Even Nubians who were dark skin have different skull with subsaharan Africans and you say Egyptians had subsaharan skull?! This is absolutely false my friend! Also even Ehret who is know for his passion to cheer up black people , in this video said it openly that” the dna and genes do not define our identity and history, our culture and history does “.
@@user-iw4wz6ex1q Ooo really?! But there is a big problem here with that nonsense you claim. Ancient Egyptians were using the wheels and chariots since at least second millennium BC . In subsaharan Africa the wheel was almost totally unknown until 19th century when western civilization introduced it to them during colonial era. Are you saying that black Africans built and ruled ancient Egypt but when they were “ pushed out” they suddenly “forgot “ to use the wheels or what ?! Do you understand the stupidity of the statement you just made ?!
I am so pleased that the work of our African American scholars has changed the face of Egyptology, thank you to Cheikh Anta Diop, John Hedrick Clark, Runoko Rashidi and many others for their tireless work in the face of scorn and ridicule. I honor you forever.
@Parasitic Shunk The only difference is that when Black people say the same thing, White people don't accept it. Thanks, he came forward to support our cause and hstory.
So, just one who somewhat agrees with what you believe And he wasn't claiming this all is entirely accurate or factual. You hear him say several times he is propaganda these things. Diop also proposed many things. But they were later shown to be utter bullocks.
@@smokinjoe420ooh9😂😂😂😂 u people are so phony it's amazing. Diop work is still being referred to. Now Mr Neil Degrassi Tyson kehmet was a thriving civilization when white people were in the mountains doing God knows what 😂😂😂😂 now who are u
Egypt is a western agenda..we don't know Egypt we forever know it as Kemet.. period.... example,, Mo salah is not a kemetic descendant but his Egyptian.., as history will tell you that Arab's,,, black Arab man had asyrian woman.. an that's the product of the Arab's of today... people are so fed lies all their lives that they just can't take that reality.. come to the land of the King's to know thyself.. how can we ever want to say these an that..if we are all victims of the system... just imagine the people who teach you are the once who are not from that part of the world an yet they apparently know what they are telling you.."scholars",,, just amazingly funny an desturping...am from southern Africa an yet most the traditions of ancient Kemet ( Egypt ) we practice them just as in Nigeria,, Ghana,, even in. Congo..,!!! So I don't know y can't we accept that so called black people started everything they are the original people of the divine one.. let's accept that fact period 👀👀👀👀
This Man is not only Scholar, but the Man of integrity, honest, and dignify human beings, that go beyond deception and lies of self glorification of old Eurocentric scholar. We know our History, especially the New generation, and wel travel African. I was in lourve Museum in Paris, I was blown away with Ancient Egyptian Amulets and their resemblances with many that, we use in Yoruba rituals. I was in London Mankind Museum, I saw huge Stone carved of Khafre, nothing but African in look, he look Senegalese, Watustsi of great lake, we know who Ancient Egyptian, you go toAswan in upper. You see native Nubian in different shade, skin tone like every African, you go to Sudan the same things, in Chad, Niger, or Chadian boarder with Nigeria. When you go to Ethiopia, you see, Ethics group like Oromo, Afar, Shoha, Guararage, Somali, you see their resemblances with Ancient Egyptian, there nothing Egyptian Civilization, just African Nile Valley Civilization.
But he still should explain why he uses the term "Afro-Asiatic" to refer to Erythrean, Ethiopian and Cushitic languages, i e African ones.How does he link these languages to Asia?
@@EgyptianHorus I am not black Africa is very diverse Continent, many Egyptian like are ignorant of History, Egypt is Continentally, Geographically in African Continent, And in Egypt the Copt, Nubian, Tamazek, Beja are Indigenous to Egypt. Arab, Turkish, Bedouin, are invader. Anwar Sadat is not Arab is African a Nubian decent from Aswan, you to South Egypt in Aswan you find Dark Skin African.
What is “ African “ civilization?! People in subsaharan Africa didn’t know that ancient Egypt civilization has ever existed until 20th century when western colonialism introduced that to them . There was no connection whatsoever between civilizations of Egypt and Nubia and other parts of subsaharan Africa.
@@st3019 think or research before typing bullshit , have you looked at black African kingdoms before colonial era? Have you seen the very similarities with Adrinka Simbols? Also the elephants inhabiting the grassy savannas of sub-Saharan Africa provided a source of ivory for the Egyptians, and Punt is recorded to provide them with incense, myrrh and oils. Sub-Saharan Africans had cultural similarities and relations with the Ancient Egyptians. You’ll go to some ethnic tribes and some will tell you they come from those areas, some ancient Egyptians names still exist, sone practices too all seen in black Africa and none in the north give me a break you all like to put all black Africans in one bag when talking poverty but nit picking differences when we talk about greatness. There are litteraly hundreds of ethnic groups in Africa and that used to be how we distinguished ourselves , but as a group we are all black/Africans because we are culturally and phenotypically closer to each other than anyone else
The Nubians have a magnificent and beautiful history, along with all the other magnificent empires all over Africa. As an African American, it makes me even prouder of the motherland and its beautiful people. That’s why I get highly annoyed when racist people try to claim that outsiders created these empires and not black Africans.
Count Volney said: I remembered the remarkable passage where Herodotus says: ' As for me, I judge the Colchians to be a colony of the Egyptians because, like them, they are black with woolly hair... . "Just think," de Volney declared incredulously, "that this race of Black men, today our slave and the object of our scorn, is the very race to which we owe our arts, sciences, and even the use of speech! Just imagine, finally, that it is in the midst of people who call themselves the greatest friends of liberty and humanity that one has approved the most barbarous slavery, and questioned whether Black men have the same kind of intelligence as whites!
