The Book of the Covenant vs. The Book of the Law? 

A lifetime of listening to a guy talk for 30-45 min once a week was all I had. Now? Wow.

Eyes in your own book revival anyone? I hope so.

Years of going to church was actually preventing me to know the whole truth..em so glad to know the truth before I die..so I can try to keep the word of God and pray for strength to keep God's commandments..God needs to be served with gladness, with love, appreciation, gratitude..not with us always wanting and asking for ourselves..worship with Thanksgiving..this life, no matter how difficult, we were given this privilege to be part of creation..it's pretty awesome ❤️

@babithasingh9367 I was blessed by coming to the word, With only a belief in god, And not having the man religion aspect Taught to me. I feel for ex christians, For I myself will not call myself a christian. Just a man learning scriptures. The wisdom is torah and the religion speaks against it. It's sin one of man all over again, Praise YAH firmly Worship YAH humbly Give thanks for the Messiah Halalu-YAH

Off the stone, on to thy heart Ezekiel 11 19-20 And I will give them one HEART, and a NEW SPIRIT I will put within them. I will remove the HEART of stone from their flesh and give them a HEART of flesh, that they may walk in "my statutes" and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my "PEOPLES", and I will be their YAH/God. Jer 31 33 But this is the COVENANT that I will make with the HOUSE of ISRAEL after those days, declares the Adonai/Lord: I will put my TORAH within them, and I will write it on their HEARTS. And I will be their YAH/God, and they shall be MY PEOPLES ie YAHisrael. Hebrews 8 7-13 Hebrews 10 16 This is the COVENANT I will make with them after that time, says the Adonai/Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their MINDS.”

God died?

@@richardtarr8145 Do you want to understand or do you want to argue your point? It will determine how this exchange progresses...

@@bawbjusbawb6471 Neither. Thanks.

@@richardtarr8145 HIS son died!!don't you know??

@@richardtarr8145 The one who gave the commands at Sinai was Messiah!!

@@Alleycatthegadite you really shouldn’t make comments such as this in ignorance. Rather maybe seek WHY there are people who make a distinction between the two before you make silly false statements as above. It in no way negates torah, nor do we NOT follow torah. You don’t understand of what you speak, neither does 119 for that matter.

@@MK4Hisgloryso, I ask you then . Why do you make the distinction?

@@motherbear5091 because I see the distinction between the two in scripture.

@@MK4HisgloryScripture verses?

