The Cumulative CO2 Emissions by Country Since 1882 (Carbon Dioxide Emission from Gas) 

because china produces the most co2 today

This is cumulative

@@malehumanersgaming4706 the USA also produces the most CO2 emissions per capita today because don’t forget we’re China is number one China also has five times the population of America.

Both countries should

@@malehumanersgaming4706 Yes, China is the largest source of pollution!

US is gonna destroy our planet with all those emissions

What is the name of the music?

We are still emitting because we need to as of now. Unless you want to live without electricity, meat, heat, transport and other things, as of now we can't stop.

Sure, we could reduce it but we can't entirely stop.

@@aurexify That is quite true. I wonder about the no-emission/lower-emission alternatives that exist out there for everyday activities.

​@@aurexify 60% of global greenhouse gas emissions can be eliminated entirely in the span of a few years. Which is exactly what is happening right now, most developed nations have pledged to reduce their emissions by around 30%-68% depending on the nation, with UK leading at a 68% reduction pledge by 2030. The reality now is that it's simply cheaper to be more eco-friendly, renewables have been much cheaper than any fossil fuel for years at this point and governments are starting to notice by increasing renewables subsidies and themselves building new nuclear or renewable power plants. Some countries are building great infrastructure for electric cars and if the rest of the world joins in, we might cut down our emissions by another 20-30%. So no, we don't need to be emitting. It's just that countries like the US and Australia where the government is controlled by the monopolistic overlords of the fossil fuel industry, constantly lobbying and putting pressure on politicians to not work against their interests are undermining the work of other, more democratic countries. Thankfully, that is starting to change now.

Uh...you say we can't stop? We CAN STOP, all in necessary activities and manufacturing of impractical,, frivolous products. Such as...professional sports, which, would reduce flying by a whole lot...stupid plastic ...Did you know that, on average for Super Bowls, rich people fly a out 1500 private jets to go and warch...uws..when I first became aware of this around 2012 ish ..it was 1200 that year....all manner of such enterprises such as Disney could go.....if you think of these as the frivolous, humancwnteic wasteful products of human hubris that they are...it begins to come clear..just how destructive we arem..tacking the transportation jobs issues...is a whole ' nother territory. But..there ARE EXPERTS who could put together an economy based on DEGROWTH principles ...and everyone could have a way of living ..but..it would not look anything like what we do now...however.mi am pretty damn sure this will never happen...because most people still do not understand what is happening to our biosphere ...eenewablwsa will cause an increase in MINING of around 500% ....we have already destroyed so much natural habitat...not just for other animals ..but for ourselves also...ridiculousness m

Not quite, the US auto market is mostly trucks, while the EU and Asian markets have few trucks. European companies are actually selling a lot more EVs than US companies.

It's also only gas

Yeah

Read the video description :)

Because ukraine was a major industrial centre in USSR

Hardwork , ease in business and industrial laws , attractive destination for fdi

Lol. That is literally the direct result of India’s underdevelopment and poverty. 😅 the country isn’t even industrializing in any meaningful way at this moment. Have u no awareness about India’s terrifying pollution issue??? Again, the country isn’t even industrializing yet. You don’t even have a harsh winter in which coal are burnt for heating/heating systems like Mongolia or northern China. What will the situation even look like when the country does industrialize??? You wanna a prize? I will give u a 30/100, a straight F as score.

China economy in another level that why they're producing more Co2

@@nehcooahnait7827 soo wrong except the pollution part

China is shit

@@folklore9062 not really, india isn’t cool or industrialised and yet they already produced this much, not something to be proud of and certainly doesn’t spell good for the future.

India should emitting more, India have such huge amount of population, but such little emission doesnt make much of sense, unless India doesnt have much Industry

China is the one developing the most for the last two decades. It is like the USA a century ago. Besides that, they also have 5 times the current population of the US. They are also heavily investing on renewable sources. So yeah, they have a lot to contribute to change the current situation but it is not as if its their fault

Funny how you say "who" because on a per capita basis the average american person produces 2X the co2 emissions than a chinese person

@@dy5066 Dumbass if you were smart you'd know this isn't counting every single thing that also can emit CO2

The CO2 you emitted 100 years ago is still in the atmosphere it doesn't magically disappear

Innovate like what China is doing and stop building coal plants

They are the biggest investors on renewable energy like solar and wind

今天楼主又是装外宾的一天

Das glaube ich nicht

@@olivers.3669 Go back to Hitler?

I certainly hope not.

@@olivers.3669 Then don't believe live in shock 😂😂😂😂. U r not only person in this world nobody cares what u believe or not 🤣🤣🤣

@@therealmccoy5819 Then confirm India will No.1. u guys gives us motivation to do more hard & smart work for our country 😘🇮🇳

Do you know what cumulative means?

@@henry6431 yeah check all data

It says emission from gas even if you count per year USA is much higher than China

Is cumulative CO2 emissions which means total amount of CO2 read the title

@@energyhyd3796 its is TOTAL emission in last 40YEARS , at starting china and India emit less compared to usa. *This is not wrong data.* *Read video title, its clearly written 'Since 1882'*