Тёмный

The History of Paper Money - Working out the Kinks - Extra History - Part 5 

Extra History
Подписаться 3,6 млн
Просмотров 1,4 млн
50% 1

📜 History of Paper Money! Part 5
The first question of paper money is not how much you can print, nor even what its value is - but who prints the money? When every bank started to print their own bank notes, it caused confusion and frustration. Enter the Central Bank.
* Watch Extra History ad-free & get 1-week early access on NEBULA go.nebula.tv/extrahistory
* Suggest & Vote on our next episodes, get exclusive content & 24-hour early access on PATREON bit.ly/EHPatreon
* Show off your fandom with MERCH from our store! extracredits.store/
Interested in sponsoring an episode? Email us: extracredits@standard.tv
TWITTER: bit.ly/ECTweet I FACEBOOK: bit.ly/ECFBPage
INSTAGRAM: bit.ly/ECisonInstagram I TIKTOK: bit.ly/ECtiktokz
BLUESKY: bit.ly/ECBlueSky I TWITCH: bit.ly/ECtwitch
GAMING: / @extracredits
Miss an episode in our History of Paper Money Series?
Part 1 - • The History of Paper M...
Part 2 - • The History of Paper M...
Part 3 - • The History of Paper M...
Part 4 - • The History of Paper M...
Part 5 - • The History of Paper M...
Part 6 - • The History of Paper M...
Series Wrap-up & Lies Episode - • The History of Paper M...
♪ "Simple Gifts" by Sean and Dean Kiner - • ♫ "Simple Gifts" - Sea... - Available on Patreon!
Thanks for the high-quality conversations & for following our community guidelines here: bit.ly/ECFansRNice
Artist: Heather McNabb I Writer: James Portnow I Voice: Daniel Floyd I Editor: Carrie Floyd I ♪ Extra History Theme by Demetori: bit.ly/1EQA5N7 I ♪ Music by Sean and Dean Kiner: bit.ly/1WdBhnm
#ExtraHistory #Money #History

Опубликовано:

 

28 окт 2016

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 986   
@grfrjiglstan
@grfrjiglstan 7 лет назад
The phrase "The year was XXXX and Britain was massively in debt" pops up a lot in these series.
@KryalSDA
@KryalSDA 7 лет назад
we basically have the ultimate form of "little man syndrome", it caused some great things to happen and some outright horrific things to happen. regardless of which, it usually causes a lot of debt
@Leivve
@Leivve 7 лет назад
Actually no. America's debt for what it's economy can support is actually tiny. Only a third of their debt is owed to other countries, and at the current moment their country could maintain 56 trillion dollars before it would start to feel any kind of pressure.
@WBlake01
@WBlake01 7 лет назад
Could I have your source? I've heard numbers that say America will never be able to repay its debt.
@a3x4ever6
@a3x4ever6 7 лет назад
Well he didn't really had the chance to talk about Spain, but that's a debt for another time.
@Leivve
@Leivve 7 лет назад
Metatranscendent What? If America couldn't pay back it's debts, people wouldn't loan it money. Basic concept of debt. America pays pocket change in interest on their debts because the american dollar is so strong, and they have the strongest economy in the world. That's why economist around the world were flipping complete shit when trump said he wanted to default on our debt. We are in no need to do so, and doing so would basically destroy the world economy. You'll want to see England as another example of a nation with high debt but doesn't worry to much about it. They have had one loan for over 200 years, and actually last year announced they were making their first payment towards it. The reason they got away with not paying for so long is because they were at the time at the height of their power, and everyone knew they were good for it. Loans are fully based on people's trust on your ability to pay them back. If America had 100 quadrillion (next tier above trillion) dollars in debt, so long as people trusted america to be able to pay it back it wouldn't matter.
@williamheayn3760
@williamheayn3760 7 лет назад
What I've learned is that a large portion of history is driven by "XYZ Country was in debt in the year ____"
@JohnJohnson-jr6hp
@JohnJohnson-jr6hp 7 лет назад
Upon which, they proceed to do ____ to _____ in the year ____.
@sarasamaletdin4574
@sarasamaletdin4574 7 лет назад
Hasn't it usually been England?
@jeffreyrider6977
@jeffreyrider6977 7 лет назад
I think that's more because we've been talking about England more than most. National debt are a proud European tradition, at very least.
