The fastest GTX GPU is now $182. 

yep😥😥😥

Why would you say that? Now we all feel old 😆

@@Panster7we are old

why would you resort to violence like that?

It's been more years than that since good games came out😂😂😂

Thats just not true, the only more expensive one is the 4090. 4080S and 7900 XTX are both 1000€

I think the most egregious one is back when 3090 was $2K

@@mjdevlog that was only scalpers price, as i remember rtx30 was cheaper then rtx20

You also have to keep in mind that back then the 1080 Ti had just released at $699 and the GTX 1080 had released a year prior at $599. So, not only was it $1,550 in today's money, it was also as much as two 1080s and nearly as much as two 1080 Ti. Which were technically both top-tier GPUs, while the Titan was a pinnacle GPU meant for nothing more than flexing. It was truly crazy back then.

​@@mjdevlog No, the most egregious was the 2080 Ti Founders Edition dropping at $1,199. It came out a year after the $699 1080 Ti and was somehow $500 more for the same class of GPU.

Nice seeing you here lol

maybe he just pulled one out of inventory and didnt go and buy one

Greatest technician that ever lived😎👀

swamp gooch

What was the absolute hardest thing to repair

Me too! My first PC that built with my own hands (a CYRIX 686 100Mhz) with windows 95 messing with my mind cos I was used to MS-DOS back then! Talkin'about feelin' old :p (I was 12 at that time)

i not even alive in this time, how old are you fella?

lol, I felt that too. high school in 2000 here with the first 1Ghz chip - AMD Athlon Thunderbird

Lol try 10 years before that. Been here since 286 days, damn I'm old.😅

@@mikemmxp I built my first rig in 2003 with an Athlon XP 2000+, and that wasn't even the fastest available at the time. Kinda miss the clockspeed wars lol.

Crazy how technology value depreciates. I wonder what the price of a 4090 will be after 5 years...

​@@icenote1591You can find 2080ti FTW3's for around $350 so I'm gonna say probably somewhere near $400

​@@icenote1591it's already depleting

@@JKAB9285 and I just bought one last month 😥

My monitor is capped at 60Hz so 60fps became the standard for me.

I might consider it if my PSU could pull it, which it can't.

@@LeElister64 Once you go to 144hz, 60 just looks like 30.

@@astrikos4011 i have a 144hz monitor and 60 looks fine still.

@@astrikos4011 can confirm. But I went from 75Hz to 165Hz recently and oh my god, what a difference. I decided to try 75Hz again and it was PAINFUL, and 30FPS looks like a literal PowerPoint presentation. I cannot play on consoles anymore.

same

time to upgrade

Me too, with a 6700k?

@@msg360 naa

@@msg360 yeah but its still prretty decent i have a 4090 now, but i still play my sim games on my old 1080ti/8700k pc

truly iconic. the 1080ti will live on forever in our hearts

@@illuminoeye_gaming "It's time to go" "was I a good GPU" "was? I'm just moving you to another rig."

Best when factoring in price for sure. Otherwise it has to go to the current gen, 4090 represented a meteoric performance boost beyond that of the 1080Ti

Same with GTX 1070, mainstream 380$ 8GB card that was faster than 980ti, NV isnt making a mistake like that again

Still on the 1080 ti lol

I had 1060 6gb ROG Strix OC and i got 3060 ti on I7 870 1st gen 2.9 @3.8ghz OC. SSD Sata III 500gb , 16gb DDR3 1600mhz 750w psu.. i play all on ULTRA / high 60 FPS 1080p. this is 2009 year CPU still capable in 2024.. 4c 8t

1070 at 1440? Were you playing at super low settings on a ps2 emulator or what

@@Zelielz1 Nah hahaha, you'd be surprised

​​@@Zelielz1 1070ti is basically a 1080 and my 1080 does 3440x1440 fine™

I've said it before when it comes to GPUs on PCs and I'll say it again. If you strictly buy a very high end graphics card your just a beta tester for the mid to lower mid range market in less than a decade! Buy at least mid to upper mid range and I don't wanna hear I'm future proofing! Right that's we now have ray tracing and much better display ports along with new ports? Yeah ,so much for that future proofing!

