Igual escucharlos desde un video hace que se escuchen menos. También no esperes mucho es un v6 de 1.6L turbo e híbrido. Es obvio que nunca van a sonar como un v10 atmosférico de mas de 18.000 rpm. Ni hablar que los v6 están limitados a 15.000 rpm pero en carrera no llegan a mas de 13.000 rpm.
0:30 that's the 1995 412T2. 1995 was the first year of the 3.0L engine rules and Ferrari's last V12, so Ferrari had to make it rev to 17000rpm to make the same power as the 3.5L engines, which is why it sounds more screamy and slightly less throaty than the previous years V12s
@@AndrewLewer90 A bitta wikiing later, apparently the ‘94 3.5L V12 could hit 850hp at best. The 3.0L in 1995 couldn’t keep up even with 17k rpm of absolute hell bent ear porn.
@@hongthainguyen5334qualifying trim it got to around 760 I think. The 412 T1 hit around 850 in its later engine configuration, whereas the V10s could only reach 820 in qualifying trim and 790 in the races. It’s the 3.0 engine formula that pegged everyone back a hundred BHP or so.
The 95 car had a smaller engine of 3.0 litres and lower power at 760 because of that. It also revved to 17,000 RPM to compensate. Seeing that was the first and last iteration of the 3.0 V12 it would’ve been cool to see how it sounded if developed like the 3.0 V10.
The one with the most beautiful sound are V12 and V10, the tie this time, idk why but the V12 just made a rank-up for my ears. The blown diffuser of the V8's are epic tho
The V6 is SO underwhelming. If the FIA wants people to experience the "pinnacle" of "MOTOR-SPORT" at the track, they SURE are loosing the fans, and revenue with this stupid sustainable agenda. What is the purpose really? Stop messing with the core fans and bring back the noise, THAT is the CORE of Formula one. It's like putting CATS in the Colluseum instead of tigers for the gladiators. I'm done, and i really hope for a breakaway-series where there are REAL NOISY engines, and HARD to drive cars, and not this crappy simulator-races we have nowadays. Rant is over.
Wow, I thought I was the only one thinking like this. Thanks for being a voice for so many of us. But I don't think anything will change because they do not get money from the fans. They get money from the corporations and have to obey environment laws and other stupid shit. It's embarassing to have series cars more powerful than F1 cars.
@@georgepetre4430 I would really like to give you a decent answer, but i'm to fed up with this crap they call Formula 1 nowadays. I understand what you are saying, and this is another problem, the greedy bastards who treat F1 as a corporation instead of a sport. Too political and not about the sport anymore. And dont get me started on all the rules. Let them race, shove, be dirty, anything to liven up the show for the fans. Not being controlled by this stupid rulebook who hinders good racing. This isn't F1 anymore, it is a shitshow.
@@bugsan exactly. I've been watching F1 since '94. Between 2014 and 2020 I haven't wstched it anymore because it literally crashed. In 2021 because of the pandemic and lock downs I started watching again every race. I am dissapointed because they just roll around the circuit trying to get the best time, ans being penalized for the smallest rule breaks. Anyway... let's see what happens in 2026.
@@georgepetre4430 This year is already lost. No competition at all. For the first time since 94 i missed a race, that is, i watched the result before i watched the race. I dont think i will watch more F1 this year, it is just not interesting when there is domination. As you said, lets see what 2026 offers. I'm not that hopeful and i'm not that certain i will watch it either, time to switch sport i think. This stupid "show" they call F1 has painted themself into a corner.
War alles besser als die heutigen leisen Öko Schleudern. Man muss ja mit der Zeit gehen....aber nicht im Motorsport, dann bleib ich lieber einer von gestern...😂
The sounds get progressively worse , then a few years ago the sport turned into a business. F use to be for Formula, now the F is for Fake. Such a shame they killed the sport for greed and profit. Rest in Peace F1.
Although the Greek gods v10 and v12 are not comparable with any, it cannot be denied that the v6 is at least satisfactory in the fly by with the echo upshifting like there 1:48
En los v8 vale aclarar que en este video son con los escapes sopladores o difusores soplados en 2011 (o como le llames) también es casi la última generacion de los v8 ,ya que los v8 del 2006 suenan distintos.
I saw the V10s live at Indy in 2004, I think. It was the year Ralf had his big crash on the wall. Holy moly. Those things shook the entire Brickyard. I live in Las Vegas now, on the north end of town. If they were still running the V10s, I’d bet good money that I would have heard them from my house. As the crow flies, I’m probably about 15 miles from the main straight.
Everyone loves to hate the current V6 engines/power units, but as far as the science of engines go they're much better than the old ones in every way. More efficient, more reliable, more relevant, exactly what the manufacturers (who pay for everything) wished for. When the electric motor is included the power units even make more power than the V10s. IMHO designing an engine that's powerful, efficient and reliable all at the same time is much more impressive than an engine which blows up as soon as it crosses the finish line. Relevance is important, because these days almost every manufacturer produces a hybrid car of some sort, and everyone is trying to reduce their environmental impact, even if petrolheads don't like it.
The engines are more reliable because the rules mandate reliability. The tolerances of the older one race engines were that way because the rules weren't focused on multiple race engines. Had the 12 and 10 cylinder engines been required to last longer, the tolerances would have been such that the reliability would have been there.
Many motorsports still use N/A like MotoGP, so your point doesn't stand strong Relevancy is not important, at all. Go ask every fans sitting and tell them if they're excited about how efficient they are, I doubt they'd answer positively about that How is it road relevant when they're going full throttle and full braking all the time on highly illegal speeds? (When comparing road speed limits) Reliability? On N/A engines you could push up to 20k rpm, but go 18k rpm for reliability and it would be still sufficiently loud compared to those hybrids
@@kerimca98 Motorcycle engines are generally NA, while these days cars tend to be turbocharged. Therefore MotoGP uses NA engines, because they're more relevant there. Looks like it's actually you who didn't think their point all the way through. Technical relevancy may not be important to petrolheads, who only care about loud noises and burning rubber, but it's very important to manufacturers. All current engine suppliers offer hybrid powertrains in their road cars. So you'd prefer race cars that are slower but louder than current cars? OK, to each their own I guess. I prefer fast race cars.
