The courage of Napoleon Bonaparte summarized in 3 minutes 

and he will be even more respected after that

@@LeGrandConsilium tu as napoleon total war ?

@@donnydoeschildren3517 je suis plus crusader king

@@LeGrandConsilium dommage tu pourrais ajouter des cinématiques t batailles a tes montages

Ehhhhhhh Oversimplified. I got that reference

If so how come he let so many die ON THE WAY to Moscow (through disease starvation and no drinking water)? More in fact than perished on the infamous retreat which he should have avoided for his men's sake.

Not everyone is immortal, His ambition got the best of him. he wanted the russians who betrayed him to really give up and sign a peace treaty... they never did, It got to his head really hard when they kept retreating and retreating.@@phanders2022

⁠​⁠@@phanders2022What else should he have done? Not retreat and still die?

Cierto, no en vano cada soldado llevaba en mochila el bastón de mariscal

​@@phanders2022Napoleón luchaba por Europa, Rusia estaba gobernada con una mentalidad cavernaria

I agree

His only tactics was to attack when 3 against 1.

@@ie2adm212 Bataille d'Austerlitz : France : 65 000 hommes 139 canons Pertes: 1 305 à 1 537 morts 6 940 blessés 573 prisonniers 1 drapeau Russie / Autriche : 80 000 à 90 000 hommes 160 à 278 canons 15 000 morts ou blessés6 12 000 prisonniers 180 canons 45 à 50 drapeaux Pour toutes les batailles : Armées de Napoléon 2845000 contre 5323000 Pertes des armées de Napoléon 1095000 contre 2524000 .

​@@ie2adm212 Lol stupid guys...

@@ie2adm212 Not exactly, he was an excellent strategist even when vastly outnumbered he was able to divide the enemies forces into smaller groups by making it appear as if his army was bigger in some areas than it actually was, by doing this he was able to decimate them with concentrated attacks using the bulk of his army on the smaller groups of the enemies.

A part que Napoleon sur le pont est une legende !

Le tableau le représentant sur le pont d'Arcole est justement une commande dans ce but. Je constate qu'en plus être un tacticien de génie, un meneur d'homme au charisme hors pair et un grand réformateur, il a été aussi un merveilleux communicant...

@@ffaff1 ça pleure à chaudes larmes ici

@@felixlarondelle1842 pas complétement

@@ffaff1 les français vous renvoient la politesse

Except for the Austrian artillary

@@juancarlosdegoya2757 yea I know right they look like Russian cavalry

Was you there?

And the actor that played him I just looked it up is about 5’6 which is about how tall Napoleon actually was

Wow you know how did Napoleon behave? You was his friend probably? You should be very old man

💪👍

The greatest Italo-french General ever

French*

@@tassinarif.5562 french in first

@@christopheherpin155 et même on peut juste dire a la limite franco-Corse et Français d'abord

He fought in the first line, maning the guns, during the last campaign(campaign of France) before his first resignation in 1814.

pretty solid chance that this whole event was propaganda. If nothing else, Napoleon went through great lengths to embellish victories and hide defeats. Other material described the whole charge as an embarrassing farce because nobody wanted to suicide themselves crossing a fortified bridge. Of course, ask yourself if you think Napoleon would really share that embarrassment back home or make up some grand glorious heroic encounter for the newspapers --he went with the later, as always.

​@@kevin-mv6qfanglo y sajon,, 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

@@kevin-mv6qfright, he fell off the goddamn bridge and nearly drowned.

@@kevin-mv6qf Non ce n'est pas de la propagande et quelque généraux ont fait la même chose pendant la campagne d'Italie pour donner du courage aux hommes T'es quand même au courant que les historiens sont pas débile au point de croire les journaux de guerre de Napoléon?

Говорят Бонапарт говорил по французкий с акцентом. Корсика не могла не повлиять на императора,ведь он там родился.

same; the last part, and i fully agree.

100% agree (I'm also not French)

Absolutely.

lol buonaparte was a fraud. He had not even one single good side. Nowadays he would photoshop his pics.