Basically, what Dr. Chris is saying here, is that Diodorus of Sicily was right: “They say also that the Egyptians are colonists sent out by the Ethiopians, Osiris having been the leader of the colony… And the larger part of the customs of the Egyptians are, they hold, Ethiopian, the colonists still preserving their ancient manners. For instance, the belief that their kings are gods, the very special attention which they pay to their burials, and many other matters of a similar nature are Ethiopian practices, while the shapes of their statues and the forms of their letters are Ethiopian; for of the two kinds of writing which the Egyptians have, that which is known as "popular" (demotic) is learned by everyone, while that which is called "sacred" is understood only by the priests of the Egyptians, who learn it from their fathers as one of the things which are not divulged, but among the Ethiopians everyone uses these forms of letters. Furthermore, the orders of the priests, they maintain, have much the same position among both peoples; for all are clean who are engaged in the service of the gods, keeping themselves shaven, like the Egyptian priests, and having the same dress and form of staff, which is shaped like a plough and is carried by their kings, who wear high felt hats which end in a knob at the top and are circled by the serpents which they call asps; and this symbol appears to carry the thought that it will be the lot of those who shall dare to attack the king to encounter death-carrying stings. Many other things are also tol huh d by them concerning their own antiquity and the colony which they sent out that became the Egyptians, but about this there is no special need of our writing anything.” - Diodorus of Sicily, Book III What didn’t Diodorus say that Christopher Ehret said? Honestly? The Ethiopians or Nilo-Saharan speakers sent a colony or colonies out. This colony carried linguistics and cultural practices that came to be shared with the native population, hence, Afro-Asiatic Egyptian was the demotic language, but the Nilo-Saharan language was sacred among the Egyptians, but commonplace among the Ethiopians. The shapes of art and burial items originated in Lower Nubia but came to be practiced later in Upper Egypt. The evidence for a priesthood in Egypt is along the southern border of Egypt and Nubia. But people legit tried to hate on Diodorus’ account, talking some nonsense about its “psuedo-history”, and had the nerve to call us “Afrocentrist” for saying he was right. Well? Now what? People suck man.
Emberling and Gatto also concur with Siculus..."We now recognize that populations of Nubia and Egypt form a continuum rather than clearly distinct groups,” Mr. Emberling writes, “and that it is impossible to draw a line between Egypt and Nubia that would indicate where ‘black’ begins.” Dr. Maria C. Gatto Phd The American University in Cairo | AUC Department of Egyptology, Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology University of Leicester Leicester, England As the first statement in that quotation asserts it is nothing more than Western racial animus why certain people try to dismiss all of these consistent facts and cherry pick inconsistent pieces of evidence to deny that the ancient Egypt was black as was Nubia. This is consistent with the revelation from Dr Maria Gatto posted above which confirms that pre-Dynastic Egypt started off as essentially a northern extension of Nubia which in turn was descended from earlier Saharan Nilotic pastoralist cultures.
The Bantu Area was called « ethiopia » when « Ethiopia » was called « abyssinia ». You can see it on the map of Africa out of 1650 and when you type: old map africa ethiopia. The Atlantic Ocean was even called « Aethiopian sea ».
@@EgyptianHorus To be pacific, I say the ANCIENT Egyptians, the builders of the Pyramids and Sphinx are black. If you don't believe , then prove they are not black.
oh how I wish we had lecturers like this man at every school and university. Teaching history as it is and was! Thank you. I am so happy I came across this video, so enlightening to hear the truth about such important parts of humanity
@@juliandinkins2531 In reality, none of his theories about his “ africanity of ancient Egypt “ has ever been proved. Instead, his theory has been debunked time after time . It seems like this man belongs to those white pseudo scientists who like to cheer up black peoples by telling them magnificent lies. It’s beyond pathetic!
@@amenrakwamehotepporchprima9307 LOL you pop up a lot, have you read everything out there, the last Euro-centrist everyone LOL, don't like Diop, don't Browder LOL Do critique the video above minute to minute so we can all have a laugh
@@amenrakwamehotepporchprima9307 (Repost) But you are in for a rude awakening: This group of studies shows how North African/Lower Egypt changed over time. Compared to Upper Egypt, before and after it's many run in's with other groups. The history is complex and of course also sad today. The precursor to multiple waves of quite possibly non-confrontational migration at the beginning. But of course later on came invasion/occupation and terror/discrimination. Through arabization and other means. -------------------------- "Burial practices of the Final Neolithic pastoralists at Gebel Ramlah, Western Desert of Egypt" citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.737.7822&rep=rep1&type=pdf + i.imgur.com/XEd1FWd.png + i.imgur.com/RejKxqp.png - www.pnas.org/content/115/26/6774 - www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257290/ More ......................................... pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22146064 - pbs.twimg.com/media/Eeykd0JU4AAs0Ef?format=png&name=small ............................................. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21082907 - pbs.twimg.com/media/EeykIcrUEAAUKVu?format=png&name=small ................................................ onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00493.x - pbs.twimg.com/media/EeylFEWVoAEDLT8?format=png&name=small ................................................... Also do you not understand what ethnic groups means? Search up the term, and make it parallel. The man in the video is from Upper Egypt in the South of Africa not the North, Ancient Egypt flowed down the Nile. Not up it...that's where Egypt began, not the North. So regardless of what you believe, like Native Egyptian said. Those in Lower Egypt are more related to Mumluks, Phoenicians, Mediterraneans, Romans, Greeks, "Arabs", Canaanites...etc. The passage from the sea and land is right there for you to see: it allowed for invasion, after invasion, migration after migration into North Africa. ________________ (Lower Egypt) i.imgur.com/0xJYDD3.jpg _________________ (Peep, the "Nubian's") i.imgur.com/HKYoYVZ.png _________________ i.imgur.com/MLlv3LY.png i.imgur.com/MV8LjvI.png i.imgur.com/PGWOBzb.png i.imgur.com/CXqzgOf.png i.imgur.com/hwI2TOa.png ------------------------------------------------------------------- This is you though, "wE wUz RoMaNz" + i.imgur.com/Yr5l9tr.jpg
