Тёмный

The Evolution of SpaceX’s Starship from SN1 to SN20 

Apple & Eve
Подписаться 23 тыс.
Просмотров 33 тыс.
50% 1

The Evolution of SpaceX’s Starship Explained: From the MCT and Starhopper to SN20.
#starship #spacex
SpaceX has had quite a few revisions of their two-stage reusable launch vehicle prototype, alongside quite a few name changes. From the Mars Colonial Transport to the Starhopper prototype to the SN naming, Starship has evolved quite a bit.
This video will cover a general outline of the evolution behind SpaceX's Starship.
In 2012, Elon Musk was floating an idea for a "Mars Colonial Transport," which would transport colonists to Mars as the name implies. While the concept continued, the name quickly changed, as Musk believed SpaceX's vision could go further.
Welcome to the "Interplanetary Transport System," or ITS, which Musk unveiled in 2016. The new name faced a new design, which, when revealed in 2017, noted 40 crew cabins with a total capacity of 100 people. However, that design was short-lived when Musk announced a new revision the year later, which now sported three rear fins and two front fins.
Alongside a new revision came a new name two months later: Starship (and the Super Heavy booster). Nonetheless, with the vehicle having an official name for the upper and booster stages of SpaceX's design, Musk went into a complete overhaul of the ship's previous specs.
What started with the Starhopper, quickly moved to the Starship MK1 and MK2 before finally renaming the MK3 to be called SN1.
SN1 began testing in January 2020, with the intentional destruction of tanks during pressurization tests. While the vehicle's first test made it to a pressure of 7.1 bar, the second hit 7.5 bar, and the third hit 8.5 bar. Starship tanks were deemed safe for human flight with these tests, having reached 1.4 times the mandated safety pressure.
Now with flight-ready tanks, SpaceX began stacking SN1's parts in February 2020, before the vehicle's cryogenic pressurization test destroyed the prototype.
In the meantime, SpaceX went back to the drawing board with SN3 and 4, designed for short flights and longer flights, respectively. Unfortunately, SN3 crushed itself on April 3rd, 2020, after a configuration error caused nitrogen reserves to leak and the methane tanks to destroy the vehicle.
SN4 lasted until May 29th, when a static fire test caused the prototype to explode after a quick disconnect failed. Ironically, SN4 survived a methane fuel-powered fire ten days earlier before exploding from the fire test.
Musk and SpaceX got back to work with total developmental forces focused on SN5 and SN6, centering on fixing Starship's past weaknesses. And, it worked.SN5 faced a successful static fire test on July 30th, with a 150-meter flight successfully occurring on August 4th. Thus, SN5 served as SpaceX's first official Starship flight if you don't consider Starhopper's quite different design. Nonetheless, this was a huge moment. SN5 was proof that SpaceX can put a Starship into space, even if the test flight only went up 150 meters.
Since then, SpaceX has continued on with even more Starship SN rockets, which now leads us to today where SpaceX is preparing SN20 for their first orbital space flight for Starship.
According to current SpaceX plans, SN20 will enter the upper atmosphere, accelerate to orbital velocity, test body flaps, altitude control, and the heat shield as the ship re-enters our atmosphere at hypersonic speeds.
So, with that all this in mind, do you think SN20 will make it deeper in the history books than it already is? How do you feel about SpaceX's progress within just the last two years? Let us know in the comments down below!

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

24 авг 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 79   
@appleandeveofficial
@appleandeveofficial 2 года назад
With the fast-paced development of Starship, how do you feel about SpaceX's progress within just the last two years? What excites you most about Starship's potential? Let me know down below (also we changed our channel name)!
@cabbit3008
@cabbit3008 2 года назад
they renamed it to S20 instead of SN
@FurkanDincerov
@FurkanDincerov 2 года назад
Hi
@FurkanDincerov
@FurkanDincerov 2 года назад
Hello
@ThunderrRush
@ThunderrRush 2 года назад
WHAT IS THE MUSIC
@wackyroo
@wackyroo 2 года назад
with the amount of setbacks they've had it makes you wonder how many other companies would have given up by now. Astonishing.