Even considering inflation, the 1200$ PC of 2005 would be 2100$ today, the increase in pricing over the last decade is crazy.

Same but 9900KS

get out of your bubble, those two were nothing close to what most people could afford. 1060 was and will forever be the GOAT

1080ti 8700k

@@yugalkhanal6967 i think hes talking abt dream builds back then but ok

i9-9980XE and gtx 1080 ti

I miss that man 😣

games don’t even get optimised anymore, they just blame everyone’s hardware

Did the times change though? It's the same story today with the amount of unoptimized garbage coming out 😂

... for worse.

​@Micromation Nowadays we get a lot more unoptimized games but they don't run that badly. Having a game run so badly even on the best possible hardware can't run it is impressive in some way. The devs went oh well looks like everyone who wants to play the game will have to wait for better hardware. You might be able to pull that shit with games like Crysis which at lower settings looked like a completely different game and ran much better. As far as I remember the game TB was testing didn't even look good. This must mean the devs didn't even enable the most basic optimization like only rendering what's visible on screen.

2017 feels 2 years ago 😢

😢true

can't really tell. those oldies are not covered by warranty, there is a high chance it gonna be damaged by delivery,, you can't really check it in person for flaw, potential issues

And if people start doing that, that's pretty stupid because of driver support. Driver support will eventually end for newer games and then they're going to be SOL and bought an old card because of a RU-vid video 🤣

Not really.

@@302efi maxwells drivers are still supported let alone pascal if youre talking about games launching there are currently zero that dont launch on the titan xp by the time a game wont be able to run on the titan xp you wont have the performance to play that title on lowest at 1080p 60 fps plus even if you had a card with a newer architecture and had the same amount of raster performance also it wouldnt change the fact the fact you still get atleast 2 years of every brand new game being supported plus every single game ever made up to this point

So because of the lack of VRAM are you forced to buy the highest tier of modern GPUs? If so then I'd say that their marketing ploy is working.

@@mauree1618 Unfortunately, yeah. Bear with me for the long comment: The strangehold that NVIDIA has due to them technically having better performing cards than AMD at the high end for CUDA compute tasks is basically making them get away with making the GPU market be terrible. And AMD isn't really in the capacity to take over compute any time soon even with the supposed improvements with ROCm/HIP given how fragmented their support for compute is to begin with even if CUDA wasn't dominant (the RX 5000 series is mostly left dead on the water compared to the RX 6000 and 7000 series; and the 7000 series has some better stuff than the 6000 series for no real reason). Not to mention both NVIDIA and AMD have nerfed bandwidth capabilities for the GPUs that have been put on the entry level/1080p category. Like the atrocious 64-bit bus for the GTX 1630 and RX 6500 XT on top of being terrible GPUs is already obvious. But even the well renowned cards like the RX 6600 XT have been critiqued to be limited in bandwidth for no reason other than saving costs for production: the RX 6600 XT has a 128-bit bus compared to the RX 5700 XT that has a 256-bit bus, which matters because the gap in performance with how better the RX 6600 XT is is not that wide compared to the RX 5700 XT, when it could be even wider for more games if the bus width hadn't been stifled to be halved essentially.

@@mauree1618 The RX 7900 XTX offers the same amount of VRAM as a 4090, for half the price. While the ecosystem is generally better for ML on Nvidia cards, removing such essential features weakens their position in this field. Many ML folks would have happily added a second 4090 to their Workstation.

How did you set up the environment for OpenCL programming? Also, what kind of training materials did you use? I tried to pick up OpenCL a few years ago, and the most up-to-date textbook was "Heterogeneous Computing with OpenCL 2.0", which is a book published in 2015. OCL_SDK_Light was the sdk.

@@mauree1618 And, the RTX 4060 16gb's bandwidth limitation cripples the performance. It is only good for launching larger models, but the token/second rate is poor. It is considered a good card for some use cases, but not for speed.