@@amenrakwamehotepporchprima9307 You failed, you're dumbass had to use Wikipedia...lol None of that paper does anything to refute any of my links. You have zero knowledge, little 4channer. The fact that they hypothesized, it was from "slavery" is bunk (as I've shown way below, and in another comments to you). There was no slavery at that point in history, the wet sahara, and its populace was not doing "slavery". Now lets go with the actual facts and not the bullshit, narrative of "slavery", as chosen from agenda driven users from around the world on Wikipedia. One, there were no "Caucasians" in North Africa until after, the Neolithic period, while into the later half of the Holocene. ---------------------------------------------------------------- genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-018-1393-5 + "Consistent with the tree reported in phase 3 of the 1000 Genomes Project. However, It is worth noting that branches 72 and 81 are within the E-M2 main multifurcation and both of them include chromosomes. Similarly, the other terminal lineages absent in the 1000 Genomes Project’s tree are mainly represented by samples to a lesser extent, from the (i.e. the central Sahel)" + "Outside the African continent, two rare R-V88 sub-lineages (R-M18 and R-V35) have been observed in the Near East and Southern Europe. Because of its ethno-geographic distribution in the central Sahel, R-V88 has been linked to the spread of the Chadic branch of the Afroasiatic linguistic family. In spite of their genetic differentiation, however at different frequencies, namely A3-M13, E-M2, E-M78 and R-V88. In this context, rare Y lineages with a relic. Thus, considering their frequency distribution, the four trans-Saharan lineages A3-M13, E-M2, E-M78 and R-V88 could. In order to we performed targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of ~ 3.3 Mb of 104 Y chromosomes mostly belonging to these four lineages. We also analysed the geographic distribution of 142 informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by genotyping about 8000 male subjects from 145 worldwide populations (including 17 populations from literature), with a particular focus on the African ethnic groups. Our findings, excluding recent historical events, such as the Arab slave trade, as a major determinant of the male gene pool of present-day northern African populations. (Additional file 1: Table S1). In the set of 104 samples from our lab collection, we identified 5966 SNPs and this figure is significantly greater than that reported by Hallast et al. " + "we obtained a mutation rate of 0.735 × 10−9/site/year, which is consistent with previously published estimates and which was used to obtain an accurate estimate of the coalescence age of the tree nodes, with a particular focus on the four trans-Saharan clades. E-M2. It is worth noting that branches 72 and 81 are two deep sister lineages within the E-M2 main multifurcation (Fig. 2) and Similarly, the other terminal lineages absent in the 1000 Genomes Project’s tree are or, to a lesser extent, from the northernmost regions of "sub-Saharan" Africa (i.e. the central Sahel) (Fig. 2b)." ___________ They also weren't carbon dating, only using dates from archeology as a basis. They have demonstrated that E-M2 in North Africa is not due to Slavery it has been present in North Africa since before the "Arabs" arrived. ___________ This what they were doing in North Africa, and it's where they found the Uan Muhuggiag in North Africa, "The Black mummy", who was buried similarly, in a way that people know with the Ancient Egyptians. But thousands of years before there was any Egypt/Kemet. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12567376/ + www.researchgate.net/publication/336873519_Medical_imaging_as_a_taphonomic_tool_The_naturally-mummified_bodies_from_Takarkori_rock_shelter_Tadrart_Acacus_SW_Libya_6100-5600_uncal_BP __________ That there was so called "sub-saharan" people going into and out of North African and the Green Saharan for centuries. Especially during the wet period. www.academia.edu/677017/Human_Skeletal_Remains_Fazzan_Libya + "From Figure 7.22, it can be seen that the Garamantes cluster most closely to the "Sub- Saharan" Africans and secondarily to the Roman Egyptians from Alexandria and the Nubians from Soleb. Populations from Algeria and Tunisia are somewhat more distant but still rather close to the Garamantes. The most distant groups appear to be the Sudanese Jebel Moya and Kerma, as well as those from Gizeh. Overall, these results are reasonable given that from the archaeological evidence it is known that the Garamantes were in close connection with Sub-Saharan Africa, and at different times with people from Egypt and the Mediterranean coast of Africa. " ________ They also did a recent study, in North Africa and found that once again, it was not due to slavery. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ahg.12040/abstr + "The presence of sub-Saharan L-type mtDNA sequences in North Africa has *** traditionally been explained by the recent slave trade***. However, ***gene flow between sub-Saharan and northern African populations would also have been made possible earlier through the greening of the Sahara resulting from Early Holocene *** climatic improvement. In this article, we examine human dispersals across the Sahara through the analysis of the sub-Saharan mtDNA haplogroup L3e5, which is not only commonly found in the Lake Chad Basin (∼17%), but which also attains non-negligible frequencies (∼10%) in some Northwestern African populations. Age estimates point to its origin ∼10 ka, probably directly in the Lake Chad Basin, where the clade occurs across linguistic boundaries. The virtual absence of this specific haplogroup in Daza from Northern Chad and all West African populations suggests that its migration took place elsewhere, perhaps through Northern Niger. Interestingly, independent confirmation of Early Holocene contacts between North Africa and the Lake Chad Basin have been provided by craniofacial data from Central Niger, supporting our suggestion that the Early Holocene offered a suitable climatic window for genetic exchanges between North and sub-Saharan Africa. In view of its younger founder age in North Africa, the discontinuous distribution of L3e5 was probably caused by the Middle Holocene re-expansion of the Sahara desert, disrupting the clade's original continuous spread." _______ The Sahel belt is and was the bridge between all native ethnic African groups. Before any concept of "slavery" was even in existence. The use of that term is just another tactic but you Eurocentric shit heads, trying to erase other ethnic groups from their land. In Africa, as non-Africans. You are out of your depths here.
