The Complex Marriages Of The House Of Windsor | Royal Wives | Real Royalty 

688u8

She's regal AF.

KvI’m jogo

😊lol Khu hi hkkjlhkkk📞🎛️📞📻

I agree

She has a good husband, that makes a difference, unlike Diana who had to deal with someone who is in love with someone else?

I think that marriage is another charade and its beginning to take its toll on edward he looks sick

@@johnungi7315 What a shameful comment.

@@dorisgooden423 and himself

Charles wasn’t forbidden to marry Camilla. If he had put his foot down,as he later would do, he could have gotten his way, but Camilla actually wanted to marry Andrew-Parker Bowles who was the most eligible bachelor of the time. Diana was sure that she would marry Prince Andrew when she grew up. Her family took to calling her Dutch because they were also sure she would marry Andrew and become a Duchess. Once Diana realized that she could actually catch Charles, the chase was on and facilitated by her family. Diana feigned interest in Charles’ interests and hobbies (Balmoral, fishing hunting, etc.)-basically, she pretended to be who Camilla is, a hunting, shooting, fishing, reading country girl. Then as soon as they were on their honeymoon (most of which was at Balmoral), Diana declared each of his interests as borrrring. When the honeymoon moved on to Balmoral she would have have fits of screaming and crying when he wouldn’t do what she wanted when she wanted him to do it (the court was at Balmoral for the summer so there was official business going on and many witnesses). After the honeymoon she proceeded to, one by one, separate him from his friends (he would give in to avoid conflict with her), then his staff (who would quit because she would not look at or speak to those she wanted to leave. In her mind, she loved him, but then attempted to change everything about him, and if he wanted any kind of peace, he would comply. Diana and her family, particularly the Spencers, were very ambitious and misrepresented who she was to the RF, particularly regarding her emotional health & stability. The Spencer’s actually had a bit of a reputation for unstable men (Diana’s mom cited abuse in the divorce), but the RF didn’t think the mental issues affect the Spencer women. Diana actually refused to cooperate with mental health professionals provided by the RF when they realized how unstable she was, and wouldn’t accept mental health help for years (yes, the RF tried to get her professional help) until a friend threatened to out her bulimia to the press because she was afraid it would kill her. And that is just how she treated Charles. As a grown woman she held hostility towards her mother for leaving her abusive father (her mother took Diana & her brother with her but lost custody), pushed her 60 year old stepmother down the stairs (long after Diana married btw), threw her stepmother’s things out the window in trash bags after her father died, fired one staff for claiming expenses with the palace for some trips with Diana (completely legitimate expenses), and fired another who was the currier delivering tapes to Andrew Morten for her for accepting reimbursement from the publishing company. The virginal “Shy Di” persona was completely a creation of a press. A bit like the common impression that the Queen Mother “sweet ol’granny.”

corona

Ce qui aide c'est leur niveau intellectuel commun; autour de 100! Ce n'est pas moi qui l'ai dit. Ne pas se poser de questions et ne pas essayer de comprendre les choses (se mettre des œillères) ça aide à avancer. Ça ne fonctionne pas pour tout le monde!

To prove that this institution is not right,u did something wrong and they discard you. God does not work that way, he forgives because he knows none of us are perfect. Furthermore they are the ones that took Andrew away from his new wife.

She supports him through Jeffrey Epstein?

@@dorisgooden423 - the 'institution' is not 'god', so whatever you attempting to say is moot.

Happy and healthy women don’t look like Kate. They also don’t age at such an advanced speed

​​@@allytrudie864Damn...you just texted what is on everybody's mind. Catherine's wrinkles are clearly evident and highly noticeable. She's also too thin...no womanly curves at all. I wonder is she anorexic. I wonder is she still alive.

​​@@allytrudie864I was thinking the same thing. I wonder is she anorexic. No womanly curves on her. The wrinkles in her face are very noticeable. And I wonder is she still alive.😲🧐🤔

@@allytrudie864 What do they look like?

