The Falklands SAS mission known as 'Op Certain Death' 

Qué guay!

😃👍

Nice wee souvenir.

❤️ Chile

Respect to the people of Chile, the support given by your nation during that war helped us win.

To fill in some of the detail you should read Special Forces Pilot. In addition to the three Operations referred to By Ewan, there were other SF ops on the mainland which were not cancelled.

So much BS in your comment. Utter fiction! Maggie asked for options. This Op. was called unofficially called “The Option” by those tasked! Tell me, what EW Radar used by The Argies, was capable of tracking a Seaking at low level over a heavy sea? Chile had of course been hosting 51 Squadron throughout. Nimrod R’s.

@@EnglishVeteran Have you read the book? He has interviews from both sides of the conflict. He has senior officers from The Royal Navy, Royal Marines, British Army, SAS, RAF as well as UK civil servants. The Argentine officer in charge of the airbase left considerable information, as did other Argentine pilots and officers. So which part is rubbish? Were you in any of the rooms where it was planned? Involved in any of the ops covered in the book? Or have any inside political or civil service knowledge of events then?

@@EnglishVeteran You don't know as much as you think you do. This mission was being pushed by General DLB in the face of common sense. The pilot's expected to fly it weren't even in one the planning.

Soy argentino y tengo entendido fue al revés. Fue una operación planificada por Tatcher y los altos mandos británicos, y los que se oponían era el mismo SAS por considerarla una misión "suicida". Nunca se intentaría llevar una acción sin decisión política. Se trataba de un ataque a territorio continental argentino. Podía activar el TIAR (Tratado Interamericano de Asistencia Recíproca) con graves consecuencias. Pasa que el fácil hundimiento del Destructor HMS Sheffield con misil exocet en represalia por el hundimiento del viejo Crucero Belgrano, causó conmoción no solo por ser el primer buque británico hundido en combate luego de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, sino porque sus Portaaviones quedaban muy vulnerables. El hundimiento o puesta fuera de combate de uno de ellos podría significar perder la batalla. Destruir ese sistema de armas (avión Súper Etendard -misiles Exocet y pilotos) paso a ser una prioridad. Pero planificarlo es una cosa, realizarlo con éxito es otra. Fue un fracaso desde el inicio esa operación. Y ataque naval o aéreo a esa base estaba condenada a la derrota. A los Portaaviones no les quedó otra que alejarse de las Islas, tratando de quedar fuera del alcance de la aviación argentina. La flota pago el precio, fue bombardeada una y otra vez . Igual fue acertado, el Portacontenedores Atlántic Conveyor, cargado de pertrechos y helicópteros pesados, fue hundido por exocetes cuando se acercó a las islas. No obstante y pese a ser negado por Gran Bretaña, el Portaaviones Invincible fue atacado y dañado el 30 de mayo. Encima, técnicos argentinos desmontaron un exocet naval, lo modificaron para ser lanzado desde tierra y fue disparado éxitosamente desde la costa de Malvinas impactando al Crucero ligero HMS Glamorgan. Los británicos ganaron con lo justo y s costa de sufrir graves perdidas, por eso no pudieron imponer una rendición incondicional a la guarnición argentina de Malvinas integrada por soldados conscriptos. El Comandante argentino negocio el cese del fuego contando con toda su fuerza en la Capital Malvinenses para evitar una matanza inútil y proteger a la población civil que quedaba en medio de la batalla ( ya tres mujeres kelpers habían muerto por bombardeo británico) pero ese Comandante argentino tacho de puño y letra el termino "incondicional" y Jeremy Moore tuvo que aceptarlo, ya estaban sus fuerzas agotadas, escasas de munición y necesitaba que sus buques no siguieran siendo diezmados por la aviación argentina.

I've looked but couldn't find it if you know share

@@wayneabel5421 although his comment isn't quite right about the background of the situation, he's more or less right. How could you not find anything on it if you supposedly looked? I find that rather baffling, this isn't a new subject and is well documented. I put it to you that you didn't bother to even open your Google search.

I ment the documentary,,I know south Africa was involved in supplying parts and alledagly excess to the argies

Sounds more like SIS area of ops.