@@amenrakwamehotepporchprima9307 I didn't lose anything, and no, there was "Caucasian" dynasty until invasion from non-African groups. During the middle period and parts of the new Kingdom. Until the collapse of Ancient Egypt itself, after the 25 dynasty. North Africa has a history of foreign invasion: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644363/ + "Despite the long-standing presence of human cultures in the region, **it has been suggested that the present-day populations in North Africa are the result of a recent back-to-Africa migration in pre-Holocene times that replaced the first inhabitants** in the region, followed by multiple migrations from neighboring areas [3]. One of the most relevant human groups in the area are Berbers who are supposed to be the descendants of this first migration back-to-Africa from the Middle East; however, the dynamics of human groups living in that area is still unclear. ** Historical events testify of many invasions, conquests and migrations by Phoenicians, Romans, Vandals, Byzantines, Jews, Spanish, and French [4], as well as the presence of autochthonous groups such as the Libyans, Moors, Gaetuli, and Numidians, among others. However, the most important event was the Arab conquest that begun during the 7th century, when North-African autochthonous Berber populations were converted to Islam ** and since then Arabic has become the official language employed in the region. This fact influenced the geographical distribution of Berber communities, which are nowadays relegated to peripheral and relict areas in a vast region extending from Mauritania to Egypt and from the Sahara desert to the Algerian and Moroccan Atlas mountainous areas [5]. " Also the native Egyptians, knew who the foreigners were, and it was the "Caucasian" Greco-Roman. That they fought against. www.lib.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/files/TheGreatRevoltoftheEgyptians.pdf + "With **the invasion of Alexander the Great (333 BC) a Greek regime is established in Egypt, which will last until the Arab invasion a thousand years later (640 AD) **, first under the Macedonian dynasty of the Ptolemies, from 30 BC onwards under Roman and Byzantine emperors. For more than a millennium the land of the Nile is directed from the Greek city of Alexandria, situated on a peninsula before the coast of Egypt, a bit like New York before the coast of the US. The language spoken at the royal court and used by the royal administration is different from that spoken and understood by the overwhelming majority of the population. Although the Ptolemies were officially recognized as pharaohs by the temples and even crowned by the high priest of Memphis, although they supported Egyptian religion by subsidizing the cults and building great temples (see below, text 2), they remained fundamentally a foreign dynasty. *** Starting from 246 BC there are several native uprisings ***. During the most successful of these, all Upper Egypt revolted against Alexandria for almost twenty years (206-186 BC) under the leadership of two native pharaohs, called Hyrgonaphor (Haronnophris) and Chaonnophris. Though no monuments have been preserved of these last native Egyptian pharaohs, we are able to reconstruct the main events and even the ideological background of the revolt on the basis of a very diverse source material, both in Greek and in Egyptian." ______ Yeah, but the Egyptians were "Caucasian"...lol gtfoh.
What a coincidence. I'm just decluttering and come across files from a Pan African history classes I took over 30 years ago. This information was learnt back then. The power's that be, struggled with its acceptance. I'm not surprised but glad to see a gradual acknowledgement.
Yes, its amazing how this has been suppressed. If you study they earliest work on predynastic Egypt its more than obvious their culture, religion, language are all African.
@@Dosadniste2000😂😂😂 u mean when he sat down with 8 white men an had a debate they made things up because they definitely didn't win that debate. An the world knows
Hates off to this man.He is a principled man of high integrity who decided to swim against the waves of lies and deception to discover and tell the truth.Respect!
@SV Green Turtle no white man, in antiquity and today, can survive the 37°c temperature and heat, that Egypt gives out....especially without sun screen creams. If you must know, our ancestors were also sun worshippers and they do so with little or no clothes on their bodies....can any of the Arabs today dare to expose their skin in this heat? Kenneth, like its name connotes, remains black.
@@amenrakwamehotepporchprima9307 He knew exactly what he was talking about. The Khoi-san people of South Africa have the oldest living DNA on the planet at 100k years and we all have an oldest common ancestor who is a 200k South African woman, Homo-Sapiens are born dark skinned and Africans have the most dominant DNA traits being the source of the human race. A white Biologist dates pale skin around 6.5k thousands years, only black people were around in those times so what exactly are you arguing here as you don't date old enough? Did you even watch the video up top? There is even a collection of Afro combs from Egypt that dates older than non-black DNA. You all need to stop throwing non-sense story out there it so easy to shut down.
@@amenrakwamehotepporchprima9307 Ouch! You think you won something? You do realise all phenotype originated and exist in the most diverse place on Earth, Africa? Child, do not play this game, all ancient skeletons found are dark skinned people, look up cheddar man for Britain.
To this day, they can't find a group of more than three whites or Asiatic together on any paintings, statuettes, or any art whatsoever. Yet, many of such black Egyptians everywhere in museums all over the place. However, these people will tell you it is white and Asiatic.
You're just making up jealous lies. Nothing you just stated is true. Your people lived below the desert in dung huts. The Egyptians didn't know your people existed.