@coonjamalay
@coonjamalay 2 года назад
they wont even try in the first place
@psion01
@psion01 2 года назад
SpaceX has made a point that they try to test systems until they fail so that every explosion on the launch and landing pads results in learning how to make an even better launch system. They're close. SN20 has so many improved systems behind it that I expect fewer and fewer things could go wrong as the system clatters and bangs on the road to maturity. Look at how reliable their Raptor engines have become! That was developed with the same philosophy, and now SpaceX is delivering supplies and personnel to the ISS!
@0741921
@0741921 2 года назад
Well most advanced manufacturing companies face a lot of failures before final product. It's industry standard. You can't make something so complex without failures as long as you have the money and see exoected roi
@Marc_Gagne
@Marc_Gagne 2 года назад
Elon Musk is hell-bent on making interplanetary travel a reality. I'm cheering him on. We, the world, have been eyeing this prize since Apollo.
@Mity_Mo
@Mity_Mo 2 года назад
"interplanetary travel" is kind of grandiose isn't it. What does that even mean ? Like saying interatomic travel, means nothing. Is it the same as traveling via pickup truck to foreign countries, or whats the difference?
@Marc_Gagne
@Marc_Gagne 2 года назад
@@Mity_Mo Means that eventually we'll have a human Martian colony and we will be Martians. On Earth we are called Terrans. And yes it will be very grandiose.
@allanchurm
@allanchurm 2 года назад
thank goodness he has 6 sons to carry on the dream in the future..
@Mity_Mo
@Mity_Mo 2 года назад
@@Marc_Gagne A fyi. 1) There is no place in our galaxy, let alone solar system that can support human life existence. 2) Asteroid strike you say ? That won't be enough to wipe out life on earth. You'd never get enough people off the earth if you wanted to (and see (1)). Whats left ? 3) Global warming. This is the 800 lb gorilla in the room. This is the existential threat in our generational time. If you care more about interplanetary than Global Warming, you must be a Republican Nazi. Wake up and smell the coffee, Prioritize the human existence life cycle.
@vykintasmorkvenas6839
@vykintasmorkvenas6839 2 года назад
@@Mity_Mo 1) how the hell do you know that? You visited the whole galaxy? 2) there can be asteroids capable of destroying the whole planet let alone life on it. BTW to destroy civilization as such the rock doesn't have to be that big, just remember the fate of dinosaurs.
@anatoleh1
@anatoleh1 2 года назад
Really great recap video with tons of insightful detail. Great job, I can't wait to see what you make next!
@appleandeveofficial
@appleandeveofficial 2 года назад
Glad you enjoyed it!
@nerdwatch1017
@nerdwatch1017 2 года назад
I’d feel so blessed and honored to be one of the folks working on this ship!! And the Technology going into it!!
@XBlueBeam
@XBlueBeam 2 года назад
Then how was the surprise jet flyover with the inspiration 4 team?
@kylecahalan1350
@kylecahalan1350 2 года назад
This channel has potential.
@appleandeveofficial
@appleandeveofficial 2 года назад
Thanks I appreciate the support!
@borrico1965
@borrico1965 2 года назад
Great short history of Starship development up to SN20! With the data and information gathered until now, I’m sure Elon Musk and SpaceX will attain their objective: reusable space craft!
@Muuip
@Muuip 2 года назад
Great summary! Much appreciated!👍
@SkepticalChris
@SkepticalChris 2 года назад
Every failed launch, was a lesson learned towards the improvement of the project. "The greatest teacher, failure is!" - Yoda
@priyanshu1168
@priyanshu1168 2 года назад
Great work
@clarencehopkins7832
@clarencehopkins7832 2 года назад
Excellent stuff bro
@appleandeveofficial
@appleandeveofficial 2 года назад
Much appreciated!
@milo9528
@milo9528 2 года назад
What’s the outro music?
@paulbrizzi7693
@paulbrizzi7693 2 года назад
Hey you got to start somewhere! from failure brings opportunity for improvement. If you don’t fail you don’t improve. This man is going to make the human race interplanetary. I just hope I get to see it in my lifetime!
@nerdwatch1017
@nerdwatch1017 2 года назад
What’s awesome about Musk and all those at SpaceX they only see the failure and destruction of each ship as a learning gift on the move to perfecting this ship
@lordphoenix485
@lordphoenix485 2 года назад
Damn, tell that my teachers
@ckdigitaltheqof6th210
@ckdigitaltheqof6th210 2 года назад
With the CGI animation, you see windows in the trilogy, today, to do that, would require HS coated tiles all over SN, with aerodynamic nods as the HS coated moon-roof for windows, for the living render pod to become a living poperty on other planets.