@@motherbear5091 Exodus 19:4-6 “‘You have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you to Myself. Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people; for all the earth is Mine. And you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words which you shall speak to the children of Israel.”” ‭ Above clearly shows that Yah desired obedience to His commands and if obeyed they would be a holy nation and ALL a kingdom of priests, not just the Levites. Deuteronomy‬ ‭4‬:‭13‬ “So He declared to you His covenant which He commanded you to perform, the Ten Commandments; and He wrote them on two tablets of stone.” ‭‭ What was covenant??? The 10 commandments, not sacrificial system. Deuteronomy‬ ‭5‬:‭22‬ “These words Yahuah spoke to all your assembly, in the mountain from the midst of the fire, the cloud, and the thick darkness, with a loud voice; AND HE ADDED NO MORE. And He wrote them on two tablets of stone and gave them to me.” ‭‭ Yah gave them the 10 and He added no more….not until He added the law of sin and death because of transgression (Gal 3:19). Deuteronomy‬ ‭31‬:‭24‬-‭26‬ “So it was, when Moses had completed writing the words of this law in a book, when they were finished, that Moses commanded the Levites, who bore the ark of the covenant of Yahuah, saying: “Take this Book of the Law, and put it beside the ark of the covenant of the Yahuah your Elohiym, that it may be there as a witness against you;” ‭‭ The book of the law was written by the hand of Moses, and placed on the side of the ark as a witness against them. The 10 commandments were written by the finger of Yah and placed inside the ark because it was covenant. Psalm 40:6 “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire; My ears You have opened. Burnt offering and sin offering You did not require.” Jeremiah 7:22 “For I did not speak to your fathers, or command them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices. But this is what I commanded them, saying, ‘Obey My voice, and I will be your God, and you shall be My people. And walk in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well with you.’” ‭ ‭When Yah proposed covenant to Israel in Exodus 19 there were no curses or sin offerings attached to it. He just wanted their hearts. Because they broke covenant by making golden calf, He gave them the sacrificial system under Aaronic priesthood as a tutor. ‭‭Hosea‬ ‭6‬:‭6‬-‭7‬ “For I desire mercy and not sacrifice, And the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings. “But like men they transgressed the covenant; There they dealt treacherously with Me.” Ezekiel 20:25 “Therefore I also gave them up to statutes that were not good, and judgments by which they could not live;” ‭ We know that the law is good, holy and just so what were the statutes that Yah gave them over to that were NOT good?? The priesthood/sacrificial system. I would strongly recommend that you read whole chapters for context. Also, the entire book of Hebrews is a compare and contrast of the levitical priesthood, its obsolescence and why the melchidezek priesthood with Yahusha as High Priest is superior in every way. “For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law.” ‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭7‬:‭12‬ “For the law of the Spirit of life in Messiah Yahusha has made me free from the law of sin and death.” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭8‬:‭2‬. The law of the Spirit of life in Messiah is covenant torah, the 10 commandments). The law of sin and death was placed on the side of the ark - it’s the sacrificial/levitical system. Paul is clearly making a distinction here as he does in many other places. What then was nailed to the tree in Col 2:14, and Eph 2:15? We know it was not Yah’s commandments. It also wasn’t “oral torah” as so many in this movement like to suggest. Whatever oral traditions there were, were man made, not from Yah, therefore they never stood against us. It was the book of law that was added because of transgression until the Seed of Promise should come (Gal 3). We know Noah, Abraham, Isaac etc. were in faith and obeying Yah’s commands. See Gen 7 (Noah knew what animals were clean/unclean); Gen 18:19 and 26:5 indicate Abraham was walking in Yah’s commandments, yet there was no priesthood nor sacrifice for sin. Hmmm…

That's the good news of the gospel! Power to overcome sin through Christ!

I looked out my door: Guess what?? I saw that the HEAVENS & EARTH WAS STILL IN TACK, SO YASHUA DIDN'T ABOISH THE TORAH,

This is also wrong. Matt. 5:18-20 shows Christ putting the responsibility squarely on the individual follower to do what He did in obeying His Father's laws. This is repeated in Christ's messages to the church eras where He tells them to overcome Satan like He did. He didn't say "I overcame Satan so I could transfer My righteousness to you by osmosis". That's not in the Bible anywhere.

Completely out of context my brother in Messiah Yeshua as I’m correcting you that Genesis 7 tells about how there were 7 pairs of clean animals and 2 unclean animals. Not two of everything was in the boat. God knows the purpose of these unclean animals and they are scavengers. God put them here to test our loyalty towards Yahweh.

Being one of “these people” as you call us, we do adhere to the dietary laws because it precedes the book of the law.

@@MK4Hisglory exactly amen there is no difference in the book of law and covenant all of it is just the Torah

@@tylerchurch6945 I will wholeheartedly disagree with your statement.

@@MK4Hisglory and why do you disagree? Just my question?

The IJ is what you guys should get rid of.

@@iguanapoolservice1461 What is the IJ?

​@@NANA-fh6weinvestigative judgement doctrine of Ellen G. White

@@nickeleye7607 Thanks. I’ve never heard of that. I think the person replying mistook me for an SDA member

I bet you got real far on that lol. In my experience they never take on board and just ignore the subject until you go awAy. Have you read their book 'The Ten Commandments, twice Removed' ? It's a small book which has a dedicated to God law blessed, Moses Law curses, etc, etc.

