I live overseas and the banks are making you agree to give up your bio metrics or you can't use the bank app to handle your account. Chinese social credit system coming.
Honestly I'm more scared of the psychological profiling we will soon have from AI and the subsequent enforcement of pre-crimes. As I'm sure im in the main core databanks I await my roundup when the shit hits the fan. All I can do is call it out like I see it and how is that? I don't care Ezekiel 33:6 no I'm not religious but it's dead on. I've spoken and will continue to come what may. You know what is right people silence is compliance I don't comply with tyrant's.
I love how when referring to facial recognition everyone immediately goes to China or Russia, yet the United Kingdom has by far and away the most advanced and prolific public cctv monitoring systems backed by both ai facial recognition and trained human facial recognisers.
Not just that but there have been dozens of reverse image search engines that have existed for the last 20 years that will do facial recognition. They get used all the by osint community to track people and geo locate places.
3:40-3:48!?? Did she just say she doest think our phones listen to us unless were being tracked? Wt....dude, i wont google or watch a topic. Talk about something for the first time, in a loud parking lot or a room....in a car...Within minutes now i get 50 advertisements on that related topic. School advertisement, medication advertisement or video recommendations based on that topic.... Same with watching a movie. Shes trippin. I even went as far as putting on an Indian movie and setting my phone near by. It completely changed my recommended in you tube and advertisements id get.
@@chachis-censored For sure from 1 perspective with a few slices from another. Definitely not knocking anybody because there may be a reason but on some of the stories they completely ignore some of the shit they Definitely know. 1 of em tripped me out a little because it was way past a possition of plausible deny ability and bordered mis information. I'll say again though there may be a purpose. It just peeked my curiosity though and I hope they don't or havnt settled up with a side....especially the side who seemingly wants to give away the farm.
@@_nick_d You think it is only apps? Commercials? I don't really think she mis spoke, seems every circle of any demographic within a civilized community has known it happens.
i'm AI dev, you are only scraping the surface how bad future will look like, the hidden social rating will be a thing really soon but ofc no one listen
Statement ending at 22:30 I hope you are being sarcastic. FYI. Data brokers can resubmit info on you 90 days after asking them to remove your data and don't forget about the third party clause.
The J6 insurrection and attack on our Congress while they tried to certify an election? the one where our own countrymen attacked the seat of our power in front of the rest of the world, including our adversaries? Yeah, that WAS a debacle!
I can't see lawmakers making any laws to protect citizens at this point. Kashmir nailed it when she said that if it were an actual government agency doing this it would violate our 4th amendment. Apparently private sector isn't held to the same standard. But I guarantee there were probably government grants to help develop the facial recognition software.
It's a contract violation. How long have they been collecting images and violating terms of use? The terms of use are terms of use. A person should be able to sue the offenders and or the website that didn't protect the images.
How many folks just blow thru end user agreement(s) and just install app / update app / just to use an app? Very few even read the app or read user agreement - plenty of CYA language thus negating recourse of user(s).
A good reason to not have any active social media accounts and not share photos online. I know that they have other info on us, but we don't need to provide them with daily photos and our locations, just to get "likes" from strangers.
If you have a phone with GPS your physical location is tracked by dozens or hundreds of companies. Governments and hackers can also simply take over your phone from the other side of the world to track you, disturbing when the Russian government has decided to start targeting people who raise money for Ukraine online.
Re: 00:04:30, why should "we" have to take a step back to reclaim our privacy? I don't like your premise. "They" need to be regulated away from invading our privacy in the first place.
Bro they already have this fully stood up and deployed in Production in airports and other places with people’s walking gait, it is as unique as a fingerprint.
The only privacy we have left is narrow distance between our ears - that too will be parsed and tokenized via psychometric algorithms courtesy of each individual digital exhaust.
You actually understand these technologies rather well. One day soon we'll be forced to get a computer interfacing chip placed in our brains that will be necessary to give us competitive cognitive advantages over peers or be left destitute. And that will be a very, very dark day for humanity when that is turned against us.
Interpol! Go arrest Hoan Ton-that! That is why the Dutch DPA is looking for ways to make sure that Clearview stops the violations. Among other things, by investigating if the directors of the company can be held personally responsible for the violations.
How many times somebody asked me if I was hear or there , swearing I was at work but they insisted they saw me hear or there. Crazy. Can't be relied on A.I. should not be allowed to violate our rights.
Kashmir Hill is a top-tier journalist. Not only because she's properly critical of facial recognition technology, but because she does a proper amount of research before publishing or talking about a subject. Thanks for getting her on the show!
The cartels have this ability. Other entities also have this ai ability. If you have the ability to pay their fee you can get their service. Its all about the money. Today their is absolutely nothing or almost no-one that can't be bought. For the government they buy everything with our tax dollars. They even invest our tax dollars take the profits privately and return the principal without anyone being the wiser. Welcome to the new world of anything goes.
unbeilavable really i remeber the early noughties there was this regulation of investigatory powers, a little before the data protection act and this information Communication Offices over here in the UK
if you look at the new intel laptops , the latest ones, they have ai built in and therefore have extended their reach into literally everything you do, but what it is , its supposed to mean that this ai will artificially intelligently manipulate the end user.
Because nothing is being seized. It's comparing photos available in the public domain. It is very useful and LEOs need a case number in order to run any pictures. Many cases have been solved using it. Take it away and goodbye to solving numerous crimes.
@@pointman73 but the 4th Amendment guarantees freedom from unwarranted "searches" or "Seizures!" I would argue it absolutely violated the 4th Amendment. Second, you could make an argument that your personal likeness is your property.
@@oxydoxxo I couldn't agree with you more. I don't think we want to go down this road. Polygraphs, for the most part, aren't allowed in court because they have been known to yield a false positive. The biggest reason they're not allowed is because it violated the self incrimination clause of the 5th amendment
@00:15:45 you hit the nail on the head. "we" can't do it, but we won't stop anyone else from doing it. And for bonus points, we'll probably buy the result back from them
