The Cosmology of the Old Testament 

I don't think he's denying that metaphor was very often employed. However, the trees were made to glorify God and their tossings in the wind clap their leaves. I've heard it before. It's beautiful. Don't really have an answer for the mountains.

The eastern gate of Jerusalem

Funny how many morons in these comments believe in a flat earth.

Agreed. I think we view much of the ancient world through this lens that they were somehow all incredibly dumb, and I think we are largely flawed in our view of the past because of this. The arrogance of our time will be viewed in a shameful way in the future.

They haven't found much to speak of, though. Not that the rest of what you say isn't so it's just that oak island really hasn't panned out to be much. Either whatever was there has already been taken or they're digging in the wrong spot.

Could it be?? 😂

The earth being a globe was a known thing since ancient greece

If I'm not mistaken he didn't deny that he just claimed that it was still debated long after that

He's talking about pre-ancient Greek times. The ancient near east.

sad how you have to jump outside of the bible to get your answers for what God has clearly spoken the earth is flat

@@GThePreacher You don't. Scripture uses spherical language for earth as well. Don't listen to unhinged teachers with no knowledge of original language or literary genre.

The Greeks were an exception. Most cultures believed the Earth to be flat. Eric Dubay has proven that.

Hi I see your point Tho as someone who is Nigerian and grew up in Nigeria with its culture I see often enough that we unfortunately conflate our traditions and culture with the bibles context Trust me, the value of teacher like Dr Heiser is that they remind us that we need to read the bible as God and the authors he chose intended

@@mrarcade2504 Hi 😊 That is my point. Well said 😊 May God always bless you.

Ahhh, my apologies I meant to reply to a different comment. Apologies again for the slight confusion 😂 But I totally agree with you Dr. Heiser was really God sent ❤️

@@mrarcade2504 That's ok. Thank you for clarifying 😊

Acts 17:11

He passed away some time ago

my 1611 says "the wolf shall also dwell with the lamb and the leopard shall lay down with the kid(goat) and the calf and young loin and the fatling ALL together and the little child will lead them " I think we get mixed up because we always put a lion and lamb together to symbolise Jesus' two sides

Walt Brown's theory is really interesting but I think Catastrophic Plate Tectonics is a better explanation. (lots of discussion on that on ICR's youtube channel)

It’s from a 5 hour long lecture. Look up Genesis and the ancient near east Dr. Heiser and you should find it.

no.

no

No because the Moon Sun And Stars are in the Firmament. There is only mention in the Bible Of one Firmament.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rN2Ppbrtf-Q.htmlsi=1-y4Mi3POQyA8X4E

Genesis and the ancient near east Dr. Heiser. Look that up. It’s 5 hours long. It’s a lecture.

Thanks!!

Through passes, not over the tip of mount blanc?”!

Bingo!

The Bible is the truth, but to understand truth as a binary yes or no concept is incomplete, and considering that it's as simple as the bible is true, therefore the earth is flat is quite a jump in thinking IMO. For instance, the expression " the pen is mightier than the sword" is true in one sense, that is say like politcal policy or cultural influence, but not neccesarrily true in a hand to hand combat scenario. The expression itself doesnt intend to convey pens are better weapons than swords. Likewise, the Bible has intention and I would suggest its point is not to express how the cosmological nature of the world works, but who created it and why. The Bible is true in some aspects literally, relaying historical narratives, and some others are metaphorical, they convey truth about God's nature and His accomplishments without necessarily speaking to the literal. The Bible uses cultural idioms, similies, etc... just like we do, which aren't literally true, but they are true in the message they are trying to convey. One error is to extrapolate the Bible as simultaneously true in all literary forms at all times which when one says the Bible is absolute true, on e might confuse the two. Obviously we don't do this and I don't think you are, but can you see where it's not exactly right to conclude the Bible is just 'true' without clarifying how language and literature express truth to varying degree. You suggest the cosmological world view of the ANE comes from God and relayed to humans, and that knowledge was passed down, even to the humans outside the Biblical narrative, and this is how they knew about the nature of the world. But is it not feasible to say one can deduce such a cosmology from simple observation? I don't appear to be moving or spinning, the horizon is flat to my eye, and the luminaries appear to be moving in circular fashion around and above me. That doesn't require divine revelation to conclude, much less an assumption that God found it necessary to reveal the nature of the world to humanity.

