The Greatest Dynasties In NBA History 

No wonder

Re-Comment from Goat video You should do a video of the most underated athlete in every major sport but if you did could you make it ranked...Please. Thank you

Warriors dynasty might not actually be over tho

The warriors dynasty is not over yet

The 2006 heat?

Super impressive…they beat all my school teachers…and wilt😴 bill russelllll stinkkkksss how u a center and shot 46% from the field 🤣🤣😩 deandre Jordan had a higher FG percentage 🤣🤦🏾‍♂️ but y’all killed kobe for shooting under 50% from outside the hoop 🤣😆

@@renaldopierre1995 As soon as you spouted that "school teachers" LIE, you demonstrated your total ignorance of the period. Also keep in mind that Kobe was SUPPOSEDLY an "elite shooter" yet never led the league in FG% and often was BARELY BETTER THAN AVERAGE. Bill on the other hand was NEVER focused on offence or considered to be an elite shooter, he was a DEFENSIVE STOPPER and concentrated on that end of the floor - yet he ALSO was league average TO MUCH BETTER as a shooter in an era that big men mostly dominated offenses DESPITE it being a secondary concern for him in almost all of the games he played - and even then Bill was TOP *5* in FG% for his first 4 years in the league and 14'th in his 5'th year. Kobe's BEST year was *18th* in FG% - and he NEVER made the Top 20 any other year of his career. Also keep in mind that REAL DEFENSE was possible in Bill's era - most of the rules that opened up the floor for offensive players happened DURING KOBE'S TIME IN THE LEAGUE, while Bill's era (due mostly to Wilt) kept changing the rules to make it HARDER on offensive players.

@@bricefleckenstein9666 not reading all this mate u didn’t watch bill…as a center he shot under 50% (under the basket ) Kobe shot 50% outside the paint 🥴🥴 not the same

@@bricefleckenstein9666 defense ? Kobe has the most 1st team as a guard..go for a walk

@@renaldopierre1995 Kobe has those records in an era that THE RULES DON'T ALLOW serious defense. Do some research before you decide to post in the future.

He’s also a big baby. Hence the nicknames cupcake n snake

@@simninja95655 lol someone’s feelings r hurt 😢. Its ok cupcake 🧁.

@@simninja95655 lol its like arguing with an 8 year old. I never said i was better than Durant cupcake 🧁. 😆

Lol I never knew that but I can see how he took it. Can't believe how soft and sensitive the world is turning into. It's like a band KEVIN DURANT & THE SELFISH GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS 😂😂

@@anthonyvallejo1537 he wasnt hurt tho atleast he didnt act so he just said kd saw it from another way nothing more nothin less

Ofc they r u fan boi

@@kingoffood3221 what

@@kingoffood3221 Godzilla had a stroke reading that

@@kingoffood3221that’s not what your mom said

it is

@@exwhyzgaming8996 it might not be

@@robsanfeyissa6343 Giannis is definitely not going to a desperate franchise that could never beat LeBron without an advantage

@@exwhyzgaming8996 I didn't say that. Plus, they did defeat Lebron once without KD.

@@robsanfeyissa6343 kevin love and kyrie got injured

How are the 2011 heat a dynasty and not the 2008 to 2011 Lakers. Heat won the same amount of titles and it took them four tries not three.

@@4touchdowns1game29 Ya, that’s tough. You could argue that, because they won the same amount in less appearances means they were more clutch in the finals, but I feel like to win 3 times and go to the championship an extra year is barely more impressive just because it’s hard to make the finals, and they won their conference one more time than the ‘10 Lakers did.

The Warriors Dynasty isn't over yet.....

Gsw dynasty isn't actually over yet..

No heat dynasty from 2006 to 2014

As a lakers fan I'm lowkey mad that this comment aged so well

good call

Now it’s over

Showtime

@@liams.4529Yea bub 5 rings compare to 11

they played aganist janitors

Lebron wasn’t all that bruh😂😂

Your first three were good then you went off the rails. The Warriors _damn sure_ ain't ahead of the Duncan-era Spurs. And they shouldn't even be ahead of the Bird-Mchale-Parish Celtics either. That team would've squashed the soft ass GSW squad to mush

And if reggie lewis didn't die of heart disease. I'm 99% sure that mj wouldn't be as highly regarded as he is now because he would not have won championships in the 90s.

Or if jordan didnt retire in '93 or his dad die that year, he wouldve won 7 imo. I think the rockets wouldve been his hardest finals matchup, but he def couldve won also in '99 against the spurs. Think about that... Rip to len bias though

@@woo_shynen8805 He was out for two full seasons so the Bulls would've won 8 straight.

That's a great point but I'll add one more. Reggie Lewis was drafted in 1987 the year after Bias died. Another what if..... That Bad Boys dynasty might not have happened and that's Bulls dynasty would've been 3 or 4 years after 1991

@@mj23goat3 nah they couldn't have won both. No one on the bulls can guard Hakeem. He to quick for rodman and Scottie

Wilt is cause in the. Day there were like no rules

@@mellon3293 Care to rephrase that in English? That made ZERO sense.

