The Beatles with Paul McCartney (1962-1966) vs The Beatles with Billy Shears (1967-1970) 

Thank you for creating this channel. When I tell someone that Paul McCartney isn't really Paul cCartney they recoil in horror and surprise, and when I try to explain what I mean, they almost feel sorry for me. I don't blame them, because at first I reacted the same way. However when I did some research it became very apparent to me that something terrible had happened to the Beatles in 1966. I can no longer enjoy anything The Beatles produced after 1966, its as if i'm dishonouring the memory of that lovely fella that died. When I watch their "concert" on the roof, (he one where coincidentally there is no audience) I just am amazed at the idiot beside John, who's pretending to be left handed. Paul McCartney was a very loveable person, with a very friendly face. He was smiley and funny both on stage and in interviews and it beggars belief that people think that that guy on the roof is the same person.

"joined the best band in the world" "already set-up affair" these statements make no sense if he is really paul mccartney

He never passed as Paul to me. I knew at 12 years old it was not him. RIP Paul.

George was always the most honest and seem to take hiding the secret the hardest, especially as he became more spiritual later in life. I hope he found peace before passing.

I saw the original interview of Heather Mills today. That woman was scared out of her wits over being offed because she knew Paul was dead, and she was stuck with a fake ass doppleganger.

He PASSED as Paul * after surgery, but in time it seemed to wear off, and the real face came through again.

Its about time we were told the truth. Its not fair to Paul's family having to keep up the pretence

Great as always. I enjoyed the side by side showing the sock coloring.

George was always very specific.

He let his face grown long

I feel a bit guilty & foolish for believing the lies told about Heather Mills. it all comes together when you listen to her speak about "Paul"- Billy.

On the 1962-66 beatles album, that's Paul McCartney. On the 1967-70 beatles album, that's Billy Shears. There's a difference.

I would like to remind skeptics, regarding voice and other topics. In discography it is normal routine to record many songs, tracks and incomplete ones. Many songs are discarded waiting for a next album or to be released as unreleased after years. Everyone does it. So with all the takes that the Beatles have, creating albums with the real Paul's voice for the first albums would have been a very easy operation, taking into account that without the live performance everything can be done in the studio. The backstage studio footage is a cover-up. In fact, the music videos taken from the films reveal many inconsistencies. This new Paul McCartney multi-instrumentalist, film director, who advertises drugs, who wants to be the "only genius" in the band, is another personality with a very different ego, and above all a great connoisseur of the teachings of Aleister Crowley. An additional musician ready to do anything to take over the role of the real Paul until he takes control of the Beatles. When he created a new band, without the original takes to re-perform he never had much success. Use logic in this absurd story and the answers will come in no time.

I've noticed Billy becoming more brazen about this recently. He's minimally if at all trying to hide it. The Lyrics by "Paul McCartney" he is showed interviewed recently discussing it on his own Twitter page. Interestingly, on the website this is promoted on, The Memoirs of Billy Shears is promoted right along side it as an even better set. He's even got comparison photos on there that are great at showing the differences!

Always fascinating... cheers

This channel is such a W for Exposing Billy. And is it just me or does Philip normal Kinda look and acts like paul mccartney here? ( better acting than billy ofc ) JUSTICE FOR JAMES PAUL MCCARTNEY!!!!!!!!!!

Do you think replacing Paul was forced upon the other Beatles? Or was it a decision they made to keep making money?

"the parting on the left becomes the parting on the right ....we won't get fooled again" the Who referring to Paul/Faul hair transition. Did Elton John sing about Paul's death ?

Wow, some people still believe that Paul McCartney was in Wings.

Paul had brown eyes and Faul has green eyes.

Another Masterpiece justice keep going we won’t get full disclosure till Billy departs I feel but keep you going your awakening so many people

I've got 3 huge Doubts in my life , 1 the Man on the moon , 2 Kennedy's assassination and 3 if Paul really died in 1966

George singing: Paul, Paul, Paul, Paul, Paul .... (While My Guitar Gently Weeps 1968)

James Paul McCartney died in car crash on September 11 1966 and was replaced by William (Billy). I hope that one day justice will be done to Paul.

We've been deceived about so many things in history. I'm sure they signed a contract, either lose money or fake it to make it. I couldn't imagine the pain John, Ringo and George losing Paul and felt like they had no choice. They always seemed genuinely happy with one another then they look sad. I mean I feel bad for Billy, he probably thought it was the coolest thing being involved but didn't care for the lie either. RIP Paul. 🙏❤️

Billy looks so evil and smug in some of the photos...

WOW. Just wow. Now the question is, did Paul accidentally die in the car accident and they wanted to keep the Beatles the way they are or was he sacrificed?

¿y Jane Asher?. Ella vivió ese cambio, esa transición de Paul de antes de 1966 a la etapa posterior. Mucho antes que Linda.

I think at this point that the only person who could tell about Paul/ Billy , would be Pete Best. Why ? He does not need compromises like Ringo , i think that Mr. Starkey has been told to keep his mouth closed , Pete has nothing to loose or making profits about all this history. Pete is the most reliable Beatle .

How does the musical genius who wrote fool on the hill turn into the ludicrous junk musician of Band on the Run. I never heard this theory but I always wondered about the music.

I've just been watching the Princess switch. And they quote John Lennon in the film. Film is about a Baker who pretends to be a princess and ends up taking the role for life. Uncanny or what?

If Paul was replaced by Billy Shears why does Billy's singing voice sound like Ringo Starr?

Paul looked nothing like Billy does - fact.

Beatle Bill.

Two different people.

The obscuring of Faul's chin and ears was clever, but not as impressive as how they got the physiognomy with the angle of shoot, real solid post 66' puppetmastery

For me, the most obvious clue was when Faul sung ‘Blackbird’. Not ‘Whitebird’ but ‘Blackbird’. We all associate Black with death (Black widow) whereas White is life (White wedding). As if to underline the point he sings Blackbird singing in the DEAD of night. How many clues do you need?? As I said, for me it’s all here in just this one song. Billy Shears was/is an MI5 agent as we all know who also happened to be a very skilled songwriter/musician. Ironically he wrote Live and Let DIE, like we need another reminder, thanks Faul! In many ways Faul has been more successful than Paul ever was and must have been gutted when Paul was knighted so I’ll say it here on behalf of the forum (if you’ll allow me) - ‘Arise Sir Faul’ !!

Liking the soundtrack. What is it.

How come so many people won't accept rhis

Why didn’t Faul wear coloured contact lenses to avoid all the comments about eye colour?

Yo apuesto doble contra sencillo "Accidente programado" lo quitaron del medio.Razones no aceptaba "cosas de la Helite".

Nineteen seexty-seex