Yes, as someone who adheres to this Biblical understanding of a distinction between Yah’s commandments/dietary laws and the laws added because of transgression, this entire video makes utterly false claims. 119 ministries should really have a proper understanding of what we profess before putting something like this out.

@SpiritofTruth.Remnant Ezekiel 11 19-20 And I will give them one HEART, and a NEW SPIRIT I will put within them. I will remove the HEART of stone from their flesh and give them a HEART of flesh, that they may walk in "my statutes" and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my "PEOPLES", and I will be their YAH/God. Jer 31 33 But this is the COVENANT that I will make with the HOUSE of ISRAEL after those days, declares the Adonai/Lord: I will put my TORAH within them, and I will write it on their HEARTS. And I will be their YAH/God, and they shall be MY PEOPLES ie YAHisrael. Hebrews 8 7-13 Hebrews 10 16 This is the COVENANT I will make with them after that time, says the Adonai/Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their MINDS.”

The word law is fodder for the enemy.. it helps reborns to speak TORAH . Baby Steps.

They're the Same Book...

CAN YOU SHARE SCRIPTURE?

@Owfjajae Ezekiel 11 19-20 And I will give them one HEART, and a NEW SPIRIT I will put within them. I will remove the HEART of stone from their flesh and give them a HEART of flesh, that they may walk in "my statutes" and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my "PEOPLES", and I will be their YAH/God. Jer 31 33 But this is the COVENANT that I will make with the HOUSE of ISRAEL after those days, declares the Adonai/Lord: I will put my TORAH within them, and I will write it on their HEARTS. And I will be their YAH/God, and they shall be MY PEOPLES ie YAHisrael. Hebrews 8 7-13 Hebrews 10 16 This is the COVENANT I will make with them after that time, says the Adonai/Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their MINDS.”

15:00 minute mark also

Shalom, Thanks for reaching out. You might be interested in watching our teaching about this very subject. You can find it here: 119ministries.com/teachings/video-teachings/detail/pleroo-the-law/ Blessings to you and yours

Maybe you should test the dichotomy a bit more before making such comments? He doesn't read into anything and is the first to say that the book of Exodus is not chronological. Through the example you gave above, you actually prove the point that it is indeed not chronological. 2ndly, your argument of spatial relationship is moot, because when you look up the phrase "in the side" referring to Deuteronomy 31:24 in a concordance, it means exactly that; the side or beside. Setting the book of Exodus aside, there are still many other Biblical proofs that make the distinction between covenant torah and the sacrificial system imposed for sin (the law of sin and death) until the Seed of promise came. Study if you care to the following: Ezekiel 20:25; reading the whole chapter for context. Deut 4:13; 5:6-22 (emphasis on v22) and 31:24-26, Jere 7:22; Psalm 40:6-8; Hosea 6:6. Did Yahusha exalt His Father's commands while here or the sacrificial system imposed because they broke covenant with a golden calf? Do those in Rev 22:14 who get to eat of the tree of life and enter to city do so because they followed the commandments/dietary laws or because they wore tzitzit and had a beard?? “For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law.” ‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭7‬:‭12‬

@@MK4Hisglory ”Yahusha” is a modern fabricated word that doesn’t exist in scripture at all.

Excuse me, but manmade “oral Torah” never stood against man. Yah’s laws added because of transgression however did until the Seed of Promise should come.

