Couple of corrections: there are two DisplayPorts and one HDMI port (not 1 DP and 2 HDMI), and the HDMI/DIsplayPort specs are the wrong way around in the Essentials Checklist. Also the UFO Test header should read 271QRX not 271URX (monitor names strike again!)
@@MaxxDW *a lot Because HDMI 2.1 doesn't mean much. The previous 2.0 doesn't exist anymore, they can all be called 2.1 now even if they don't include any specs that one would expect from 2.1
It's a gorgeous monitor. 360hz is brilliant, the colours and black levels are great and text clarity has definitely improved (still not perfect) - but unfortunately I've had to return it. The eye strain was insane on this one for me, significantly worst than the LG OLED monitor, worst than anything I've experienced on previous TN or IPS panels. After 2 hours of use, I could feel my eyes really struggling - then leading to headaches and ultimately not wanting to use it. It seems I'm not the only one based on comments across online forums and with Dell themselves.
I’m glad I’m not the only one! I felt so much eye strain and for me the text clarity was really bad. This is my first OLED monitor, but I jumped straight back to IPS after trying it due to how bad the headaches I got were. Not trying OLED for a while I think until things improve…
@@jeffdev7947Yeah, I ended up moving back to my previous IPS monitor and the eye strain/headaches went away immediately. It's such a shame because the actual colours and clarity of the OLED was so so good - but just not worth the eye strain and headaches.
Ugh... pains me to read this! I am really scared of this and him mentioning the pwm flickering was not a good sign. Doubting whther I should buy this now since I already spend the entire day at the computer screen. By the time I have time to game my eyes are often strugling already!
@@user-nk1wq4zf9fDell's return and service policy is great - so if you wanted to try it yourself then it's really straightforward to trial it before returning if it doesn't work out. It does seem to differ from person to person too, I've seen a few people on the Blur Busters forums say this panel works great for them.
A good review but I am disappointed that you do not go into more depth and detail regarding VRR with both AMD (FreeSync) and NVIDIA (G-SYNC) graphics cards, in particular in regards to flickering when playing games using VRR with variable framerates. You show footage of Spider-Man: Miles Morales running in the review but make no specific mention of what it is running on or whether VRR was in use. I've owned this monitor since 8th February 2024 when I received it directly from Dell here in the UK for a bargain £779. It was an upgrade to a 7 year old 27" 165 Hz 1440p ASUS ROG Strix PG29Q G-SYNC monitor that cost about the same and had a hardware module that worked flawlessly with G-SYNC. I just enabled it when I got it and it just worked in every game I played without any noticeable flickering. However, the AW2725DF has noticeable flickering on the desktop wallpaper when using the 360 Hz refresh rate with G-SYNC enabled on my RTX 4080 Founders Edition using the latest graphics driver. This issue is also visible in dark grey loading screens and in some games too that feature dark settings. It can be quite distracting at times although I'd say that for 90% of the time, at least for me, G-SYNC works fine and the flickering is not obvious. However, I suspect that is more to do with the games I am playing running at a locked 120 fps with little to no frame variance and in my experience this seems to be what is required to get rid of flickering completely. But needing a fixed framerate to reduce flickering kind of defeats the whole purpose of using VRR in the first place. Initially, I thought the VRR flicker was a fault or because this display is not certified as G-SYNC compatible by NVIDIA unlike the AW3225QF but I have discovered from other user posts that not only does the 32" monitor suffer from this exact same issue but the issue is not a fault of this particular monitor but a flaw with the OLED and QD-OLED technology that causes the gamma to fluctuate with the refresh rate. For something that is advertised as a "gaming monitor" this is kind of surprising to me as it is what I would consider to be pretty major flaw and one that very few reviewers even cover, if they mention VRR at all. Love the monitor for everything else though. Fantastic image quality (I'll take those slightly raised blacks and a purple cast to the screen in ambient light over the IPS glow on my previous monitor any day!), superb HDR and beautiful colours, all of which make me feel like I am seeing the games I am playing properly for the first time. It's a really impressive display only marred by the aforementioned flickering with VRR enabled.
so it flickers with gsync on if the framerate wont reach 360 what if you lower the refresh rate to for example 120? will the flickering stop because you can gsync with 120?