​@DonnaV411 not like Kate

How

😂

If Diana had had a Tibetan Buddhist master as a consultant, she would have gained the wisdom to manage her position. As it was, she only had Charles & Carmlle getting their sadist glee from torturing her as their love grew (but only because of that distraction, brought together thru the destruction of a beautiful soul). I don't know if they knew what they were doing, Charles do wounded from neglect & bully abuse. Don't know anything about Carnelle, development except that from the looks of her family at the coronation,they were an uneducated sloppy bunch, the socioeconomic equivalent of the court mistress, which is exactly what her foremothers and she herself were...bred to service, not to compete or present themselves as equals at any level/at any time in their development. I hope that SEC is finished now, what a horrible history follows these sirens (ie.Charles is no different than his Uncle, and his 2nd son).

@@drdebocherry to start with, your beliefs are not everyone’s beliefs. Diana was a Christian and whatever life she lived, it was a successful and beautiful one during that short period in her life and all her wisdom were from her Creator. It was time up for her to leave this earth because her Creator allowed it to be..

@@nubianqueen4375 You obviously didn't learn very much about YOUR creator

Gold digger and bad role model for normal sized women

She has great style, but she definitely put a foot wrong when visiting colonial islands. Unfortunately the royals, Kate included, can't do something as simple as acknowledge genocide and slavery and offer a simple apology.

Whereas, Meghanlomaniac was the complete opposite - she DESTROYS EVERYONE & EVERYTHING in her rampage! Thank God that William chose very well with Catherine & cherishes her, too

​@@MedicLady523Aloser troll

@nanaof7preciousgrands115 your heart was broken by the loss of your grandfather which is only natural, but you did not know Diana and a nursery school teacher, she had no qualifications at all and was actually a mother's helper

@nanaof7preciousgrands115 Diana wasn't a nursery school teacher she left school at 16 with no qualifications, she had a series of low paying jobs she did some cleaning for her sister and friends, she was also a nursery school assistant, which back then did not require qualifications

​@@lsmith9249 Trying to knock Diana down isn't working for you. With little formal education Diana became one of the UKs best Ambassadors ever because she had high emotional intelligence and she was genuine and authentic in her compassion for others.

Sie wahr eine untersetzte Ikone.

Something with her hair, probably gives that impression

@@jennifer_m.8613 and her walk, mannerisms, happy go lucky attitude...😊

​@@yvonnecaldwell6088 et toi tu t es regarde ?

Gotta love that fun down to Earth happiness

If Diana had had a Tibetan Buddhist master as a consultant, she would have gained the wisdom to manage her position. As it was, she only had Charles & Carmlle getting their sadist glee from torturing her as their love grew (but only because of that distraction, brought together thru the destruction of a beautiful soul). I don't know if they knew what they were doing, Charles do wounded from neglect & bully abuse. Don't know anything about Carnelle, development except that from the looks of her family at the coronation,they were an uneducated sloppy bunch, the socioeconomic equivalent of the court mistress, which is exactly what her foremothers and she herself were...bred to service, not to compete or present themselves as equals at any level/at any time in their development. I hope that SEC is finished now, what a horrible history follows these sirens (ie.Charles is no different than his Uncle, and his 2nd son).

If Diana had had a Tibetan Buddhist master as a consultant, she would have gained the wisdom to manage her position. As it was, she only had Charles & Carmlle getting their sadist glee from torturing her as their love grew (but only because of that distraction, brought together thru the destruction of a beautiful soul). I don't know if they knew what they were doing, Charles do wounded from neglect & bully abuse. Don't know anything about Carnelle, development except that from the looks of her family at the coronation,they were an uneducated sloppy bunch, the socioeconomic equivalent of the court mistress, which is exactly what her foremothers and she herself were...bred to service, not to compete or present themselves as equals at any level/at any time in their development. I hope that SEC is finished now, what a horrible history follows these sirens (ie.Charles is no different than his Uncle, and his 2nd son).

I saw that and thought WTF. Funny not funny.

He's a weirdo and a freeloader..............Same as his Chucky Doll ex...........

Not everything. She did break up a marriage after all.