@@MK4Hisglory wrong, man-made oral torah is sin. Sin stands against man, not righteousness. Torah is: "light" "life" "sweeter than honey" "the way" "truth" "not difficult" "not burdensome" "liberty" "better than gold or silver" "my delight" "faithful" "righteous" "the rejoicing of my heart" "wonderful" "above fine gold" "endures forever" "perfect" "converting the soul" "pure" "enlightening the eyes" "eternal" .......... Col 2:13 When you were dead in your SINS and in the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our SINS, 14 having canceled the charge of our legal indebtedness, which stood against us and condemned us; he has taken it away, nailing it to the cross. 22 These rules, which have to do with things that are all destined to perish with use, are based on MERELY HUMAN COMMANDS AND TEACHINGS. SINS- legal indebtedness. SINS- stand against us. SINS- condemn us. SINS-following rabbinical (MAN-MADE) laws that are based on HUMAN rules/teachings that are destined to perish. (Torah laws are eternal!). SINS-nailed to the cross. Obeying Torah is not sin, breaking Torah is sin. Following man-made laws are all throughout the NT and it is sin to follow them. That's why Yeshua broke those laws all the time. Examples of man-made rabbinical laws: hand-washing ritual, declaring healing to be work, sabbath day's walk, declaring that nothing can be picked up/carried on Sabbath, preparation day, declaring that picking heads of grain to eat is work, brit periah, fasting from meat, etc etc

@@bmjjjja did you read your response before you sent it?? I quote, “wrong, man-made torah is sin.” What??? Makes no sense. Next you posted Col 2:14 then skipped a whole bunch of verses and posted v22 as if they are speaking of the same thing which they are not! You cannot cherry pick verses and take them out of context like that to fit your narrative. The handwriting against us is what Yahuah imposed. Yah would not hold oral torah which was manmade against us. Oral torah didn’t exist until after babylon when the pharisees came on the scene. Oral torah was then said to be passed down from Moses as an excuse for them to impose their interpretation of Yah’s laws. All lies!!! What was placed on the outside of the ark (deut 31:24-26) is what stood against us…there was no oral torah then. Let’s think instead of being indoctrinated. Where did you even get that definition for sin??? Some talmudic rabbinic dictionary? If sin were really nailed to the cross why do we still sin then?? Gal 3:19-20: What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of mediator. Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one. Nothing to do with pharisaic oral torah.

@@MK4Hisglory Ok, I'll go slower. You're wrong. The oral Torah is sin because it is made up by man. This includes any/all rabbinical laws, man-made or "merely human rules." No, I did not skip verses that change the subject. The whole 2nd chapter of Colossians is about the same thing; sin. In this case, the sin mentioned is "mere human rules" "destined to perish" "nailed to the cross" "stand against us (because sin stands against us)" "having only the appearance of wisdom" "hollow and deceptive philosophy" "depends on human traditions" makes one "legally indebted (to obey rabbinical laws)" "self ruled" "of the flesh" "lacks any value." None of those describe Torah. The reason this chapter is about SIN (God's Torah is not sin) is because in Torah, it says we are forbidden to add to or subtract from His law with our own (Deut 4:2) Oral laws have been around for ages; especially clear in the NT. A handwashing ritual in Matt 15, a sabbath day's walk, considering healing to be "work" and therefore violating Sabbath, same with picking heads of grain to be considered "work" and violating Sabbath, preparation day, carrying your mat considered "work" and therefore violating Sabbath. All of these rules which were very alive and well and going on in the NT that our Messiah broke all the time, are not Torah laws but rabbinical made up laws. They added to Torah. That's why He broke them. He never broke a Torah law or He would not be Messiah. Read Gal 3:10. There is the "law" (lower case L) that is being contrasted with the "Book of the Law" (upper case). In that passage alone, Torah is referred to 4 times as the standard to obey. Yet there is a "law" that is in violation of Torah and brings a curse. That law is rabbinical law and we know this because it is a "different gospel which is no gospel at all." Specifically, that law being talked about and the reason for this letter happens to be brit periah. Look it up. It's why Titus refused. It's man-made as opposed to Brit Milah which is what God said to do and what Timothy did.