It amazes me how black people seem to want to claim other peoples cultures and identity, yet they will be the first to shout cultural appropriation if someone dares to have an Afro hairstyle if they happen to be white!... Some of them even claim the Greeks where black!! some even claiming Jesus was black! even tho its historical fact that he was a Galilean Jewish man! No one claims Egyptian's are white, but it is historical fact that Egyptians are related to people form the Middle East ... new DNA evidence has proven this Quote: "They found that the ancient Egyptians were most closely related to the peoples of the Near East, particularly from the Levant. This is the Eastern Mediterranean which today includes the countries of Turkey, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. " source: bigthink.com/philip-perry/were-the-ancient-egyptians-black-or-white-scientists-now-know Even the argument that blacks where somehow displaced from Egypt by Europeans or the Arabs has proven to be a lie Wolfgang Haak at the Max Planck Institute in Germany said, "The genetics of the Abusir el-Meleq community did not undergo any major shifts during the 1,300 year timespan we studied, suggesting that the population remained genetically relatively unaffected by foreign conquest and rule.", It wouldn't surprise me if they where also black people living in Egypt, but the evidence suggest that the majority of the population of ancient Egypt was genetically related to Abusir el-Meleq people and probably had most of the influence of its development , in fact most of the artwork found also seems to reflect the skin colour that you would expect to see from this ethnic group, although you do also find some artwork showing them as white, black, yellow and green! but in much fewer cases!
@Chris Lee: you wasted almost 2 hours of your life, if you watched this video and still came up with that misleading "DNA evidence" on the origin of Egyptians. For crying out loud, Dr. Christopher Ehret discounted that "evidence" within the first 10 minutes of this lecture! He pointed out that DNA samples were taken from subjects from a latter period of Egyptian history, to infer the origin of Egyptians. He likened this to the intuitively ridiculous notion of inferring the ethnicity of the founding of America, from DNA samples taken from Irish immigrants of the 19th century Biston, rather than the English who arrive much earlier on the Mayflower! Fact is, Dr. Ehret presents a most intelligent, logically compelling case for the origins of the Egyptian civilization ... at least for those who are intelligent enough to follow his lecture.
The last couple of hundred years have been a historical anomaly. From the origins of civilization in Egypt 5000 years ago, "Africa" was either the center of civilization or one of the centers all the way up to the 19th century. Our time is the dark ages of Africa, but already the continent is regaining it's place in the world. Far in the future, these last 200 years of poverty in Africa will just be a footnote. Roughly 4800 years of glory and only a very brief period of collapse.
Why is it hard to believe? Because we have no real knowledge of the history of the human being. we only guess and speculate from lack of knowledge and lack of being. Consciousness.
Don't forget South Africa brother. That's the oldest civilization period. There you will find the oldest depiction of the Ankh, Heru, and the Adams calendar dating back 75,000 years ago. Also the Labemba Bone the oldest mathematical instrument in the world dating back 35,000 years ago. Ask well as ruins
Despite the fact African people are the first people, white people would rather give credit to aliens or more recent people from maybe 10 to 20,000 years verses African that we can show the bones of from 200,000 years ago
@@natemyers4946 not true..againt one Erhet there is 10 other scientists that say the opposite. You just have one biased jerk and can not find any other. Make gim into a God cause he is the only one approving your BS ;)
I see a change here compare to what people wrote about egypt. People who were or are not africans, explaining africain country, its culture, and langage from their europeans views. I do have an issue with the story of egypt related in the Book of geneses. The language the scenery have nothing to do with africa or egypt of those days. Words like: prison, slaves , camels don't exist yet in ancient Egypt. At the time of the book of geneses camels were not introduced yet in egypt. In ancient egypt or un all africa there were not prison. And the egyptians themselves left nothing about all these stories ( Joseph, moisés, the exodus, and slavery )
It's so sweet how everything you've been working on gets further recognition and affirmation as truth. And continues to seep through into the mainstream narrative as more and more evidence is brought forward. Such a beautiful time to be alive, the truth is coming out as was forecasted to be so in the new age of Aquarius we are heading in.
@@dvrmte Indigenous Afrikans are not homogeneous nor do they have a single phenotype. Being the most genetically diverse and oldest of the homo sapien sapien species, slim lips and narrow noses are traits that can be found in indigenous Afrikans with no foreign admixture 🤝🏾
@@dvrmte Homo sapien sapien is over 200,000 years old and indigenous to Afrika. Migration of the species into continuous settlement is from around 100,000 to 80,000 years ago, from Afrika. Making every ancient population group to have established continuous settlements in those regions have indigenous Afrikan ancestry. Back flow migration is evident because there are various reasons for migration. Indigenous Afrikan women are the only women of the entire species that hold the genetic memory for every genetic variation present within the human genome. As in they are the only humans able to birth every homo sapien sapien variation currently present. I'm Nilo Saharan from the East of Afrika, my genetics belong to those who are indigenous to the Nile Valley and the Sahara region. Indigenous being the first people to have enhabited those regions. Indigenous Afrikans are the oldest and most genetically diverse of the homo sapien sapien species. Afrika is a vast continent with varying climates and altitued that attributed to the indigenous phenotypic markers found within various populations, thin lips and slim noses are not exempt traits within indigenous Afrikan populations.
@@denzelonyangod109 Show me one modern human fossil with Negroid affinity older than 6,400 years old. The 36,000 year old Hofmeyr skull, found on the Cape of South Africa is Caucasoid, not Negroid. Maybe we should look at human fossils in the Congo for the elusive ancient Negro fossil? The Ishango site near Lake Albert and the White Nile might hold some answers. The site was occupied constantly from 5-25,000 years ago. A volcanic eruption covered the area with a deep layer of volcanic ash. It lay uninhabited until it was resettled a few thousand years ago by its current occupants. Scientists have found a lot of modern human fossils there. They're most like Upper Paleolithic European fossils. Still no old Negro bones. What about Egypt? The 33,000 year old Nazlet Khater 2 skeleton shares closest affinity to Upper Paleolithic European fossils. The Negro is the most recent modern human group to arise.
@@dvrmte You're sure talking alot without saying much at all :// the mtDNA of all Afrikans is estimated to be dated as far back as 165,000 to 125,000 years ago...