@@debmaddox5130 it literally takes 2 to break up any marriage. He was just as culpable as she was.

@@Warrior_Spirit_Experience-JenHe was unfaithful from the beginning and before the marriage. They chose her together only to provide an heir. Charles should never have married anyone, even a lover, and should keep out of politics ( WEF etc.).

​@@taraalan1131Not according to Charles. He admited having an affair with Camilla AFTER he found out Diana was shagging the Hewitt fella. Why do you believe her, a well known manipulator, and not him?

@@debmaddox5130and several relationships. She was quite determined in her pursuit.

Well it seems all of the royals have stopped following the rules. If they did Charles wouldn’t be King.

What rules might you be talking about?

Related to her country - She might have been a good queen . But, as a mother in law of a very young bride like Diana she was not a good mother - in law especially she s a queen ! an older woman , why she did not understand the pain of a young woman betrayed by her husband ???. Diana was too young and her 1st man was Charles - Diana was a virgin when she married Charles . Elizabeth preferred Charles to marry Diana because Diana was still a virgin , that's Royal regulations.....! Why Elizabeth did not know that Diana was too young , no experience to be wife , Elizabeth has refused to help Diana when she approached her for help .That s heartless ! She s lucky having a good husband and she did not care about the heart breaking of the others !. As a queen , what message she wants to send to the youngs when betrayed by husband ? .She's a Catholic woman ,.she seems.not care about the Christian rules ? Divorce is unacceptable??!! Her silence ,.not interference drew a divorce of Charles and Diana !

Don’t think the media did to the queen what they did to Harry and Megan. Remember how bias they were to Kate and Megan. No one blame the media , they just decided to blame Harry and Megan. I am so disgusted with William not protecting his brother instead he try to pull him down as long as things work for him it’s ok.Hypocrite

What the Bible says about divorce. It says that God does not condone divorce, but for one reason and that reason is if there is infidility. And the whole world knows the coming and goings of Prince Charles with Camila while married to Diania. And now he is the King of England!!! And Camila is the Queen…What was the queen thinking?

ARRANGED MARRIAGE FOR HOMOSEXUAL. just like battenberg

That's ONE marriage... most failed

Camilla didn't get to ruin that Windsor relationship thank God. But she killed Diana's and Charles bullied Sarah tried to have William break up with Kate and kept leaking stuff and then well Harry and Meghan, we know who keeps leaking from the Palace there and it's not always William most Camilla.

​@@CrustyUgg Charles was allowed to marry the love of his life and is also happily married. He was forced to marry lady Diana.

King Charles and Queen Camilla are together since more than 25 years. If you count from the time since Barry Mannakee had to leave July 1986...since 36 years. They are an awesome long-term couple, aren't they ?❤️👸🏼🤴🏻❤️ Up and downs are in all relationships, but millions couples would wish to understand and love each other like the King Charles and Queen Camilla proofed they do. Enviable. More than 30 % of all marriages are divorced every year since 1986 and earlier. Meanwhile it should be 40 %. More than 150.000 every year in Britain and Wales since more than 36 years.

Cannot stopped thinking about my HM I Love Her Lovely Family Highness Of United Stated Family Highness Of United Kingdom 🇬🇧 te quiero mucho mucho feliz año nuevo y feliz día de mi familia te deseo mucho feliz año nuevo y pases un día muy especial para tu día te quiero mucho te amo te extraño mucho feliz día de tu vida mi corazón te amo mucho feliz año nuevo y que pases un buen fin del mundo 🌎 y que tengas un día muy buen viaje te quiero mucho ❤️🙏🏽❤️😇😍💕💯👨‍👩‍👦🥰👉🏾

Who has forgotten how Father Philip treated his eldest son Charles, calling him a jerk? Philip was smart. CANCER at the age of 75, along with dementia and other old people's affairs, is the END. Charles likes to sleep with the devil. He doesn't care about the beautiful Diana and his sons. Although they are the best and dearest thing in his worthless life.