@Lordofkittys
@Lordofkittys 7 лет назад
Mostly because of X war ___ years before hand.
@jambondepays1969
@jambondepays1969 6 лет назад
Follow the money
@CommissarMitch
@CommissarMitch 7 лет назад
3 banks, for the Russian kings, in lands far and wide. 7, for the Roman lords, in their hall of golds. 9, for the Swedes, doomed to die. 1 bank, for the dark lord, in the land of England, where the money lie. One bank to rule them all One bank to buy them One bank to bring them all And in the money bind them. In the lands of England, where the money lie.
@desertsand8778
@desertsand8778 7 лет назад
Mike Fluff That's pretty creative.
@sopheakseng9647
@sopheakseng9647 7 лет назад
One tiny suggestion. I think it could be "And with the money binds them".
@MasteringJohn
@MasteringJohn 7 лет назад
Sauron may dwell in London, but his lord Morgoth still lingers in the city that never sleeps.
@VCYT
@VCYT 7 лет назад
...till being shot dead by a cop who thought he was black.
@samuelepicurus8456
@samuelepicurus8456 7 лет назад
You think the Russians are the good guys and the Swedes are those most led astray by wealth? Ummmmm, no. More like 3 to the Southern People (African/South American) , 7 for the Europeans/Asians (continental), 9 for the colonies of Britain (mostly the US). *FIXED*
@timothymclean
@timothymclean 7 лет назад
I'm curious how widely-accepted those non-government bank notes in Scotland and Ireland are.
@extrahistory
@extrahistory 7 лет назад
There's a thread on the Patreon page with folks gleefully sharing tales of using their notes from those banks and getting dumbfounded looks from people. Seems to be in active use, at least among us trollish geeks! Also, my favorite right now is the Danish bank that bought one of the Northern Irish banks, along with its right to print legal currency, so that (as RMS phrased it) "we have legal Sterling Tender that proudly says Danske on it."
@generalamsel4743
@generalamsel4743 7 лет назад
Extra Credits I actually been to the oldest bank in the world that's still In use, it's in a town in Italy but I don't remember what it was called.
@inger2327
@inger2327 7 лет назад
General Amsel Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena
@generalamsel4743
@generalamsel4743 7 лет назад
it's 6:31 pm in montreal what is that in English?
@thexyouthxattack
@thexyouthxattack 7 лет назад
in Scotland and Northern Ireland it's absolutely fine to use them, once you got into England and Wales people look at your funny and sometimes assume it's fake, if you try to buy something with a Scottish/NI tenner.
@jellybean358
@jellybean358 7 лет назад
I loved the banks huddled around a camp fire and the gold being abandoned on the church steps, its these simple images playing with the words that really get me
@__-zh6oq
@__-zh6oq 5 лет назад
Same! The animator's on-the-nose humor is pretty rad. Great chemistry with the narrator.
@jonathancampbell5231
@jonathancampbell5231 7 лет назад
I am Scottish and 30 years old, and this is the first time I've heard that how we print money is just THAT uncommon. Thanks for the info, +ExtraCredits.
@sniperyuri
@sniperyuri 7 лет назад
Ask jesus for more bread and fish
@merrittanimation7721
@merrittanimation7721 7 лет назад
wariodude128 not to mention the market value of bread and fish would go down, leading to more economic disrepair without solving the previous issues
@Bluecho4
@Bluecho4 7 лет назад
This, incidentally, is why you teach a man to fish, rather than just giving them fish.
@AgentClank
@AgentClank 7 лет назад
But bread and fish are tangible products which can actually be used by normal people, whereas most of the population aren't chemists.
@Sophiebryson510
@Sophiebryson510 6 лет назад
wariodude128 he is not real.
@pillowtalk__
@pillowtalk__ 6 лет назад
How are you so sure about that?
@onelowerlight
@onelowerlight 7 лет назад
Wow. I did not expect this series to become so terrifying.
@onelowerlight
@onelowerlight 7 лет назад
Holy shit, you're not kidding…
@zacharygustafson8714
@zacharygustafson8714 7 лет назад
You know, Dan should keep this look. He looks dapper.
@extrahistory
@extrahistory 7 лет назад
Professor Dan is indeed now his official Extra History design!
@robertwalpole360
@robertwalpole360 7 лет назад
Nevertheless, it makes me wonder why Dan is the only one who has those weird tubes at the sides of his body.