@@wayneabel5421 The book, not the documentary, is called Exocet Falkland and is available from Amazon books. It's written by Ewen Southby-Taylor. I've had it for ages on my Kindle. It's well worth a read.

Fake Valor. You peeled potatoes behind the lines

@@richardnixon4345 I have you Fake Valor hanging. I do not know you and I know you do not know me. To make a lame comment shows you lack of knowledge. I do not have to fake anything. My 25 years are for real. I know did not walk in my boots all over FRG along with the many other countries that I have been.

@@rayw.cunningham8643 of course you have.

Hi Ray it's "Twizzle" hope you are keeping well.

@@seymourbutts9364 twizzle....is that you?

There were many brave people on both sides, it's a shame the whole episode happened, RIP all those who died from whatever side.

If they did do it they would of been successful. Its the SAS, the best. This would of been there bread and butter carrying out such a task.

@@dannybatterbee2444 Do not be ridiculous; I very much respect SAS capabilities. However Superman is only Hollywood. No one could land an Hercules with AA missiles and 6 x 35 mm Oerlikon AA artillery firing against you at point blank range. Even then, there were 600 very well trained marines armed to the teeth beside the airstrip. Last but not least, in any case, it would had been a useless nonsense operation since there was just one Exocet left.

@@dannybatterbee2444 120 AT MOST against 1500 marines + base personnel? which for a base that size is going to be 500 to 700 so 2000 to 2200 total. Outnumbered 18 to 1 out in the open on an airfield??? Yeah they'd have been successful....successfully slaughtered.

@@dannybatterbee2444 ,stop your nonsense .The SAS lost many battles to Talibans and Iranians in Afghanistan and Syria and English troops ran out of both countries ! Everyone is Vulnerable in resistance wars including SAS ok

This comment was not made by me. Thank you the Deep State for using my name I must frighten you.

Used to it now

The British (and Russians) have very big egos. It leads them to do things beyond their abilities. The British military has also always had capability gaps, bad leadership, and a need for the dramatic.

@@willw8011 but, the dregs from our sink estates, get it done and prevail.

We are told we are looking for tea.

@@willw8011 lol, we also have had the worlds biggest empire, the world is made by and in our image too, suck on that .

No, it really didn't

Lehman: British Would Have Lost Falklands War Without U.S. Support May 29, 1988 LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying. In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported. The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations. ADVERTISEMENT ″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying. U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said. ″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.

very highly trained upgraded common folk with viking,celt,germatic,roman,ect,ect blood.the rest of world will never understand this

SAS Wherever they come from they are the Best trained people in the world. Special Air Service. Plus the SBS UK Elite Forces. "Who Dares Wins" Plus the SBS 'Not By strength, by guile'

Lehman: British Would Have Lost Falklands War Without U.S. Support May 29, 1988 LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying. In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported. The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations. ADVERTISEMENT ″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying. U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said. ″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.

@@kawagonzo6951 maggie and reagan relationship at the time was borderline cheating on their partners ,lol.prob true the usa was feeding intelligence ,good call....but highly trained soldiers,,only british soldiers ,, sailed thousands of miles to fight a war the world said was impossible to win? it all comes down to the man or woman on the battlefield ...yes you need good intelligence in war, why do u think a very small country had the biggest empire the world has ever seen,,plus we have sbs,sas

and james bond,,ect,ect lol

1. feat 2. it didn't happen

The point is they didn't do it. The recce mission was a failure and Operation Mikado never launched.

Limited resources? It was the third military force in the planet at that time.

@@alejandro1904 respectfully.... that is a shocking comment ... did you use google? or wiki?

@@FIREBRAND38 you were there then?

I doubt it Luis.

@@tonkerdog1 I think the same, besides this region did not have much strategic importance, the Mirage III will operate from a runway 300 kilometers south of this place.

@@MsLuchoGonzalez I used to fly with Kris Ward who was a Harrier pilot. His dad Sharky war was also a Harrier pilot in the war. I’m now in the Middle East flying, and some of my training was done by an Argentinian Super Etendard pilot who also flew in the war. His best friend who left here was a British Vulcan pilot who bombed the islands and was my ex trainer!

@Phil Tierra del Fuego is part of Patagonia and is an island shared between Chile and Argentina, nice trip.