😂right

It's called "Morph Cut" in Premiere Pro, combined with good camera positioning

@@teslawp I GOOGLED MORPH CUT IT LOOKS NOTHING LIKE THIS WDYM

Eating woood

​@@teslawpmaybe I'm blind, but I don't see any morphing, it just cuts to some hard to describe 'fast-paced footage" that fits the vibe (second cut is zipping through some car parking?)

i dont need a card, googled and saw this is better then my 2060, kinda tempted but i have no need hahah, deff pushed me to think about it

It's amazing how much these cards depreciate, the 3090 for instance is like 1/3 the price already, can't imagine what the 50xx launch will do the 40xx prices.

He is MKBHD in computer world

​@@huyphamuc6372 MKBHD doesn't put even 30% effort compared to optimum, he just turns camera on and talks, thats it.

@@doo0mstar I think mkbhd writes scripts for his videos

MKBHD is a pleb

why don't you just propose to him?

Thats what I thought

Although I personally think the shade of green nvidia uses is nicer than razer's

That is Nvidia's green... as in envy green.

Razer is just a tiny bit darker but yeah.

@@makatronrazer has a different font

I'm still using a gtx 970 and a i7-4770. Everything runs fine at 60 fps+ at 720p

@@oberpenneraffe I upgraded my MOBO and CPU last month from an I7-4790 to a I5-12400F, (because it was about £100 in a sale) and I get even more FPS in games now, (about 25% more in fact) turns out my 4th gen I7 was actually a bottleneck!

I had 1060 6gb ROG Strix OC and i got 3060 ti on I7 870 1st gen 2.9 @3.8ghz OC. SSD Sata III 500gb , 16gb DDR3 1600mhz 750w psu.. i play all on ULTRA / high 60 FPS 1080p. this is 2009 year CPU still capable in 2024.. 4c 8t

@@Stanke24 I was using a 4th gen I7-4790, (4C, 8T @ 3.6Ghz, 4.0Ghz on turbo) and it did everything I ever asked for. I have upgraded to an I5-12400F, (6C, 12T) and DDR5 RAM. I have to say the benefit is underwhelming, (still limited by the refresh rate of the 60Hz 52 inch TV) and I wasted the money thinking I would get better FPS, but mainly to get Windows 11. Stick with what you have until it stops doing what you need it to do. Also, Windows 11 sucks, Windows 10 is better. Go figure.

a 980 ti does not push 1080p max on all games anymore. 1080p high/optimized ultra definitely then. The last generation of 1080p60 GPUs are the 900 and 1000 series, all newer gpus are meant for higher frame rates or higher resolutions (1080p120, 1440p60) the current 4000 series is intended for 1080p240, 1440p165, 2160p120

Dude ur not the only one who feels that way, holy shit

Its going by too quickly..

My conclusion, the world is changing so much that our brains stopping fully comprehend the changes (social media addiction, singularity from the technological stand point is near) it's feels like our brains processing the data so fast that we're not able to "live" in the moment, but in reality the opposite it's happening, our brains create the time frame gaps as it's have hard time to comprehend what's is going on around us which feelis like a void, losing part of memory from specific time frame.

The only way to going back to the time where everything was "normal" is to live off the grid, far away from social media and technology boom.

There is also Titan RTX.

Used 3070's go for the same price and outperform a Titan Xp in literally any way. Titan Xp is a collectors/nostalgic item, not something you actually consider for a new build in 2024.

@@YISP7 did u not see the 300fps on overwatch

@@hookbook1Nice way to ignore his comment about the 3070 being the same price and having more performance

I up the bid to 11 dollars

11.25, final offer

12$

$15

16€

the 4060 still isn't the best option, as he said the 3070 is just plain better, checking second hand prices quickly in france, it is also only 190 euros. AMD's 6700XT is also a really option if you don't need CUDA

If you care about power consumption then amd cpu and gpu is your best bet. Intel cpu's and nvidia gpu's are more power hungry.

depending where, i went from gtx 1080 to rtx 4080, so from 160-180w to 260-300w and i see no change in bill

@@MV-ri7zu nvidia gpu's, especially the 40 series are A LOT better than their amd equivalent from an fps/watt point of view. they're not fairly priced, but saying amd is more efficient is a flat out lie

@@AnEagle i have a 6700xt and i love it :D

What can you afford then?

