THE CLOSURE DNA SHOW: S11 Ep 7 (BAMUKURU VAKANDIMANIKIDZA)  

Hanti muri kuona ganda ravo? Tete munhu ane zvinhu zvake. It's these ones vanogara muma one Room who are a nuisance

That's true ana tete ava vanoziva zvavanoita vanoda zvinhu zviri straight zvakajeka

I even said it she deserves Maturity certificate tete .Zim Tete award

Madzitete manyama!

It looks like tete vane zvinhu zvavo saka no godo she just wants chokwadi

Video yema zero% evana vese ingachinjise mutemo weinheritance munyika. There'll be DNA before all distribution of estate.🙈🙈🤣🤣

or maybe haasi related to the sisters

@@EuclasHedegwe That would be amusing. 🤣😂🤣

or the sisters are not related to the deceased 😂😂😂 drama racho

kkk vakatoramba kuuya

Mai ngavaudze mana chokwadi mhani kwete kutowedzera kudzimba mwana ronda

Very true

Shoo

Tete avo amana kaa apa she is really sweet and accommodating

She is an amazing person.

They can't be unrelated because their DNA comes and is also generated from their birth mother

You are right Hako, this is bad, the what ifs are too many apa .

@@tonderayitawonezvi7707 Were they tested against their mother? I missed that.

What do u mean tested against their mother? If you and siblings share a mother your dna will show a percentage of relationship because of that one parent

@@samanthakane9986 Imi, hospital switches happen, kuzvarira mukoma vanhu kudhara vaizviita. If these 2 tetes do not share a mother and father with their late brother then hapana zvaprovwa apa. This was an incomplete job.

Both AUNT'S vadiki nevahombe Both vanehunhu 🎉

Are you not Knowledge ...(Lodza)

Let's hope Shumba's mum was not eating bota somewhere else.

Justic for Shumba, But face ya mama ine guilty conscience ,

Chimomzy chonyepa icho haungakanganwe makore aunoti ndakabatqa

Yes

Whose closure? They have accepted that they are their father's children and the father acknowledged them during his lifetime. Who needs closure there. This guy is unerelated to them except to mwana wamaiguru who is sister's with his mother. I feel the lawyer failed to express the legal point that the other adult children have no legal obligation to prove their relatedness to the father. Noone is suffering any prejudice by them inheriting. Only a court can force them and thats if they find reasonable grounds to do so.

lawyer varikutadza basa, to me it seems he is not being open and truthful

@PriscaWhite-ql9pt I specifically said for closure's sake, meaning that it is not an obligation, legal or not legal for the other children to be tested. To answer your question, that guy is not the enemy here. He is the one who needs closure. There are a lot of loopholes when DNA tests are done based on relatedness when the alleged biological father is no longer there. That guy will live his whole life with a lot of questions if truth doesn't come out. How ever way, he needs to know so that he can get closure.

@@nomsashoko3126 How will any of the other children's results change anything for this particular guy? He will remain unrelated to this family except for his maternal cousin. If the other children want to test themselves then they can do so but if they don't, it still changes nothing for this son. Unless you are suggesting that iye ndiye mwana we the deceased and the aunts have no relationship to his father, which is a real possibility.

Part 2of this test all kids

hakuna adoption isina mapepa mr lawyer kkkkkk

@@wibertwilbert2290 zvako iwe. Ndatozvishairwawo ini.

Lawyer rikuisa ma hard feelings rakarerekera divi revana 3 ...then amai can't remember vakaita mwana vane makore mangani she can't rmbr everything but she rmbr kuti bmukuru ndivo baba vemwana ummmmm

Lawyer akatengwa atondibuda ,why is he defending vamwe three

Ko vana Tete vakaenda kuDna through court based nenyaya iyoyi hazviite here....vana mai ngatiudzeyi vana vedu chokwadi....mr lawyer musaita corruption

Eeeh shar it doesn't makes sense vayinyonyotyisei zvekuti vakaenda nenhumbu is inappropriate baba, vanonyepa momz ava

I was also wondering kuti munhu anoita nhumbu waiti nhumbu ndeyani kusvika mwana azvarwe vamu chengete waiti ndewani , something is not adding up kuna amai awa

Baba vamai ava vaigqra ku UK but ivo vaingotya chete. Ummm amai matyiro enyu. Dai mati maityA sisi muridzi wemurume zvayigona kunzwisisika