If i had to guess the helicopter probably was lost due to weather or mechanical failure We had a hury crash like that here in NZ in 2012 on its way to an ANZAC day ceremony. Flying low next to a small mountain range in fairly low visibility and flew straight into the terrain all but on board died

He sounds like someone you'd want to invite to a dinner party to get the get all those behind the scenes stories. Excellent work.

The devil would not like to meet these boys ever they are worse than the devil but controlled of course they have a temple switch that God himself allows them to use now and again

Lehman: British Would Have Lost Falklands War Without U.S. Support May 29, 1988 LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying. In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported. The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations. ADVERTISEMENT ″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying. U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said. ″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.

Neither the Somme nor Gallipoli...

The number of special forces has doubled since 1999, my brother in Christ. Have faith in the meek, for they will inherit the earth.

They launched it at/towards the Invincible, but didn't score a hit. Something which is a source of Argentine legend, who claim that they hit Invincible, sunk Invincible, but it was covered up afterwards 😛

They didn't, the last exocet was fired 18 days later at hms Glamorgan from the shore.

Even if that were true (which it proved not to be), then this mission would just have resulted in a sunk carrier plus 120 more dead.

Queen Elizabeth for ever

That’s not how you spell central banks and multinational corporations, but by all means perpetuate the tired old myths that support this ludicrous pantomime as Brenda shuffles towards her bunting adorned oblivion. The primary purpose of the monarch is to legitimise the legislation drawn up by parliament. It serves no other purpose other than a cover for the actual Crown which is essentially the City of London, which the reigning monarch has to as for permission before visiting - because it is not part of the United Kingdom, just as DC is not part of the United States of America, and The Vatican City is not part of Rome. Flag waving is for slaves. Do some basic research before replying. Oh, and remember that Brenda was photographed giving a salute to a diminutive Austrian of dubious origins, just before the second episode of imperialist slaughter began. We’ve been trained to believe that her uncle David was the weak one who collaborated with those nasty Naaazees, and good old Winston saved us…! Both of those narratives are as incorrect as they are tragically hilariously ridiculous.

Or what we are capable of doing😎🇬🇧

England with its unapologetic Queen symbol of Slavery Genocide of occoupied natives with Racist discrimination as ongoing . The USA Buffollo Racial Terrorist was an Azov declared Soldier that England supports .

HAHAHAA Queen. You are a subject by a german Windsor.. Fool

Baaah!

Yep, abysmally planned and doomed to fail had the operation commenced.

I remember meeting Peter out there, his handshake nearly broke my wrist, and his breath was equally strong...

Got himself banned from SAS regiment reunions due to his books.

@@futonclutch5040 According to one former B squadron member, after the Falklands, he did a debrief and made a right arse of himself and was laughed off the stage.

Disarm it when and by whom?

Welsh Guards on HMS Sheffield ? I think you will find they were on RFA Sir Galahad. The French were always extremely kind to my father and the survivors of his regiment in Normandy on their occasional visits to pay their respects to lost comrades.

Maybe they allowed the attack to proceed to prevent the British ships from falling into Argentine hands? 3 July 1940, 1,297 French servicemen slaughtered by British Navy… and you feel they owed Britain a favour for its wartime activities. Go read a history book, if you can drag yourself away from GBnews for five minutes 😂

Sounds "legit."

Made up story by the press - no such thing existed.

And when the French radar seeker did not work, the French turned to an English company to sort the problem. Sadly they did....

The French being French.

@Phil We Brits saved the French in two world wars. They've never forgiven us.

@Phil I believe commonwealth nations should refuse any migrants from Argentina, they'll only bring their poison with them.

I hate to burst your bubble, but if you put "Las Malvinas" in the RU-vid search, you get a shitload of results with "Falklands" in the title, nice try though.

@@ricbarker4829 Well they still had to click on the video didn't they! sorry to burst your bubble.

@@heybabycometobutthead Your whole premise was that they had the indignation of having to type in "Falklands", they didn't.

@@ricbarker4829 My premise was they specifically look for British videos to start arguments, they do, I've watched a dozen Argentine videos on the Falklands war and found a couple of comments from British people starting arguments, but you can go to literally ANY Falklands war video on RU-vid and the entire comment section is littered with Argentine comments starting arguments, this is a fact.