@@bricefleckenstein9666 sorry autocorrect got me but wilt made a lot of rule changes cause he played when the league had just started and there were not that many rules

@@mellon3293 The NBA predated Wilt's entry into it by about a decade and a half. Also, some of the rules CHANGES (there were very few new rules he had anything to do with) people commonly attribute to Wilt actually date back to George Mikan, or were due to the COMBINATION of Wilt and Bill Russell. The free throw rule change though was ALL about WIlt....

The Spurs aint a dynasty.

@Squarbuck NO. stop capping. 😂🤣

@@Riri-oj1zs your capping how can you say they're not a dynasty

@@exotic-ketchup3570 They have not even won back to back titles.

@@Riri-oj1zs so they won 1999, 2003, 2005, 2009, 2014 that literally 25% of the championship won by a single team in a span of 2 decades

That's right thank you

Yes I think 5 straight and 3 chips is better than 2-4 and the heat would have only had 1 if ray allen retired in 2010

yea KD joining warriors to beat LeBron!

Yes from a team standpoint, the warriors are better coz of their 17 and 18 dominant season.

@@mypeuslyips8761 lol let's not carried away like allen won them the series. That saved them from being eliminated but not winning them the ring Lmao. Even if he hit that shot, if they lost in the overtime or in game 7, it still wouldn't amount much.

Nick Samp well if he didn’t make it he would be 1-4

Wel the content isnt top 10 dynasties or anything it just said dynastiest in the nba

They shouldn't be on the list period, neither should Detroit. 2 rings don't make you a dynasty.

@@henny6566 then the spirs shouldnt be there because they dont have any repeat dynasty means dominating for a loong time detroit did that

@@lucianoon8625 Some people don't consider them a dynasty for not repeating. 5 rings in 15 years is dominant though. Birds Celtics didn't repeat and are considered a dynasty. 2 rings isn't dominant so the Heat and Detroit aren't dynasties.

@@henny6566 the heat team only stayed for like 4 years and won two thats already pretty dominant well in detroit i dont know

I though 2014 spurs were considered the better team that year tho

@@omnipepper3665 they were lmao that year after they won 60+ games while going 40-3 from home.

So the pistons weren't a dynasty coz they only won 2 chips?

So are the bad boy pistons not a dynasty? Also Heat won a championships while facing the Celtic dynasty and Spurs dynasty

Miami heat peak is 12-13 so you could nit pick that. But in their last year the Heat fail to add some good players around the big 3 which made them lose to Spurs. Its still Dynasty

No in 1988 pistons should won but the foul that referee called in game 6 while pistons had a 3-2 lead the and pistons should of won 3 chips

Petar Musa he’s talking about 2004

USELESS HOMIE call it a gentleman's sweep

@@boketmoda6268 oh

1989 finals were bullshit.

Now it is

What? Lol if he didn't win a chip on the team it don't count as a win for a diff team wtf

Well now u do

I knew bulls,warriors,spurs,heat,Lakers,celtics

Yeah man! The were so good, they couldn't even repeat! No that's what I call greatness!

@@RooseveltAliWashingtonX What this video should've done is lay down a definition of what they consider a "dynasty". To me you don't have to repeat to have been considered one, you just need to have won multiple championships over a decent span of time while doing it with the same core of players/coach. So, in that respect the Spurs would definitely qualify as a dynasty, repeat or not. It's all moot though because the Bulls were a better dynasty anyway. If MJ hadn't retired Chitown would've won 8 STRAIGHT.

@@RooseveltAliWashingtonX they made it to the conference finals every single year for 19 years, that is absoloutley ridiculous, they always had a 50+ win season for 19 years that is just crazy

yes 3 more years 2015 2022

But they dominated.

They won back to back so its a dynasty

@@Noah-il9ft but it was not long enought to be called a dynasty

@@Noah-il9ft ​@Omega Ѱ So did Kobe's Lakers after Shaq left with back to back titles including going to 3 straight Finals like the Bad Boy Pistons did so how come they didn't get mentioned?

The Pistons won back2back and was cheated out of a 3rd championship. 5 straight eastern conference finals

russell*

No, Wilt first played with the Warriors but then won a title with the 76ers

Merlin Lipin no

Merlin Lipin fam warriors were first in philly before they moved to Oakland and then San Francisco

Phila Warriors

Its sixers idiots

Yes it is

this video was uploaded 2 years ago bum

Clown.

He was talking about his finals losses

yeah yeah yeah IFFFFFFFFF....GSW can't even 3peat lmao what a joke of a dynasty

@@randyquench8731 true now that I think of it all that money spent and lose

yea and if micheal jordan and shaq came back to the league in their prime out of retirement + bionically engineered kareem abdul jabaar so hes 9'11 and his skyhooks truly cant be blocked and then revived kobe from the dead and travel him back in time to the 2011 finals, lebron wouldve won the finals

@@randyquench8731 Spurs didn't even win back to back titles...

