The Airgun Show - summer rabbit ambush, PLUS improve your spring gun accuracy… 

It still takes skill to accurately shoot a pcp

@@coryb6722 not nearly as much as break barrels.

reply anyone with knowledge

Plenty of information on RU-vid

Hi Russ, I make them. They are available on eBay and Amazon.....if you contact me I will sort something out with you 👌

how many rounds through it?

Your scope is loose.

Park RH91 every day 😇

Walther Rotex RM8 I'd recommend, you'll not get a better pcp for the price

Hw99 is THE best break barrel on the market £230.

It's not sub12 ftlb show

Yes

The Airgun Show is a subdivision of The Shooting Show. R

It's your shooting show, shooting blanks.

@@derekbootle8316 I assume you mean it has to be firing powder-burners to qualify as 'shooting'? Whereas Matt's spot-on here, wisely using a rifle capable of 60ft/lbs+ turned down to 30ft/lbs, allows for humane headshots out to decent ranges, while keeping noise to a minimum (way quieter than a moderated subsonic rimfire rifle), so as not to scare off other vermin. 🤷🏻‍♂️ R

@Broad Side Made for free are they? I suppose the magazine is free as well. Are you that naive that you think they make these videos for us out of the goodness of their hearts? I think you probably are. It's a business, the video's are made to attract more advertising which is why they overwhelmingly positively review the advertisers wares, no matter how bad the wares are & literally never criticise them. Pushing that Gamo rammer as some sort of impressive bit of kit is a joke. If you had a clue about airguns you would know this. The "free" video reviews are there to attract the clueless & hype the latest thing that's usually rubbish , so the advertiser sells more & the magazine & channel get more money. Like I said it's a business & the business does not care that they sell & recommend tat to gullible customers & trust me they do. I would happily subscribe to a channel that actually impartially reviewed airguns, if you know one let me know. If you actually believe the reviews that these and Archant put out then congratulations you are the exact clueless punter they want to attract. Actually yep, I do know a lot about spring guns & I work a lot on my collection. I am not an expert gun smith by any means but I know what makes a good spring gun & how to improve them. I've shot, tuned & maintained springers for over 40yrs so yes I am an armchair expert & proud of it. Since you insist, here you go a quick review. Webley Vulcan MK3. Well made Birmingham gun. Very basic but reliable rifle. Easy to strip & maintain. The trigger is average compared to other brands such as HW & many modern guns but can be easily improved with polishing, honing & a lighter trigger spring. Most Vulcans are 5.6mm bore & this can make finding compatable pellets hard but when one is found the Vulcan is accurate out to 30yds if you do your bit & know the proper way to shoot spring guns One of the main issues with the Vulcan is the barrel pivot bolt which is not adjustable & can wear affecting accuracy. So watch out for that if you get one. Later Webley rifles like the Longbow rectified this with adjustable bolts to nip up any looseness in the breech Jaws. Scope rails are decent but no arrestor holes mean good mounts are essential but if you can find one with the original open sights then use them, they are very nice out to 20yds. Build quality is excellent & bluing is usually excellent & of a quality rarely found on modern guns. Stock design is classic sporter with a slightly low comb but an adjustable butt pad helps sort this out. Handling is neutral & the MK3 carbine is a truly excellent handling rifle. With properly fitted spring guides & a good lube job the Vulcan is a delight to shoot. It is a light easily handled sporter that is great for hunting out to 30yds if you can find a pellet it likes. With new Wasps I can attain 5p groups at 25yds easily & that is with 22. So the Vulcan is classic Webley, well built, easy to handle but not without issues. The trigger being the main one. Would I recommend finding a decent 2nd hand example. Absolutely, but be prepared to do some work to get the best from it but if you put the work in you will have a reliable workhorse that will last another 40 years. See, that's called an honest review because I've no advertiser masters to shill for. So, no I'm not naive I'm honest & I know the score when it comes to these sort of "review" videos / articles. You carry on believing free somehow makes up for pushing inferior quality tat, you're gullabiliy is what they are aiming at. Oh & yes Webleys are good guns & no Gamo aren't OK, they are horrible especially the gas ram, just like the Ram BSA's.

@Broad Side I pay monthly for my Internet, I paid for the devices I watch on. I pay for the electricity that powers those devices. Nothing is free. I don't know how much the mags would be but they still aren't free are they genius? Yes it's business but that does not mean you have to shill like Airgun Shooter & the Archant mags. Plenty of RU-vid channels are sponsored & advertise but they give unbiased reviews & will declare if products have been supplied by sponsors/advertisers. I 100‰ guarantee that if Mr Manning was going to spend his own money he would not be buying a plastic fantastic Gamo to go hunting with. You are right I don't have to watch & I won't because there are plenty of channels & other resources that give decent reviews, advice & technical help with integrity. You go on being a gullible simp defending bad advice, compromised reviews & I will carry on knowing more about airguns than you will ever know (plainly obvious you know pretty much nothing) & avoiding these shill sites. Oh & you asked me for a review, I threw one together quickly on the spot. It had more honest appraisal than any review those shill sites put out & mate you show just how little you know because the Vulcan is a good solid rifle easily improved & 100 times better than that piece of crap Gamo. I typed that review in 5 minutes of the top of my head, so yeah I could put together something vastly more informative, entertaining & most importantly with integrity given the time. For example I coukd do a review taking apart the review Matt does of that Gamo & show just how bad a gun it is & how much he is hyping to please his advertising masters. Could you do that? Do you know enough to actually critique his review, I doubt it. I note you said you've used Gamo's which says all I need to know about your knowledge of airguns 😂 You carry on watching crap, dishonest, biased reviews & bad advice & I'll carry on going to the places that know what they are talking about. I put my money where my mouth is, I did a quick review. All you have done is try to insult me & simp for an airgun show, are you hoping for a free subscription & pat on the head from Matt 🤔

Matmanningoutdoors

@@lancsvermincontrol 🙏