@extrahistory
@extrahistory 7 лет назад
It's a rare but not life-threatening condition brought on by long-term exposure to podiums. Although Dan looks different, he lives a happy and healthy life!
@reginadoran6980
@reginadoran6980 7 лет назад
It's very Tenth Doctor!
@reginadoran6980
@reginadoran6980 7 лет назад
Bowties are cool.
@patronofdragons
@patronofdragons 7 лет назад
Oh! So, this is why we call paper money "(bank)notes".
@Healermain15
@Healermain15 7 лет назад
It's amazing how many weird things make perfect sense once you look at their history ^^
@rjfaber1991
@rjfaber1991 7 лет назад
Yes. In fact (and I did't know this before visiting the UK, because Euro notes don't), Pound Sterling notes still have a text on it saying something like "the Bank of England pledges to award to the holder of this note the sum of [insert value here]". I think that's pretty cool.
@Healermain15
@Healermain15 7 лет назад
Robert Faber It does make me wonder: Why ARE they called Pound Sterling notes? I'm assuming it's something like "Pound of silver (or coinage equivalent to that), from the bank of Sterling".
@ThePublicDominion
@ThePublicDominion 7 лет назад
Most likely it refers to Sterling silver, which is 92.5% silver by weight, with the remaining metal usually being copper.
@ZlatkoTheGod
@ZlatkoTheGod 7 лет назад
Honestly we should really be calling them dank notes.
@Rc3651
@Rc3651 7 лет назад
So when do we review how the US switched to a bottlecap currency?
@wojtekthebear4958
@wojtekthebear4958 7 лет назад
After the nuclear war, duh.
@andyphu5038
@andyphu5038 5 лет назад
after we do the resource wars
@Rejor111
@Rejor111 5 лет назад
collect them now. Steel and aluminum is already more valuable due to trade wars!
@grugg3108
@grugg3108 5 лет назад
This is a commodity currency which can either be exchanged for goods or melted down and turned into goods and the dollar system was wiped out because people rarely went out of the vaults and often left it outside the vaults so they went to a more common, portable, and on-hand currency
@AbdulGoodLooks
@AbdulGoodLooks 5 лет назад
Somebody should make a video on how to prepare for the resource wars.
@KiwiLombax15
@KiwiLombax15 6 лет назад
Watching this series after just having read Making Money by Terry Pratchett was eye opening. He must have done just as much, if not more, research than you did to write that book. Everything in his novel is covered here, from runs on the bank to what happens when people stop trusting them. Astounding...
@extrahistory
@extrahistory 7 лет назад
The first question of paper money is not how much you can print, nor even what its value is - but who prints the money?
@horesfan400
@horesfan400 7 лет назад
The answer is Walpole
@peterjumper881
@peterjumper881 7 лет назад
It was Walpole. Its ALWAYS Walpole. All hail Walpole.
@koensintenie6115
@koensintenie6115 7 лет назад
All glory to the hypnopole.
@bastiat691
@bastiat691 7 лет назад
Loving the series so far! Don't forget after abandoning the gold standard there is another step to the world in which we live today, where money will be issued using blockchain technology, some fully decentralized like Ethereum or Bitcoin, and some issued by the bank of the future - E-money Institutions.
@robertwalpole360
@robertwalpole360 7 лет назад
Did somebody summon me?
@eerolehtonen7318
@eerolehtonen7318 7 лет назад
this video was released 2 minutes ago yet there are comments over a day old. loomynary confirmed
@anttibjorklund1869
@anttibjorklund1869 7 лет назад
*Sigh* Patreon supporters get the video early.
@krim7
@krim7 7 лет назад
If you help fund the show, you get to see the videos early.
@elijahhartman6208
@elijahhartman6208 7 лет назад
+Mike Smith Damn you Walpole!!!
@eerolehtonen7318
@eerolehtonen7318 7 лет назад
no, the video would still be uploaded yesterday and youtube would say it would be released yesterday, only that we would see it a day later after ec makes it so that the video is available to everyone (i think. prove me wrong if you know the truth)
@extrahistory
@extrahistory 7 лет назад
The videos are uploaded as "Unlisted" so the link can be shared with Patreon supporters a day early. When the videos are made "Public," RU-vid updates the time of release. :) -Soraya
@varvarachernova8506
@varvarachernova8506 3 года назад
"1921 - less than a 100 years ago...." made me bluescreen for a minute....