Yeah ok bruh

Team #1 is the better of your two teams. They would win a seven game series. Here's mine, same question, who wins a seven game series Team #1 Bill Russell, Tim Duncan, Julius Erving, Magic Johnson, Isaiah Thomas Team #2 Jabbar, Lebron James, Larry Bird, Oscar Robertson, Michael Jordan

@@davidjanes3511 team two wins in a landslide.. your first team has two point guards and two big men with only one wing in Dr j.. Team 2 has legitimate players at each position.. therefore is a more balanced team.. with Oscar Robertson Playing at point guard. And Michael Jordan and jabbar are the two greatest scorers in NBA history..they Will chew up team number one all day long by themselves

Not really a dynasty they were just a good team who were led by the most determined and most skilled player in Basketball history. Remember injuries did tear that team apart. Had Bynum fully develop and they had last a bit longer they likely could've had the longevity to be a dynasty. I will always think that team was just a team with great chemistry and Kobe and Gasol. Comparing that to say Magic, Kareem, Worthy, and Byron Scott or Magic, Kareem, Jamal Wilkes, and Norm Nixon and it gets a bit harder to argue for them. Still, I do love my Lakers.

@@ultibolt3286 He sould have included the whole 2000's Lakers altogether but he only mentioned the wins with Shaq but mentioned the.Spurs as a whole when the Lakers won the same amount in less time.

@@hennylo68 My exact thoughts

@@hennylo68 and Lakers are still the only team to three peat 2000 2001 2002

And Steve was correct. In fact that Bulls team would've swept Curry and his soft as baby shit GenZ cohorts right into the dustbin of history.

Well they certainly lost to Cleveland🤣🤣🤣🤣

To be one of the greatest I guess you need to become bald 👨‍🦲

@@yeeskee588 no you just need a hairline that goes backwards every year

Talk to him 🤫🤔

And why did he include all of the Spurs win and not the etire 2000's Lakers. They won 5 overall and made it to 7 in a shorter time span but all he mentioned were the ones won with Shaq.

Lol

They're done...

I don’t think reaching 3 finals and winning 2 of them is one of the greatest dynasties ever

@@julianduin1272 HUh

3 finals appearances isn't a dynasty

Julian Duin then why is the Miami Heat on here??

Itachi-kun that isn’t really a dynasty or should I say great one

It's not a dynasty if they have to regroup.

That’s not a dynasty then bruh

@@ehi_ij By that standard, the NBA has only had ONE dynasty - those 8 years in a row the Celtics won every championship during the Bill Russell era.

@@bricefleckenstein9666 are you agreeing or disagreeing with me because I was agreeing with you?

@@ehi_ij More disagree, actually. Even the Russell era Celtics lost 2 during the Russell era - his second year, and the one the Wilt-led 76ers won - sandwiching that 8 year straight run.

Bringing allstars to every team you go to is not cool...i like lebron hes the best of this watered down era....He can never be the GOAT....win 7 or 8 rings then theres a arguement...not saying rings should matter but it does ....theres GREAT players who never won rings...i dont think LB is?better than KOBE so how did he jump pass the Mamba....He can have the scoring title...thats basically a longevity statistic...any scorer in the league who plays 20 plus years can break it...To be honest if KD plays 20 years hes gonna be the all time scorer and i doubt without anymore rings... Anyway MJ is the GOAT....

The East on those days had competition. The West didn't. Only Houston beat the Lakers in the playoffs in the 80's. Beat them twice. The East had the Sixers who went to the finals 3 out 4 years. The Celtics who went to the finals 5 straight years. The Pistons who went to the finals 3 straight years. Not to mention the Bucks who swept the Celtics in the 1983 playoffs. The Bucks beat the Sixers in back2back years. The Bucks won the Central division over the Pistons. Also the Hawks who were the paper champions in that period. What competition did the Bulls have in the 90's??

Winning multiple championships, not necessarily in a row, over a course of 4 or more years with the same basic core of players/coach.

Bruh that’s a horrible take 😂 it’s like saying point guards weren’t elite during the 2010’s because the heat won back to back championships with Mario Chalmers at PG

@@giovannygarica275 yeah, but the nba did suck in the 90's

Didn't they only win 1 title?

Absolutely not.

Scal dropped 200 PTS for that stretch for every game that he played including 10 games where he scored 1000+ points on Alex Caruso and scored 100 PTS in 1 minute and 50 in 32 seconds and they also won 6 straight just because everyone forfeited. It’s just a joke btw

They only won 1 title. Lack of coaching and injuries and age caught up with them

They were a mini dynasty.

A lot of people think Houston won those titles by default. Seattle was the best team in the league those 2 years. Houston never played them. Of course Jordan retired also