@@ie2adm212 Nonsense. He was simply a man of his times. However he achieved a lot more than the other leaders and generals of his era. He formed the basis of unification and formation of whole countries in Europe, such as Italy, began the modernisation of countries like Egypt and others in the Middle East and his crowning achievement:. He singlehandedly created the legal system of modern civil law which is used throughout most of the world outside of common law jurisdictions. The difference being that the countries that use common law outside of England were *forced* to use it as they were subjugated by the English/British.

Oh what? That's Clavier? That guy is awesome!

About 20 years too old. Should've cast a younger guy for that part of the movie.

It's a pity. He's great bit still look too much like asterix

Pero no más que Alejandro Magno 😎👌

@@hansvasquez1663 😎👌

@@hansvasquez1663 alejandro magno es una pulga a comparacion de napoleon acaso alejandro magno goberno 1/3 del mundo¿ alejandro magno lucho contra un imperio en decadencia que encima estaba repleto de luchas internas y reveliones y esa fue su unica gan victoria y luego murio napoleon lucho contra todas las potencias mundiales juntas con una francia destruida por la revolucion y contra potencias que pasaban su maximo esplendor y aun asi gano

@@josuearonlaraperalta8492 la historia y yo no dicen eso Hasta google lo dice impresionantemente

@@josuearonlaraperalta8492 Alejandro Magno el mejor general de los tiempos

👍👍👍👍

@@alipiocunha6744 gracias legionario... marcha o revienta amigo...👍

Wellington description when asked "who was the greatest general, "Napleon,in this age,in past ages ,in any age,

@@davidgelman4935 Good quote, I didn't know it :)

👍

А когда он бежал позорно с России что писал ?

@@user-cv5zl3lz3q Армия Наполеона не бежала из России, так как не была разбита в военном сражении. Отступала, да, но не бежала. Причина - мороз и голод.

@@oleksandr9774 ну вообще-то речь тут идет о Наполеоне который в свою очередь бросил свою армию и бежал в Париж. Почитай что означает слово отступление и не пиши ерунду

@@user-cv5zl3lz3q , он вывел остатки своей армии с России

Exactly

👌👍

You have ruined my day, fella.

And became an emperor at the age of 33. I felt like a failure.

💪👍

En fait il faisait 1m69, petit mais pas minuscule.

C'était la norme cette taille à cette époque.

Le petit caporal, c’était Adolf, Pas Napoléon, il l’ était peut-être quand il était cadet, mais il était destiné à devenir officier dès son entrée au collège de Brienne.

J'aime bien l'humour sur le gros budget. La série est magnifique, pour le rapport budget/qualité. Après, c'est juste criminel de la part de l'Etat français de ne pas y mettre les moyens.

D’ailleurs dans le visiteurs il y a une scène ou on voit jacouille dans le champ de bataille qui regarde napoléon

Un pas si mauvais Bonaparte... contrairement à...

Petite? Dude he's 5'6 probably taller than you and he wasn't a corporal but a commissioned officer a graduate from Ecole Miliaire equivalent to USA's West Point. Perhaps you have mixed Napoleon with Hitler who was a Corporal.

Okay you probably don't know his reputation all that well in Italy so, let me make this quick.@@jansandman6983 "La Petite Caporal" was an affectionate term from his soldiers describing how he manned the Battery at Lodi, a position an Artillery Corporal performs. Also something to clarify; 5'6 for a French man was average, not so much for a General though (Napoleons Generals, later Marshals were either a few inches or a few feet taller than him)

​@@jansandman6983The "Petite caporal" is exactly because he was a general who in many cases did the work of a corporal (aiming the cannons).

👍

A part que ce n est qu une legende !

Sauf que c'est fake.

@@felixlarondelle1842 Qu'est ce qui est une légende ? La bataille du pont d'Arcole ou que Napoléon malgré son grade pris un drapeau et s'élance sur le pont au milieu d'une pluie de feu ? ( il n'est pas montrer qu'ensuite il tombe du pont et presque noyer dans les marais et la bataille n'a était gagner que plus tard grâce à un coup de géni de Napoléon )

@@danythedog7908 tu sais ce que c'est que la propagande? montrer un "surhomme" pour galvaniser des foules etc? rien de bien compliqué pr ce dictateur

And ?