The oldest modern human fossil is 315,000 years old and was found in Morocco, which is only 9 miles from Europe. Fossils 210,000 years old were found in Greece, and 195,000 years in Israel. You're missing the point. The fact that there are only a few modern human fossils of any kind found in Africa between 15-70,000 years old. The only ones are those I mentioned in my previous post. There are also the 15,000 year old Iberomaurusian fossils found in Morocco and Algeria. We have DNA from the iberomaurusians, who were Eurasians. That's the oldest DNA found anywhere in Africa. They shared the same basic genetic ancestry as the people that lived in the Caucasus Region 26,000 years ago. There were supposed to have been several mega-draughts over 100,000 years ago in East and South Africa. It likely killed off most of the modern human groups that were there. The only human types that survived in Africa appear to be Eurasians, archaic hominids, and mixtures. We know that people who were Eurasian genetically and Caucasoid biologically lived all over Africa by 40,000 years ago, except in West Africa. Caucasians likely evolved into modern humans in North Africa, Europe, and West Asia. The Mediterranean Region in general. An Homo erectus-like hominid survived in Central and West Africa until at least 11,000 years ago. There are Middle Stone Age sites in Senegal with stone tools used by Erectus. There is a 13,000 year old skull found at Iwo Eleru, Nigeria but it's not modern human. It's archaic and much like Erectus skulls. Those hominids are the recent ancestors of West Africans who have relatively large amounts of archaic admixture.
I had at least 2 Egyptians, that don’t even know each other, tell me ancient Egyptians were Africans and the reason they look so light now is successive waves of conquerors, like looking at someone currently in the USA and thinking that is a representation of someone who descended from ancient Native Americans. One of them gave me a book on it and said one of her parents was from the south aka upper Egypt and looked African or “Black” while the other parent was more Turkish.
My mother used to say that early ancient Egyptians are our people, till today our folk dance, traditional clothes and language is similar to ancient Egypt.
Have you taken into account the proceefings of the 1974 UNESCO Symposium in Cairo, Egypt, on The Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering of Meroitic scripts?
As an Egyptian i m proud of my ancestors’ achievements and civilization and i m proud of Africa. Whoever denies that Egypt is in Africa needs to learn geography, Egypt is located in the North Eastern part of Africa with 6% of its land in Asia and has always been the corridor between the 2 continents, its location gave it its unique character of multi-culture.African, Middle-Eastern (Afroasiatic).
Western Asia was North East Afrika at one point in time, this is documented in a academic book called, when Egypt ruled the East, the great Count Volney, his work Ruins Of Empire will back this up.
@@briggsdidnotstrapem7699 I wouldn’t call Count Veloney a historian, he is merely a traveler who documented what he saw (like today’s vloggers). He described Egypt during the late 18th century before the French campaign n which they discovered the rosetta stone and translated the Heliographics. I am talking only about the Sinai peninsula which was and still is a part of the Egyptian land (not Egypt’s expansions). Ancient Egyptians used to mine for copper and Turquoise from Sinai and called this land “Ladders to Turquoise”
@@Sema-Tawy I will not attempt and, pretend i know Count Volney like the palm of my hand but, what is he to you then? if he is not a historian, The Ruins Of Empire is a masterpiece, its either your a racist or, a hater. do you have The Ruins Of Empire??? have you read this book??? i have this book in my collection also, I have some of his work and studies, Count Volney's work will cognate and could relate to many European scholars and philosophers, my prime example is Goeth. what do think about Goeth then???
@@briggsdidnotstrapem7699 I wouldn’t either, but i read his biography and his study by the time standards doesn’t qualify him to be a historian, a writer maybe, a philosopher perhaps, I have read travels through Syria and Egypt, and i have studied French literature, the author like many of his time is making a propaganda for the French Revolution slogan which gives excuse for the French occupation under the pretext of applying Liberte, Egalite et Fraternite (just like the USA today uses the pretext of liberating Iraq from a dictator to steal their oil). Reading his notes on Egypt after spending 7 months and the amount of details regarding the nile and the lands and their measurements, the kinds of fruits and vegetables, the politics, one can easily assume that this is the work of a spy, no wonder Egypt was invaded by Napoleon 15 years later. That is just my personal opinion.
@@Sema-Tawy You did not answer my question about Goeth, I asked you specifically, do you care to answer about Goeth? before i pretend to think you do not know Goeth and, to show you how much European scholars, European philosophers could relate to his work and studies. I collect academic books, i will stay away from biography, for they are written in a political stand point, I like following scholars and academics, so it is not problematic. The conclusions of Count Volney were subsequently confirmed by Professor A. H. L. Heeren, General J. G. R. Forlong, Gerald Massey, Dr Albert Churchward, and Lady Flora Lugard. The Ethiopian contributions to culture and mythology were best stated by the Scottish Anthropologist, General J. G. R. Forlong, whom we cite. Please forgive me for I did not get your name????? Count Volney was not the first to write about Egypt, Herodotus, Herakles, Plato, Aristotle, Diodorus Siculus etc. etc. has taken notes about Africa and, not just Egypt, Napoleon was not the first to sack Egypt, just for your information, your theoretical description about someone taking notes about Egypt and, later Egypt fell into the hands of a new conqueror is old and, not new at all, I am trying to dispel you of this notion.The Cambises in the 550 BCE sacked Egypt, the Persians sacked Egypt, Greeks, Romans, Arabians etc. etc. Egypt is not Egypt no longer, Also check your dates from the old kingdom, The Kings of Egypt, Egypt has been sacked, even before the Cambises smashed them in the 550 BCE, your confessions tells me you have missed to read what i am covering right now and, you have displayed how delinquent you are in African History. France is a young country, Napoleon is a baby, France was not even around in the Carolingian era, I will not need no educating today about France, thank you. Barok Khan
This man is very honest in a world of liars . I appreciated this very much. My father, who is a Nigerian Yoruba descendant, on his father side, did his DNA with 23 & Me. He discovered he is a descendant of Ramsees III. I found out that many black men from the African diaspora are finding they are this Pharoah's descendant. I also found E1B1A is the genetic marker and that is a black African haplogroup.