@@joeyg1315 Well Heiser’s point was basically “If knowledge of the flat earth was derived from divine revelation, then how come the pagans knew it too? Therefore it isn’t divine revelation.” Well I gave a reasonable explanation as to where the pagans got the idea, if it was in fact divine revelation: the knowledge was passed down from our first parents. Now you’re essentially saying “Well that idea could’ve just as easily come from our earthly perspective. We don’t experience movement and we see the celestial bodies moving around us, so it would’ve been a logical conclusion for them to draw.” Well are you therefore saying it wasn’t divine revelation? It was just our primitive observations? My counter to that idea is that the Bible confirms this flat/geocentric cosmological view. Basically: God’s word confirms it. So either the view was given by God in the garden and we stuck with it: Divine revelation. Or the view originated from our simple observations and was then confirmed by God: also divine revelation. The only counter point would be to say “Well the Bible isn’t being literal.” I think that’s entirely unreasonable. It’s not written in some poetic way. It’s just stating “a firmament separating the waters above from the waters below.” I think we only take it figuratively because of our modern cosmological presuppositions. Either way, it’s undeniable that taking the flat earth conception literally is entirely reasonable; it’s a viable interpretation. And one with the most explanatory power and scope.

@@quickattackfilms7923 |"...My counter to that idea is that the Bible confirms this flat/geocentric cosmological view. Basically: God’s word confirms it."| Not necessarily. It confirms that Biblical writers believed in the ANE cosmology and used that langauge to express God's attributes. It doesnt tell us if God Intended to teach ANE readers the nature of the Earth. I realize now that this conversation really comes down to our hermeneutic lens and our interpretation of what divine inspiration in the scriptures looks like. Heiser's idea of divine inspiration entails God providentially choosing the right people to write, they weren't channeling word for word scripture, like an oracle or spiritual posession. Biblical writers thought independently but were selected carefully by God who knew they would write what he intended. To think inspiration produces every word of scripture by careful selection makes the bible an easy target for criticism, especially in the field of manuscript data and text traditions where variance, contradictions, and omissions show up alot. It also doesn't allow for variance in the Biblical writer's personality, specific word choice, writing style, which are quite apparent in the field of textual criticism, like with Paul's letters, the Pslams, etc. This makes the Bible to be what it does not claim to be. With that being said, The nature of the world wasn't a disputed idea in the ANE when the Bible was being written. Considering the cultural audience of the time, why would Biblical writers feel compelled to explain the cosmological world view if it was already well established knowledge. There was no counter movement to the ANE Cosmology. Why would there be? What theological importance is there to teaching or enforcing the shape of the world. Can you consider if this is truly the message the Bible is trying to convey, and if not why we insist it to be true anyways? What fundamental theology does the "how" of the creation account and the prophets convey to ANE readers? I would suggest none... One of heiser's main points of Biblical theology is reading with an Israelite worldview in mind. What are they getting out of this? |"So either the view was given by God in the garden and we stuck with it: Divine revelation. "| When are we allowed to fill in the gaps with theories outside of scriptural authority? What other ANE sources could suggest such things? |"The only counter point would be to say “Well the Bible isn’t being literal.” I think that’s entirely unreasonable. It’s not written in some poetic way. It’s just stating “a firmament separating the waters above from the waters below.” I think we only take it figuratively because of our modern cosmological presuppositions. Either way, it’s undeniable that taking the flat earth conception literally is entirely reasonable; it’s a viable interpretation. And one with the most explanatory power and scope."| Again Heiser points this out flat out. The Bible IS being literal. The Bibilical writers DO express their literal belief in the ANE cosmology. They weren't Heliocentric Globe Earthers but is that their point? To them it wasn't poetic or metaphorical, but we are back again to what I wrote earlier. Is God's point to teach Earth Science 101 to ANE readers who already believe in said concepts? I would suggest no, they already believed in said things, there was no counter-movement against the domed flat plain. Rather, inspiried Biblical writers used what they 'understood' of the world to convey truth's about what God did do, and His express attributes through them. That's at least Heiser's position in this matter.

