The Citizen Chronomaster AQ4020-54Z 

THIS!

if only they were available outside of japan that would change quickly

Their accuracy is also double that of grand Seiko 9F I believe. Rated at 5 seconds a year compared to 10

What is your wrist size? I’m tossing up between the 37.5mm and the 40mm. I have a 7 1/4” wrist or slightly over 19cm. I love the smaller size but can’t tell if it will wear smaller or larger than it’s measurements.

What time was it keeping over the years?

blows most watches out of the water thanks to its extreme affordability compared to the swiss brands. $4000 for one of these or $10000 for a cheap Rolex or 4 Hundred Thousand for a patek phillippe.. are those watches really worth that much more?

Pomyśl o wieczności, o zbawieniu swej duszy !

L.E. = 200 Pieces

What's the price for it ?

I definitely love the convenience of not having to set the time for a watch. It's unfortunate that I'll never be able to enjoy wearing a Bulova precisionist (They need to make a

True, I think they put the money they save on the bracelet into the watch itself perhaps. I've seen very good bracelets on very mediocre watches. It's cheaper to change the bracelet than the watch!!

The japanese have been paid off by the swiss consortium... never to touch a bracelet, and never to make a Submariner killer.

@@ddogiddogi Technically the Omega kills the Rolex, yes. But you are ignoring the fact that people are fcuking stupid. Also, let's be frank now, cos you seem to know more than the usual punter. The ELEGANCE of the Submariner case has TILL THIS DAY not been approached by a single competitor brand. Ask yourself, why is that? How come that stupid ol' Sub sits better, is sleeker, has the better bracelet, than any other offering? It really is the 64 million dollar question, which I of course have solved, in the reply I gave to you all before. Regards, G.

so, are you also calling the hour hand the 'hours hand' and the minute hand the 'minutes hand' then? because that would be coherent.

@@MJFallout Hour(s) and Minute(s) are not numbers, so it seems you may have missed the point. Hour hand, generally being the first applied/installed/inserted (so at the bottom of the hand stack - closest to the dial), minute hand generally being the second hand applied (there's where the problem occurs) and generally the seconds hand being third. Saying the second hand shows X can mean seconds, but also minutes...

​@@monkeymanstones1 Yet, by doing this we're basically solving one problem by creating another: Second, the subset of minute, is no longer being confused for the 2nd ordinal number, but two of the hands are now named in singular, and one's named in plural. Not elegant that. In addition, in English it is conventional that compound nouns be formed with the singular: Chicken's live in a hen house, and not a hens house, and their dozen eggs come in an egg carton and not an eggs carton, maybe you need the eggs for your recipe book, but not your recipes book; meanwhile 13 of something are a baker's dozen, and not (the) bakers' dozen, trains go to the train station, not the trains station, etc.

@@MJFallout Yet by replying as you have, you've shown me to be beneficial to you as I've enabled you to feel superior by having allowed you to prove what you've shown to be obtuse, yet needless. Language changes, such that it can remain useful and fully functional. But your statement refuses acceptance of this verifiable fact, therefore I've taught you and not the opposite (but the opposite was your intent) . But, I certainly allowed you to feel some level of power and I'm glad I could be of such benefit to you! If only you hadn't posted at nearly 2AM EST I could have replied earlier...

@@monkeymanstones1 Language does change; true it is that that's verifiable. Just, it won't change in this particular case since I can't see the ''seconds hand' is less confusing' train pick up any steam, like at all. Rather, others will point out to you in the future that seemingly you're wrong and need to rethink the term.

problem is, this movement is faaaaar better than anything automatic. the second hand sweep is just porn to my eyes.

The dirt/adhesives you mentioned are on top of the crystal, not on the dial. My room can get quite dusty and a few specs of dust inevitably fall onto the watch. Ideally, I should've done reshoots to replace any footage that contained dust, but it took a few hours of filming just to make this video. But I agree that the Casio Oceanus series is a respectable lineup.

Not really. The Citizen is to GS what A Lange is to Patek. Everything is more purposeful and carefully designed.

There os one listed on Chrono24 👍

In the instruction manual, it tells you how to set the perpetual calendar. I haven't had to do this myself, however, because it was already set to the proper year when I bought it.

There is one up for sale currently on Watchuseek for 2600 USD.

Last time I saw it for sale online was a few months ago and it was for around the same price as I bought it for (250,000 JPY). Even though it's a limited edition, there probably isn't much demand for it currently.

If the watch is stopped for a few seconds, you will have to push the crown back in, wait till the seconds hand reach the 12 o'clock position, pull out the crown, adjust to the correct time, then push back the crown. This is the only way to set it to the correct time accurately.