If Diana had had a Tibetan Buddhist master as a consultant, she would have gained the wisdom to manage her position. As it was, she only had Charles & Carmlle getting their sadist glee from torturing her as their love grew (but only because of that distraction, brought together thru the destruction of a beautiful soul). I don't know if they knew what they were doing, Charles do wounded from neglect & bully abuse. Don't know anything about Carnelle, development except that from the looks of her family at the coronation,they were an uneducated sloppy bunch, the socioeconomic equivalent of the court mistress, which is exactly what her foremothers and she herself were...bred to service, not to compete or present themselves as equals at any level/at any time in their development. I hope that SEC is finished now, what a horrible history follows these sirens (ie.Charles is no different than his Uncle, and his 2nd son).

No

Commoner means you are not royalty. She was an aristocrat but not a royal princess before marrying. Ergo, a commoner. It doesn’t matter how “close” to royalty you are.

​@@ClaireBeattyDiana was from nobility, so she was not a commoner.

​@@ClaireBeatty Lady read more history , Diana is descended from not one, but two illegitimate children of King Charles II of England: Henry Fitzroy and Charles Lennox, via two of her great-grandmothers, Adelaide Seymour and Rosalind Bingham. This means that Diana's royal family tree stretches back through the ages of both English and Scottish history.

@@ClaireBeatty Of course, I had to research the difference between the terms used here: "Overall, the key difference between nobility and aristocracy is that nobility is based on hereditary titles and lineage, while aristocracy is a broader social class that includes both hereditary elites and those who have gained their status through other means." -- Google

"Commoner" simply means that Diana wasn't born Royal. She WAS a commoner, just not 'dead common'.

You do realize she's a beard, don't you?

you think she is plain? I think she is gorgeous

And it appears that Edward has treated her so much better than his brother treated Dianne. What a difference!

Fergy listed on Epstein list twenty times more than Andrew

😊😊😊😊😊😅

Such uprights king Challis queen Camilla

What a CLASSY and enjoyable Video

Honey, you are so wrong in so many levels.

Rot. Sophie tried to sell cash for access to the Royals, just like Fergie did. (Look it up). Plus naughty William and Rose Hanbury. William really is his father's son.

Life is not perfect or easy on any human through life. Some do better than others. I love Sophie -don't know Edward much as he stays out of limelight.

From what I've read they were the kind of couple that might have stayed married but made it an "open" marriage, kind of like the royals centuries ago, but that was too unseemly for modern royals.

​@@c.w.8200EÈ

If you're referring to Camilla, how many marriages and relationships did Diana rip apart - or at least cause trouble in?

If this is re Camilla…she did not steal any one…that can’t be done…Charles loved her from get go…and she him…Camilla came from great wealth and social status…Diana was always too shallow and just the wrong person for Charles….

Like the Queen..she will always be the Queen of hearts The people's Princess

@@annychest718 Diana had such exquisite style that not one of the younger royals can capture and she had a beautiful heart!

​@Anny Chest qq0p

Diana was a true princess and will always be loved. I wish Charles could have seen that.

Queen Camilla i s not forced t o be like. I really like her

@@charsenior Diana was a member of the aristocracy and not a true princess. Queen Camilla did not force anyone to like her.

Charles and Camilla had this all planned. They should be abolished! Princess Diana found out on their wedding night! I’ll always love you Diana!

@@sylviabanks2455 what are you ona about

#ThePeoplesPrincess #QueenOfHearts

@gr8fuldeb699 what utter rubbish, she was not even a Princess in her own right the wife of a Prince of Wales has the courtesy title of Princess of Wales and she was EX wife, she would have only been Princess Diana if she had been a Princess by birth or created a Princess, Princesses Elizabeth, Margaret, Anne, Alexandra, Charlotte were and are the epitome of a Princess because they were and are Princesses

Princess of Harlots and Queen of Drama. She was deranged beyond redemption. Spiteful, vindictive and manipulative too.

Pity her youngest son has turned out to be such a disappointment. Trashing his family for $$$$ - he was wealthy by the late Queen Mother & Diana, so he wasn't 'Poor' financially & he had Charles financing him - he's turned out to be a money hungry grub like his wife.

