this was a 3v3 ai gen no multi tournament...the first no multi tournament in months...creating for some insane moments...enjoy. PATREON FOR MORE: / professionalgeoguessr EDITED BY: rawcruz (linktr.ee/rawcruz)
Round 1 GAME 1: 1:52, debre, demetra, consus VS heypando, duckbavis, maccem GAME 2: 8:07, kurt, max, pivver VS jilbee, kiribati, vell GAME 3: 14:44, harmless, ning, jupa VS toro, brectify, oceanman GAME 4: 18:15, harrier, lennli, trichter VS emily, mhud, aksel GAME 5: 20:49, blinky, mumrik, havrd VS geoguessru, nexx, dani GAME 6: 27:30, jhk, southbye, poli VS rc, kodiak, karo GAME 7: 37:56, rainbolt, ziggi, daiiono VS rust, milan, eamonn GAME 8: 56:22, topotic, simi, alok VS dj, sverre, bag Round 2: game 1 winner vs game 2 winner: 1:00:56 game 3 winner vs game 4 winner: 1:10:42 game 5 winner vs game 6 winner: 1:18:49 game 7 winner vs game 8 winner: 1:29:39 SEMIFINALS: set 1: 1:32:41 set 2: 1:47:19 FINAL: 1:50:22 other timestamps: ziggi antartica: 13:32 tunnel ai gen moment: 37:33 notes: i loved this no multiplier tourney! lots of rounds where a single mistake really cost the team and benefited others. 3k health was so fun to watch because it was really on the edge of your seat for everyone! make sure to watch tourneys live at twitch.tv/rainbolt on saturdays at 11am pst!
No multis are so much better I think, because it still allows a team to lose based on one big fail but then most of the time allows the more consistent team to get the win. Also no multis create some elite matches because when you get up to round 25-30+ the tension is insane. Case in point: the epic JHK comeback doesn't happen if multis are on
I wish multis could be customized to be a shallower slope. Because it is fun that pinpointing matters more as you go on but the luck factor kind of cancels it out.
i think i like the 2v2 / 3v3 tourneys a lot more. the 4v4 always ends up dragging on in matches because you can hedge so easily not to lose too many points
Agreed. Even 3v3 allows to more hedges I feel . 2v2 is better . You can still allow 3 or four player chatting together on TS to think as a team, but only two guesses allows , even 1 would be better
Alexander Kononov I iknow ! That’s why I said they could keep coms. Still play with 4 persons in the chat , and thinking about strategy, but only 2 can actually click/ guess on the map
1:23:43 the no electricity poles meta in NL is actually very true haha, we only have those huge metal ones but besides that almost everything is underground!
1:22:58 If Blinky can read Japanese massive respect bc u cant read japanese by remembering hiragana and katakana, you need to know like 4000 characters(kanji) to read
Having vacationed on the outerbanks in North Carolina many times I immediately knew that was were it had to be, so glad you guys sent a guess there. Crazy game
55:30 Funny how they called out front plates, then 2 of them went states with no front plates, and they ended up winning on NC, a state that has no front plates yet there were vehicles with front plates. I am so confused lmfao.
Some places are just more confusing and less obvious. Also those 0.1 second videos, and especially the bw/distorted ones are a collection of the best rounds after many tries.
please do multiplier way more exciting when u get rounds where the multiplier could kill. these games were sm more boring still a great tourney tho love watching these
Just fyi, being from Perth, that curb meta thing is kinda not true since there are spots here where it still is the straight block, but the curve in the road is reliable pretty much all the time.
Does geoguessr have a mode where they compare the average distance of each person on the team instead of just doing the closest guess, so it's a bit less luck based
Nice tourney 💪 personally i like to see the emotes but i also think the facecam is in the right spot. Maybe would be a nice idea if geoguessr could add a feature where you can change the layout of the buttons so emotes are on the right for example
Not the biggest fan of this layout without the multipliers. I’ve watched every stream and for me the multipliers add more intensity and make me want to watch every second of the game, however now it’s almost boring and I can’t retain my full attention on the match when they last so many rounds where nobody can lose
@@Londronable Well who would want the same team to win everytime? That's why i find multis way more interesting. The best team can lose on one mistake.
@@drugsrbad475 I mean, I want the best team to win. Want to win next time? Get better. Like, I don't even feel good about winning by a technicality. A higher frequency of upsets also devalues them, both in shock value and skill necessary.