Mai avo vavada nhaka vakat life yachinja

Itsotsi mai ava

it's totally waste of time

Paye panonzi nema Zimba we are educated. Woona kuti hazvisizvo. Kugona kuverenga is not been educated. The lawyer explained properly zvinonzwisisika but heyi seems everyone is a lawyer now

MaZimba kunzwisisa chaiko kunonetsa 😅😅😅

​@@cc35506aaah nhai zvenyu munhu wese putting the blame Kuna lawyer

Yes but maybe baba havana ukama nanatete. Zviriko stereki mudzimhuri but nyaya yamoms ine maholes akawandawo zvawo. Hapana here hembe dzababa dzitestwe nemwana uyu bcoz vana havachambofa vakabvuma kunoratidzwa ma0%.

@@emmanuelsithole8767 but kana manyatsa kuterera pavabvunzwa kuti mwana kana akanzi haasi wababa ava muchati kudii vati ndozvigamuchira that response alone say a lot and pane panzi vakagarisa dare for more than 3 hours vachingoti vari kuuya vakarega chii chaizvo chavaitya ?I'm not doubting the results at all mwana haasi wababa ava it's just that a lot of zvikunetsa kugamuchira coz tanga tichida mwana uyu awanewo nhaka yake coz munhu anga akadzikama pashow tikamufarira

@@emmanuelsithole8767 They share same mother saka hukama hwaibuda chete.

@@cc35506exactly since they share same mother paibudawo just a small %

Amai varikuchiva pfuma yabamkuru

dont work on assumption. As for the other kids, as long as the supposed father recognized them, the DNA result does not matter. Whats dangerous is to come out of the woods and try to make a claim.

But the other kids have no issues; they are officially registered as children of the deceased (vana maB/Certificates ane zita rababa). Yet, this one is just mother's child - no father's name on B/Certificate; so how on earth would anyone know the truth of the claim?.

True evn me l saw The same vanopiwa Marika yekuti vamuvharire panze mwana uyu havasikumuda

True

Yaah that's true

They are saying that the other kids have birth certificates, so even if they come out negative in DNA tests there may argue they are adopted. It's a tricky situation

I think the other children have a right to deny DNA , coz possibly the deceased knew kuti they are not my kids but however was comfortable with that and even obtained birth certificates for them. This one doesn't have a birth certificate or wasn't introduced to any partenal family member. Again this woman's story is somehow not adding up, they were afraid of her father yet they were not afraid to bring a fatherless child to him, not making sense

Even if all the 3 children are tested and the result is negative, that does not mean this other child will get something. He failed the relatedness test nemadzitete ake and he was not included in the deceased's will. The other 3 children will get their inheritence regardless of the DNA results because they were included in the deceased will.

Hona ka wangu, how many men are coming for DNA for kids with birth certificates? It's important to note the years of the other siblings, hanzi kuhombe ariku ma 40s, wechi2 kuma 30s the the youngest ku malate 20s.DNA was not yet popular saka vanhu vaingobvuma vana

@@mimzwepatop8012 Even if the children are not yours, ukangovaisa mu will zvatovharana. Kunyorwa mu will is the ticket to inheritence, even adopted kids can get inheritence as long as they are in the deceased's will.

Yes they are afraid, but legally nothing will be taken from them, they will only lose the house the lawyer was going to allocate to Shumba.

You nid to understand the Law Sir vamwe Vana avo vakabuda vachizi havasi vemufi Upfumi vanongodya nekuti mufi pachezvake akasiya ava gamuchira zviri pamutemo achiri mupenyu ,Shumba dai akabudikira paFuneral before the execution of the estate aiva ne chance yekuwana before even the DNA so unfortunately Mai vakuzotaura a year later so which raises questions

​@@aqua4497no no no

@@munyaradzigamana5019 unfortunately you listened selectively mr law man. Panevakatambirwa nehama not nemufi. Batai mazwi.

😢😢sry shumba don't loose hope there's light at the end of the tunnel.

