THE BEST PLANE IN HOI4

Подписаться 60 тыс.

Просмотров 31 тыс.

50% 1

Join us on Feedback IRL as we unveil the ultimate guide to choosing the best fighter for Germany in Hearts of Iron IV. In this comprehensive video, we'll break down the various fighter options available to Germany and analyze their strengths, weaknesses, of each model and template. we'll provide expert insights and practical tips to help you dominate the skies and achieve air superiority. Whether you're a seasoned general or a novice strategist, this guide is your key to mastering aerial combat in HOI4. Tune in now and take your German air force to new heights!
-TIMESTAMPS-
00:00 Intro
00:07 1936 fighter
00:56 1939 fighter
02:40 1940 fighter
05:38 1944 fighter
08:56 Modern fighter
11:38 MIO guide
13:00 Officer core guide
14:16 Doctrine guide
15:16 Advisor guide
16:07 Outro
Support me on PATREON / feedbackgaming🌟
Sub to my MAIN RU-vid: ‪@DaveFeedBackGaming‬ 🎮
Sub to my FEEDBACKIRL on RU-vid: ‪@FeedbackIRL‬ 🌍
Sub to MEMES channel: ‪@feedbackmemes‬ 😂
Sub for SHORTS: ‪@feedbackshorts3731‬ 🩳
DISCORD talk with me / discord 🗣️
Follow on TWITTER: / feedbackgaming 🐦
Follow for TWITCH livestreams: / feedbackgaming 📺
------------------------------
Business email: davefeedbackgaming@gmail.com 📧
------------------------------
#hoi4 #heartsofiron4 #dlc

Игры

Опубликовано:

17 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 127

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

--TIMESTAMPS-- 00:00 Intro 00:07 1936 fighter 00:56 1939 fighter 02:40 1940 fighter 05:38 1944 fighter 08:56 Modern fighter 11:38 MIO guide 13:00 Officer core guide 14:16 Doctrine guide 15:16 Advisor guide 16:07 Outro

@TheArklyte Месяц назад

You look extremely tired.

@picklesusa3449 Месяц назад

Can you do the other forms of planes too. Including wether or not to build tac bombers or strat bombers

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Sure

@jjthefish446 Месяц назад

Dave’s grinding out this video with the enthusiasm of used car salesman who’s boss jerks him around with his commissions, but still has three kids to feed. Hang in there Dave!

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

BRUV, I got kids to feed

@bigpoppa1234 Месяц назад

@@FeedbackIRL who's the father?

@Makem12 Месяц назад

@@bigpoppa1234The milkman

@user-wx1iv1fw3d Месяц назад

是，我感覺得到，一個研究到徹底導致完全失去興致的聲音

@Majora1988 Месяц назад

Mentioning that you never really get to have a late air war is why I really wish Hoi4 had a vanilla 1944 scenario, like Hoi2 did.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

TRUEEE

@TheArklyte Месяц назад

In 1936 Poland has an ability to stack 4(?) autocannons onto their fighter thanks to historical power of MG FF and PZL P24. Sadly Poland has no industry to do anything with that ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Cannons aren't worth for a dog fighting fighter. Too expensive and don't perform as well

@kenny.-.9087 Месяц назад

Yes, can we get a vid showcasing the strengths of medium and/or heavy aircraft?

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Sure

@nathanwaldrop3723 Месяц назад

Please

@psychzach1588 Месяц назад

Glad to see for once my own conclusions mirror Feedbacks!

@Hazardius Месяц назад

This video is really good. Thanks for it! If I have to wonder about something I'd like to see what kind of CAS would you do as Sweden.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

@viktorradev1609 Месяц назад

The current meta for fighters goes like this Air defence>Air attack>Agility. So the best design will be the one that can achieve the most air defence, followed by air attack. My go to 1940 fighter design is 2xQuad HMGs, 1xQuad LMGs, single engine III, drop tanks, self sealing fuel tanks, armor. This designs is superior to any other, especially when you stack your MIOS.