@TopShadowman
@TopShadowman 7 лет назад
It's a pain having to exchange your Irish/Scottish notes in for English ones just so you can travel to England/Wales. They're still usable, it's just that the majority of shops in england rarely come across notes that aren't from the bank of england, so they think it's just monopoly money. Was wondering why here in N.Ireland we have 3 separate banks printing their own money
@aaronmorton5427
@aaronmorton5427 7 лет назад
As an economics major, this is my second favorite series on extra history. I love it!
@drtickles214
@drtickles214 7 лет назад
I feel privileged watching this channel, people who admit they are wrong and use it for educational purposes. It's not even wrong, but admitting it and fixing things and sharing learning in a fun way. If history was this cool in school, I'd be a massive history buff. Ill sit semi baked and learn, this is brilliant and I'm in my mid 30's. And James that goatee is a killer! When I am not so broke I will have EC coffee mug.
@claudiolentini5067
@claudiolentini5067 4 года назад
I love that at 3:20 "organic-fair trade" is written in current italian, english and chinese for euros, dollars and yuans respectively
@pastymccheese7866
@pastymccheese7866 7 лет назад
I've just learned so much about our economy in less than 10 minutes, it's amazing!
@icedragon769
@icedragon769 7 лет назад
(the deadly kind) Rather than the pretty kind that you can trade for food in Maldives :)
@cliffbunny5759
@cliffbunny5759 7 лет назад
Shells? Bah! Toy money, sir, toy money. Give me the assurance of huge stone rings any day.
@AegixDrakan
@AegixDrakan 7 лет назад
Yeah, you can only trade the deadly kinds of shells in post apocalypse Russia (the METRO series) XD
@Drysart
@Drysart 7 лет назад
The description of fractional reserve banking given at 6:20 is *wrong*. Depositing 100 dollars worth of gold with a 10% reserve ratio *does not* mean the bank can lend out 1000 dollars worth of bank notes. It means the bank can lend out *90* dollars worth of bank notes. This is still increasing the money supply, since all things considered $190 would exist in the economy after the loans were given out, but the key difference, and why 100->1000 is nonsensical, is that 100->90 enforces a concept known as the "money multiplier", or the *maximum* amount a single deposit can increase the money supply by; whereas 100->1000 would lead to unrestrained exponential growth of the money supply. (It would also imply every commercial bank can 'create new dollars', which they can't; that's a function reserved solely for the central bank. In other words, there's nothing a commercial bank does that it couldn't do with purely physical dollar bills and a ledger.) Run the process a few times in each scenario to see this in action and why 100->1000 doesn't work. In how it actually works, the $100 deposit becomes $90 in loans. That $90 ends up deposited in another bank, which enables an additional $81 in loans. That $81 ends up deposited in another bank, which enables an additional $72.90 in loans. Each step in this process reduces the amount the money supply can be expanded by 10%, and eventually that growth reaches zero through the geometric series of each deposit resulting in 10% less in loans given out on the other end so the growth doesn't continue unabated. The "money multiplier" is the reciprocal of the reserve ratio. That's why, if you look on Wikipedia for "money multiplier", the graphs level out to horizontal after a number of deposits. Each deposit cycle skims another 10% off the top and eventually you get to the point where you can't shave a penny in half to satisfy the reserve requirement while still loaning out the remainder. Now look at the incorrect 100->1000 assertion from the video. $100 in deposit supposedly becomes $1000 in loans. That $1000 ends up back in deposit at some other bank, which would then become $10000 in loans. That $10000 ends up in deposit elsewhere and becomes $100000 in loans. This process of exponential growth could continue *without limit*, and that would mean the complete devaluation of currency and the collapse of the economy because, taken to its natural conclusion, the result would be *infinite money* in circulation.
@meatharbor
@meatharbor 7 лет назад
I think this would be accurate if the original deposit was actually reduced in any way by the loans issued by the bank, but the loans don't come from the deposit. The money to service the loans is basically created out of thin air ON TOP OF the deposit from the Fed, as is the reserve. The reserve doesn't get removed from the original deposit, so the original bank is allowed to make $100 in loans while still keeping a $10 reserve that they essentially invented on their books. From Modern Money Mechanics by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago: If business is active, the banks with excess reserves probably will have opportunities to loan the $90. Of course, they do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits. If they did this, no additional money would be created. What they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits to the borrowers' transaction accounts. Loans (assets) and deposits (liabilities) both rise by $90. Reserves are unchanged by the loan transactions. But the deposit credits constitute new additions to the total deposits of the banking system.