@@joeyg1315 Do you agree with this?: “Yes, this is exactly what they believed. And therefore it is actually what the Bible authors are saying. But they are incorrect.”

A computer simulation, not reality

Starry Night is a good one, pretty fancy stuff.

@@joshlbiomechanic smooth brain

@@LiGhTbOrN77 lazy easygoing

Massive ignorance on the part of flat earthers! Get in your lane and wake up to simple physics! Earth is a sphere!

yra that's just a stretch just because its in the middle does not make it the center of everything its in between a heaven and earth does not mean its Gods center peace in he values most,the middle represent the dome firmament not space lies youve been taught and by no means is the firmament his focus except when he will roll it up like a scroll,the middle symbolism was meant to symbolically show us the gate that could not yet be passed and keeps up away from the holiest place,which in order to get through that firmamne thou must be covered by the holy and pervious blood

I'd be curious to know what denomination or who you follow?

I believe you are confusing it with "discovery." Revelation is information given to the one(s) whom the revealer chooses to give it. Unless the revealer chooses to give the information to everyone, everywhere, at all times, then naturally it would belong to some and not others. That is, at least, until they in turn share it with everyone else.

Revelation, as in a revealed truth (or Truth), in whatever language time or culture it is spoken or individually intuited, is not any one person or persons exclusive domain. Perhaps that's clearer. Truth is Truth... It's fundamental, universal and ordered. It's also knowable relative to the level of development of the "knower." : ) @@rebbrown7140

not of private interpretation is another way t put it

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rN2Ppbrtf-Q.htmlsi=1-y4Mi3POQyA8X4E

“Michael Heiser-Genesis and the ancient near east”

@@solidsnake497 Thank you!!

Hi Danny. I was used by freemasons in ritual abuse. It runs deep in our family line. God is healing me. For His glory and to expand His kingdom and for the redemption of my family.. I'm thankful you are on YHWH's side!

That's what I came for🍿🤣

I'm always amazed these plain text fundamentalist Christians still exist.

@@keepclimbing2015 plain text fundamentalists? Lol so you disregard the scriptures if NASA shows you pictures? That sounds like a failed test of faith to me....

Me too. Thank the LORD he left so much for us to learn from . What a blessing he was and still is to us all

@@melchis873 Agreed. GB

Heiser was a demon loved by the world because the world loves their own - his biblical ethnicity says it all "Malachi 1:2-4"

@@James1v1-pf6lo I rebuke you in the name of Yeshua.

@@oldcrowtj4937 Yeshua is truth - so attempting to rebuke truth in his name is both pointless as well as blasphemous - so like I said Heiser's biblical ethnicity says it all "Romans 9:13" "Obadiah 1:9-10,18"

Greek are not near as ancient as the other cultures mentioned in the Ancient Near East

Eratosthenes' math would have worked out the same if the sun were smaller and closer to the earth... I.e. flat earth....

In the beginning GOD created the universe and earth...nope, heavens and earth. The Bible tells us the earth was created before the sun, moon, and stars. Which are called lights and luminaries. The luminaries were created on the 4th day of creation. Modern science is in direct conflict with the word of GOD. The indoctrination we all are subject to from birth results in something called cognitive dissonance.

Just because God says he sees the earth as a circle doesn't mean it isn't round. The sun is a circle, as is the Moon, the Bottomless Pit is the earth's core because that's where gravity meets.

@@datprawn4850 according to modern cosmology, the sun and moon are spheres.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rN2Ppbrtf-Q.htmlsi=1-y4Mi3POQyA8X4E

It's titled: Genesis and the ancient near east.

Earth is a topographical plane. It is measured flat, is navigated flat, and is functionally flat. The globe model is derived from angle measurements taken from a flat plane and wrapped into a sphere. I don't have a "belief" that the earth is a horizontal plane, it just is. It's axiomatic. The "beliefs" are held by those who dont understand this and "believe" they are stood atop a spinning water ball when in fact that very ball was created from angle measurements taken from a flat plane. Most Bible scripture is somewhat ambiguous though both sides like to use many scriptures as proof one way or the other.

@@AWAKEtheIRON you are functionally ignorant and ignore actual facts

@MrEmeralddog God bless you too brother.