Very great points that I hope they address in future reviews. It definitely came to me as a surprise as well when I bought my 240 hz Corsair OLED and I experienced the same issues you did. G-sync/freesync is virtually unusable on OLEDs from what I gathered unless you can put up with the flickering.
My monitor baby. I took the plunge this year and I’m glad I did. It’s such a beautiful smooth monitor. Makes everything a joy. The only people that might not love it are people that want a 4k screen or want better text clarity (fine for me but I’m also not working on it). But for anyone that likes 1440p at 27 inches, this makes gaming fun.
360 hz is only for dp monitor not for console i have thi monitor and is OP ,2.1 hdmi work perfect in xbox series x and ps5 2k 120hz need to try if work 4k 120hz same monitor suport that also even if is 2k !
Thanks for the review. I have been waiting for this review so as could decide between the Alienware and the MSI so much appreciate. Now that i've ordered the Alienware 27" please could you do a 'best settings' guide for this monitor for an oled noob like myself.
I’ve had this monitor now for about 3-4 weeks and I’ve got to say, it’s incredible. I play a lot of e-sports titles and with the clarity and responsiveness of this panel, it’s just unreal. Love this product, in my opinion it’s really amazing!
I’ve been on the fence with committing to the 4k 240hz or this one. Is there anything that you recommend to optimize this monitor from cables and such?
@@cookiepuss8182you could also consider the dual mode monitors asus pg32ucdp or lg 32GS95UE 4k @ 240hz and 1080p @ 480hz you can also get a 15% discount right now during lg pre order period for the monitor I was able to checkout at $1430 with a 5 year oled warranty so 2 years for the default warranty and 3 years for the extended warranty
It's quite amazing how many Dell has produced of this monitor lmao. I have it also with the same use case, it's just amazing. I understand better now that it is not about seeing stuff earlier than 165 IPS, but just that everything is clearer and smoother.
Biggest problem for me is that, I use dldsr for better looking image, but this is disabled on displayport because of of DSC. Unfortunately no way to disable dsc or even in lower refresh rate on displayport DLDSR is still not enabled. So I only use HDMI ( Limited to 144hz and 8bit color). I might return it, idk
I feel like the MSI is a better value here. Especially with HDMI 2.1 compatibility, USB-C power delivery (i use that), no flickering and the increased brightness. The brightness is honestly a deciding factor for me. Waiting for rtings' review on the refreshed 27GS95QE to decide finally and hopefully by then B&H will restock the MSI model.
I can't decide between the Dell Alienware AW2725DF (777€) vs GIGABYTE AORUS F027Q3 (786€) The Alienware hat 2x Dp 1.4 and the Gigabyte has 2x HDMI 2.1 Both are grate Qd OLED.
I thought about waiting for q4 2025 for 4k 27 inch Oleds however after search and consideration, i passed. I think it requires a bigger screen to get 4k benefit and I dont want a 32 inch screen for many reasons. The price in Switzerland was 759 CHF including tax which makes it cheaper than US hence ordered it.
@AAMAIUV For me, it certainly is! Unfortunately, the only 27 inch 4K OLED 240HZ panels are set to start production in late 2025, and by that time, I'd be more interested in what LG's 34 inch 5120x2160 W-OLED 240Hz panel could bring.
@@gokhanbat6169 In gaming terms, I sincerely agree about 4k at 27 inches not being a worthwhile step up in clarity vs. cost of performance to drive such a high resolution. In terms of doing work, or even day-to-day usage, 4k offers quite a bit more room for applications on screen, even at 27 inches. With that said, I still use an LCD for general PC usage and work. Even though I've never experienced noticeable burn-in on any of my OLED displays, I don't want to be the one torture testing something so expensive.
In Canada the Dell is $200 off like every other week ($999) while the MSI is $1019. Hard choice but might go with the Dell for service. Might just wait for 480hz woled tho. LG definitely should have priced the new 27gs95qe more aggressively imo.