🙏👍

Привет, товарищ

@@LeGrandConsilium Привет:)

Hé mon pote la russie vont nous attaquer

@@Zcfk peu être

Honte

El hombre más grande ???? Lo dudo mucho, un hombre que dejó 6 millones de muertos que convirtió a Europa en un carnicería invadió a muchos otros países , por dónde paso dejo destrucción y desolación ese no es ningún ejemplo....ese es un loco maniatico dictador asesino ....

ignorante traidor

@@musica9040 No. Vive la France, vive l'Empereur. Not our fault if you can't even conquer your toilet. Ah

@@manuelajenjo7787 cualquiera que lea un libro en España es traidor...

@@musica9040 gracias a Napoleón las ideas de la revolución francesa se expandieron. Sin el tu en este momento me estarías besando los pies y me estarías pidiendo permiso para tomar el sol aweonao

He finally won this battle by building a bridge further, that was just the first round

He was a tyrant himself. Have you heard about the Haitian revolution?

@@plrc4593 He was not a tyrant, learn the definition of being one, he wanted to make a French Empire as some sort of union under revolutionary values, he made the decision of doing a coup to prevent an actual royalist tyrant to takeover. And for the Haitian Revolution, it was the early 19th century and like all man Napoleon was not perfect, but he eventually changed his mind and abolished slavery himself in 1815, he even condemned slavery when he was in exile. In St Helena he wrote this about Toby, his slave who he tried to free "As for poor Toby, he endures his misfortunes very quietly: he stoops to his work and spends his days in innocent tranquility. Certainly there is a wide step from poor Toby to a King Richard. And yet, the crime is not the less atrocious, for this man, after all, had his family, his happiness, and his liberty; and it was a horrible act of cruelty to bring him here to languish in the fetters of slavery."

@@ernestov1777 1815 was over a decade after the Haitian Revolution xD He was a tyrant. He used Polish soldiers, who wanted to fight for freedom of their country and sent them to Haiti to supress Haitians fighting for freedom of their coutry. To hell with Napoleon.

@@plrc4593 its kinda funny because after the haitan revolution ,the man who lead that same revolution enslaved his own People just right after he kicked out the French I mean thats some hipocrisy

At Lodi though an identical operation was indeed conducted by himself, lannes and masséna.

False ! According to multiple visual accounts, (polish officer Joseph Sulkowski, and lieutenant Jean Antoine François Ozanam) he did lead the charge on the Arcole Bridge. Both do confirm he went all the way to the middle of the bridge, not just on the shore... The english page of wikipedia Battle of Arcole is only citing a single amercian author (Boycott-Brown (2001) for most of the article, which is a bit of shame when you have so many direct testimonies of this battle.

@@yamapopi Yes wikipedia is every time worst with the Napoleonic wars articles, they are basically citing controversial authors with bias, than mainstream aceptable sources.

In fact, Napoleon did lead three charges over the bridge but they failed then Augerau took the charge and passed.

Napoleon beggining the march but he fallen and augereau poursuit

Que trépasse si je faiblis!

Oui t'as raison c'est comique !!!

Messsiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiire !!!!

*Christian Clavier

@@LeGrandConsilium ок, спасибо)

Непохож. И играет так себе

They planned for that,if Prussian won't agree to rescue Wellington wouldn't fight at all. Consider Wellington is a very good general,I don't think Napoleon can really get much from him.

@@dehaifu68 Yes but if Wellington would not had fought, his army wouldn't had been a factor, and thus the French would had won