@meatharbor
@meatharbor 7 лет назад
Technically, though, this can only lead to an increase of 9x the original deposit. A $100 deposit from the Fed would eventually end up as $900. This is where interest comes in. When a bank loans the $90 it's allowed to loan (that it just sorta made up), they charge, we'll say, 10% interest. The amount doesn't really matter in this case, as any interest would push the amount owed back to the bank up and over the amount of money created by both the Fed and this process, forcing the Fed to print yet more money to service all these interest payments that were also, essentially, created out of thin air. Of course, this leads to inflation/devaluation of the dollar as the Fed must constantly issue more and more money to service both the phantom money created by the banks when the loans are issued as well as the interest the banks demand on repayment. This is why one dollar in 2016 only has the equivalent buying power of twenty three cents in 1913.
@Drysart
@Drysart 7 лет назад
The bit from Modern Money Mechanics that you quoted talks about how the Federal Reserve bank introduces new money into circulation with the purpose of expanding the money stock through deposits made via Fedwire with money initiated by taking a liability against itself in purchasing a T-bill. It basically describes the process through which 'on paper only' money is credited to banks to allow them to loan out beyond what their actual, non Federal Reserve deposits would allow -- a distinction that's very clear if you read the rest of the section leading up to the bit you quoted. (And also note here, that the 'new money stock' is being created by the Federal Reserve, not by the commercial bank it gets deposited into. This is important. Only the central bank can create new dollars.) It's *not* a statement on general commercial bank operation, and certainly doesn't fit the description given in the video here where it talks about what happens to $100 dollars when placed into a bank by an individual. For deposits into commercial banks made by individuals, loans are indeed paid out purely from deposit reserves up to the reserve requirement ratio.
@meatharbor
@meatharbor 7 лет назад
Crap, I'm in a hurry and I don't have time to check the literature, but I'm pretty sure the bank is allowed to treat deposits made from any source in the same way they treat deposits from the Fed. I may be wrong on that so I'll have to try to remember to check up on it later if someone else hasn't by the time I get around to it.
@Drysart
@Drysart 7 лет назад
Nope. As I mentioned in my original comment, even if the entire economic system were based purely on physical dollar bills and paper ledgers, everything a commercial bank does would still be possible. When you hear that commercial banks "create money", it's the abstract concept of money creation; not that they're actually creating new dollars out of thin air. If you deposit $100 and the bank loans out $90 of it; *on paper* there's now $190 worth of money in the economy (because the loanee has full rights to their $90 while you still have full rights to your $100) even though there's still only actually $100 of stock. That's why bank runs are an awful thing. Because the bank is 'lying' to you by saying you have $100 in your account, but *they actually only have $10 of your money*. If there's a crisis of confidence that causes enough people try to withdraw their savings at the same time, the bank will exhaust its reserves and can't service any more withdrawals, which in turn makes the confidence crisis all that much worse, and the bank collapses.
@blaster915
@blaster915 7 лет назад
As someone living in London, I can not tell you how many times I have seen someone from Scotland show a Scottish Pound note and have a disgruntled face by the barman looking at it xD
@Gearran
@Gearran 6 лет назад
"I prefer to think of it as a mattress a third of a mile high." -Hubert Turvey, Making Money
@Mitsuraga
@Mitsuraga 7 лет назад
This could very well be the best episode of Extra History, yet. So engaging.
@AuraSight
@AuraSight 7 лет назад
Please tell me there will be a full version of "Simple Gifts" made available at this series' conclusion! The Kiner's never fail to make amazing music for Extra History. There isn't a track they've made that I don't love.
@extrahistory
@extrahistory 7 лет назад
There will be a music video in two weeks, but you can stream it right now from their website: www.kinerbrothersmusic.com/extra-history/
@AuraSight
@AuraSight 7 лет назад
Thank you for the response! :D
@DuranmanX
@DuranmanX 7 лет назад
Does Gold or Silver have any real value anyway, unless you're a Pokemon fan or Electrician
@malamutehunter
@malamutehunter 7 лет назад
Adrian Duran No, they covered this in the first and second videos
@kin2naruto
@kin2naruto 7 лет назад
And its pretty! (Used in jewelry and art)
@adamblakeslee5301
@adamblakeslee5301 7 лет назад
Gold and silver are actually mostly useless. While both are rare, gold doesn't have many practical applications and silver will tarnish over time. Gold actually became valuable because Touchstones made it easy to verify it's purity.