@scubandym1941 Месяц назад

I have been playing minor nations lately and the great thing about air is that they can make a large impact on a budget. Even 3 military factories each invested on fighters and CAS can give you a powerful Air Force. I always put research on it.

@tagus100 Месяц назад

Bombers (for bombing enemy factories, supply hubs and railways) as Britain and the USSR.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

TAC UK sounds fun

@spindash64 Месяц назад

For the US specifically, i think it's worth going for Heavy Fighters: if you research the Improved Medium Airframe at the start of 1940 or just before, and then grab the Escort Fighters focus, you can boost research speed enough to unlock Advanced Medium aircraft by early 1941. Considering the massive airzones the US needs to cover, having that extra range is a huge bonus

@bencom01 Месяц назад

going battlefield support and putting a rocket rail in the first slot will give you cas that can beat any fighters thanks for the percentage boosts (while also harassing enemy ground troops)

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

It works if you get the numbers. However the first few wars will the costly

@discopig5768 Месяц назад

Germany cas next please!

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

CAS Japan is coming

@yamnational9461 Месяц назад

@@FeedbackIRLNo. not German cas. German cats 🐱. Panthers, leopards, tigers, lions, pumas.

@Protorit Месяц назад

If I unlock rocket rails and put them on my fighter, existing fighter groups will not upgrade to the new plane. This is annoying, and presumably happens because the new plane and old plane now have different missions it can do. I wish there was a button where you could change the plane type a squadron uses. As is I have to delete the old fighter squadron, losing all its exp, and create a new one with the new plane.

@stuff9680 Месяц назад

I always upgrade the starting Me109 fighter as i research new air tech and keep them on intercept missions, high agility, high air attack and decent defense

@crips2668 Месяц назад

I'm interested in the numbers of strat bombing. Is it even viable? Btw: Thanks for the vids. I really dig these deep dives!

@EZCompanyofficalclan Месяц назад

I know it's probably a niche but is there any possibility to find old template videos from before the changes to air and tanks. (No DLC Pleb)

@meg_Lepi Месяц назад

Germany (or whatever) CAS next if you can, please

@TheWiseYoung 6 дней назад

This may be a silly question but does the radar that gives a perm 20% night fighting bonus worth it?

@TankBoii Месяц назад

I would like to see a USA fighter and Carrier Fighter guide

@simplymatt6140 Месяц назад

I know you're probably sick to death of people asking for tutorials like this, but for someone who is bad at the game, having an explanation of the stats and how to balance them is really helpful. Maybe navy next?

@arthurrelke Месяц назад

In AAT, cannons were buffed; the agility penalty was significantly reduced, and cannon is now the best weapon on fighters (from testing). A proven design. Cannon has a very high air attack value, which makes it excel against both fighters and support aircraft. Self-sealing and armor plates add air defense. Note that the range can be a problem outside of Europe. In Europe, the range is large enough.

@h3x0r_ 18 дней назад

I know some time passed, but I want ask a question, why not to put 2x Cannon II, they have just a little bit more weight than 4x HMG, but dealing much more dmg

@RangerJoe79 Месяц назад

Thanks for the guide. I’m still confused about how to best make a plane with recon. Naval bombers are another type I need clarification on. Lastly, are maritime patrol planes just naval bombers with recon equipment?

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

I'll do more videos on other plane types

@Hyde_Hill Месяц назад

For the Modern air plane I mostly use the most advanced regular engine instead of the jet engine.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

TRUE it has more thrust so you can fit more modules

@bigpoppa1234 Месяц назад

The late game "I've already won planes" aren't always "I've already won", especially in mods. I played a KR game as Japan that took forever as the final battle was an apocalyptic struggle against a united German lead Europe that had conquered Russia and the France/UK Syndicalism faction, I had to completely neuter their outside resource production with invasions, and take back all of Africa, clear them out of Asia to surround them, takeover Eastern Russia then get stopped by hordes of units + poor supply and only after making over 300 factories on fighters and having a year long struggle to win air dominance was I finally able to start dropping nukes on airfields and outproduce them.