Lehman: British Would Have Lost Falklands War Without U.S. Support May 29, 1988 LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying. In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported. The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations. ADVERTISEMENT ″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying. U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said. ″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.

@@kawagonzo6951 And you've commented this why?

@@maquettemusic1623 for everyone to know the truth !!!! argentina rejected Soviet Union help in 82 knowing that it would lead to the ww3...uk instead got nato help ...so yes it wasn't a pic nic as they want you to believe

Ha! Hope you packed plenty of Mars bars!

@Phil And SIS collaborated with CIA to put Mugabe in power. The intelligence agencies serve the interests of the banks and multinational corporations. Peace

@Phil it actually goes back to Francis Walsingham who was Elizabeth 1’s infamous spymaster. The banking link really becomes obvious during the Napoleonic war when Rothschild made use of his network of spies to amass sufficient profits to gain control over the Bank of England. In order to begin to understand the true situation around the Cambridge situation, it’s necessary to attempt to separate fact from fiction, and make some sense of the narratives employed. During the Cold War, the USA was supplying technology to the Soviet Union. This included the Gaz truck factory, supplied by Ford via Fiat in Italy. But it even extended to intercontinental ballistic missile technology! So the alleged issues between the US and UK intelligence agencies were a narrative designed for public consumption. We also need to remember that whenever spies are revealed, it is usually in order to protect more valuable assets, and to distract the masses from whatever is really going on. A case in point could be Roger Hollis of course, and therefore by extension, another could be James Jesus Angleton. Every whistleblower, even Peter Wright, is also only a limited hangout. The mainstream media is just the propaganda arm of the intelligence services and the commercial interests of the banks and multinational corporations. What we are told by dear old Frank Gardner comes directly from his main employer just over the river. And all the wars of course are proxy wars begun by assets run by the intelligence agencies on behalf of their real masters. Or it’s just like Smiley and Jason Bourne…! 🧐

@Phil Research the connections between the number 201, everything that’s going on in the world, and the Jesuit Order. The evidence is irrefutable. Let me know what you find. Only 7 years ago I would not have believed it, despite researching this subject since 9-11. Bear in mind that my background is in that game, and I was initially attempting to prove the case FOR UBL being responsible for 9-11, and arguing against the ‘conspiracy theories’ that the USA and Israel collaborated. It’s a very very deep rabbit hole. But the evidence is there if you look for it employing the first principles. Good luck.

Yep, old maps and charts

Thats how unimportant that part of world was untill the conflict started haha

they were lucky argentina chose wrong war one to fight!...Argentina should have destroy Chile instad

Had Argentina waited for all 20 Exocets to be delivered before they attacked the Falklands , the war would have been very much more terrible. The British would have known that Argentina possessed 20, and so would have kept their ships far away in safety until the threat was eliminated or reduced massively. The only way the British could have reduced the huge threat posed by 20 Exocets, would have been to send their Vulcans to bomb Argeninian air bases . It would have been terrible. Great loss of life in Argentina, some British Vulcans shot down, and the war escalating to terrifying proportions . The Argentinian government were stupid all along, they were stupid to invade. I am grateful however that their stupidity extended to not waiting for the complete order of Exocets. I'm glad the war was over quickly , and that the suffering less than it could have been.

@@maryjane-ei4hl Given the difficulty of getting enough conventional bombs to the mainland to do the job I wouldn’t rule out the use of tactical nuclear weapons

@@tomsoki5738 Neither would I. As I said it could have become terrible .

@@maryjane-ei4hl Lehman: British Would Have Lost Falklands War Without U.S. Support May 29, 1988 LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying. In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported. The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations. ADVERTISEMENT ″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying. U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said. ″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.

I don’t think we would have dropped nukes on them. I think there would probably be a different flag flying The Falklands, with a Cold War between Britain and Argentina. Nuclear subs blockading Argentinian ports and a diplomatic solution eventually. I’ve never seen any firm evidence why they DIDN’T wait for Exocets.

Those were ship based missiles (MM38) bright and secretly converted into land based ones.

The Falklands was a super success and very much thanks to Maggie. So yes she and the Conservative party can be justifiably proud.