@DuranmanX
@DuranmanX 7 лет назад
I said outside of electronics
@RealClassixX
@RealClassixX 7 лет назад
Looks pretty.
@husavik4
@husavik4 7 лет назад
Thanks for another great episode in this series! I also really like the theme song. It's a nice irony to have a 19th century Shaker dance hymn about appreciating the simple things in life be used in a series about money. But it's also a double entendre- living simply could be about the small things in life but it could also be about making things easier for people, as in creating paper money because it is makes it more simple for the average person to buy the things he or she needs. It´s overall a really thoughtful theme song idea. Very clever.
@Its_just_Avi
@Its_just_Avi 2 года назад
Sir I got to know that there was a person named John Blunt who sharpened swords and John Law who illegally gambled and both ruined economy of UK and France respectively
@JusDoc
@JusDoc 7 лет назад
Wow I love this series so much. Politics and economics can occasionally be way more interesting than war I guess
@Patrick-ud3vu
@Patrick-ud3vu 3 года назад
Truly amazing content! The visual and audible presentation of complex topics covering historical time periods being broken down to easy understand simplified terms is the sign of a true educator!
@KnakuanaRka
@KnakuanaRka 5 лет назад
3:09 “...leaving you probably a bit less than jazzed about this whole “paper money” thing.” I don’t know what you think, but that visual pun has to be one of the funniest things in Extra History. Also I love the “Shells (the deadly kind)” sign at 4:18.
@peaceribbon8322
@peaceribbon8322 7 лет назад
They should have chosen option B. XD You guys have great humor where it counts!
@JanjayTrollface
@JanjayTrollface 7 лет назад
lolololololol
@OldHawkEye
@OldHawkEye 7 лет назад
Now... Lets talk about Jekyll Island. I'm Calling you out Extra Credits!
@Garmichael1
@Garmichael1 7 лет назад
The federal reserve is such a good idea, it had to be built in secret!
@CommissarMitch
@CommissarMitch 7 лет назад
I think the drawings describing that humans are slow to embrace new ideas in the start is so on point
@zerocentpictures
@zerocentpictures 7 лет назад
Fascinating. Learning about this makes me think about all the problems and solutions that come with digital money.
@Sabrowsky
@Sabrowsky 7 лет назад
4:26 FOOLS, THEY COULD JUST ASK FOR MORE FISH AND BREAD, IT WOULD SOLVE THE SUPPLY PROBLEM
@KamikazKid
@KamikazKid 7 лет назад
You know if you want to talk about fractional reserve banking and bank runs it'd be nice if you talked about a few of history's casualties of that idea. Namely the Knights Templar in the middle ages and the Merchant banks of the Renaissance period both of whom were destroyed by bank runs because they were engaging in fractional reserve banking. Also no mention of The Mongols & their use of paper money in the Yuan Dynasty.
@TheRagingStorm98
@TheRagingStorm98 7 лет назад
KamikazKid Could come up the lies part of the series ect
@greenlaw6503
@greenlaw6503 7 лет назад
KamikazKid watch previous episodes. all you have mentioned is explained
@KamikazKid
@KamikazKid 7 лет назад
greenlaw yes, it's explained, but no mention of the prominent failures or the yuan.
@Healermain15
@Healermain15 7 лет назад
Presumably because they are always pressed for time as it is, and because those would simply illustrate what they've already said earlier instead of adding new information. Also, using the BoE is a nice link to the South Sea series :)
@KamikazKid
@KamikazKid 7 лет назад
***** Did he mention that paper money failed in China due to inflation? No, and as one of the earliest failures of paper money it stands as somewhat important. My point is we're lacking some nice little historic anecdotes that can be done in 1-3 sentence blurbs and helps better contextualize why paper money didn't become a thing sooner.
@borlumi4664
@borlumi4664 7 лет назад
Great visualization art in these series! IMHO The art really follows and reinforces the reasoning....well done!