@@AWAKEtheIRON I told you the facts, I had a good education but at 73 my schools were much better than what you were subjected to, sorry for you

@@MrEmeralddog OK. Have a good one.

this man said God told not one the earth is flat then goes to quote fake math and fake science to prove his case without any biblical sourcing,wisdom of man vs the bible its clear you've listened to school rather then Gods word.When this topic is debated people can't go to the bible they run to fake science made by men(not all science is fake)

Bingo

Sure thing, Mr. Short School Bus.

On the dot!!

Dr.Heiser never believed in a Flat Earth ( cognitive dissonance & pre-conceived notions of the world), but what I do respect about him is that he never once hid from what the text said. I on thee other hand can only say that the Bible says what it says, I don't understand sometimes the logic of ppl. You are not trying to make yourself sound crazy to who if you don't believe FL theory. Yet you do believe in a 6 day creation account, that a snake talked to our first parents to deceive them, Giants were created by Angel+human female offspring ( unless you adhere to the Sethite theory ) but even then you still believe in Giants because post flood they're still there I.E Goliath minimum 8ft people, Jacob wrestled an Angel/Jesus and Jacob won to become know as Israel, Moses did wonders via God and the staff including parting the Red Sea, Jonah being in the whales/Fish for 3 days and surviving, a talking donkey, that a man who we now base our faith in as non Hebrew gentiles via a new covenant say he defeated death + he went to heaven after his resurrection and he was God incarnate. But yet you wouldn't believe this even if all evidence was thrown at you because Nasa and all of the space agencies and governments tell you it is round. I'm not saying it isn't but take out you pre conceived notions what you think the Bible says and just let it speak for itself. All i'm saying is most people who don't believe in God already deem you a fool for believing in a God to begin with, a lot of so called ''Christians'' already don't take Genesis as fact anymore because they want to fit in Evolution into the Bible. Let me ask you this...If we take out Genesis out of the Bible and Adam and Eve and thee whole creation account is just allegory or fiction...Then what was the point of Jesus coming down and dying on the cross?? , you start getting into a slippery slope from which you really cant come back from. I will accept God's word for what it says and if other ppl see me as a crazy person, then it is what it is. I rather be crazy to this world and it's people who deny God, that to turn away from God and his word. When we choose to be Christians we accept Jesus and what he came to save us from, and that includes the Genesis book ppl try and say is just fiction. Because in Genesis we see the plan already being mention ed by God in Genesis 3 the seed of the serpent in emnity with the woman's seed, we get the shadow of Jesus being our savior in the recalled sacrifice to Abraham to test his loyalty and not sacrificing Isaac his son (His only true heir ). Shows us that God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son for us John 3:16 and didn't withhold what was most precious to him in order to save us. I know i will get heavily ridiculed for this comment but honestly I couldn't care less, I've looked into your question for years now and I still haven't found a reason to believe otherwise, I never wanted to think of this stuff but i know I will get ridiculed as part of believing this topic. But Biblically I don't see anything to disprove it, and I've seen enough video to not make me believe Nasa or Earthly Governments to tell me Cosmology. Like the good book says - Romans 3:4a : ''let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written''. At the end of the day, we have to ask ourselves, do we truly believe this book? or only bits and pieces, specially the parts were it doesn't fit into our world view as we see it now. I mean just think of what is going on with its twisting of the word by false leaders who affirm LGBTQ+ to fit their world view on how we should accept this into the church when scripture is clear on the matter. At some point we either believe God's Holy inspired words or we don't. I pray you find the answers your looking for and please consider all arguments before casting them aside.Proverbs 18:13 - ''If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame.'' . Pray to God and ask for the Holy Spirit to reveal the truth to you. God bless.

He's just saying that the original audience and authors of the old testament lived in a pre-scientific era. They didn't know that earth was a sphere, hence why the Bible describes earth as a circle resting on pillars with a dome over it.

if he did that be a step up because the earth is flat and you've been lied to,you evidence doesnt come from s rupture rather it comes from fake science(not saying all science is fake) but this science just like evolution is boolonie

Its FLAT you are not alone 😎@@danperez3970

Earth is The Sheol

Genesis describes ancient near east cosmology, not modern science. Get over it.