@marrs g550 No, the connection wasn't from the non African side. It was the Y chromosomal marker that both my dad, Ramsees III and his son Pentaware share. The haplogroup is E1B1A which is Sub Saharan Black African. Ramsees III'S DNA was analyzed and the detailed results are in the British Medical Journal Dec 17, 2012 issue entitled "Who Killed Ramsees III" The DNA haplogroup is on page 40 above the area that reads DISCUSSION. This study was in conjunction with Hawass the Minister of Antiquity of Egypt who is very anti black. He didn't promote the findings because he's a racist and didn't expect them😂You can read the full report yourself. I've downloaded it. Ramsees III is a part of the 20th dynasty. Those kings were direct descendants of the first kings of Egypt. Ramsees III'S male line goes back in a straight line to black men who are Central African Great Lakes people who followed the Nile, forming kingships creating Pharonic culture. They are the very beginning of the Egyptian civilization. I went to Egypt and saw tombs in Aswan from the 1-4th dynasties. The people on the tomb walls look like any blk people with Afros and dark brown skin. Other groups came into Egypt much later. But the civilization was created by black Africans who are my ancestors.👍🏿
@@AskiatheGreat64 www.bmj.com/bmj/section-pdf/187711?path=/bmj/345/7888/Yesterday_s_World.full.pdf This is the link to the article. The article is titled "Who Killed Ramsees III. The Haplogroup info is on p.40 on the paragraph above the heading that says DISCUSSION. It's kind of buried because Hawass is very anti black and I believe he was shocked that the haplogroup was Central African Great Lakes BANTU. There wasn't much publicity on it. It's just that Ramsees III'S DNA is public domain and with these DNA tests the people having DNA connections to him are black men from East and West Africa and Afro descendants from the Americas.
The languages are Nilo Saharan (Nubians) and Afro Asiatic . We know Tah Seti , Nubia is the foundation and that they are the indigenous people . So much overwhelming evidence says they were Africans especially in the old Kingdom when the pyramids where built . I don't see were there is any room to say they weren't .
I see still a possiblity that the low Egypt ws moe middel eastern, at the beginning they were 2 difernet palces, and both depictions and gentic anylsis of low egypt shows realtion with mid east.
Keep in mind that the current narratives about Egypt and Africa as a whole comes from a generation steeped in a belief of racial superiority. And it would discredit the claims of race supremacy if it were widely known that the race designated to be the other end of the spectrum was creating advanced culture and structures while the ‘superior’ race was still hunter/gatherers. But the African story should serve as a lesson to all, hubris comes before the fall. Africans went from rulers of the ancient world to the world’s only third-world continent because they got complacent, and history has a troubling way of repeating itself.
I never understood why people are still debating on their race . Their skin color is what their paintings shows . They look Nubians to me , some looks Ethiopians ( brown skins ) , some Soudaneses ( darker skins ) .
@@devrayne6770 reddish brown is the adjectival form of aethiopia in Greek. The noun being burnt face. Technically, reddish brown is also a definition for what we call black today
Because they cant stomach that earliest civilization of human beings was belong to Africans. Greek, Roman and Persian civilizations are based on Egyptian civilization. Thus, it is really hard for Europeans to give credit to Africans. Remember black people were ,still are, subhuman according to white people.
@@curiouskid1547and Egypt is not in Africa and the moon don’t rotate around the earth and there is no such thing as a sun and birds swim while fishes fly😂😂😂 lame ass bozo the clown in the face ass 😂😂😂
Only Europeans could try and argue Egypt out of Africa and Europeans can place it back. Africans know that Egypt is African or was, now Europe has to unlearn their bigotry.
I agree with him respecting his revisionist definition of the word CIVILISATION. Monument building isn't necessarily CIVILISATION. It is the equitable use and application of social resources and technology for the broader wellbeing of society that constitute CIVILISATION.
He published a paper c. 2023 which detail all his findings. It's an exhaustive study which incorporates linguistics, genetic analysis, and classical studies.
Question: Twice, I visited the village by the name of Makere, in North-West Tanzania. Later, I ran in something interesting when I read somewhere that "Makere" was one of the names of queen Nefertiti. I don't know if the people living there, or the ones that used to live there, and who named the village, were nilotic people, but it sure made me wonder if there might be a connection. Could professor Ehret please elucidate?
"The Lebombo bone is a bone tool made of a baboon fibula with incised markings discovered in the Lebombo Mountains located between South Africa and Eswatini.[1] Changes in the section of the notches indicate the use of different cutting edges, which the bone's discoverer, Peter Beaumont, views as evidence for their having been made, like other markings found all over the world, during participation in rituals. The bone is between 44,200 and 43,000 years old" African Culture and African Science is much older than most realize.
She (the famous one) was obviously from the invaders the Ptolemaic dynasty therefore Greek or whatever European background she came from not the true African Egyptians
She was a Greek colonizer, murderer, culture vulture and usurper. Her father was Ptolemy, he was also a Greek colonizer, murderer, usurper and thief. Europeans love to put these people as the face of ancient African civilization, which is racist. However, her mother’s ancestry isn’t known.
I agree, professor. I agree that the world making cultures relevant only by conquest would hope to change as it seems that those who are more destructive are not those most creative historically.
I like how this man is honest !! Long time I have been telling people that ancient Egyptian are Cushitic ( north East African ) even their language is too close to beja language which is Cushitic language in eastern Sudan and Eritrea
@@ruggedtechie5867 😊לערבים אין שום קשר להיסטוריה אפריקאית ההיסטוריה האפריקנית שייכת לאפריקאים. המצרים היו אנשים שחורים בדיוק כמו העברית. וערבים הגיעו 600 שנה אחרי ישו אז בבקשה עזבו את ההיסטוריה של אבות אפריקה בשקט.