@lilysantiago679
@lilysantiago679 9 месяцев назад
The legendary... BIG FUCKING ROCKET.
@rickybojangles162
@rickybojangles162 2 года назад
Seeing what SpaceX has done in a Matter of 2 years compared to what NASA has done in over 10 years, its honestly astounding. It just shows what having real purpose will do for a company. I love NASA, but they should be embarrassed
@noone.unknown
@noone.unknown 2 года назад
Might be an idea to have a carbom Version for a space only, to reduce weight and increase range
@odysseus5872
@odysseus5872 2 года назад
I was thinking that, as well. Once they get the design perfected they could make at least the lunar Starships carbon fiber
@andrewzangrilli
@andrewzangrilli 2 года назад
@@odysseus5872 I think the main benefits of stainless steel is the heat resistance and ease of production. (They want to create hundreds of functioning and reusable starships) If the starships are just intended to stay on the moon then the heat resistance probably wouldn’t matter because they won’t re enter the atmosphere, but I think all ships are intended to be reused. Actually, they may make some that are meant to be used as the first parts of the lunar or Martian bases, in which case they may not re enter. My guess is that that will be too few ships to make it worth changing the production, but who knows
@furbykit492
@furbykit492 2 года назад
sn20 is testing
@Bobcat665
@Bobcat665 2 года назад
My prediction is that the booster will work as intended but Ship 20 will break up upon reentry because of issues with the tiles.
@kevinbreau4232
@kevinbreau4232 2 года назад
I wanna work there but I don't know if the States will let me.
@marjanjakshoski4979
@marjanjakshoski4979 2 года назад
Цртани филмови. На тоа остана, прашање на време е дали се ова ќе се оствари???
@mgabrysSF
@mgabrysSF 2 года назад
What IS the current estimated test launch for 20? I've been talking to quite a few people going to Hawaii and they're curious.
@cabbit3008
@cabbit3008 2 года назад
september
@flyingfiddler90q
@flyingfiddler90q 2 года назад
Whenever the FAA decides that enough reams of paperwork have been filled...
@KeepItRandom100
@KeepItRandom100 2 года назад
You forgot BFR
@KEB129
@KEB129 2 года назад
I am sure they will succeed in reaching orbit, but next year. Starship is a promissing space shuttle, good for low orbit. But for the moon, they should divide the orbiter (starship) into two parts. Let the heavy bottom part with the huge tanks stay in orbit around the moon and land with the upper part. That will give them the delta V they need. As it is now, they will only have about 7,2 km/s with 100 tons payload (after 12 tanker flights!) and they need 9 km/s for the moon and back.
@Mity_Mo
@Mity_Mo 2 года назад
Can you explain the delta-v you speak of to go from orbiting the moon to landing on it. Also the delta-v to go from the moon surface to orbit. Its my understanding that delta-v = v2 - v1
@KEB129
@KEB129 2 года назад
@@Mity_Mo Yes. We have all heard about 3 or 5 tanker flights. But if it can only have a payload of 100 tons, then it will be close to 12 tanker flights to fill up starships tanks with 1200 tons of fuel. I have used the numbers and the rocket equation, then we will only get 15 tons to the Moon, and only if the dry mass of Starship is below 100 tons! Above 115 tons we will not get to the Moon at all. Let us see: TLI 3,1 km/s. Lunar orbit: 1 km/s, Lunar descent: 2 km/s, Lunar ascent: 2 km/s, and TEI 0,67 km/s. That is in total 8,77 km/s. We need a margin, so it is 9 km/s for a lunar mission from LEO! And we will use it here: Now we are in orbit (with almost empty tanks) and want to go to the Moon and return to the Earth, and we can calculate the numbers. Dry weight: 100 tons. Weight of refueling in orbit: 1200 tons. Isp = 378 s and g = 9,81. Then we will only have 15 tons of payload available!! Let us try with 15 tons: With 100 tons of refueling pro tanker, it will take 12 tanker flights. m + fuel = 100 + 15 + 1200. So delta V =Isp x g x ln(m+fuel)/m. That is delta V=3708,18 x 2,43666 = 9,04 km/s. So you can see it is only 15 tons for the normal version of Starship!! Not 100. The HLS version will probably have a mass of 85 tons and it will not need a TEI back to Earth. So that one will have a max capacity of 60 tons to the Moon and back to Lunar orbit. Try the numbers yourself. (I know you are so enthusiastic about it and I love it! Please don't get angry at me!) The rocket equation is a good myth buster! The rocket equation is relentless. The delta V numbers are from NASA's lunar missions.
