Or only just wild West he could kill himself Edit: I understand that it would be cool to see these games in two universe but there is so many evidence that proves they aren't.
I've always wanted something like that since you help the army for 1 mission in undead nightmare there's something so appealing about red deads combat and huge scale battles that's just 👌
Imagine > being a German soldier > war is going to shit and your losing > try to take back the Argonne > watch as some random soldier fan fire and deadeye the whole platoon > lose hope
And as the greatest author of a story based on the reality of what it is like to be an outlaw, what the reality of the west was like and the life of all those who sought to survive, the story of Red Dead Redemption.
Technically he wouldn’t be the last Outlaw or gunslinger cause right after WW1 ended the mafia/tommy gun wielding gangsters started another Era of outlaws and gunslingers now just imagine jack Marston wielding a chicago type writer
@@fintherebel5000Definitely THE last gunslinger because remember John-or-Arthur beats all of the legendary gunslingers... and John learns even more from Landon Ricketts as well as John teaching Jack the last bit of dead eye before the modern era of mafia sparks change of guns... but let it be know the only legendary and last gunslinger Jack to ever be known he was the last of the true dead eye user...
Jack Marston lived to see Home alone and movies that showed a time he himself lived (The good, the bad and the ugly, Winchester, Stagecoach, the magnificent Seven etc.)
My man would spit shine Uncle Sam's boots after witnessing his father executed at the hands of the government. Now that's some good character development. Better send Rockstar a copy of your resume. You, sir, are a genius.
@@radias2589 Hitler was regimental runner. He likely didn't even see combat at that battle and to what i remember hitlers company in the 16th RIR fought frenchmen, not Americans. No matter because Hitler did not participate in any assaults anyway. And as the Americans only were there a brief moment its even more unlikely.
I think if the war is included in Jack’s story, it should be like the tutorial in the mountains in RDR2. Think of it like if chapter one was set in Guarma.
eh you think it would be nice but RDR games are about the wild west so it would sorta ruin the story be nice to see it when theres nothing else though for RDR3 its either this or if you listened closely in RDR2 Epilogue it was 4 years or so since then been there so its that or the past with Dutch Arthur and Hosea getting the gang or this so good idea but it will be awhile
@@NikoTheLordmafia 2 started eith the main character fighting i italy in ww2. You could do something simillar only for him to return to a wild west thats changed
Yeah make it a completely different timeline that's different from the Canon timeline where we see events of WW1 as jack but still keep the main line of the whole wild west theme in the main timeline where we most likely go back to before 1899 maybe we even get to play as a soldier in the American civil war idk really depends on what rockstar has planned if they have anything planned
Not by me. I would expect him to be smart enough to burn his draft notice. Why would he want to fight for the government after what the government did to his father?
@@josephr4761makes lot of sense, i think the same way. When younger he was a good kid, cult. But after his parents death he would probably ghost herelf for governmant
@@josephr4761 Same. Jack would NEVER join the army. The Gov't agents killed his father, after the bank job incarcerated John with threats to hang him, and most likely traumatized him with the whole Pinkerton fiasco.
There is like a lot of fans that are fine with the Red Dead trilogy, but Jack Marston surviving all wars and writing a book before his passing is impressive.
Most obvious ideas for rdr3 are either to expand on the Italian Mafia stuff they set up in 2, or go back in time further and tell the story of another character. Maybe Uncle, or Dutch, or even a complete retelling of Red Harlow's story during the Civil War.
Wouldn't he have a seething hatred for the US Government? Why would he sacrifice himself to die in a muddy trench in Europe? He'd more likely take up arms with Pancho Villa than willingly serve the US.
@@kylethompson3008that would honestly be awesome. It would cool if it was titled “Red Dead Retribution” where Jack becomes a real Robin Hood with his gang, unlike Dutch Van Der Linde’s false self view as a Robin Hood
@@wackoproductionz1115 can i ask you something ? When i started the chapter 6 i couldn't upgrade the camp because i didn't find the book,this happened also to you?