Which do you think is better? Alienware or MSI? 27 or 32? I use a 27 for productivity a bit. Don’t game as much anymore but watch movies . Is 32 more text clarity? I don’t want text super small either
@mjregan88 ordered the aw2725df and came scratched from crap packaging. Returned and order the MSI which came with a dead pixel. Not sure what to do now 🤦♂️
I bought both this and the 4k 240hz model to test side by side, and the 360hz vs 240hz is absolutely noticeable, however the lower ppi is also VERY noticeable. Ended up returning the 27 360hz as the 4k offers better resolution, significantly better text clarity, and still incredible speed
@@tr4nnel752 very true! but honestly with a proper setup you can easily max out 4k240 in competitive games, so it really just comes down to size preference and if you care about clarity
Could you elaborate about in what way was the difference noticeable between the different refresh rates? Are you talking about smoothness, input lag or something else? I have a 2 year old 1440p240 and am looking to get a 4k240 27" in the future, and I can't imagine that getting 120 extra frames above 240 is going to be very noticeable. I exclusively play shooters, albeit mostly with a controller...
If you're in Canada currently the AW2725DF is $999.99cad($736.29usd) while this Is MPG271QRX is $1119.99cad($824.64usd). I ordered the aw2725df a few days ago and looking forward to use it.
I wish built in KVM would become more common with these high end monitors. With working from home becoming more commonplace, I think it makes sense so people can use their monitor to easily switch between their work laptop and personal PC.
@@captainminxley Think about it this way: At 1440p you will be able to run more games at higher frame rates which I personally think it a better trade then some extra clarity that you will get at 4K.
Just bought this monitor for ~844€ ($923) in Germany, including student discount which you can claim on the Dell-Website. Absolutely love it! Pairing it with a 4080 super to actually achieve 360FPS in competitive games. Unfortunately you didn't mention that the stand is a bit shaky so I'd advice to use it on a solid table!
Finally decided to pull the trigger on this bad boy now that Dell has announced that they will include a setting that disables DSC to allow DLDSR in DisplayPort through a firmware update. As someone who uses DLDSR often on older titles, that was the deciding factor on whether or not to get this monitor so kudos to Dell for listening to their customers.
Alienware uses a fan to cool with msi uses passive which is pretty big difference imo because fan can break. Thing is the alienwqre is on sale for about 1k cad now and msi is 1120 cad right now
@@Attqched Sure fans can run a long time, but that's just another breaking point that can happen. They don't fail often, but when it does I'd rather not have a fan inside a monitor fail. It's all up to your opinion, I find less mechanical moving parts means more reliability. Alienware is the objectively better monitor, better calibrated and marginally better performing monitor. Right now the alienware is a way better deal obviously but when prices come closer together MSI takes the cake for me. It's like how new cars these days are full of technology that can break and cause issues, but you still have reliable beige corollas on the road. Not all new stuff break, but there are always a few out of a production that are unlucky and get hit with issues
Hey there! While waiting for all QD-OLEDs to come out I bought an U2724D IPS Black 120Hz display as secondary and gotta say it deserves way more attention than it's getting.
I was about to comment this, that the ~€100 difference is not true here. I'm still on the fence whether to go with this one, or wait for the 1440p 480Hz models coming later this year.
@@spaghettilocomotive the Asus 1440p 480hz is probably gonna cost between 15k - 20k nok when it released. Do you really need 480hz? If you do then it makes sense to maybe wait.
@@hypnoticlizard9693There is a difference between 360hz and 480hz cause of how the persistence delay works. 480hz is so close to 2ms of monitor persistence lag which is why it looks amazing. However you should always at least double your current refresh rate when upgrading to see a big difference. So from 120hz to 240hz, 240-480-480-960/1000 etc.
Right? I had a preview of what this could be like in June 2022 using a gaming laptop with a Samsung Display 15.6” 1440P 240Hz OLED at up to 380 nits full screen white. The pixel density was at 188PPI and it was completely glossy so in a dark room I was in heaven. This is basically the realization of that dream I had almost two years ago! I love my AW2725DF.