@Mity_Mo
@Mity_Mo 2 года назад
@@KEB129 What do we need all that 1200 tons of fuel for ? In space things are without gravitational affects. And the moon is only 1/6 earth gravity. Granted, mass has to be moved and all but does it really need a full 1200 ton fueled starship for lunar orbit to surface and back ?
@KEB129
@KEB129 2 года назад
@@Mity_Mo Yes, as I showed above. It is hard to make the needed delta V of 9 km/s. If you just give Starship a payload of 100 tons, you will only get 7,2 km/s. My calculations are not 100 % correct, because how much will we get back from the moon (don't know) and how much fuel is left in the empty tanks (this is as important as its empty weight). But it is pretty close to the right numbers.
@guisampaio2008
@guisampaio2008 2 года назад
Hope Elon Musk decreases the costs of launches/sattelites/dishes until it becomes economically viable, we need a bigger rocket.
@Jason_Nighthawk
@Jason_Nighthawk 2 года назад
I think elon musk is also in the process of making brand spanking new space suits for nasa
@extraterrestrialtech
@extraterrestrialtech 2 года назад
But first why you changed channel's name?
@appleandeveofficial
@appleandeveofficial 2 года назад
I'm hoping to make the channel more focused on space rather than just tech content now. This new name is more general and allows me to do both!
@FurkanDincerov
@FurkanDincerov 2 года назад
Hello
@conlabgaming
@conlabgaming 2 года назад
Starship and spacex are doing well. Pls I want to go to Mars I Beg you 🙏
@FurkanDincerov
@FurkanDincerov 2 года назад
Hi
@evsonelus4340
@evsonelus4340 2 года назад
I think it will do well, but not yet a sucess. Fully sucess only with SN 24, which is 42(0) written in reverse and its Musk lucky number :-)
@gcarter9745
@gcarter9745 2 года назад
Just build it a little quicker, want to go to mars :)
@stevenredcay8839
@stevenredcay8839 2 года назад
Great work spacex go go go . in the 60's it took ten plus years of development to shot the moon spacex has done as much in a lot less time ! ! ! When NASA gave up on maned flight to the moon or the other planets ? Why would they do that when there greatest ambitioution's where to put boots on the surface ? I think the FFA has pressure on them to stop spacex or why so long of a delay and I bet there will be more if I am correct ! ! !
@jimmbbo
@jimmbbo 2 года назад
If Stainless steel is 7500 kg/m^2 it could never fly...
@karlthemel2678
@karlthemel2678 2 года назад
SpaceX needs FAA approval before launching. Governments get funny when private groups take the initiative.
@michaelsmith2723
@michaelsmith2723 2 года назад
That pretty funny since only commercial private companies have been launching rockets in the US. Rocket Lab, spaced and ULA.