The deceased left a good estate. The other children looked as if they benefitted a lot. So if DNA tests are done to them and prove they are not his... moda kuti vatorerwe. Mwana hauzive baba vako. Mai ndovanoziva chete chete

That's true

Legal Advice: Going to put this on all the comments questioning the lawyer. 1. A WILL was present. Whatever the deceased (Apple) writes in a will = legally binding. Meaning, say for example he was lied to and one of the 3 other kids (Yellow) actually isn’t his? BUT he (Apple) had still written the will and left something for Yellow … according to the LAW, you only follow what’s in the will. A 0% child can still get an inheritance, if the will writer added them. 2. The lawyer can not go against the will writer’s wishes to REMOVE. Thats all he’s saying. He’s reminding people that even if all 3 other kids = also 0%? then, that actually doesn’t change anything. They were written in the will & they still recieve something. 3. This one, SHOULD have been added to the will, the father had no reason to not add him as well. 4. From a legal standpoint, the lawyer is correct. 5. Now, if he WAS a biological child and it’s proven then the lawyer still can’t take away from the others, but he can then say the deceased left without knowing/having included another child. And he can request before the courts to add a beneficiary. But not to remove* a beneficiary written by the deceased, biological or not. Lesson 1: If you have things? If you have kids. Write an iron clad will & REGISTER it with the Courts. Done. Lesson 2: Stop this nonsense of kids becoming adults without knowing their fathers. Lesson 3. DNA doesn’t lie. Solution = test other 2 aunts or siblings. The probabilities WILL lead to truth.

Very corrupt. Hw cn he deny tests with other sibllings yet family members see no problem with that

@@stembenimuhwati9313 zviripachena Kuti akapihwa mari

Its true

Correct! Mother is very tense and possibly not being truthful that there's another man to be tested. She worked a lot with this man in his businesses, so she feels her son deserves to inherit something. Where is her sister's kid? The bad part is her sister who is her only witness that she lived as a sister wife, is dead. Surely they should have told someone as a witness..

Whereas I don't consider that the said xhild belongs to the deceased father, the lawyer's advice is bad and misplaced. He should just have asked yhem to make a court application to compel the other children for DNA testing. Imagine in terms of maintenance, you have already given the child a name and a birth certificate and DNA proves the child is not yours, do you continue paying maintenance? Does the child then still belong to you just because he has a birth certificate? No guys there is no such law. Let this guy file a court application through his own lawyer's to compel the other children to be tested, no hard and fast rule saying that once you have inherited it can't be reversed. Possibly mufi haana kana mwana, why should vana vasiri vake inherit from him? They were not adopted, there is only a presumption, which can be challenged. Mr Mugabe please be advised.

@@beavenmutoko1222 DNA is for information purposes only otherwise paternal responsibilty isn't based on blood relationship. Even if you learn kuti mwana haasi wako by DNA you can still choose to be the legal father to that child. Baba had acknowledged 3 kids before his death so they will inherit accordingly. DNA won't change anything and by law you can't force them to take tests. Seems baba ava vakagara UK long time and only died last year. If he had any doubt of paternity he would have done ma DNA. The paternity in question is only Shumba s and its negative. He wasn't acknowledged as mufi s son achiri mupenyu and DNA is 0 percent. Even if it was 100% it would still take another legal battle to get inheritance because the father didn't acknowledge him. So apa Shumba ngavaudzwe baba vawo chaiwo. Zve ma DNA e the other siblings is now none of his business. They aren't obligated to do so.

@@beavenmutoko1222 he cant challenge DNA results of the other children coz he is not their alleged father. ko kana baba vaiziva kut vana avo havasi vavo but was ok kuvatora sevake. as long as paine birthcertificate mwana anenge atove wako. zvekuti DNA izvo hazvishande , birth certificate rinotatidza kuti baba vakabvuma vana vamwe avo.

Lawyer ane nyaya ndodaira akarambidza vamwe kut vatestwe

Akatengwa nxaaaa

Adoption papers actually don’t matter here. What takes precedent is the will. 1. A WILL was present. Whatever the deceased (Apple) writes in a will = legally binding. Meaning, say for example he was lied to and one of the 3 other kids (Yellow) actually isn’t his? BUT he (Apple) had still written the will and left something for Yellow … according to the LAW, you only follow what’s in the will. A 0% child can still get an inheritance, if the will writer added them. 2. The lawyer can not go against the will writer’s wishes to REMOVE. Thats all he’s saying. He’s reminding people that even if all 3 other kids = also 0%? then, that actually doesn’t change anything. They were written in the will & they still recieve something. 3. This one, SHOULD have been added to the will, the father had no reason to not add him as well. 4. From a legal standpoint, the lawyer is correct. 5. Now, if he WAS a biological child and it’s proven then the lawyer still can’t take away from the others, but he can then say the deceased left without knowing/having included another child. And he can request before the courts to add a beneficiary. But not to remove* a beneficiary written by the deceased, biological or not. Lesson 1: If you have things? If you have kids. Write an iron clad will & REGISTER it with the Courts. Done. Lesson 2: Stop this nonsense of kids becoming adults without knowing their fathers. Lesson 3. DNA doesn’t lie. Solution = test other 2 aunts or siblings. The probabilities WILL lead to truth.