@@omarbradley6807 Wellington won't fight Waterloo but he will wait for better chances, like in Spain. Napoleon couldn't win because 4 countries decided to maintain at least 600000 troops,yet France was depleted. No way they would stop. Napoleon was just so arrogant,his Marshalls were defeated by Wellington in Spain. So of course,he won't admit he is just like his Marshalls that he was defeated completely. So was "what if". The key is Wellington and Blucher they made agreement. If Blucher said he won't then Wellington just retreats more deep, Napoleon couldn't catch him and when other troops of other countries come,then he will fight,so Wellington won't fight an unprepared battle. So if Blucher wont come, Wellington won't fight and Napoleon can't catch him. So if he does fight, Napoleon should think that Wellington must be planning something because he's Wellington who defeated his many Marshalls before,so Wellington definitely a good general,so if he stands and fight he must have confidence. But Napoleon was just so arrogant. Not only he underestimated Wellington. But he won't allow his Marshalls better than him. So that's his excuse to tell his Marshalls means I was better because I already beaten Wellington and if Blucher wouldn't come, blah blah. So I wouldn't think Napoleon is so great, He had better combat skills because he's an military officer who become emperor. But other countries also had great guys just they were not emperor so they wouldn't use whole national resources to fight . So Napoleon had great achievements. Yet I don't think he is that great.

@@dehaifu68 You are repeating yourself time after time, however Wellington, would had no place to whitdrew except the sea, and Napoleon, wasn't arrogant, but he beat the bests, Wellington wasn't so great, he screwed at almost every offensive battle, and the campaign would had been won. The other troops didn't matter, maybe Napoleon would had won maybe not. But Wellington either fought, or retreat to his lines

@@omarbradley6807 I don't think so he can retreat to Prussian at least, Napoleon just couldn't beat them if they stick together. Napoleon defeated the best? Who? Prussian emperor? You said Wellington isn't best so did Napoleon beat him? No. Don't say excuses, Napoleon had better troops and even more troops. He didn't know where Prussians went,he didn't know Wellington had new tactics. That's war,like Napoleon used new tactics several years before then won many battles. In Waterloo, it's Wellington's turn. And Napoleon was arrogant, that's a fact. You can see how he judged everyone. How he treated ppl who could have challenged him. Wellington won in Waterloo because he planned well. Prussian was even late for several hours.

Well, he was not a peasant, though

@@yannickbesson1448 but other European powers viewed him as a peasant some random guy who had no right to rule suddenly now is an emperor. So he was right

Corsican with a big C please , That's my people.

@@tadluimeme there I Corrected it happy.

@@glocksmith226 thx

🤮

L'erreur est humaine et c'est en s'apprenant des erreurs que l'humain progresse.

il a tellement apris qu'il est mort en slip sur une île lui

@@amenohana1494 ptdr ça marche le weeb bandeur de japon

@@amenohana1494 combien sont mort en slip sur ton île, par contre, j'aimerais connaître..

@@amenohana1494 tu n’as clairement rien appris de la culture japonaise.

Good description in Chandler s The Campaigns of Napoleon

👍👌

👍🙏

Por isso que eu nao gosto dessas guerras modernas

@@rianmachado2890 Nem eu, mano. Pra mim, a honra nas guerra acabou em 1945. Dps, com as ogivas e mísseis, já era...

@@chiron8018 verdade

Um míssil faz muita coisa, especialmente em questão de destruição, mas pra ocupar um território até hoje ainda é necessário a velha infantaria. A conquista do chão ainda é decidida com pólvora e sangue.

@@MarcoAurelio-vv3gz Se esqueceu dos drones que destroem vc em segundos...

No ! Churchill getting sloshed in 2 mins ...🤣

The war of the third coalition in 3 minutes XD

😂😂🤣🤣🤣

Le Grand Consilium , 1812 kämpften die sogenannten Franzosen, die sogenannten Russen und andere Verbündete gegen Deutsche.Die niederträchtigen Verräter der Deutschen Nation leisteten den Alliierten im Krieg gegen die Deutsche große Hilfe.

Tu sais quoi mon copain... après tes vidéos branlette sur l'empereur J'ai hate que tu nous fasses une vidéo sur comment les russes et les prussiens ont occupé Paris ! Ça va être chouette

Desaix too...

It is not Murion but Muiron !

@@charlyfrog5666 Thanks😁I misspell his name

Well History is however full of examples where such and similar manuvers suceeded aswell. One shouldnt forget that any War is both sides trying to do their best while suffering the worst. Deciciveness, swiftness and great resolve is required to carry such a thing through. In this case, I could have told old Bonnie in this scene that this attack would not suceed when both the Cannons AND the Infantry were ready to receive him.