@tarjako4536 28 дней назад

Terima kasih, Tuhan memberkati Anda dengan pengetahuan Anda :V

@dzikidzwon3802 Месяц назад

Fighters for Poland please. I'm still trying to figure out is it possible to play Poland with both planes and tanks effectively

@tricot6468 Месяц назад

heavy fighters, USA? i use the combo bc the heavy fighters have range to match the strat bombers. was wondering if there is an optimal way to do these.

@johnnicholas1657 Месяц назад

Shit I didn't realise there was an auto upgrade button. Thanks

@jjquinn295 Месяц назад

What about carrier planes? Beyond just remembering to put them on the carrier

@JosTheMan1 Месяц назад

On carriers you just want to max out the stats, range does not matter as they are enclosed in the naval battles. Afaik

@aegeanharrier6648 Месяц назад

@@JosTheMan1Dive and torpedo bombers can get drop tanks to give high efficiency Air support to landings and coastal fightings.

@jjquinn295 Месяц назад

@JosTheMan1 I know it's just funny to see Dace try to do things with navy. I had just watched is last usa game where he lost to Japan a bunch because he forgot planes on his carriers

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

For Japan it works due to the buffs they get. Everyone else. NOPE

@cristinmarius Месяц назад

No medium or heavy airframe guide ? Also, a scout plane, is it worth it ?

@JosTheMan1 Месяц назад

It depends, the scout planes do get shot en route when you are trying to look where enemies are hiding their troops without fighter support. Medium airframe is great for the heavy fighters, but the ic cost is a good bit higher so should have proper industry to pump those out. Very useful for large air zones. Heavy airframes are mainly great for the long range naval bombers, i have done them as a proper strategic bomber few times but the amount of fighters you need to produce to stop them being shot en route is way too high sadly. These days i make those long range naval bombers and attach recon camera on those, or on to the heavy fighters. There is one great use for proper scout planes though, and thats with the naval superiority. Feels quite common being stuck in like 47% naval superiority, but ditching out fleet of scout planes on naval patrol should tip you over the 50% :)

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

This video was a focus on fighters. We can do TAC or STRATS on another video

@bigbenhgy Месяц назад

Why not make dedicated CAS planes and just downsizing the Fighter production after you won the air war?

@commissarkordoshky219 Месяц назад

Netherlands - Naval Bombers ;)

@Jey096 Месяц назад

Let's see if this still works: Albania, Heavy Bomber

@Carlos-tx8jx Месяц назад

Designs for France and answer the question, is better make a cas and a fighter or make a multi role plane.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

True. However this was a focus on fighters

@schnipelchwanz83 Месяц назад

wait i'm a bit confused here: is it actually better to make fighter-planes that do mainly CAS instead of making dedicated fighter- and CAS-planes? And if so, why?

@JosTheMan1 Месяц назад

Better make them seperated, but after you have already won the airwar its just easier to combine them

@aegeanharrier6648 Месяц назад

Its better for your fighters to focus on destroying enemy airforce all the time than to both deal with air and ground forces. Also if enemy has high Air attack in divisions they can decimate your CAS forces. Multi role fighters are expensive, imagine making the best fighter just for it to die in a random skirmish

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Its all about the doctrine you select. At the end of the video I talk about the buffs from the doctrine paths

@Liverpool-2004 Месяц назад

I dont understand plane templetes so I will save this guide

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Save for later

@stepheningram6415 Месяц назад

I love playing Mexico and conquering South America. Any thoughts on a good set up for this? I usually go medium fighters and tactical bombers cause range. You might have a better idea.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Range and numbers due to low mil count. Non-Strategic Material Usage a must

@BigMacAnFries Месяц назад

Best plane pog

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

POG

@anauthentictincan6850 Месяц назад

Range is good for the pacific

@alexbillmire5536 Месяц назад

Poland and everything Poland….tanks, planes, and (god help us) ships

@dsyncwashere8077 Месяц назад

Mr. feedback, what is the point of adding CAS damage to a fighter. Because from what I've seen, you can't make a fighter do both air superiority and CAS missions.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Flexibility. When you have max air superiority you giving limited support to troops on the ground. Also more air superiority over 100% doesn't give you any more bonuses. Some more fighters won't help you. More CAS will

@willywonka6487 Месяц назад

put fuel tanks on your planes is my #1 advice, anywhere away from western europe and its so good

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

True! All depends on where you're fighting in the world

@nathanstruble2177 Месяц назад

USA Heavy Fighters plz

@christianmiranda3757 Месяц назад

Can you do a guide for the USSR?

