The BATTLE is on! MFT is the BEST. For these 3 reasons - SENSOR SIZE DEBATE (part 1) 

@@JJARCHIE well. We’ll see… I mean, people are saying MfT is dead for years, yet LUMIX came and chocked the world with both the GH6 and GH7

@@KevinvanDiest There hasnt been much camera that can do uncropped 4k60 and pull insane bitrates without overheating before z6iii now they cant really pull much out of it , the density is a downward hill - the one thing they can do like uncropped 4k60, no overheats and raw is now matched with 4k120 soon with no crop. Their rolling shutter isnt even that good since the z6iii pulls 14ms and the fast sensor advantages dissapear. Lumix pulls the ibis to ff and achieves what their mft lineup can , once the s5iii gets the z6iii's sensor then its over. Comparable in ibis and rolling shutter Larger sensor 1-1,5 stop better in low light Lets not even note that the a7v is usiang a semi/full stacked 33mp sensor , a 7k60 would be monstrous

@@JJARCHIE yeah LUMIX also has focus on their FF line up which is looking good already. It’s compact (even lenses), comparable I.S. performance, the amount of output options ..very promising

The Z6iii costs 3000€, doesn't have a fan and the GH7 has more dynamic range (Stack sensor is not magical, Less rolling shutter but less dynamic range)

@@sebastienblanchetiere1323 gh7 has 11,2 - a proper entry stacked xh2s has 12. Oh would you look at that. sure , The semistack 24 isnt really tuned that great by nikon , but it still does 11+ dr for a sensor double the size, problem is the a7s4 will fix it and match a7s3's 12,4 - and then what. The z6iii doesnt have fan - yes , so they can just throw in a fan if they want , but even without it , it doesnt overheat that much. The z6iii being a hybrid looms over the mft cinema cams more so than any other ff cams ever. And thats coming from the smallest of the fullframe competitors. Arent you afraid of what the s5iii will pull ? The eventual 4k120 no crop and matching ibis with no overheat ? The fact that z6iii launches at 2,5k and will go down more ?

@@sebastienblanchetiere1323 thx for adding. True. Rolling shutter is something that’s less on MFT due to smaller sensor. Another pro for MFT.

@@paperstacksfilms thx for sharing. Left it out of this 2part sereisy

@@NetvoTV not really going into the comp between Nikon and LUMIX now …because that’s quite the obvious.

@@cyborgchimpy thx man… yeah always on the edge. Worked with green screen for this series so that’s always more of a struggle. Next episode will be the same..probably the last green screen I’m gonna use. Simply because it’s a pain in the ***. Seeing you in the next part? 👍🏼

@@KevinvanDiest ya know what, yeah. I subbed. supporting a fellow Dutchy ;) and I'm an MFT fanboy so let's gooo.

@@cyborgchimpy great having you! Another MFT fanboy… let’s enjoy this awesome time where we have such great gear to pick from!

Maybe your eyes are aging a bit 😉😂

@@McSnappples mine or his?

@@2004Ches Part2 of this series is coming, reasons for FF. No worries mate, you’re good😉👌🏼