It worked in real life as well. The depiction here isn't accurate.

@flvctvat…..except it didn’t. Napoleon never even stepped on the bridge during the fighting. He stopped a good ten to twenty yards away from the actual bridge. His men were cut apart by the two cannons and the Austrian infantry. The attack was repulsed as shown. What won the day was French actions all along the front forcing the Austrians to decamp before they were surrounded if I remember right. Napoleon had sent at least two or three battalions across the river by pontoon bridge and boat on both the up and down stream sides of the river. So it was actually General JJ Gueie , who had crossed the rivers at Alberado that led the push from the north that drove the Austrians out of arcole.

Oui dites... Comme c'était formidable d'aller se faire étriper de plomb à 20 ans pour la folie d'un seul homme. La guerre 39/45 aussi, quelle époque formidable. Ça c'est du sens!

Naïf

@@p-esimiste3274 Tu vois ça comme ça car tu penses individualiste. Eux ils se battaient pour un destin commun.

@@MrAlkylation ba oui, le destin de mourrir ensemble, c'est super! Puis surtout on a vu ce que ça a donné. Napoléon a quand même tout perdu. Et la République ce n'est pas mieux qu'avant quand on voit ce qu'il se passe depuis deux siècles. Vas t'en toi mourrir pour un meilleur destin, toi qui n'est pas individualiste, il y a plein de combats à mener. De toute façon la pensée principale de mon message est de trouver ça totalement ridicule de dire que c'était une époque formidable. On peut souligner la mentalité, la détermination, mais plein de combats nobles sont mené à notre siècle aussi, sauf qu'on en parle pas. Les gens comme vous s'en foutent. Vous préférez bander devant un symbole de puissance(ce que vous ne serez jamais) qui n'a finalement fait que des milliers de mort pour rien et dire que'' ça, c'était le bon temps''.

@@p-esimiste3274 Mort pour rien non je crois pas.

Tout pareil J’aurais pas dit mieux Pas de doute, tu es un vrai fan de Napoléon. Vive l’empereur ! mais pas trop quand même, la démocratie c’est bien et mettre sa famille dans des sièges royaux ça fait despote. Personne n’est parfait…

Si tu connais des films plus « historically accurate » sur Napoléon et plus récents, ça m’intéresse 😉

@@thibaultbushido3540 Tout le monde mets ses fidèles serviteur ou membre de sa famille sur des postes clé par exemple les Habsbourg ont eu de nombreux rois sur différents royaume d'Europe durant longtemps

Ah non quand il pause ses couilles sur le trône c'est là que ça devient intéressant! Vive l'Empereur!

больше нет рыбы

Why ?

@@TonioBZH Because he liberated poland and germany from being occupied and divided up between prussia, russia, and austria.10's of thousands of germans and poles gladly joined his armies after his campaigns in that region defeated those powers.

ok french fries..alexander the great conquered the whole known world unlike the frenchies

@@habazlambazazathe6th989 I was comparing more his tactical genius and way to fight among his troops. One can also argue Napoleon opposition was much stronger than the one to Alexander but its debatable.

Всё битвый выигрывают с трона командующие на карте придумывая стратегию, а уже после войска просто выполняют эту стратегию

Наполеон все еще в центре битвы

Nazi

@@thierrythierry3624 how much do they pay you to saay crap?

@@picollojr9009 nothing mec gratis for you

@@picollojr9009 c'est gratuit pour vous de France

....через Березину ))) 😄😁

Charles de Gaulle le plus grand

@@dominiquebeaulieu пока русские Воевали с нацистами ,где-то Прятался

А русские всё-таки ,отправили его Домой

@@user-gq4wb4nt3t quoi ?

@@user-gq4wb4nt3t Oui ?

we moroccans were invaded by spain also and the western world was mad at us when the people resisted 😭😭😭😭😭

@@waalaikumsalam. we know how were spaniards ,we won them with thou of deaths.

@ look at the riff republic. that we’re moroccans who destroyed spain

Pity about the Falklands....