Skiba died from his own ignorance. How many others were adversely affected by his "advice"? Why venerate an individual who was hopelessly wrong and spread his dangerous ignorance to others?

@@moggpiano8043 Rob Skiba isn't dead... 🤷

@@Theggman83yes he is unfortunately

@@dylangoldman2310 holy smokes, I totally didn't know he died. I don't follow his channel so I guess that's how I missed it... Died of "COVID" I see... Crazy.

@@Theggman83 Yup they got him :(

amen valid points

It doesn't.

@@ericb2409 sure it does, speeds up to go in front, slows down to go behind.

The speed of the moon is a constant. However its direction, being circular, is constantly changing. This means that although the speed of the moon is constant, the constant change in direction results in a change in velocity. Speed and velocity are two different things.

@@ericb2409 nope if it stayed the same speed it would crash.

The 'son of man' is a 'worm' - Job 25:6 Solid trees... ever build anything out of 'worm wood'? It's my understanding that it's not too 'solid' - unless the builder using it has faith. Iron and clay cannot mix, but laws of iron can form it - and even break it. The 'laws' are as 'air' if there is no 'faith' in them. Thus... the son of man is INSIDE of 'man' and OUTSIDE of 'man'. The son of man that is LACKING in faith serves the man, the son of man that HAS faith serves God. I can teach you about a 'book'.

There are waters above - living - faith & those works. There are waters below - bitter - faithless & those works. All of the ground (earth) is the same - Adam is 'earth'. What grows dependa on what you water it with... there is only one kind of seed... and both are from the 'woman'. The woman is inside - when man is 'created' - male and female made them 'he'. When man is 'formed' - the woman is 'separated' from the man... and thus there are needs of 'rules'. There is only ONE RULE - that of the LORD, who does ALL THINGS (Isaiah 45:7). Thus... to judge the seed - is to judge what God does. "You speak like a foolish woman - shall we not accept both good and evil from God?" ...and in saying this - Job did NOT sin with his lips. Joseph... the dreamer - knew that what is seen as evil can be used for good. Guess who is here to rescue a bunch of slaves out of Egypt... again. Ugh. Can we get started already?

Mount Sinai is only just over 7000'.. that's not exactly a big mountain.... Especially since you don't need oxygen supplementation at 7000 feet. Most climbers don't use oxygen until they reach well over 6500 meters....

Some of my other posts from threads on the other video: ""solid vaulted dome" is an interpretation, Isa 40.22 says God "stretches out the heavens like a curtain" -- you don't stretch a solid dome and a curtain is not a firm solid dome structure and Gen 1.8 says "raqia" is called heavens (plural) yet "raqia" is singular (not firmamentS) and we know there are at least 3 sections to heaven, one where the birds fly, one were the stars/planets move and the dimension where angels reside. The closest thing to some solid layer would be what Josephus described as a layer of ice crystal surrounding earth before Noah's flood -- there may be something to this as some planets still have ice surrounding them, like in the rings of Saturn for example. Other than that, it may just be describing the atmosphere, hence objects move through them, including meteorites and birds." "i’ve studied all this in depth in the original languages and like I said elsewhere, it’s either a highly massaged rare translation that FE people/bots like to quote, or it’s using metaphorical language (usually in regards to the social order of the earth), and sometimes language from visionary or apocalyptic scenes which are not literal." "simple to understand when you know the text, for instance pillars are used for mountains, which do indeed extend down into the foundations of the earth such as the 7 pillars/mountains Jerusalem sits on (temple allusions are often used in creation language as well); likewise the pillars of Hercules are the two promontories that flank the Straight of Gibraltar, this was common in ancient language." ""Firmament" in Genesis is something like an expanse since the text says birds fly in it (Gen 1.20); there may also be different sections similar to shamayim/heavens having at least 3 sections/3 heavens." "I did a study years ago on those verses about the earth being immoveable, etc - either the translations were misleading or the context was about the social order or rule of the earth being firmly established vis a vis God’s rule. To be sure, other parts show God shakes the earth and overturns the land when man becomes wicked. As a bonus, when Matthew describes the star of Bethlehem coming to a ‘stand’, we now know this is describing Jupiter (planets were also called stars or wandering stars), universally known as the king star/planet, in retrograde motion - a phenomenon that happens with the orbits (circular movement) of both the earth and planets."