ndomutemo. kana mufi akabvuma vana vakatobvumwa

Haunyepe hako

Lawyer uyu even the way he is talking after results doesn't look professional

kuzogwadzisa kwahi dai waita 100% vakutowana makey emba

He isn’t. He’s following the law. 1. A WILL was present. Whatever the deceased (Apple) writes in a will = legally binding. Meaning, say for example he was lied to and one of the 3 other kids (Yellow) actually isn’t his? BUT he (Apple) had still written the will and left something for Yellow … according to the LAW, you only follow what’s in the will. A 0% child can still get an inheritance, if the will writer added them. 2. The lawyer can not go against the will writer’s wishes to REMOVE. Thats all he’s saying. He’s reminding people that even if all 3 other kids = also 0%? then, that actually doesn’t change anything. They were written in the will & they still recieve something. 3. This one, SHOULD have been added to the will, the father had no reason to not add him as well. 4. From a legal standpoint, the lawyer is correct. 5. Now, if he WAS a biological child and it’s proven then the lawyer still can’t take away from the others, but he can then say the deceased left without knowing/having included another child. And he can request before the courts to add a beneficiary. But not to remove* a beneficiary written by the deceased, biological or not. Lesson 1: If you have things? If you have kids. Write an iron clad will & REGISTER it with the Courts. Done. Lesson 2: Stop this nonsense of kids becoming adults without knowing their fathers. Lesson 3. DNA doesn’t lie. Solution = test other 2 aunts or siblings. The probabilities WILL lead to truth.

Because law is itself corrupt and senseless...

Anoda mari

good analysis

Yes, but tete said they always saw this mother working together with their brother in his businesses. Problem is her sister died before this case was mentioned. What if sister didn't know that her husband lay with his sister?

@@aqua4497 also men love siring children and its highly likely that Babamukuru vakati bcoz the sister was no longer capable of giving him children ndakudya munin'ina wako. Again, mhuka inonzi babamukuru hairege kudambura chiweti chamainini coz hapana ukama.

Taura hako aitodanana nabmkru zveku batwa kunyepa

@@emmanuelsithole8767 You're right, because tete said she always saw her working with him. Maybe she wanted to be his wife so this boy who belongs elsewhere would belong and inherit here. Pakasiiwa pfuma apa. Lawyer said he could have got keys for a house that day. No, mainini lies that the man knew his son but everyone was afraid of tezvara. She knows the real father and he's unapproachable I guess.

Know the law before you make such comments. Mamwe mashoko anosungisa. Every lawyer would have done the same

❤❤

True vakagara vasabhura Shumba kare

​@@veronicamashumba7387kumusabhura kupiko when shumba was never there to begin with? That woman ari kunyepa, anonatsoziva muridzi wemwana. Kana baba vake vaityisa sezvaanoreva, so who did they say is the father of this child? Vakavaudza kuti mimba ndeyani iyi. Nekutyisa kunonzi vaiita, they must have said something.

Since the aunts had initially wanted all the kids to go for the test and still want that to be done, I guess the lawyer should let that be, again they mentioned that at one point the father also wanted to do the same. Right now I feel even the aunts need closure as well. I hope the family will have the kids tested all together because right now i am certain its not up to the children to decide whether they should be tested or not unless they know very well that they aren't kids of that father but still want to benefit from the estate.

True ... Akabhadharwa uyo

vamwe vana vakabvumwa nababa vavo. Uyu ndiye asina.tese ka tinotoendao kunowana inheritance

After what they saw here, unonyepa iwe......havabvume kkkkkkk

From what l hear from the Lawyer according to the Law,even Vana vamwe vakaita DNA nyangwe vakabuda vasina hukama nemushakabvu hazvina basa becoz a child can be adopted what matters ndezvekuti mufi akasiya avagamuchira zviri pamutemo or vakauya in time.uyu Shumba it's unfortunate he came 1 year later so which raises eyebrows so he only has his mother to blame for kept quiet for that long.