@noneofyourbeeswax01
@noneofyourbeeswax01 2 года назад
_"That's four Raptor engines less..."_ - *"Fewer"!*
@allanchurm
@allanchurm 2 года назад
richest man on the planet spending his money to help mankind/womankind to exspand out into space..( diff to that bezos person trying to slow the lot down )
@casperdahlheim3692
@casperdahlheim3692 2 года назад
Yeah, who even is this Bezos person? Pffft
@Mity_Mo
@Mity_Mo 2 года назад
Lets examine the mind numbing debacle that is Spacex Starship .. = Starship Development Trivia = ----- HOPPERS ----- starship sn1 : February 2020, destroyed during a pressurization test starship sn2 : ?? starship sn3 : April 2020, destroyed due to a test configuration error starship sn4 : ?? starship sn5 : August 2020, completed a test flight to an altitude of 150 meters (490 ft), landing at an adjacent landing pad starship sn6 : September 2020, completed a test flight to an altitude of 150 meters (500 ft), landing at an adjacent landing pad starship sn7.1 : September 2020, destructive pressure test ----- FULL w/NOSE CONE ----- starship sn8 : December 2020, test flight to an altitude of 12 Kilometers, spetacular crash/burn landing attempt starship sn9 : Febreary 2021, test flight to an altitude of 10 Kilometers, spetacular crash/burn landing attempt starship sn10 : March 2021, test flight to an altitude of 10 Kilometers, lands hard at an angle and on fire, spetacular explosion 6 minutes later starship sn11 : April 2021, test flight to an altitude of 10 Kilometers, while attempting to land, blows up 1000 feet above the ground in a spetacular fireball starship sn12 : Version skipped. Confident of past results, test not needed starship sn13 : Version skipped. Confident of past results, test not needed starship sn14 : Version skipped. Confident of past results, test not needed starship sn15 : May 2021, completed a test flight to an altitude of 10 Kilometers, landed at an angle, large fire, gear crushed, fire extuinguished starship sn16 : Version skipped. Confident of past results, test not needed starship sn17 : Version skipped. Confident of past results, test not needed starship sn18 : Version skipped. Confident of past results, test not needed starship sn19 : Version skipped. Confident of past results, test not needed starship sn20 : Not flown or SF tested yet, heat tiles added, heat tiles removed for repair ----- BOOSTER (June 2021 - September 2021) ----- booster BN3 : 3 engines installed, cryo tested, SF once, still dismantling it booster B4 : Photo OP - 29 raptor engines installed, rolled out put on OLP, SN20 stacked on top, then unstacked and dismounted ----- Obseervation ----- SpaceX claimed it will do an Orbital Launch Test in August, which apparently is not the case ----- Launch of B4S20 ---- Will be the largest non-nuclear explosion on Earth ever as it wipes out Starbase and levels Boca Chica. I think SpaceX owes it to humanity to blow up the full stack Booster and SS in the desert to get the full scope and breadth of the catastrophe that would befall the surrounding area here at BC.
@livingexcuse3767
@livingexcuse3767 2 года назад
Kinda misinformitive with the Prototypes, no prototype performed near perfect, SN8 was a literal nightmare and was lucky it made it back to the pad at all, SN10 didn't fail because of its legs, it basically crashed into the ground over 30 feet per second on its skirt, and SN15 while it did successfully land its clear especially watching the recap that one of the engines failed, also that fire was not small by any means.
@TheBestOfSweden
@TheBestOfSweden 2 года назад
How was SN8 a nightmare?
@livingexcuse3767
@livingexcuse3767 2 года назад
@@TheBestOfSweden Engines clearly had leaks during flight, fire frequently around engines, one of the engines was burning fuel rich, pieces of insulation etc. were breaking off and/or catching on fire. Then there was the obvious pressure issues which led to the vehicles destruction. The fact it didn't pull a SN11 was a miracle. This wasn't surprising since SN8 was the first legitimate flight worthy"ish" prototype and the Raptor 1 variant of the raptor engine was unreliable garbage, however alot of these problems seem to have been fixed with SN15 and RaptorV1.1 even though the engines still clearly need improvements as we will see with RaptorV2 in a few months from now.
@Ascii89
@Ascii89 2 года назад
Nice try Jeff, found his secret account guys!
@livingexcuse3767
@livingexcuse3767 2 года назад
@@Ascii89 Jeff who?
Далее
How SpaceX Will Land On Mars
16:45
Просмотров 963 тыс.
World’s Deadliest Obstacle Course!
28:25
Просмотров 65 млн
How To Make A Spaceship Look Terrifying
9:58
Просмотров 136 тыс.
The Real Reason SpaceX Is Building A Starfactory!
13:12
SpaceX Starship SN10 soars, lands for first time!
8:53
Starship SN15 Flight and Landing - The Mini Film
8:32
Просмотров 279 тыс.
Model Rocket Battle | Dude Perfect
6:47
Просмотров 107 млн
How China Reinvented The Space Station!
19:09
Просмотров 1 млн
Watch SpaceX Starship SN10 launch and stick landing!
8:46
solve bubbling fan issue
0:24
Просмотров 2,6 млн
Мечта Каждого Геймера
0:59
Просмотров 1,4 млн