"Science has caught up with scriptures in many ways and now we know the stomach is intimately connected to the nervous system and plays such an important role on the brain it is sometimes called the second brain or the enteric nervous system in scientific literature. Shame so many don’t give the Word of God more credit." Edit: Re "four corners of the earth" as in Isa 11.12 or Rev 7.1, 20.8 The term for "earth" used in the Hebrew and Greek and Aramaic here can also be translated "land," in other words it's speaking of the land of Israel having four corners (lit. "wings" in Hebrew). This fits the context in light of Ezk 38.5-6 and Rev 20.8 which describes the nations around the four corners of the land - Israel - from the north/east/west/south, which includes Gomer, Persia, Ethiopia and Put - so we know it's not talking about the four corners of the 'earth' but the 'land' (Israel) unless you believe the earth ends around Persia and Ethiopia, etc. Here are also examples of the earth/land being moved at times with Hebraic parallelisms comparing mountains to pillars (reaching into the sky): _"It is God who removes the MOUNTAINS, they know not how, when He overturns them in His anger; Who shakes the earth/land out of its place, and its PILLARS tremble"_ (Job 9.5-6). _"For thus says the Lord of hosts, 'Once more in a little while, I am going to shake the heavens and the earth/land, the sea also and the dry land."_ (Hag 2.6) The following shows that the earth/land can indeed be moved, ie, not always "FIXED and IMMOVABLE," in this case it appears to be speaking about conditions after the flood: _"The mountains rose; the valleys sank down to the place which You established for them. You set a boundary that they may not pass over, so that they will not return to cover the earth/land."_ (Psa 104.8-9) Other times it is stable and enduring for the age (עוֹלָ֥ם וָעֶֽד), and the mountains are as foundations (reaching under the earth's crust): _"He established the earth/land upon its FOUNDATIONS, so that it will not totter ("mot") forever and ever. You covered it with the deep as with a garment; The waters were standing above the MOUNTAINS."_ (Psa 104.5-6) PS - Every lunar eclipse shows the earth's shadow revealing the shape of a globe to the naked eye, not a flat disc, especially during a total lunar eclipse. This is not rocket science.

From different threads: >> "Not everything Hesier and other scholars, or pharisees said was false however."

It’s a pity he didn’t know. I think it would have delighted him.

@@stevezane68 Two assumptions don't make a truth. From another old thread from the video "Were there Female Angels in the Bible?": I'm not basing my caution only on this video but on a long pattern with many red flags over many years. There is so much falsehood and deception (usually by omission) in Heiser's videos I considered making a new channel just to address them, called "Reversing Heiser." He's usually subtle how he slips you the poison to eat away at and undermine faith a little here and little there while pretending to be "helpful." Another big deception off the top of my head was how he declared a while back that we cannot use prophecy to know what to expect which is the opposite of what Peter said in 2Peter 1.19, and doesn't even make sense about warning about the abomination of desolation and to flee when it is set up as Christ warned. He's also condescending when it comes to the biblical creation narrative and essentially says the writers didn't understand science and were just trying to explain things as they understood them (hence they were wrong). There are simply far too many things like this, but his fans don't seem to either care or notice which speaks to a lack of scriptural knowledge. The whole field is like this in different respects including Dr Brown, Dr James White and so many other ministries, each doing their part for the AC kingdom. It's clear the enemy has long conquered the leadership of Christianity and the academies and institutions -- not just the secular world and govts. Sadly most won't stand a chance when the more amazing deceptions of the false messiah and his false prophet happen. I'll have to leave the discussion there.

Actually the globe model HSS lead many to feel we are flying through purposeless space without a meaning,flat incased dome earth which the bible teaches would help people to realize we were created

@@GThePreacher The topic of my comment was "salvation" for ethnic Israel only - not flat or globed earth - obviously ur reading comprehension needs to be worked on

@@James1v1-pf6lo I know that topic of your comment and to say it had nothing to with flat earth makes no sense when it was mentioned in your comment,as stated it does have to do with salvation in sense,I'm not saying you can't be saved if you don't believe in flat earth but what I am saying is if many unbelievers realised we were not on a spinning ball in an empty space but in a dome they would come to know God exist.