@dnaseb9214 Месяц назад

Romania, ground attack

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

IS THAT A THREAT?

@dnaseb9214 Месяц назад

@@FeedbackIRL a challenge

@jimvanslyke1 Месяц назад

1936 CAS - Netherlands

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Sure

@pricel141l Месяц назад

Note on jet engine, the earliest jet planes were developped by Germany but those were attrocious and at some point you could easily win a one on one fight against an early jet fighter Their main ability was obviously their speed but ironically that doesn't allow them much range since the faster you go, the more fuel you burn, and you don't have a lot of fuel to start with

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

For a tiny boost for speed and 5% boost to agility, I don't think jet engines are worth it

@pricel141l Месяц назад

@@FeedbackIRL They are obviously not, only late jet engines (post-1950) are worth but that's clearly out of hoi4's time span

@TheMBeats Месяц назад

France - CAS & Fighters seperate?

@vancedrefrigerator5977 Месяц назад

I know you just drove home the importance of specializing, but fighting in North Africa as italy, with limited industry and the need for a tank killer as well as fighting off the RAF, is there a case to be made for a generalist?

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

What's a generalist? A multirole?

@vancedrefrigerator5977 Месяц назад

@@FeedbackIRL yes. Something for fighters and ground attack.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Agreed if you can keep the cost down. Big factor for winning dog fights is cost effectiveness. Which is tough if the plane is too expensive

@uncleiroh3301 Месяц назад

japan naval bombers vs cas with dive brakes

@sorkvild1473 Месяц назад

I honestly really like medium plane fighters. They cost much more but they destroy everything and you don't have to worry about the range from the beginning.

@Bradsketbawl Месяц назад

I like them for fighting in Asia or the Pacific (so USA, Japan, USSR if you're fighting over there) but other than that small airframe fighters get the job done better.

@aegeanharrier6648 Месяц назад

I id too as Japan. Then I had to "fight" Spitfires. I could NOT fight the spitfires

@Hyde_Hill Месяц назад

After some patches medium planes are just not as good as well built small ones.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Range is a biggie

@aegeanharrier6648 Месяц назад

@@FeedbackIRL I used fighters with extended fuel tanks for the first time after listening to you, it was perfect. My volunteneers ensured air superiotirty in finland and China while in real war completely covered every sector I needed. They didnt died off in masses as I expected too.

@jmullner76 Месяц назад

It pains me to see a turret on a fighter... how about a long range large naval bomber, with perhaps Italy (a Spaghetti PBY)?

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

LARP ruined. Respect the turret spitfire 🐐

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

I'm never built long-range patrol aircraft. I could give it a go

@aegeanharrier6648 Месяц назад

What exactly is power projection?

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Impact on air superiority. Green/red bar at the top of the air battle

@MaciekKleczar Месяц назад

Your 1936 fighter is not bad, but if you would just put 2 canons, this one is much better.

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Cannons don't trade as effectively vs non cannon fighters. Less about stats more about cost effectiveness

@user-wx1iv1fw3d Месяц назад

讓我說的話，引擎三之前甚麼都做不了，引擎三之後甚麼都能做單引擎戰鬥機，說來好笑就是如此，其實防禦不重要飛機沒有這麼簡單被打下來、也沒有這麼厚到打不下來，機動性才是生存的關鍵看德國的飛機公司，老實講很多有加成機動性的，也就是說跟AI對戰的時候有加成所以不會低於他們，使用一組機砲最大化傷害比重機槍好(12:20 德國公司上方的加成就有3個、剩下的加攻擊力也是綽綽有餘)

@user-wx1iv1fw3d Месяц назад

至於地面支援火力，就交給支援機去做就好，不需要打腫臉充胖子

@FeedbackIRL Месяц назад

Yes?!