I have a 42" LG C2 that I am incredibly hard on. Often leaving static images on it for hours on end. I play Wow some times 8 hours a day on my weekends, I do tons of browsing and treat this display like any other monitor. After 1 year, I have zero burn in. Zero.
Yeah, LG Display panels have been doing well in the image retention department. The jury is still out for Samsung panels, that seem to be more susceptible but we're not sure by how much. Especially these new 3rd gen QD-OLEDs that they claim have better processing that should lead to less burn-in.
@@DrakonRif he were doing something "wrong", wouldn't it burn in after a year? If it starts burning in fast at 4 years, then he changed his usage pattern.
@@DaddySizeIt you really don't understand OLED burn in.. No, it's not expected to burn in after a year. Otherwise the warranty would be for a year. Typically under normal usage you're looking at 3+ years. My OLED experienced burn in at the 4.5 year mark.
@@DrakonR I've been thinking hard on this topic and decided for my new TV to replace my old '09 plasma, I'm getting a Bravia 7 55" miniLED. I also replaced my MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED with an LG 27GR83Q-B. Both great monitors, yes the QD-OLED is better for sure, but they're not that far apart in my opinion. I don't think one makes me a better or worse player at least. But for my new TV, I whittled the list down to that new Bravia 7 or HiSEnse U8N. Going Sony even though the HiSense TVs look amazing in person too because I think it'll hold up longer. Don't trust HiSense component quality. Maybe I'd take a gamble on one for a 2nd TV.
Have you used a QD-OLED monitor before? Even at 5% grey it looks really good at 100% brightness. These are night and day better than their MLA WOLED counterparts.
I'm just curious, are there many adults (25+ years) who actually like the "gamer" style? And why the flip don't more manufacturers make more monitors with normal, slick, elegant designs?
I want to note that saying the SDR calibration is the best you can get isn't essentially false. TV, Movies, and essentially all games post LCD TVs (so the last 20years) are based around a flat 2.2 Gamma instead of piecewise sRGB gamma as that is what TV use. You cannot change this on any of the QD OLED panels without unclamping the Colour Gamut, so you will always have a viewing experience that looks washed out as near black under sRGB gamma is linear tracked which isn't needed as we aren't using CRTs anymore. So far not a single major publication has mentioned this, I don't exactly know why, but saying the SDR calibration is elite is only applicable when you consider for web (not content) use ONLY.
ngl i have no idea what that means. can you explain more? i can change the gamma to 2.2 in creator mode > srgb mode on this monitor. is that not correct?
@@NoshNosher Dell and basically everyone on the internet reviewing displays incorrectly lists sRGB gamma as 2.2 as it averages out to 2.2 but is infact correctly called Piecewise You cannot change the gamma on this display from piecewise to flat / pure 2.2 gamma whilst retaining the correct colour gamut (saturation) If you choose a different preset, the gamma goes from being piecewise to the correct flat / pure 2.2 Gamma but colours become over saturated You often hear Windows HDR looking washed out, this is because Windows SDR to HDR translation assumes the SDR content should all be piecewise when that hasn't been the case for two decades.
Forgot to add that the lack of full bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, meaning that I cannot use 360 HZ with HDMI, is disappointing for a 2024 display. This was one of the reasons I held of buying one of last year's first generation 27" OLED monitors as well as the low brightness. At least, this monitor has two 360 Hz capable DisplayPort connections and just one HDMI that only does 144 Hz as most of last year's monitors with the exception of the LG one only had one out three connections that were capable of 240 Hz. I was hoping to try HDMI with G-SYNC to see if the VRR flickering is better than with DisplayPort but the refresh rate limitation means that it just isn't worth bothering with, particularly as I am playing many games at 120-240 fps now on this display (my previous monitor was limited to 165 fps with G-SYNC).
I still think that LCD monitors are much much better in terms picture quailty/reliability/features for it's value. OLED is really for someone who already has an LCD for monitor use/work and wants a dedicated gaming setup, still 99% of people won't risk it with the OLED and/or don't have enough money anyway,.