@@GThePreacher Again My point is rather nonIsraelites believe in God flat or globed earth there is no salvation for them "Luke 1:68-72" salvation "Psalm 83:1-6" enemies

@@James1v1-pf6lo you still don't get my point at all just flying over your head while I've understood you,try actually listening and reading rather then allowing things to go over your head just so you can respond

"the bible is a geography book". Yes, yes, of course.

@@CJFCarlsson what do you mean it does not have to be a scientific book to talk about scientific things there are multiple verses that show earth is flat

@@_lucifer6996 You did not claim to be a genius, did you?

@@CJFCarlsson nope

@@CJFCarlsson so the Bible is 100% accurate, inspired word of God, yeah?... But it's wrong about the shape of the earth? Make it make sense without unchristian like ad hominem....

The ancients did not know about wavelengths. These terms may best be described as constructs. To understand what the ancients thought it is best to keep modern science out of the discussion. Things were true to them because that is what they saw with their eyes. They thought the sun rose and went down. Not true, but to the unscientific mind it seemed correct.

True. And those fields are toroidal.

@@Tom-xg1kj God creates in fractals patterns. Everything follows this pattern (as above, so below).

@@Tom-xg1kj Explain to me what “solid dome” the ancients “saw.”

expanse (ra.qi.a - רָקִיעַ) רָקִיעַ (ra.qi.a) 'expanse' (H7549) This word occurs about 17 x Meaning 1) extended surface (solid), expanse, firmament 1a) expanse (flat as base, support) 1b) firmament (of vault of heaven supporting waters above)

That the sun, moon, stars rotated around a flat stationary earth.

It WAS OPPOSITE of what the the non believers ie those who invented the Heliocentric model of the earth and those who said we came from some “Big Bang” or animals or that those who say that Yeshua was just a prophet, lol but not funny.

Did you watch the video?😂

@@joeyg1315 yea, what’s your point? I’ve watched practically all his podcasts and vids. Enough to know he isn’t right on all things and neither am I or you or any other earthling. We know the TRUTH not based on another’s “scholarly” opinion or understanding but ONLY on Yahs revealed truth in the inner man through prayer , supplication and fasting. Would love to hear your knowledge of these virtues.

@billyd8084 My point is Heiser clearly articulates what ANE readers were thinking cosmologically, and we see glimpses of this in Biblical literature. It doesn't mean the Bible is wrong, it just makes us ask the question of what is the Bible trying to say. Is it trying to be a science book, or is it declaring the theological truths about who God is and what He has done for us.

Cause he was intelligent genius!

@@MrEmeralddogNot in cosmology.

lol. Nice.

The flat earth is explained by him. The earth isn't flat. You people are so deceived. Heiser was brilliant.

​@@dereknelson6601Obviously you prefer the CIA op started in the '90's by 2 atheists. There has been no one who can prove fe. At least it's not an issue of salvation.

It a flat circular world (like the UN logo) around the rim is Antarctica (South pole) where we are not allow to freely venture!! Why not!

@@kingston163 oh I agree. Modern cosmology is a joke.

​​@@Theggman83flerfers are a joke. They don't even believe their own eyes when watching a sunset. Instead they have to gaslight themselves into believing that the sun is moving away from them when in fact it never changes its angular size in the sky 😂.

@@MrSeedi76 lol, needing to resort to ad hominem is the classic play for a globe earther. Glad to see nothing changes. Meanwhile, would you care to explain why the north star doesn't move, even though are solar system is constantly moving.... 🥱 Too easy...

Another option.... religious text is unverifiable nonsense.

Circle doesn’t necessarily mean globe. You can have a plate that is a circle but not globe shape. I just remain open to the idea the earth could be “flat”. But at the end of the day, I don’t know. God bless

Basically, Israelite cosmology is probably more like a snow globe earth than anything else.

@@damachinen most people when they think “flat earth” it’s like the ridiculous drawings people make to discredit it. I would also think of it as more of a snow globe.

Circle doesn't mean sphere... The flat earth would also be a circle, with due north in the middle of the plate.

​@@thekingstable4740yes. It's a hard issue because so much of the discussion is purely poisoning of the well, ad hominems and straw men. The best thing for people to do is go and shoot long distance photography, calculate view distance and then calculate the earth curve rate and compare. At the very least, the earth is either much larger than is currently purported, or its flat.