@hughjarsole6570
@hughjarsole6570 7 лет назад
Thank you Extra Credits. Stuff like this gets me interested in topics I would never even consider exploring.
@mrredeyes7021
@mrredeyes7021 7 лет назад
Walpole walpole walpole now he has to show up
@robertwalpole360
@robertwalpole360 7 лет назад
Excuse me?
@damianpenston6588
@damianpenston6588 7 лет назад
Extra History could certainly do a few videos on Rothschild to clear up some of the myths. Soooo much misinformation on the Internet which causes problems and distracts people from the real issues.
@marcoshayman8535
@marcoshayman8535 7 лет назад
4:23 B) Ask Jesus for more bread and fish, obviously
@soulstudiosmusic
@soulstudiosmusic 7 лет назад
So fascinating - thanks guys! I had no idea how all this stuff came to be before- now I do!
@sszy59
@sszy59 7 лет назад
I assume that someone in the comments on one of these videos has pointed to Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle trilogy that gives an (often thinly) fictionalized account of much of this. A ripping yarn (albeit long) about the beginning of the virtualization of value. It has a very odd mix of truth and fiction (and for history buffs it is fun to tease out what parts are true an which are not). He also wrote Cryptonomicon which covers the end of that process where bits overtake atoms as the center of value.
@celinak5062
@celinak5062 7 лет назад
Steven Szymanski +
@tonysladky8925
@tonysladky8925 7 лет назад
"Shells (The deadly kind)" So… the blue ones with wings and spikes then?
@TheTariqibnziyad
@TheTariqibnziyad 7 лет назад
but when you charge interest on using money, problems starts to pop out
@losinggumby
@losinggumby 7 лет назад
This has been a very interesting series. Thank you for making it.
@aidanwansbrough7495
@aidanwansbrough7495 5 лет назад
Love this series!! Really interesting, and brilliant explanations!!
@NotHPotter
@NotHPotter 7 лет назад
You guys should mention social credit theory.
@MegaRadomstuff
@MegaRadomstuff 7 лет назад
So that's why the English won't take my LEGAL SCOTTISH TENDER
@Gristobar
@Gristobar 7 лет назад
These videos are great and incredibly informative. Keep up the great work
@mazjaleel
@mazjaleel 7 лет назад
The visual puns on this one were simply brilliant
@forzaacmilan36
@forzaacmilan36 7 лет назад
9:00 Wait when did the woman cut her hair?
@CrashKinkaide
@CrashKinkaide 7 лет назад
Recommended reading: Making Money by Terry Pratchett.
@celinak5062
@celinak5062 7 лет назад
Crash Kinkaide +
@Pastshelfdate
@Pastshelfdate 7 лет назад
Oh, wow - you really are the future of my education, because you also make me laugh. You really cracked me up when the new "wheel" put out the fire, resulting in a dark fram full of sound effect text. :D Thanks! Now, on to the rest of this episode. :)
@randynixon5059
@randynixon5059 6 лет назад
I got my Econ Degree in the 70's and this little series covers Econ 101 pretty well!
@CuriousFrog
@CuriousFrog 7 лет назад
can somebody tell me the name/tell me about those scottish banks etc that are allowed to print their own notes?
@Shadowreaper5
@Shadowreaper5 7 лет назад
7:21 Welcome to the Great Depression
@cd21234
@cd21234 7 лет назад
Simple gifts. Such a nice version.
@Fuzzmunky
@Fuzzmunky 7 лет назад
You need to make that "I believe!" frame into a shirt... Do It!!!! I want that shirt!!!
@AegixDrakan
@AegixDrakan 7 лет назад
Just one problem with said Central Bank that can't fail... What happens when said bank decides it DOES care more about profit than keeping the country economy stable? When it goes "Hey, I'm too big to fail, so what's stopping me from taking wild insane risks? If we screw up, then the government will just bail us out with loans from other countries or wherever"? ESPECIALLY if said bank is able to apply pressure on politicians so that they don't get penalized for what they just pulled. I mean, TECHNICALLY that has not happened yet, but allowing any bank to be "too big to fail" encourages a certain kind of people to then abuse it in order to get rich with no penalty. >_> Seriously, why do economies somehow continually bloom to the point where there's not enough currency in the country to make things run? It's insane.
@AegixDrakan
@AegixDrakan 7 лет назад
***** Well, ok, it hasn't happened in the western world on a huge enough scale that it actually makes the news like the 2008 crash.
