i was looking for a grounding hub because of what ive learnt with ecu and auto electronics and stumbled on this which is my other hobby and im like holy shit I didnt even think how it could relate to audio lol. Thank you for existing! Now I can clear up my car audio whoooooop!
But the signal ground is attached to the chassis so it's the same as chassis ground. Still, there likely will be benefits to connecting each separately to a grounding box. Kind of like not having a return path wire on your interconnects and relying on connecting the ground lugs on all your components. I tried it. It sound real bad.
What a bunch of BS. This isn't an interview, it is an advertisement. How in the world does it makes any sense to allow a person who is deeply financially interested to assure use that the has developed his own way of "objectively" testing/measuring different electrical properties and this has allowed him to make various "discoveries." . Unless an until these "tests" are repeated and confirmed by the electrical engineering community generally, they are worthless. This is so typical of the "audiophile" community. The interviewer does not ask a single difficult question. Instead he allows the head of a company selling snake oil to say that he is "scientific" and talk as if he has discovered something that allows his company to make products that "science shows" are better. If the interviewer were truly interested in the "science" of audio, he would not allow this salesman, to go on and on without asking any even semi-challanging questions. Instead we get same old "the difference was so profound that my wife was able to hear it from the kitchen" garbage.
What's amazing is I would LOVE to have my technologies comparatively tested and published against the supposed very best of the best but there are no takers??????
If scientists used your logic, or thought like you, mankind would still be living in caves. This is a maker, inventor, and practitioner. If you’re looking for pseudo science that changes every 5 years, and actually contradicts itself 100% of the time, go read Ivy League professor peer reviews who are in the business of getting more funding to do more peer reviews. Science is not for you, but you seem rather, to be more interested in the religion of science.
A “power conditioner” or power cords making an audible difference? Can you say gullible? When someone shows the results of a properly administered ABX test that support this smoke and mirrors them I’ll be all in. Until then I’ve got a bridge I’ll sell you.
Why is it so hard for some to accept that there might be phenomenon (that can demonstrably addressed with high fidelity technology) that don't conform to their traditional measurement tools that were created for a different purpose?
@@divertiti I'm not embarrassed at all. I would be if I believed in this kind of BS equipment and actually spent my money on something that does nothing to improve my system based on a sales pitch with no facts or proof other than their word. That's not going to happen. I must have hit a nerve with you. Did you buy one and now you're too embarrassed to admit you got taken or have you convinced yourself that you actually hear a difference where none exists?