Genesis describes ancient near east cosmology, not modern science.

@@bettyblowtorthing3950 that’s the kind of things you say when you treat Scriptures like any other book. In any case, you need more faith to believe modern science than to believe Genesis.

Check the NET bible's footnote of the verse in Job. tn The verb means “to beat out; to flatten,” and the analogy in the next line will use molten metal. From this verb is derived the word for the “firmament” in Gen 1:6-8, that canopy-like pressure area separating water above and water below. This is metaphoric language delineating God as the Master Smith hammering out the skies like casting "metal" or something like that in that regard.

​@@treksta2009I came here to say just this. You are totally right.

The raqia is to spread out something solid by beating. Like spreading out a sword over an anville by a blacksmith. That's how you stretch something hard. You "raqa" it.

No. He is explaining the biblical cosmology. He believes in science's cosmology, not the bible's. You can find online a blog article he wrote about flat earth a few years ago.

God is a flat earther, but Dr. Heiser was not.

He’s a realist not a theorist. ALL that Mike teaches is what the ancient Israelites believed and taught which IS a circular, stationary, flat earth. If the Word of Yah is inspired, those who Yah inspired to write it are CORRECT. YES indeed Mike was a “flat earther” although he appeased the liars in order to reach them and I can’t and won’t hold that against him.

​@@billyd8084 that's a misrepresentation of MH's position - he made it repeatedly clear that he did not believe in the ancient cosmology of the Bible in a literal sense. He wasn't "appeasing" anybody when he affirmed today's scientific understanding of Earth and the Solar System - that was what he actually believed.

Why? Are you going to cry about it? Are you going to stop listening to him because he holds positions that differ from yours or that you don't understand?

😂

Funny, there’s whistleblowers from airline pilots, astronauts, even NASA employees - saying the earth is flat and nobody’s been to the moon. However, there’s no flat earth whistleblowers.

Like a square

😂😂😂

Yep, so is your cerebrum

Somehow you’ve managed to miss the entire point.

@@lemnisgate8809 I think you think our ancestors were dumb. You cannot claim to believe in the creation account and leave out day 2, 3 and 4. It is very detailed and specific. “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: and if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.” ‭‭Revelation‬ ‭22‬:‭18‬-‭19‬ ‭KJVAAE‬‬ You cannot read the word and make it mean what you want to believe. The same guys coming with this demonically inspired information about creation that contradicts scripture. You believe when it come to an earth you haven’t seen any read photos of, but if they present evolution to you , you would reject that.

It's funny, i actually think he clears up a lot of things that I found confusing. To each their own tho. Let God be glorified either way.

He seemed to dwell more in the alternative communities. He was strongly affiliated with the ancient aliens crowd, and the UFO crowd. His content seems more directed at those kinds of people, hence flat earth stuff. Pretty interesting that Heiser has the intellectual temerity to be honest about what the bible teaches about the cosmology of the earth. All credit to him, even if he was a glober.

Because the Bible is a flat earth book, alongside every other religion. Because the Earth is, indeed, flat. It is the universe. Not a pancake floating through space, but the entirety of the universe with the stars, great lights. and planets hovering around a central star (Polaris). This star never moves (disproving any notion of a seasonal globe “tilt”). The heavens are the barrier above which separates earth from the other realms (heaven and tartarus). Below the ground is Sheol (hades, the underworld, the grave). If you want your Christian faith to *click* then it’s time to accept the way its authors truly depicted it. If you use google, you’ll get results google wants you to see. So instead go and buy a telescope and point it at Polaris. According to the globe model earth needs to tilt 23.5 degrees between seasons . This means the entirety of the sky should shift just as much. Track it for 3-6 months. I can assure you it will not move (if you have the telescope pointed at the correct star). Then consider that perhaps the god who created the universe knew what he was telling his authors about it (it’s flat with a round outer “dome”. Amos 9).

I have to agree. Was he a flat earther or not?

@@AnthonyShaw-ty9pi he acknowledged that the bible said the earth was flat but (likely to keep his credibility) refuted that he actually believed that. I appreciate that the guy from the Bible project admit to the true nature.