Makagona kusarura mutupo Shumba. Mwana wechikara,mhukahuru,varidzi vemasango. Isu hatikuraseyi😂

Vamwe vana havana problem nekuti baba havana kumbobvira vavaramba. Vaizivikanwa nehama dzese

She can’t even remember gore rakafa Bba vavo amai ava ane kakunyepa

@@user-rp3qn5zs2r Vanonyepa. Imagine if you are a woman how can she forget how old she was when she gpt pregnant. All this time even when the father died.

Varikungodavo nhaka chete problem blacks vanoda kukwana kwana nepasiri pavo. Kana vaitya baba vavo ko vakazokwanisa kumira sei kuti mwana haana baba kana vaityisa tsereki ngavataure chokwadi.

Ko gogo vakabereka Mai navo vati ndaizviziva but she chose to keep quiet . What rubbish is that . Why didn’t she tell her husband or at least ma sisters a Sekuru kana vaipenga zvinembiri. Gogo navo havasi right, vanenge vane hundyire.

@@imath68 The whole story is sad. Can you believe telling this kid now. Kungoti kufunga kwakasiyana if l was him l.will just say lm happy ndanzwa kuti baba vangu ndiyani l dont need anything. Why will l want things from a person who never wanted me all these years. I have respect kunana tete.

You are right, they did not handle it well. They also displayed they don't understand genetics.

They checked the relation of the aunties. DNA testing doesn't just jump to conclusions,, it is strategic,,, go back n here what Tinashe read on that paper.

​@@leelynnleehuc9431they did

DNA matches the 2 aunts.

Exactly.probability of relatedness should be there chero 10%

True I second you on this ndosaka mwana wa sis asi kutaura nemwana wavo vanoti ndaimbunyikidzwa more than once how can she make fool of us. Hama dze mkdz idzi very bad people including mbuya vakadii kutamba nyaya varidzi vese vachipo umwe neumwe achidaira nyaya dzake

Shumba vakafanana Na Mai vavo ko anatete vacho kana vasiri vemumusha zvonetsa izvi

​@@cathrinepfudza3198Chero vasiri vemumusha mumwe ndevemudumbu rimwe. Relatedness inobuda. Shumba is from somewhere else

Pamwe vakatopiwa mwana asiri wavo kuchipatara ivo mbuya

Vanotengwa ava takazviitirwa

Mufunge

She is also a good person

Taura hako muninina anoita kunge mukuru kuna sisi

With an Apple 😂 She’s the UK tete

I agree with you 💯

Wobva watozvishaya kuti saka nhumbu vakaisenga sei igobarwa mwana agokura ivo vasingazivi baba vemwana apa voti taitya baba,pedzezvo mopihwa mukana moramba munyere henyu wozoti pava paye aaaaa yazviko izvi

But they may will split the inheritance. Kana Mota dzanga dziri 2 pa mwana dzatova 1 point something pamwana

Yes, but they are upset they can't have it all. Imagine this one was going to get a house! Pane inheritance yakawanda.

U are right

Hahahahahaha taking such a huge risk?? 🤣

@@patrickchikwekwete5298 😄😃 Why?

Anga achida kusunga tai ndokukanganwa😂😂😂😂😂

Kkkkkkkk asi chii newe

@@margaretmawango4591 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Exactly

True, I loved the cross examinations. He asked all the important questions. He probed well.

I don't think so, anoita kunge anozodawo nyaya dzisinei naye. Whats the relevance of asking the son how he got to marry his wife and at what age. Sandizvo zvanga zviri paagenda.

@@PriscaWhite-ql9pt it spices up his show. Don't forget ipapo.

@@Tindom Depends on the type of audience. I found it unecessarily intrusive especially given that mwana iyeye is obviously under stress as can be expected. It shows a lack of emotional intelligence on his part. He fails to distingush whats appropriate and whats not, his end goal is just for vibes regardless of who suffers in the process.

@@PriscaWhite-ql9pt hapana chakamboshata pakubvunz life yemwana hantie ndiye muridz wenyaya hr

Zvakaoma henyu

Kkkk😂

Kuzama lucky

Exactly the best ever comment I've read , you put it well honestly

It seems she is not feeling well

True

They share the same mother

They would still show relatedness because they share the same mother. DNA isn’t only paternal its maternal too

Correct

They share a mother so what are u saying?