You do know that Diana was, struggling with mental health issues, borderline personality and paranoia being some of them.. and was the main reason, that her marriage was a living hell, to both herself and mostly her husband... I am a big fan of Diana.. she had great ideas!!! She was no saint, but a human!!! Saying that she was honest and respectfu to the Queen is just not the truth. She was working with people from the media, under most of her marriage.. and she was spreading a lot of misinformation and Lies, in tabloids, books and interviews.. Sorry but Harry is doing, what his mother did to Charles and the Queen.( he is just stupid to) Try to go back over just, some of her claims , and put it into the timeline!!! The last couple of years, she was getting her life, and mental health issues, under more control...(I respect her enormously for that, that must have been a hard struggle) King Charles is the one with great Hart, and his have been so respectful to Diana's( his boys mother) memories. There is so much evidence of her behaviour, and extensive infidelity, and he has chosen not to use it... Not even to rehabilitate his or his wife's image.. and Frankly he could easily have done that!!! Maybe you could read, Lady Campbell's book "the real Diana" , Penny Junor's book " the Duchess " and Angela Lavin book" from outcast to queen consort " I know that lady Campbell also wrote a book called " Diana in private" ( the first book about Diana) but I haven't read it yet myself... I actually think that king Charles has been dreading that Harry maybe, has some of the same mental health issues as his mother... And it is the reason that he has been, trying to help him, and praying

. L.l O .PLL. 😅 Lm. 15:35 😊😊 .😊😅😅😊😊

@@mlk27743when a family puts you through what William and Harry went through, some children fall in line out of exhaustion and others get angry. Both are predictable responses to trauma.

​@@amandakesterson224 And that unfortunately was taken advantage of by Harry's wife, who obviously is full of hate and greed, and was also exhibiting a serious mental illness. A very pitiful situation that honestly could only be solved and mended if Harry will be separated from her and see the whole picture through the distance. Harry needs help and Megan needs to be put in her place as she surely is well aware of what she's doing. Learning the hard way for Harry would also be a good eye opener. Hope he gets help before he lose everything and will be left nothing but regret.

That’s because they are regarded as dispensable by the so-called RF.

Well Princess Margaret's behaviour was beyond appalling. She was lazy, an alcoholic and a tart. Her blatant relationship with Roddy Llewellyn (and others) was as embarrassing or more so than the behaviours of those who followed her. She was a chain smoker and had a member of staff following her around with an ashtray. Did she ever do much in the way of charitable work, which was after all the reason why working Royals are paid? Nobody was allowed to call her by her Christian name. She demanded to be called Ma'am by everyone except some of the more favoured were allowed to call her Ma'am Darling. It didn't work out well for her. She had every advantage and was the architect of her own demise.

They all look like they have had anorexia to me.

😊

P Del

😊

😊

From Diana to Meghan!!!

Diana didn't live long enough to remarry, she died one year after getting divorced. I'm sure she would have done eventually if that hadn't happened.

It would have been great to see her happy and (in love) again

Thank you for the wonderful documentary thanks for following me much love.

IYOO

Well atleast Kate can deal with being cheated on. She's a good woman who knows her place and to keep her mouth shut and eyes on the children and to let her man be a man.

​@@TheBasher-_- Giles Coren made it up as a joke to see if anyone would believe it. He was drunk at the time. He apologized for it and removed his tweet.

@@audreykennedy90 Yeah but the "woke" and gullible generation ran with it as usual. 😂😂 Rose is simply a friend of Kate and William's.

Probably won’t have to wait long 🤣🤣🤣

I hope they will have MUCH more time as a family, allowing their children to grow up as"normal" as possible before duty fully hits... Who says King Charles won't do a good job? He surely was prepared long enough!

@@heikerosenau1520 That won’t happen unfortunately their children are in the line of succession,their lives will never be normal.

@@sashalove83 Well - that's why I wrote "as 'normal' as possible"!!

