I was curious about what this was.... as someone who has met Jensen Ackles, gotten to look at his face up close... he is beyond handsome, beyond perfect, it's like he is not real
I can not even imagine what it feels like to be scrutinized to this extent. I’ve seen Jensen up close at an SPN convention and he is a gorgeous man. Piercing eyes!! Cheek bones!! And you can not stop looking at that mouth!! O my goodness!!!! And there is nothing feminine about this man.
Yes Jensen is physically perfect! Perfectly handsome and his persoanlity is just as a beautiful I meet him a couple of times and got to hang out with him one time Jensen is such a nice guy and a dork lol! He is so humble too its just endearing and adorable!
Jensen is GORGEOUS AF even camera people on the red carpet or promotional events zoom in and linger there . Some cam be heard saying omg or your gorgeous.
There are many handsome men whose faces may technically be more masculine than Jensen's, but I think the slightly more feminine aspects to his face soften the harshness of the conventionally masculine ideal and give him his stunning beauty. He is in no way androgynous. He is quite male.
This brought back memories of me and my friends thirsting over him back in high school when he was in ‘Supernatural’, totally rocked the bad boy thing back then
One of the most attractive side profiles I’ve seen. Could you take a look at Vito basso, Simon nessman, young franchisco lachowski, Jon kortajenera or David gandy?
Me imagining all the SPN fan girls watching this and screaming "HERESY!! Jensen Ackles' face is perfection and without flaw!" (Ok yes, it's me. I'm the screaming fan girl. 🙄) Seriously, tho, this was pretty interesting. I mean, you're wrong, because his face is perfect and without flaw, but still. Interesting. 😁
Well they used some strange pictures, like at least one of them, the profile picture they use, is a screen shot during an SPN episode and he's moving his mouth, he's kind of sucking in his chin in reaction to what's going on. They only looked at one side of his nose(and as all good Jensen connoisseurs know, his nose is slightly upturned in profile on one side and not upturned in profile on the other side).
Interesting - i don’t think jensen has the perfect face - for instance - his nose is slightly crooked - but as far as humans go he is a stunning man and i think his more feminine aspects add to it
This is really interesting. Jensen is beautiful to look at, and beautiful to listen to, and so kind! Would you do one of these for my favorite metal vocalist, Philip Anselmo?
Di una bellezza Angelica....Creatura splendida...Dai lineamenti gentili e delicati,e più passa il tempo e anche con le rughe è ancora più bello... Appartiene a quella categoria di persone che attraversa il tempo acquistando ancora più bellezza,per me rasenta la perfezione...
Huh. I read somewhere that Amber Heard (Johnny Depps ex) supposedly has the perfect face. So going by that she should be drop dead gorgeous and shes not. I actually find her face slightly disturbing.
I've recently become absolutely obsessed with my appearance and in particular my face. As a consequence I keep watches videos like this and using face rating apps online. I googled "negative canthal tilt" and downloaded faces with this feature. I uploaded the images, which included celebrities like Paul McCartney, into one of my favorite face apps. It is my fave because I believe it is accurate beyond most, possibly all others. As you may know, the negative canthal tilt (which is all about the eyes) is considered unattractive. Yet according to the software all of these people were fire. None were rated as a "normie," which 5 out of ten.
Yes, Paul does seem to have really bad negative tilt. I wouldn't put too much trust in those rating softwares; they generally aren't consistently accurate in assessing how attractive a face is. I don't know the exact methodology behind their ratings though
@@creatingattractive They are strange things to be sure. I've been rated a high eight and told I'm utter fire while the same software tells me I shouldn't feel too bad about the rating I get as these apps are for entertainment! The difference between the pictures I post could be things like profile verses straight on or how far I am from the camera or whether the picture was taken on a Monday or a Wednesday that week. Maybe beauty is in the eye of the beholder after all? It certainly seems to be.
This was really interesting! Could you recommend a good open-access review article on this topic? I had no idea the study of human attractiveness was so technical
There are a lot of research articles, meta analyses, and all other types of info linked in the third tab of the google sheet. That should be linked in the video discription
I suppose. Being hyper masculine in all areas likely won't be ideal; there's a balance although mostly masculine is going to be most attractive to the opposite sex
