The first  

Cheers Gary, and you are (currently), my favourite subscriber!

I couldn't agree more. Outstanding.

Hans. The human eye does not view the world as square. Composition is often more difficult within a square. After all, the square format dates from oldie cameras intended to save on 120 roll film. (the 2 1/4"square format; 12-20). Other models took this reduction further; 16 on 20, which again was rectangular.

Foxglove963. Thank you for that information. I didn't know that. However, in my opinion, one single human eye would probably view the world in a circular form, thus closer to a square than a wider rectangle. With two eyes, we are able to view a slightly wider angle. Yes, we can see a wider angle but we tend to concentrate on the center of what we see with both eyes. Probably because the center of what we see is like a combination of what both eyes can see individually. Close one eye and you immediately see that you're view has become narrower. Basically, we have two images of what we see in the center through each eye at the same time. So, for me, the square format, without the distractions on each sides, made me concentrate more on what the photographer intended to show and what he concentrated on with his own eyes. I agree with you that composition may often be more difficult because the photographer may have the need to decide what to cut out from the sides. However, it simplifies the selection and it simplifies what we are to see. There's more intent in the photo. I think Craig is really skilled and his photos look great.

Cheers Rainer. Actually this was going to be my very last vlog. But as you're enjoying them, I'll do a few more! ;-)

Thanks Tony. Not my first visit or first video here. Outside of London, it's one of my favourites. And of course you have the most photogenic building in the UK here! Oh and the best flyovers too! Yes, I have seen shots of that cherry blossom, looks great.

I know, who says bins are rubbish!

Cheers Teddy

It's not really about the image quality, as the zooms are certainly on par with the primes. It's more about the size, restrictions (in a good way) and just workability of using primes. You'll only know if you give it a go!

Taken between the hours of 11am and 4pm on a Saturday in June. The only answer I have, is that maybe I need to change my deodorant?!

It's listed on my website and is availabe as part of my e6 Subscription

No, it's not been on a tripod yet.

I don't sell prints and stock is dead these days. The images get used for one purpose or another at one time or another. But I've always shot for myself and find markets to suit them, mainly illustrating my articles.

There was no Photoshopery with those water images. How dare you suggest otherwise!!

Ah, my faith in your work is restored. I am sorry I doubted you. Are you sure though? :0)