🎉

Catherine is a beautiful and gracious young woman. A timeless beauty who will serve as Princess of Wales with grace and dignity. I’m happy the Monarchy has both Queen Camilla and Princess Catherine to represent them to the Workd. How proud you must all be. Many Blessings to each of you from America 🇺🇸❤🇬🇧

Personally I can’t look at Carmela as a Queen.

Only a hypocrite could

Mdr kate a toujours la gueule ouverte quand elle rit comme une dinde

She could use instructions in making speeches.

Yes, it was self centered & unfair of Charles, and tragic for young Diana. Such a shame that Charles was so obsessed with Camilla, that he didn’t give Diana a chance. Sadly she just served her purpose for him, birthing his heirs. The future shows the results of Charles mistakes, just look at how Harry has evolved.

i think these kinds of comments about what charles thought or didn't think are unhelpful. Remind yourself that back in those days there was not the same knowledge there is today. Most men had no idea what to do (or women) or how to handle the issues that Diana had. in fact, all their marriage did was escalate the mental illness that she already had. Realistically - she had not done any 'self work' at that stage (before her marriage) and it is unlikely she would have found happiness with anyone at all. i believe the shame is that basically her life ended just as it was beginning, when she finally understood herself and her reactions. Happiness was there for her.. within sight and reach and her life was ended. that is the tragedy..

I agree. She was to good.

@@thevocalcroneMm, you don't have to understand what someone is going through to be helpful or empathetic. Charles was cold and uncaring, which is different than being concerned but perhaps not fully understanding. It's obvious he didn't want to understand or be supportive. It wasn't just that eating disorders were little talked about. He clearly knew that cheating on her and gaslighting her whilst having all their friends gaslight her, too, would, perhaps, be extremely hurtful even to someone who had dealt with their baggage. Excusing Charles's behavior is inexcusable.

@@thedepthsofrepair you really don't know any of that. You assume based on media reports or even from Dianas interview. there is always two sides to a story.. your version is fairly biased. He doesn't seem to be cold and uncaring (in fact what we do know about him is that he is very caring based on his hobbies and philanthropical activities). was he cold to diana? Quite possibly but .. how would a person manage that kind of emotional beahviour when there is no training in mental health? He potentially wasn't aware that it was 'mental illness' and thought she was simply over reactive, emotionally manipulative, demanding and all out cra-cra.. (at the time it was happening). if you have lived with someone with mental illness who can 'go off like a fire cracker' most people will simply be silent rather than risk an explosion. the silence can be perceived as 'coldness or a lack of care' when its simply self preservation. either way - none of will or can possibly know what was going on inside the marriage.

Merry Christmas 🎄

That was the late queen's choker which Catherine has been allowed yo use. It's part of the royal collection belonging to the king and queen.

@@ysivasan yes I do know , but Diana wore it famously as a head band on royal tour … which Megan would definitely have seen xxx

he's homosexual, PETER PAN OF AMATEUR DRAMATICS

He may swing both ways, he's married to a beautiful, intelligent woman and they've produced two children. If he is bi, at least he's very discreet about it. I've seen many comments about him being effeminate, but the only ones who actually know for sure are he and Sophie. He comes across to me as a shy, sentimental and unafraid of showing his soft side, such as an artist or poet would be.

​@@MedusasFeelinSalty Or he could be so much in love with his wife and they have a great friendship and bonding just like any normal couple who have a long lasting marriage....

@@airport4173Prove it or stop spreading rumours.

so? BOdyguards have to follow their principals.

@@glen7318 not saying there is anything wrong with it stop being such a party pooper . it just looks funny seeing a huge man im a suit behind a happy kid and mom in a water ride . it was simply cute and funny you just had to be the asshole to see my comment in a negative light smh

Having to or getting to?

My thoughts exactly! hahahaha

@@TheBasher-_- lol your rite that's surly a blessing so he GETS TO 😂😂😂 still looks so funny a huge guy in a suit on a water slide 😂

She is never absent, rather, she is always present, because you obsess over her and cannot stop talking about her.

William and Kate are Prince and Princess of Wales. (Wales, the country) They are not prince and princess of "very large marine mammals with blowholes."