@@mbak7801 yeah that much of a success she was considering a ceasefire! She and they could have avoided the war completely! Absolute embarrassment! All those dead soldiers on both sides for nothing!

It wasn't really bloodied badly, and it was also up against a much larger force

@@littleshep5502 They lost way more ships than they should have, and considering their opponents, where far more bloodied than one would expect. They were simply very poorly prepared to meet the challenge and admitted as much. Hopefully lessons learned, but we in the US seem to fail to learn from our hard lessons too sadly.

@@willbrink The CIA thought otherwise. The rumours about sattelite information (which was one image sent to both sides, to let them know America was watching), comes from the fact there was a spy sattelite moved to watch the conflict. They noted how it was rather impressive that they kept most of the ships safe, when only having 20 harriers up at any one time, against a force that had 190 planes at its disposal. Britain lost 6 ships, took down 8, lost ten planes, took down 45, lost 250 ish men, and (officially, evidence suggests hiding of casualties) took down 650 men. By all means it was a sucess

a true low point for brits? we are in the 80s ,no empire, world got stronger as it does,,the argies had better tech , more of ,ect,ect,, and a small country sailed miles away with the best ,clever,ect,ect army ,the brits at the time just showed the world were it all started from,a few highly trained nutters,,lol

Your grasp of military history, strategy and tactics is second to everyone.

Nowadays the Excocet/Super Etendard threat would be dealt with using submarine launched Tomahawk cruise missiles.

@@zkcessnaguy…That would be ONE of the assets that we’d use. It’s called “Combined Arms” for a reason. Being a JTAC that could also call in IDF and NGF gave me a unique perspective on how much firepower one person/team can bring to bear!

You really believe that's actually happened lol

@@MICHAEL-wg2lh sure it’s on U-Tube 😉

@@MICHAEL-wg2lh yep.

@@louissanderson719 lol

Eh? We went to liberate the Falklands from Argentinian troops nothing more !! What’s invading Argentina got to do with anything???

@@Genghis-Khan121 It’s a response to another comment idiot do you think I just said that out of the blue lol

Invading and occupying the Falklands doesn't endanger the lives of the civilians then?

What support lmao

@@factsdontcareaboutyourfeel7204 The military aid that they gave to Britain and cut corners since NATO only applies to the northern hemisphere

Gruss aus England! We all owe Putin a great debt of gratitude for bringing us back together.

Lehman: British Would Have Lost Falklands War Without U.S. Support May 29, 1988 LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying. In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported. The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations. ADVERTISEMENT ″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying. U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said. ″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.

@@kawagonzo6951 and?

Not sure how you could watch that video and listen to the testimony of those involved and come to that conclusion.

Superhuman, no. Phenomenally trained, yes. To repurpose and somewhat bastardise an old famous quote, "any sufficiently well-trained and organised group of soldiers will appear to be superhuman to the untrained and disorganised"...

Lehman: British Would Have Lost Falklands War Without U.S. Support May 29, 1988 LONDON (AP) _ Britain would not have recaptured the Falkland Islands from Argentina in 1982 without U.S. military assistance, former U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman was quoted Sunday as saying. In a British Broadcasting Corp. television interview to be broadcast Wednesday night, Lehman also says U.S. involvement in the Falklands war led indirectly to the Irangate scandal, the Observer newspaper reported. The weekly said Lehman’s interview will be included in the latest episode of ″An Ocean Apart,″ a BBC documentary series on British-American relations. ADVERTISEMENT ″Britain would have had to have withdraw from the Falklands″ if the Reagan administration withheld support, it quoted Lehman as saying. U.S. military aid in the 74-day war, in which Britain recaptured the South Atlantic archipelago from invading Argentine forces, has been a closely guarded secret, the Observer said. ″Lehman is the first senior U.S. official to claim that the Pentagon’s supplies of intelligence and material were so great as to have been decisive,″ it said.

Hypotheticals don’t win wars though.

Argentina got lucky there were only a few dozen soldiers on the Falklands to start with.

belgrano 🤣

I don't think so, I'm pretty sure that Rio Grande would have been seriously bombed if necessary.

It’s amazing that when your good at something people say your lucky, may that continue👍