I was deeply engrossed in the debate until Mr Singh said there is no need of transparency in judicial appointment. His views are as opaque as the judiciary. J sai Deepak and Satya Prakash were pure gems in this debate.
Feeling Sorry For Justice Singh. Advocate Sai and Journalist Prakash you both made this episode one of the best episode of this year till now. We always raise our voices against the NJAC as we think it would be an encroachment of appointing power by the executive. But this is also not true. A consideration is must as nothing is enough perfect that it is beyond the improvement. Advocate Sai thank you for mentioning 'Not taking decision is also a best decision'. And I before I wrap up my views I would like to appreciate Frank as your smile during the episode killed me.😆
Prashant kumar Whatever you are mentioning no one can deny these facts And it is also true and we all are well versed with all these. Here, we are not discussing the best way of appointment of the judges. HERE THE MATTER IS TO COUNTER THE DEADLOCK WHICH IS CURRENTLY STALLING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE JUDGES. we must not fix ourselves only to the collegium system. As we can see this system nowadays became the most controversial and resulting in no appointment of the new judges like Indu Malhotra and the CJ of Uttarakhand. We must consider another ways to ensure the appointment on a regular basis to smoothen the function of the supreme court. If not NJAC then a modified version of that would be an option.Thank You
I agree with Mr satya prakash and Deepak sir that there should be NJAC for appointment of Judges. It will not reduce the independence of the judiciary but it will bring transparency to the judiciary system.
Kiran Ransing true that!!😂😂 They say Bollywood promotes nepotism and favouritism. But then you have Indian Judiciary giving tough competition. Severe allegations of the kith and kin of judges and other influential people in the judiciary benefiting from this system.
and they are also against the interference of the executives who comes from a political party with their own personal interests.....transparency should be in the appointment but executive interference is unacceptable. ..emergency is one of the example as Judge rightly pointed out
deepak kumar u can give emergency as an example but there r thousands of examples of inefficiency n corruption in judiciary sys..point is there should be checks and balances better executive n legislature n judiciary
Thanq M/s Sai Deepak n Satya Prakash for enlightening we the ordinary mortals abt the judicial appointments by the so-called collegium system n breaking the glass ceiing of the dubious superiority of judiciary over executive'''''
Very informative debate...Mr Sai Deepak had put points very well... Now I clearly understood the basic probelm... Mr Satya Prakash also rightly said today most of the people are using superlative saying to creat fear and take advantage
Satyaprakash is the gem of the show, and the whole argument summed by him with facts and ideologies is really the way one should come for debate. Satyprakash, i would like to see you more on this debates.
The best of all is Add time bound hearing and closing of cases...all will fall within line....in court transparency will never show unless young bloods mixed in 80:20 ratio with old system...thanks to the courage of Sai
Conduct an exam like UPSC to judges who want to go for HC and SC and in interview they should be interviewed by Judges of either SC or HC then transparency will increase and everyone will get opportunity
when even there is finger raising towards each others in the judiciary itself. Then its time to introduce some reforms in the Judiciary itself, nd it can't be stalled just by saying that ... "it will endanger the independence of judiciary "
great discussion. I think there should be more time given to the programme. I could see Mr. Singh wasn't able to completely say about his opinion and had to be cut short because of the dearth of time. To have a proper good discussion there should be like 45 mins be given to each programmes.
Justice Singh's behaviour is the same as those Maharajas who lost their privy purse - sour and angry for losing something which was never supposed to be theirs. I wish the present government acts with an iron hand and tame the judiciary. You cannot allow the opaque system to run the system.
Govt is the biggest litigant in the court. then how can they will be allowed to have a say in appointment of judges. if allow it will create conflict of interest between executive and judiciary
Judiciary like our Constitution believed to be a sacred thing but amendment's and reforms will be the need of time to better sustain and progress of nation but it just keeps in mind that the Independence of judiciary is more or less like the Independence of Indian nation so it must be needed to keep it in views...
judiciary works in cilos...that the only problem that they work in cilos..for collegium system , no of selection committee members should be increased to large number than its having today for better transparency.
in most cases govt is the party ,then how can govt say in the appointment.e.g latest one judge who quashes president rule not appointing to supreme court.so say of govt in appointment not good.
Every time, I hear about Indian Judicial system , it gives a vomiting sensation. When will this Media -bubble failed Judicial system end and begin providing justice to the common people for which they exist????People have lost faith in both the elites and the Judges who can't judge . It's like circus show.
how we can trust prime minister&govt,if he is the obey the constitution how he can approve ordinary bill as a money bill.whatever the reason may, every organ of the constitution constitutional principles must obey at any cost .
mr.satya prakkash your taking some mischief in the judicial system and talking about and blaming but why can't take mischief in executive. so much MPs in govt threatening to constitution,social harmony , corrupt and taking hasty decisions.so present circumstances say in judiciary better for the people of india because these rules are finally for betterment of people .