I know everybody wants to see a prequel to rdr2 and how the gang started and everything, and while that would be great, I think seeing a continuation of rdr1 and jack as an old man in like the 40’s as the last outlaw of the west evading the law and still using a horse and revolvers when the military is using cars tanks and full auto guns would be amazing to see
@@ZyronZA Maybe he's made mistakes and killed people he shouldn't have in between the end of RDR1 and the start of the 3rd. Kinda like with Arthur, where we don't really see his past crimes, but we know about them still. Or who knows maybe Jack thinks he could've saved his father and is trying to redeem himself from what he believes could've been possible
@@awlow052 John has already had his redemption arc and having two will make his arc in RDR1 less meaningful. And Jack can't get an arc because the setting of RDR is the old West. Jack's timeline will take place near the introduction of vehicles etc... and will be out of place. RDR3 must have a different story imo.
No he wouldn't lmao John wanted Jack to be a farmer, he knew the pain the outlaw life brings. He'd be cruahed that Jack fell into the same cycle as both Arthur and John.
@@Fridge_Fiendhe just do a duel in mexico side of san luis river and he can get a sherrif outfit a army outfit a fbi outfit how in the fck sht people still believe thats hes an outlaw?
@@Fridge_Fiend you just had to try to ruin a good fucking thing, didn't you. Yes, John WOULD be upset Jack became an outlaw. But I know he'd STILL be proud that his son became a FUCKING VETERAN, meaning HE ACTUALLY BROKE the cycle, and in general is just a caring person. Who hurt you man. Come on.
@@Fridge_Fiendit was never confirmed if jack became an outlaw, he just killed ross and walked away, plus the OP was talking about john being proud of jack when he's fighting in the war, not when he's doing outlaw stuff lol
but then it would have to be separated from the red dead name since the story point of red dead is the wild west the outlaws so it would either be a dlc or a disliked game
@@NoodleyRatsince Rockstar has a long track record of not adding many real "story expanding" DLC to their games (usually none at all, also GTA Online doesn't count).. Undead Nightmare and The Ballad of Gay Tony are one of very few notable additions. This was all to say it is unlikely to happen that we get ANYTHING at all involving Jacks story any further, even in a possible RDR3. Jack would need a rebranded game altogether, since his story doesn't require redemption. He killed a retired government bloodhound in a foreign country ruled by a self absorbed dictator who was once partnered with his father, no witnesses, and really a name that fell through the cracks of the government eye completely.
The only problem is it’s Wild West era, so if rdr3 (or four) takes place during ww1 where jack gets drafted then it’s pretty much gonna be loosing its game era if you think about it
@@SturmtruppKriegGaming1916when you go to blackwater with john and abigail and you take a picture there is a backgroud called "paris at night" or something like that so not all places are fictional
@@huskyman7633 they also mention places like New York and Kentucky, I mean places you can go in the game. You would have to participate in fictional battles or unnamed battles if a World War 1 Red Dead game was ever made, which is most likely not gonna happen. Like the Battle of Scarlett Meadows, Bolger Glade, or Riley's Charge, which are based off of real battles, but are fictional. You would be in France, but it would have to be a fictional location, like the fake states in RDR
Unironically would make for a killer end to the redemption series, or at least the characters we know, this cowboy lost in a cycle of rage thrust into unimaginable suffering and death, something so shocking and horrific but in it, Jack finds his true redemption, a neat bloody bow on a fantastic series, but then again, i wouldve never thought about rdr2 when i first played rdr1 so, who knows what we'll get
A prohibition era rdr would be sick, fingers crossed they do another game following the characters from the last two but i feel like they will probably branch out to something lame and do a whole new character, though a early 1800's game would be pretty cool too as i cant really imagine them going even deeper into the 1900's
@@syrnin The last western was RDR2. For all intents and purposes, RDR1 is a post-western game, and is totally misrepresented by the fact that you see so many more wagons instead of cars on the roads, especially in the east towards Blackwater.
Thats what I'm telling. They can easily make a game with a mix of jack in WW1 and Arthur during the gang's prime in blackwater. People would pay money to see that
Honestly I would love Rockstar's combat style in a war game. Rdr2 has some of the best gunplay of any game in my opinion, imagine if you got to do that large scale.