🙏

@@constantsmile3370 no problem, part2 is about reasons for FF

For anyone that has shot for many years and has used a variety of systems, brands and sensor sizes, one thing is clear; MFT offers far more versatility Vs any other sensor sizes. If you're a run & gun filmmaker or a wildlife photographer, the ability to be able to travel light and remain inconspicuous is a massive advantage! And with speed boosters, MFT can be built up and down as needed. Again, a massive advantage Vs any other sensor sizes. And just like buying a car, every DP must identify and recognise their own unique set of circumstances and then build a camera system around that! For me, I gladly mix a variety of sensor sizes as I need them, depending on the job and the shot(s) required. Basically, I see MFT in the same way I see a great selection of lenses. Would you use a 16mm lens for an interview or talking shot? No, you wouldn't. But that same 16mm is excellent at making a small space appear MASSIVE! That's the advantage of MFT. Unmatched versatility & adaptability! And personally, I prefer true medium format images over FF, as that offers far more dynamic range and light gathering than FF does. And the images of true medium format also appears more 3D than FF or other smaller sensor sizes. But it doesn't offer the flexibility and versatility of MFT. So the answer: Use them ALL! MFT when needed. APS-C or Super 35 when needed. FF when needed. And the exquisite beauty of true medium format when needed. So if you have a chance, pick up an MFT camera, I'd recommended the Lumix G9ii and of course the incredible Lumix GH7 if you can get your hand one on right now, and you'll instantly see how versatile and adaptable that system can be. Will it replace FF? No! Of course not! But does MFT offer incredible creative opportunities over other sensor sizes? Absolutely YES! Simply put, use them all! That's what the world's best DP's and photographers do Sorry for my essay 😂 And if you've read this far, I thank you and hope you have an amazing day or night wherever you are in the world.

@@McSnappples awesome input, thank you. Totally right. Unfortunately lots of people say MFT isn’t good enough, simply by watching reviews instead of having their own experience with it. Often spoke with people during trainings or workshops about MFT being bad but never used it before! What is it with people? Simply making someone’s opinion as their own? Lots of people aren’t even aware of the fact that lots of films they love to watch aren’t shot on FF. Indeed, the MFT is more than only IQ. It’s a system and I love it because of that, it’s the workflow that I love, the options with lenses, the wide open shots without to much shallow DOF. Thx for the input. 👌🏼👌🏼😉

@@KevinvanDiest Cannes 2024 has not one but two films shot on the BMPCC 4K invited to their film festival. That's two MFT sensor cameras being good enough for arguably the most prestigious film festival in the world. In other words, if sensor sizes smaller than full frame are good enough for Roger Deakins, George Lucas, Netflix, Hollywood, Arri, the Oscars and most notably the Palme d'Or, then YES, they are more than good enough for the rest of us! Use the best tool for the individual shot required. It's that simple.

@@McSnappples exactly man! What is it with people always liking one thing and instantly hating the rest? Both can be good, if only used properly. That’s why I currently used both the FF and MFT. Used aPs-c in the past too. I think people are missing out by this way of thinking, not giving themselves the opportunity to using the potential of other sensors(tools).

@@thomasa.243 yeah good addition, totally right. Keep them coming people!!

@@rMr.big13 good for you👌🏼

@@KevinvanDiest okay, reading through the comments, my point about younger, less experienced DP's obsessed about big sensors has now been proven! A guy literally called 'Mr big' is laughing at your video about a smaller sensor size. Are you compensating for something? 😅🤣

@@McSnappples 🤣🤣🤣 now I’m lmao

@@McSnappples hahah could be…is that something about my package? 🤪🤣🤣🤣 Okay but seriously I think it has to do witch the fact that FF is like the standard now in photography and therefore people starting with film think that’s also the case with film. If Medium Format was the standard for photography then I bet people wanted to have Medium Format for film. They think it’ll make their photo and videos better …but as always it’s the skill and the sensor could be the proper tool when used in the right situation. Part2 of this video will be about Ff, curious what comments au will get then haha. Are you watching to then?

@@KevinvanDiest well then you better not tell those people obsessed with full frame that the most popular sensor size in the world is the HALF INCH SENSOR found on Apple iPhones and used on the majority of other camera phone brands as well! More photos and videos worldwide are captured on half inch sensors than any other sensor size. And if you spend time on Instagram, you see the sheer scale of amazing images captured on those teeny, tiny sensors that are in fact a 5x crop of full frame! So yes, it's not the size of your sensor, but rather how you use it 😅🤣

@@KevinvanDiest and yes, I'll be eagerly awaiting your full frame video as well. Not just for the video itself, but I'm curious about the comments too...

@@McSnappples hahah you’re right man. Had a good laugh 🤣🤣

@@McSnappples we’ll see … probably more people will agree so less interesting comments maybe