Cause she is a normal person

I think she was also very much in love with the pomp and circumstance of royal life

@@brianhuffman2070 Not really as her family lived next door at one point and they used to go over on holidays etc to play, The Spencer estate is a stunning place, where she is buried on a small island on their lake. Though I do agree with you as in she was slightly in love with the idea of marry a “Prince” from reading her aunties ‘Barbara Cartland’ romance novels. Plus the Royals were very stuck in a different era and had strict rules to follow even behind closed doors. I think Diana helped improve the royals humanity towards the common people etc… She did throw herself into fashion, but that was her way of trying to compete with Camilla and get Charles love back. Though he needed a wife that didn’t outshine him and stayed in the background. Which is a shame as I think now being more mature… They would of made a great team and even a better king and Queen in my opinion.

@@lizpugh6440 I think you have a few points to me it's obvious Charles never loved her (too bad for him), she thought it was fairy tale to no fault of her own she was young and pretty and naive, and I think she came to realize who Charles and Andrew really are along with Camilla bulldozing her way into royalty was the driving force of that whole affair

@@brianhuffman2070 She was a young teenage girl of course she was, what girl wouldn't be? That doesn't change the fact most would agree she really did love him when she married him.

nonsense.

I think Charles was too concerned with his public image so for him cameras meant to be professional and maybe he didn't like that Diana was easy going and did not act so pompous in front of the lenses.

Don’t forget Prince Charles Is Her first Son and then we have been working hard for the kids lol and mommy mama merry merry blessings Amen 🙏🏽 love ❤️ and love you mama mama mommy mommy mama merry merry blessings Amen 🙏🏽🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽❤️😍😇😇👉🏾💯👨‍👩‍👦🥰💕🙏🏽🙏🏽👨‍👩‍👦❤️👉🏾

Perhaps you need to read up on the Succession. At the time that Charles was heir to the throne, the heir to the throne was the eldest male. Edward is the youngest and is miles away from the throne.

@@monique8641 perhaps you need to learn to read between the lines. I understand how succession works. Edward would've (know the meaning of that) been a better option

Her legacy will carry on. The word carrion means dead animals.

No one comes close to Diana's level of star power. Comparing anyone to her is an exercise in futility.

SHE SHOULDN'T HAVE MARRIED HER COUSIN - INBREEDING has always caused DEGENERATES.

Not really.. Not by choice, but because She was Queen, and very busy, with no time!! Plus, there was a troop of Nannies, and caregivers for the Children ..

Don't make me laugh 😂😂. I think your being sarcastic.

Merry Christmas 🎄

Did you know Diana is dead? Been dead for 25 years?

May Diana rest in peace. She most certainly left her mark on this world.... ...

Good

She should be left out...she is nothing...at all...

If you not British, you actually DON’T count. It’s how SNOBBISH they are. They don’t treat you like Humans. It’s all stage. How ironic they accept Charles long life of CHEATING. The legacy of the imperfect ROYALS .

Diana was a GRIEVING wife due to the Heartbreak of her marriage and the manner in which was said to her by Charles and Camilla such a BROKEN woman.

I wonder why indeed?

I agree, Kate will stay in her marriage to he crown Consort. She didn't stalk William for no reason.

Rose hansbury

@@CocoaPuff01 is William’s mistress, The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. To be honest I hope Charles finds a lovely young lady to have a bit of fun with. Let’s see if Camilla likes having three in her marriage. Karma usually catches them that deserve it. 🌹

@@queenshaasiabeautifulearth2223 I agree. She’ll take the blows from William. I can see him becoming a version of Philip and Charles in a not good way. They both are turning to stone in my eyes. It’s like their souls are gone now.

@@CocoaPuff01 Nonsense. Rose and her husband are simply friends with Kate and William.

Until a VERY recent change, the line has always passed down the male line. Queens only happened in the absence of male heirs. So Princess Anne was always behind all three of her brothers, and then Prince Charles' sons took precedence over the brothers. However a recent change now means that should anything happen to Prince George, Princess Charlotte would succeed to the throne.

Primogeniture! The right of succession belonging to the firstborn child, especially the feudal rule by which the whole real estate of an intestate passed to the eldest son.