Hey Tim! Are you considering replacing some of the tests you do when reviewing OLED monitors? Since OLED panels determine most of a monitor's quality and performance, and basically only Samsung and LG are making those panels, these monitor reviews end up being Groundhog Day for most of the content. Results for response times, overshoot, even color accuracy are all great, if not the same, across OLED monitors. In short, those segments end up becoming useless, or can be summed up in a few seconds instead of taking up the bulk of the review. I for one would love to see more practical or real world evaluations for monitors, such as how they look, fit, or feel to use in different desk dimensions and viewing distances, discussing gaming contexts other than first person shooters, and all in all focusing more on the tangible differences between monitors rather than these metrics that we already know are going to be virtually the same across all OLEDs. Thanks for the vids!
After using the PG279Q for about 10 years, now with the introduction of 360 Hz OLED I finally decided to upgrade and went for this monitor and I couldn’t be happier. It looks amazing, feels smoother (obviously) and hasn’t disappointed me in any single way. I use it pretty much only for gaming, but also do some casual browsing on it. Personally I have not had any issues with it whatsoever. Also I have never actually noticed the text looking worse because of the pixel layout, but I’ve also never paid close attention to it. It’s nice to see this review basically confirm to me once again I made the right purchase :)
You had the same monitor as me (PG279Q). Do you find the flickering with G-SYNC enabled to be annoying versus the flicker-free experience on the previous monitor? It baffles me just how few reviews even cover VRR on these displays, let alone mention if they have flickering while using it. Would be nice if we got more analysis of how FreeSync and G-SYNC work on these monitors.
@@DoctorHades To be honest, I haven’t done much testing and messing around with settings yet so I can’t tell for sure. I’ve basically briefly looked through some settings on the display itself but that’s all. I’m not even sure what settings I currently have enabled when it comes to G-Sync or VRR. The only thing I can tell as of now is I haven’t noticed any flickering whatsoever. I’ll try to do some testing later this evening and will give an update if I find anything interesting.
I swear I’m in the same boat I haven’t bought one yet but this is number 1 for me right now I just don’t wanna go yet because I feel like I’d regret it or something better would come out right after.
@@rdking005I feel you. I’ve kept my previous monitor for that long simply because I never thought the monitors that were better were worth the money (considering the small upgrades over my current one). It would be small upgrades like going from 165 Hz to 240 for example. I always said to myself I’ll upgrade once OLED becomes “affordable” and it’s a significant upgrade in Hz (which 165 to 360 is imo). I feel like right now this monitor is just everything I want and even if something better comes along in the future it would probably have upgrades I don’t really care about. For example more than 360 Hz which is just overkill to me or 4K 360 Hz which I don’t care about since I’ll always prefer a higher framerate over higher resolution. So yeah this just felt like the perfect moment for me to upgrade :)
I have been using this monitor for 1 month, and it's an amazing one . There are one real issue I had with, and was obvious one but unexpected....the missing of a audio output!!!
@Ray-dl5mp I don't believe the logo detection activates on a full screen white image, and I've noticed that it gets surprisingly bright when running test content. They should definitely let you disable logo detection to get that extra 30-50 nits for all content.
@@tylerthere5832 interesting. Good thoughts. Either way I love it but I do love having the options you’re talking about to max out a panel. So I would be in favor. But I am a dim room gamer for maximum picture quality so I have no problem with brightness of this display overall.
A note: the LG27GR95QE-B does NOT have 3% overshoot, there was a firmware update about 8-9 months ago-ish that fixed it completely, it’s actually around 0.4% now
Just got this a few days ago. My god it is phenomenal. Whether I use it with HDR off or all the way to HDR 1000... whether i use it for gaming, watching movies or just regular desktop use, the sheer Silky smoothness of it all : >
I bought this monitor when it launched in Malaysia on day 1. No event, no fanfare, it just pops at the website and I purchased it online inside my car. Got it 2 days later. Got it for 740usd had it for a month now. Got this instead of the LG 27GR95QE that launched last year because this is cheaper. The MSI model was just launched yesterday here and it's 130 usd more expensive. It's hooked to my ps5 tho lolz Works great at 1440p
that's how I feel about it too... took AGES for desktop OLED to arrive. People were using frigging TVs, 55"+ screens as monitors as a result. That should start dying off again in the next couple years.