Cushitic and Egyptian form their own separate branches of the Afro-Asiatic language family. Still related though. Egyptians looked like modern Sudanese and Beja people.
They can never tell the whole truth- he admits that the ancient Egyptians were Africans, but then tries to say their language was Afro-Asiatic? Riddle me this- if the ancient Egyptian language is older than any of those so-called semitic Asian languages- wouldn't that mean that the Asian semitic languages are derivative of the Egyptian or some African mother tongue and therefore not Asian at all? I mean people speak Spanish in South America- does that make Spanish a Euro-American language, same for French, English or Portuguese etc. These people are frauds, their institutions are fraudulent and their sciences are shell games.
Afroasiatic is a linguistic term that denotes the geographical areas where such languages are spoken. He clearly states all Afroasiatic languages started in the Horn of Africa.
@@ra8682ra Is the language spoken in America called Amero-English or just English? Is the language spoken in Australia called Austro-English or just English?
People should stop calling Kemet Ancient Egypt . Two different periods. It's a privilege to know African history . Kemet had many African tribes migrating through it . All different and unique . People that have tried to take it out of Africa from Africans do themselves a disservice .
" Kemet had many African tribes migrating through it ..."Migrating through it? ... There were tribes established there, who actually lived there, along the Nile river their source for food and life and they protected their territories. It wasn't a supermarket or a train station where anyone could just stop by or fly in and feel safe like in the modern world. This is the ancient world we are talking about where a lions and other dangerous animals were still roaming freely all over the place, and tribes were ready to attack strangers.
So interesting that this man of the 'right' shade is being applauded in the comments for what scholars of African heritage have been saying for over a century. I do wonder whether the comments would have been so gushing if this man was of African heritage . . . ?
You display >Eastern and northern Africa and you speak of Asia?Asiatic language? Besides Arabic, which language is 'Asiatic' in Africa, if not from Mautritius Madagascar and neighbouring region to them?
Everyone is not as honest and trustworthy like you. Those who see those statues and still say NOT black are a type of hate that’s strange. There over 300 million black Africans who have the so called “white features” from Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Rwanda etc.
1:00:00 - 1:01:14 Africa coming from the south or the upper Nile were simply a subsistence crop economy influence to Egypt civilization not a part of it? But he admits the writing art of consonants minus vowels came from/ invented by Africa Nilo-Sahara … The presenter insists that the rest of Africa continent were migrants to Egypt but the Arabs from outside the continent, were native to Egypt in Africa? Or help me to understand what and how this Scholar is presenting on Africa
The term Afro-Asiatic is a misnomer and is simply an extension of pulling Ancient Egypt out of Africa via the horn of Africa and the Middle East. The distinguished lady at 01:32:34 is definitely right about the misleading application of Afro-Asiatic to Ancient Egypt, the peer reviewed dna tests point Southward to inner Africa
Show me the peer reviewed DNA tests because I don't believe you. Afro-asiatic languages likely originated in Northeast Africa or the Levant. Egypt is in both Asia and Africa.
@@adamnesico What are you on about, the presenter and the lady are in agreement, the term Afro-Asiatic and all it's appenditures are misplaced, misappropriated, from the true source, Black Africa. I don't see the complexity that's getting you all muddled up.
The most prestige Unverisities in the World including The University of Cambridge and Oxford acknowledge ancient Egypt (Kemet) was a black African culture. But, still today people still refuse to accept the fact. As I say, Denial doesn't change facts.
You lived in egypt. Do you actually know what Egyptians look like? If I say am black it would honestly be an insult to every black person. I find it ridiculous and extremely offensive to me as an Egyptian to think Egyptians are black makes the current Egyptians living in egypt today imposters
@@martin22336 I wasn't talking about today's Egyptians.But, the Egyptians who built the Pyramids. I know what Nubians look like, who are the original Egyptians. Outsiders came in and mixed with the Nubians and lighten the population. I guess the most prestigious universities are insulting them because those Universities use the word " black" in reference to the Egyptians who built the Pyramid. Now take your word game somewhere else because it still doesn't change who the Egyptians were who built the Pyramid.
@@martin22336 You can call yourself whatever you like. I'm not talking about the people living in Egypt today. I'm taking about the Africans who went into Egypt when it was called Ancient Kemet over 5000 yrs ago.
@@martin22336 Funny, how people want to think black folks were the first in Africa but, in all the years in Africa the black folks in Africa never sit foot in North Africa. At one time the only people on Earth were those living in Africa when there were no such people as European or Arabs.
@@deejones6431 In 13 January 2012, an exhaustive genetic study of North Africa's human populations was published. The researchers analyzed around 800,000 genetic markers, distributed throughout the entire genome in 125 North African individuals belonging to seven representative populations in the whole region (Saharawi, South Moroccans, North Moroccans, Algerians, Tunisians Berbers, Libyans and Egyptians) and the information obtained was compared with the information from the neighboring populations. The data shows that the ancestors of today's North Africans were a group of populations which already lived in the region around thirteen thousand years ago. Henn, BM; Botigué, LR; Gravel, S; Wang, W; Brisbin, A et al....the truth shall set you free!!!!!
Wow - really good lecture !! It starts off a bit slow (give Ehret a chance to get rolling), but really blossoms into some absolutely fantastic research and also Q&A discussion. Bravo !!
How The Migratory Routes of Africans Prove Their Link to Egypt and Nubia | The Link - Part 1 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GSZKvinHTc8.html Kemet and West Africa - How The Culture Shows a Strong Link with Ancient Egypt | The Link - Part 2 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bYxorxfdVwg.html