I don't think she'd want it.

​@@geraldjampol3120That's the word!

Apparently they weren't kind to Meghan. She tried to do things in a friendly way but apparently the British don't understand American friendliness at all, they took everything she did wrong, and drove her away.

william is HAVING AN AFFAIR NOW- wake up.

A diamond ?...she has acquired a lot of them a gold digger and not a great role model for girls of a "normal weight"

@@airport4173Affairs - see Murad,."likes getting pegged". Shocked me.

Harry isn't cheating on his wife, but it's well known that William has a side rosebush. That's why

Result of the Palace PR machinery polishing the image of Camilla years in years out. And her having her plastic surgery too perhaps helped, somewhat.

@@none8708 heaven, that's rather snide!

I still don't like her... my opinion and I'm sticking to it

​@@none8708well said and very true...

Camilla never wanted the attention.

I doubt a long engagement would have changed the fact that Charles was sleeping with Camilla from the day married Diana

seatbelt

You dont

In my case, I gave him an ultimatum. I don't think that part of his life has been particularly successful since.

I agree but when Catherine becomes Queen she will shine

Merry Christmas 🎄

So true. He had a chance to marry Camilla. He dillydallied and took off for the Navy and she wouldn’t wait for him so I don’t think much of either of them honestly. He cheated with a married woman on his wife even sleeping with her the night before he and Diana were married. I have nothing but contempt for both of them. I will relish the day when I see Diana‘s son crowned and on the throne.

@@elishavarivka8923 how are you doing today 🥰🌹💐

Diana died because her driver was drunk and She didnt wear a seatbelt

You better know it! Charles is the only person who benefited from Diana dying!!! It's not rocket science

He is capablo of do it, as he has done many stuff, crocked

Charles gets what he wants. The late Queen tailored her life around the monarchy, Charles tailors the monarchy around his life...and wants.

@@sembradora01 what nonsense are you trying to utter?

The spoiled brat and the thief got their long-awaited toy, finally.

The Church of England probably had no choice but to accept them as King & Queen. Or else, Charles would've abandon the Church of England & support other religions.🤷‍♀️

It seems that the whole family was pushing Diana on Charles. All they cared about was having an heir.

My thoughts exactly!

Why does everyone hate Megan. I’m genuinely asking ? I’ve never read anything factual of any ill action committed.

Yes..did you notice what Charles said about Diana , she will get used to the press in time and needs to, to survive, thrive etc...the same words megain used in South Africa to tom bradbry when she said thanks for asking if she's ok😂...

@@jubilee.x6440she is a manipulating arrogant narcissist and everything she does is to benefit herself. She will use people then leave them behind without thinking twice. I know that sounds harsh and probably sounds like I am really invested in the drama but I’m not - just a psychology student and have been down a rabbit hole of you tube videos the last week watching Megan and Harry’s interviews, behavior, etc…

@@davidfoarde558 wait you’re a psychology student ? But yet the number one thing you’re taught is to leave all pre-conception at the door before gaining a one on one experience with the individual and you’re not even able to grasp that concept? You’re staying a paragraph worth of spew about someone you Don’t know && Will never know All based on a RU-vid binge staring Harry & Megan So what has she doing that she’s left someone behind to benefit herself? What’s even more disgusting is you blaming this as “invested in drama” What is it exactly that you’ve learned? Issues between individuals is viewed as drama by you? That’s absolutely scary Stick to learning more about what you’re supposedly trying to turn into a career path, would hate to know someone like you is potentially evaluating mentally impaired humans that trust what you say.

A lot of mess could have been avoided if not for the whole concept of the innocent, virginal Princess of Wales ideal that was set in place for Charles. He and Camilla likely could have married in the 1970's and done well together, but she was considered damaged goods.

As easier as it was to marry her or to be single, to quit the crown and finally getting married with Cowmilla. But nooooo

​@@mrsdudeandkids she WAS damaged , Not so good !!! It's a joke how a Tramp can become queen .. just saying 😅

I couldn't agree with you more!!