What is the best gaming and productivity monitor? OLED is great, but I don't want the risk of burn-in when the majority of my time is actually spent using normal office stuff, but I still would like a great gaming experience.
Excellent review as always but my only gripe really is the statement that starts about @7:30 in the video explaining the issue with potential burn in. He says productivity apps for long periods of time should be avoided which I certainly agree with. Then goes on to say with video or gaming it's basically a non issue. Well every game that I can think of has some level of static images that remain on screen nearly at all times. So how can both of those statements be true. Productivity apps with static elements should be avoided yet gaming which also almost always contain HUDS, Crosshairs and maps and such which are generally very static elements are just fine and not a potential problem???
Whats the best settings to use on this monitor for PC gaming? Got mine a few days ago and have been trying different presets but not convinced 100% which one to go for
MSI Gaming MPG 321URX 1245 Euro or Alienware AW2725DF at 1000 Euro ? I play 2 competitive games and the rest of the time other games like -Elden Ring Cyberpunk Baldur's Gate , etc.(time - 50% comp - 50% other games) Thanks in advanced
I wanted to go Oled but Dell is a step price and MSI is higher price here. So i found A LG 27GR95-B for 400$ is it worth it? Until Oled matures some more :) I play mostly single-player (Cyberpunk 2077 / Horizon / Tomb Raider and the likes). (Currently on a Gigabyte M27Q 1440p THE Worst monitor i ever owned).
@@antonioberrios5978it’s amazing tbh. It took some adjustment coming from my aw2721D but it’s an obvious huge upgrade. You just have to play with it and your system to find settings you like.
i went with Dell...Amex had a promo where i was able to save 120 in the US. Im glad i waited for the QD OLED, it was well worth the upgrade. The main reason to go with Dell in the states is mainly due to the warranty support vs MSI or ASUS. Based on research and past experiances I found a seemingless experiance when dealing with them.
Thanks for the review! I’ve had mine since January 18th and it’s pretty much been a flawless experience. I’ve been waiting for a color accurate sRGB mode utilizing QD-OLED at more than 200 nits of brightness and this monitor has delivered beautifully. Halo 3 at 360Hz with super accurate sRGB color and near infinite contrast is a sight to be hold! I feel lightning fast on this thing. ⚡️
Honestly I am Stunned how stupid the market is. Even how good these monitors are in other aspects it’s a 100% Fail !! When they don’t provide the custommer with a full HDMi 2.1 in 2024. I don’t care that most of us are going to use the DP connection anyway, It’s still a Fail that people with a console device don’t have access to full bandwith HDMi.
Coming from a bright IPS its hard to get used to how dim these panels can be. I just switched to this monitor and that is what is throwing me off the most.
Do I understand correctly that if this panel has VESA AdaptiveSync certification I can still enable G-Sync even though it is not officialy supported by Nvidia? Maybe stupid question, but I do not want to pay extra price for OLED panel only to find out that I am screwed. Thank for any reply folks.
I love mine.. but honestly I'm considering returning it. I used a Alienware AW2721D before, so yes, 360hz is noticeable over the 240, but that's probably the biggest improvement. I'm not saying the colors arent great, but are they 900 bucks great? Brightness is also noticeably lower, text clarity is worse, and I feel like I'm getting eye strain after a while. All in all maybe not the monitor for me, although I wish it was
Hey, in what way is the difference over 240 noticeable? Smoothness and response times I can understand when comparing 240 ips vs 360 oled, but I can't imagine it making much of an impact in input lag, or am I wrong here? I have a 1440p240 and a 4k120 27" ips and was looking to skip 360hz and higher and just go for a 4k240 27" oled next year. I only play fps, but again, can't imagine the difference to be big tbh, but maybe I'm wrong.