RDR2, GTA, pretty much any Rockstar game has the most stiff gunplay of any games I've ever experienced and I'm willing to overlook it because they both have great stories but imo I would never call Rockstar gunplay good by any stretch
Tbh no it does not Like rdr2s guns feel super clunky and they don't feel powerful like sure they aren't super strong but they still feel weak they are slow and it's just not that fun to use them
Are you smoking crack? Nobody and I mean nobody stuck with red dead 2 for 60 hrs for the gameplay. The story is the redeeming quality. Rockstars gameplay and controls are so fucking outdated and janky you’re snorting copium
Rockstar games have some of the worst gunplay in any triple A games out there. It's incredibly stiff and unsatisfying. Sure the ragdolls and gore are nice and helps to mask the shallowness of the combat system, but imagine if the shooting had as much depth as the fistfighting.
Its amazing how Jack can pretty much live long from Wild West to seeing America land on the moon. And if he live to be a hundred, he might even witness 9/11 on tv.
Yeah most likely not Jack I would imagine most likely dies at maybe like 60 or maybe he gets killed in WW2 because well life expectancy in the early 1900s was still quite low and even then with his criminal past he would've most likely gotten tried and given the death penalty for killing a government agent Or maybe he went into the whole mob business in the great depression
Ok, hear me out. The first part of the game is set in 1918 France as Jack and a squad of U.S Marines are separated from their unit. The player can choose to help the others or escape by themselves, it would be much easier to flee. After this, the game goes from different 1910s-1930s war zones as Jack becomes a mercenary. He could fight in Ireland, Russia, China, South Africa, Spain, and many others while keeping honor or giving in to killing innocents. This would be good for online as you can have different environments for different events like big game hunting in South Africa.
I like that idea. I had an idea for a new undead nightmare where you could fight other monsters besides just zombies, like werewolves, vampires, wendigo and other such monsters of folklore.
The idea seems more fit for something like the Mafia games, as it seems much more linear and story driven rather than the expansive open worlds that give you free reign that Rockstar is known for.
If they make a ww1 rdr they should implement a feature:after the war jack has PTSD and sometimes hallucinates some German man trying to shoot him and after jack kills him it turns out it's a normal man that was talking to him.
Maybe post-war Jack would be an epilogue like we see in RDR2. He'd have PTSD and get random panic attacks when you're in heavy gunfights and the likes. Panic attacks disable dead eye and make you significantly less accurate when firing a gun
Dutch would never have fought in ww1 for 3 reasons 1. He died. 2. He was too old 3. Dutch doesn't care about the governments problems unless it is he who is starting them
I don’t think Jack would join the army I’d imagine since the government killed his father he wouldn’t wanna work for em and instead probably went into hiding
That would be a great opening for RDR3. Like how rdr2 starts in a Winterstorm fighting for survival it could start with a black screen hearing prep for a charge into no man's land and it just says the year and cuts to jack's face racking up a Trench-gun.
Why the fuck do you retards want red dead 3 to be a ww1 game that is never going to happen. It’s going to be a prequel about Dutch and Hosea and how they met Arthur and John I guarantee it
@@TenTen-en4wehe whould not serve a war for the US government he’s an outlaw for killing Edgar Ross so this whole thing for him joining the U.S. army makes no sense at all his father was killed by the Army and would be a ass story for the game
@@user-hx6gs9rq7uTrue, but he does indeed live. He even writes a book about his travels as a gunslinger(and probably about Arthur and John), as seen in GTA V.
@@Model3140digitalalarmclock Set in 1911…considering that RDR2 went back twelve years to 1899, is going forward six to 1917 really such an inconceivable stretch?
@@movinmetal2596 So let’s say you make a game about world war 2. However, the game is set in 1951. That wouldn’t be so nice. The Wild West was something that lasted many decades. It ended in 1912. 1899 and 1911 are pretty fine for a RDR game. 1914 would be too far. The game is about the death of the Wild West, not looking at its corpse and hoping for some fun.
@@Model3140digitalalarmclock Formation of states did not end lawlessness in those regions. Gangs operated with impunity in several regions of the West and Midwest until the formation of the FBI and multi-jurisdictional capacities. The end of the frontier had little to do with the decline of crime and violence in America, a game about gangs would obviously fold into the Prohibition era and the most famous American gangs of all time 😅 Try reading a history book and displaying a little imagination 👍
