The Ethics of Utilitarianism. Christians REACT to Absurd Trolley Problems

Подписаться 45 тыс.

Просмотров 2,1 тыс.

50% 1

Christians react to absurd trolley problems. Glen Scrivener is joined by Speak Life Year Out student Joe Levy to explore utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics in the context of absurd moral dilemmas presented by the trolley problem.
Try the absurd trolley problems game: neal.fun/absurd-trolley-probl...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @speaklifemedia
LINKS//
Subscribe to this channel for videos that see all of life with Jesus at the centre:
ru-vid.com...
Subscribe to our other RU-vid channel, Reformed Mythologist, to explore how the stories we love point to the greatest story of all:
www.youtube.com/@ReformedMyth...
The Speak Life Podcast is available wherever you get your podcasts:
iTunes: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/6RTY21m...
Amazon: music.amazon.com/podcasts/e03...
Speak Life is a UK based charity that resources the church to reach the world.
Learn more about us here: speaklife.org.uk/
CONNECT//
Are you a creative Christian? Would you like to join us for a day, a week or 10 months? Find out more here:
speaklife.org.uk/foundry
Discord is an online platform where you can interact with the Speak Life team and other Speak Life supporters. There’s bonus content and creative/theological discussion. You can join our Discord here:
speaklife.org.uk/give/
Social Media:
speakLifeuk/
speaklifeuk/
speaklifeuk
tiktok.com/@speaklifeuk

Опубликовано:

15 ноя 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 18

@GnomeFan21 5 месяцев назад

glen, please bring back joe, he is so funny, ahhaaha

@mcmilge 8 месяцев назад

Great fun😂 (for more exploration see the Good Place!

@stjudeschurchmapperley1167 8 месяцев назад

Loved that - so fascinating! Did you notice that on level 10 (where you could speed up the trolley) the title of the level was "mercy"? Implying that it would be an act of mercy to kill the people more quickly. Maybe that's part of the reason so many people said they'd pull the lever in that case.

@LeoChaseTheMythMaster 8 месяцев назад

Love this kind of video and the channel in general. (And I would never choose lobsters lives over a cat's life.)

@peterthomas6151 8 месяцев назад

This was both hilarious and insightful. Fantastic idea

@thefioretta100 8 месяцев назад

Very interesting!

@JenE3377 8 месяцев назад

So many cats so few recipes whereas lobsters.....it's a no brainer.

@user-tc8yj7zd7k 8 месяцев назад

In the first one, I divert the trolley and splat the one. I think not doing something can also be a conscious choice (not washing bacteria off your hands before cooking for friends and giving them food poisoning is a conscious choice not to do something). Sometimes not (so in the case of end of life care I would say withdrawing treatment and actively injecting poison are different things). I totally get the point though and don't disagree with your choice to stay on the path though. However if it was my child on one track, and thousands of people on the other, I'd choose my child. Not even a question. And that puts God's love for me in context, that he was willing to send his son to die for me.

@user-tc8yj7zd7k 8 месяцев назад

Choose my child to live, for clarity!

@Ryan_possibly 8 месяцев назад

I remember the Bible also saying something about a season to kill

@enkhyy 8 месяцев назад

stop or derail the trolley. Do what you know is right. Doing nothing is not an alternative.

@justaguy328 8 месяцев назад

Cowards way out of the problem

@GnomeFan21 6 месяцев назад

Get joe back on

@GnomeFan21 7 месяцев назад

Haha

@Ryan_possibly 8 месяцев назад

There is a right answer to the first problem, pull the lever

@lage3127 8 месяцев назад

You first argue that pulling the lever would be actively killing someone, not pulling the lever won't be - later on in the money example you say "40% would kill 5 people for their life savings" - wait a minute! Why NOW it's killing people instead of just "letting it happen and pray"? You probably should check a little bit on consistency xD Great video idea nonetheless, enjoyed watching it!

@jpstahl2939 8 месяцев назад

In the first scenario it is letting 5 people die or killing 1 person to save 5. In the other scenario it is letting 5 people die or lose all your money. The hierarchy of their values are: Do not kill and help who you can help even at the cost of your own life. They seemed pretty consistent in their choices.