@@mjregan88 many things, custom graphene heat sink, real hdmi 2.1, oled care with functions to prevent burning, better construction quality and more aesthetically beautiful, kvm, I think aw does not have a headphone output, and something else that I'm sure I forgot
The review I was really needing! This model is by far the most affordable I'm the UK by a lot. Its currently £760 as it was at launch. Waiting a few weeks for it to become available with my student discount code to save am extra 10% 🤞
very nice video, thank you! grabbed a lg 27gr95qe in europe for around 650 bucks 2 days ago. couldnt be happier. price is the most important part at the end.
I feel like my screen is not bright I use it strictly for gaming maybe it’s the settings I use as I can’t find any videos on settings for the montior so I’m trial and error right now… would be appreciated if you could do a video on monitor settings to use love the content though
Why isn't anyone talking about that the OLED monitors screens flickering and not being flicker free? They use PWM technology. I think this is a huge problem and very harmful to the eyes. And it's a step backwards in that regard. Monitors should become safer, not more harmful. I don't care how pretty a screen looks if it's not as harmless to the eyes as possible.
Buying OLED monitor is such an idiotic thing to do, I can't belive anyone would do that. No matter how great response times and DCI-P3 coverage may be, they are good for TV's, but for monitors, OLED is the worst case option, with $900+ price range (some $1200+) and burning the task bar into Your screen :D In other words, play as much as You can and turn it off once Your are done, because it will burn in. What a great option! Gremlins are easier to maintain...Maybe in 4 to 6 ears, when LG or Samsung will fix this issue, we can talk about OLED monitors. Right now, no "OLED Care" bullshit will solve the issue.
@@kulter20 I did own PG27AQDM, returned it in less than 14 days after I saw on my own eyes WOLED text fringing. You can cry me a river telling how great OLED tech is, but untill Samsung or LG fixes burn in issue, there is no reason to use OLED as monitor. Go on, play Your games, tell everyone how cool OLED is, but the fact it can't be used like normal monitor, because of the burn in bullshit, tells the whole story. Cheers
With this monitor, if I went with it as a main. What would be recommendations for a good 2nd and 3rd monitor? They can be the same. Just something for monitoring info, discord, youtube and other various apps.
I already have the new LG 27GS95QE and I just purchased this AW monitor, time to put the glossy vs matte screen debate to rest. Loser is getting returned 😅
At the end of the day this is just ridiculously way too expensive for the normal person, who cares about refresh rates above 144hz lol be lucky if a handful of people will actually buy this
@@noperider1234 don’t be silly 🤪, apart from content creators on RU-vid, no other fucker out there will part with such cash for a monitor unless there stupid. Nobody can afford the hardware to run such monitors at there sweet spot
Awesome guide video like always, thank you very much. That msi monitor on same paanel is interesting too but that led light indicator in the middle of frame it's not what I would like. So for qdoled 360hz it's this dell here and new Samsung Odyssey LS27DG600SUXEN, did you have chance to test it yet? It be really great if you can review it, there is surprisingly low amount of good content videos on this Odyssey monitor. Greetings
Im going to buy this and the 4k model. Waiting for my amex card to arrive and for either unidays or bluelight discount codes to work to get them cheaper
Man I really want to experience PC OLED. But I can hardly accept, that a ~$1000 monitor can't even Display text properly. And you shouldn't be fine with it either.
Can someone please tell me, That is it come with .3ms response time and freesync enabled?! Or I need to on this manually from settings, if that then from which options?! Please anyone?!
Hey can someone help me with this? how can I get the full 360hz? I am using display port and went into my windows display setting and it only gives me the highest option of 240hz. Could this be because of my low end gpu?
Hi, yes, it probably is because of low end GPU. I had the same issue with GTX 1060 6gb. This generation of GPUs does not support DSC compression. Look into it as it is probably the cause of your issue.
alternatively, you could push more frames by going from RGB mode to less demanding pixel modes (sorry, forgot names) and using 8 bit interface, but I would not suggest that as it will compromise image quality. The best way to solve this issue is to invest in a more modern GPU.