@@bmjjjja No need to get snarky…your first response was not coherent. And you’re still missing my point. I’m well aware of what the oral traditions are, but you are incorrect in saying that those are what got nailed to the tree. I’m also aware these are what they accused Messiah of breaking and that yes, He did not break Yahuah’s actual torah or He would not be able to be Messiah. That said let’s think, if they were manmade traditions that Messiah broke for that very reason, then they did not stand against us in Yah’s eyes and were therefore NOT what was nailed to the tree. We were never indebted, as your wonderful definition says, to follow manmade traditions, especially as people grafted in to Israel. You’re also glossing over the fact that oral traditions did not exist until after their time in Babylon. The definition of sin according to 1 John 3:4 is transgression of the torah, Yah’s torah, not oral traditions. The demands and written requirements of the levitical sacrificial system imposed as a curse for breaking covenant with Yah is what stood against us and thus what was nailed to the tree. Col 2:13-14, “And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.” Look at v13, “having forgiven you all trespasses…” If Yahusha didn’t break torah when He broke “pharisee interpretation” of it, then neither did we!!! He forgave trespasses committed against His requirements under the sacrificial system. You are a walking contradiction! And no, Col chapter 2 is not entirely about sin - you “glued” verses together to make it support your argument. Paul weaves through various subjects within the chapter, v13-14 are not connected to v22.

And Peter for saying Paul is hard to understand. And Luke for giving weight to Paul in Acts. Just not your added books.

@@advex4428Hard for those who don’t know Torah to understand and go into the error of torahlessness. Not hard for those who know the Torah and deny Saul. You people never address the elephant in the room which is why are people when they learn more Torah in much more detail then turn on Saul, because he fails the test of Deuteronomy 13. Peter was not endorsing Saul he was warning about him with feint praise and The Book of Acts is nothing more than a legal document.

Yes! That's the point! There is a distinction between the 2, yet those who understand that are not obeying Torah according to this video. It's ridiculous!

YASHUAH is YAHOVAH the MESSIAH ( YASHUAH ( HE IS THE WORDS OF YAHOVAH IN THE FEASH) The older book of scriptures is all about the MESSIAH.

@DanaAdams-bc5ug Yahusha said several times, 'I and The Father are one'. Shema Israel.

@@sherrydubois6164 have you ever done any textual criticism? Looking at the changes in the text from the 4th century to the modern text we have now. The story of the woman taken in adultery wasn’t in the earliest manuscripts. Neither was the entire chapter of John 21. The last 12 verses in the book of mark are not in the earliest manuscripts either. יהוה is more than enough. A messiah isn’t required to love יהוה with all your heart and he loves me as well

@@JeriCarter-i5h I respectfully disagree. Messiah means anointed. If he needed to be anointed then he is not the anointer.

@erncrediblestories6259 I don't know, but shabbat Shalom anyways. Or belatedly anyways.

Here's how I answered that for my sister. Get a piece of paper and draw out the feast days on a line. The Gospel is laid out in the feast days. I believe these guys have a teaching on them.

God designed the placement of the annual festivals to where they would revolve around the 2 harvest periods that Israel experienced. This was further meant to convey the message that contrary what "Christianity" believes, God hasn't spent all of human history locked in a cosmic tug of war with Satan. There is a small harvest period in the spring period(God's Church), and then the larger harvest in the fall period(the ppl converted after Christ returns).

Could he be wrong concerning the BOL vs BOC, sure. However I’ve seen none of his teachings that would suggest he would deceive the elect. There is no need to slander Him for an error.

Matthew is a brilliant teacher and not the only one with this understanding. You should have care how you speak when you don’t have all the facts.

Casting stones are we? Yeah I'm sure Yahusha would be proud of you.

@@markdlt2989 Yahusha is a modern fabricated word that doesn’t exist in scripture. It’s “Yeshua.”

This is a pivotal passage. We all need to understand it, to escape the Tribulation.

@TheShutterbug1968 Saul of tarsus is very hard to completely understand. He is so learned in the torah and highly educated that his approach to these matters are so deep that if you don't fully know where he is in his knowledge surpasses most of us

@@learnandteacheverything I completely disagree. Jesus warned about Paul and not to follow such a person. Yet so many explain him away when he contradicts Jesus.

@@TheShutterbug1968oh wow so you’re saying Paul is a false prophet? 😬 😞 🙏

@@bont7948 absolutley.

@@TheShutterbug1968 I’m sorry to hear that