@@takik.2220nothing prob hes a brokey

embarrassing

😂😂

I can relate brother. I bought a pc recently for $20. It has Windows 7, AMD dual core CPU, 2 gb ram, single slot GPU, 200 gb HDD, Dvd and floppy drives. Not all todays software is compatible but you have to make the most of it.

Also on GTX 1080, shits still holding up lol

Went from 1070ti (oc'd so it was matching 1080) to RX6800 and the jump was massive.

I'm on a 1070 and going strong lmao. Only CPU needed upgrading in the past 8 years.

That's awesome I've had a 1080 and the performance is really good! The newer cards are so expensive its ridiculous and they depreciate so quickly. I sold my evga 3090 ti for $700.. all I could get for it, so ridiculous!

Bro im still using a Gtx 1060 6gb 😂

Pretty hard ngl

Yes! It was glorious! I still use my aorus 1080ti, it was nvidia's huge mistake and unfortunately we will never see another gpu like that again!

@@DigitalNomad88 It sold very well, the 2000 series was just a re-release of 1000 series on a smaller process node. Remove the heat sink, and 2000 cards look exactly the same.

@@DigitalNomad88 tell me about it, I went with the Strix verion :P

@@the_hate_inside1085 I would argue it was more of a tech demo, they focused on an underwhelming (at the time, and arguably still to this day) technology and left the performance to be desired. Meanwhile, we know what a glorious mistake it was

It's still here. Just not in the high-end segment.

So sleek

Yeah it's good for AI 😅

Depends on how good your case filtering is. But the simple answer is most likely . . . . . all the cat hair.

He did? It's showing avg FPS in those games on the Titan XP at 1440p

@@SammerJammer looked like a sub heading of the graph, my bad.

I had 1060 6gb ROG Strix OC and i got 3060 ti on I7 870 1st gen 2.9 @3.8ghz OC. SSD Sata III 500gb , 16gb DDR3 1600mhz 750w psu.. i play all on ULTRA / high 60 FPS 1080p. this is 2009 year CPU still capable in 2024.. 4c 8t

1080ti was a mistake

@@dorolo For nvidia. For us, users, it was a gift :p

I found one for 200+like 65$ shipping but it’s sketchy asf on eBay😭

@@Alpaca5089 yeah that was used for crypto mining. you got got lol

Clickbait ass title. Its impossible to find one under $250 now. I swear videos like these do nothing but ruin the used market.

prices probably went up as soon as this video got views lol

Everywhere

Yeah, Titan V is somewhere in between GTX and RTX. It has Tensor but no RT.

I agree fastest "GTX" should be claimed by Titan V. Note : Tensors on it are incapable of running DLSS, so they are useless for gaming, and Volta does not support Mesh Shaders (while newest GTX [1660 series], does). Also, Titan V might get software throttled from P2 CUDA compute state (if driver thinks you are running such workload). Both Titan Xp and V are similar in blower style cooler being the limiting factor (while getting 1080 Ti with custom air cooler is easy), and should be heavily undervolted (~0.8V range GPU voltage), to not drop performance when you PC heats up after 1h+ of gaming session.

The Titan V was never referred to as a "GTX" product. Just like the Nvidia Titan RTX, it was simply called the "Nvidia Titan V"

​@@b127_1 It's just marketing name. If GV100 was ever released on GeForce line (like GM200 and GK110 before it), it would be under "GTX" series since it's almost on par with GTX 1600 series feature set (just "lock" it's Tensor cores, and you have "GeForce GTX 1690 [Ti]" card). What it's called now under Titan series is irrelevant.

@@b127_1 damn, ur right. I was about to smugly comment how this whole video is wrong but yep, they didnt call it the gtx titan v

Already has been, it was ~150 a few days before this video. RTX 2080Ti is also something people should strongly consider an keep an eye on, it is way better than all RTX 3060 models plus it is about the same price used. Another thing 2080Ti model was the stripped down version of the Titan as in they were lazy an just added parts to the Ti to make it a titan basically the 2080Ti is a lot better than it got made out to be an it can be had for cheap. Both of those models though are generally better than a current RTX 4060, and they come in under half the price on the used market.

Looking at the size of 4090 and the price, it seems like what SLI was back in the day, but much better without stuttering and lower than expected SLI performance in many games.