@nathanbrown8680
@nathanbrown8680 7 лет назад
Modern central banks are a branch of the government. There's no one working there whose pay depends on the profitability of the bank, but everyone would be out of a job if the bank failed. The government itself could try to use the interest on central bank loans as an income stream, but if it did so it is just for the failure of the central bank to bring down the government. The consequences and placement of blame are the same as for any other deliberate currency debasement and those are nothing new with paper money. It's like asking why America's FBI doesn't counterfeit money to pad their budget since they'd be the only ones with jurisdiction to prosecute themselves. Except a modern central bank engaging in profit seeking is even sillier because in the FBI example there would be opportunity for individual graft because the operation would already be illegal
@Winters004
@Winters004 7 лет назад
Because a Central Bank is basically a branch of the government and as such they are highly invested in the survival of said government in order to remain relevant. In addition, even though Central Banks are technically separate entities, their actions and policy making is still ultimately dictated by the government. Unlike commercial banks, they can't just make loans to random people or institutions whenever they want. In addition, most central banks aren't even allowed to keep the profits they make. For example, the Federal Reserve in the US is legally required to transfer all profits it makes directly to the US Treasury Department.
@deathpick2
@deathpick2 7 лет назад
the federal reserve bank of America is private
@Winters004
@Winters004 7 лет назад
The Federal Reserve is a mix of private and government institutions, but it was created by Congress through the Federal Reserve Act, and its policy is set by Congress. Federal Reserve directors are appointed by the President and their salaries are even controlled by Congress,
@themediocremaster2388
@themediocremaster2388 7 лет назад
A world where things work because we believe in them? That's it, time for Waaaarrrrggghhhh!!!!
@Crabdoestuff30
@Crabdoestuff30 7 лет назад
How have I managed to watch every single episode of extra history in less then a week? My favorite is by far the south seas company series
@thejunks3597
@thejunks3597 7 лет назад
I remember going to Singapore in 1990 and I thought it was weird as anything that sometimes you'd get different notes issued by different banks.
@hiimsomehowstillalive8333
@hiimsomehowstillalive8333 3 года назад
5:24 Me watching this in 2021
@gh0stmast3r
@gh0stmast3r 7 лет назад
abandoning the gold standard means that we have adopted the "fiat money system", historically this system has only ever ended in one thing: rampant unmanageable inflation. added to the fact that in america and indeed in most other countries the centralised bank isn't owned or operated by the government and suddenly you have a situation where it's not the government in control of the economy but the central bank, on the surface that's not a bad idea because the central bank can in theory react more quickly but it presents a terrible switch of power because, as it turns out, the government runs on money. this can and has been used in america for the owner of the central bank to impress his will on politicians across the board.
@mkvenner2
@mkvenner2 7 лет назад
waldosan the USA owns the Federal Reserve and gets to appoint the board of governors. The member banks get to make suggestions.
@gh0stmast3r
@gh0stmast3r 7 лет назад
mkvenner2 by their own website it's stated they are run by their shareholders, which means they aren't a government entity and while there's some semblance of oversight, by their own claim of being independent they are literally separate from American elected officials as well as the citizens further reinforcing the argument that they are a private entity. banks rely on trust and the biggest form of trust there is is the government, by making themselves the federal reserve they gain that trust without actually being a part of the government. while it might have started out heavily regulated time has only accomplished the widescale de-regulating of the federal reserve. the proof is in the pudding when you consider that there were at one time regulations put in place to prevent the very type of loans that caused the 2008 housing crash here in the USA. the bank of England was started in the early 1800's why is it that almost every president since the founding of the bank of England up till Woodrow Wilson knew that a publicly owned central bank would be the death of us?
@holywaterbottle3175
@holywaterbottle3175 7 лет назад
FINNALY. somebody who understands. i had to scroll way to far to find this
@reaganmaxwell9867
@reaganmaxwell9867 7 лет назад
waldosan Actually, the 2008 crash was caused by government interference.
@1685Violin
@1685Violin 7 лет назад
+ReaganMaxwell I agree.
@richardvennel9679
@richardvennel9679 3 года назад
Regarding the United States... In the early 1960’s Kennedy ordered the Mint to print “United States Notes”; I even had a $2 one which had a red seal. These were not bank notes, rather debt-free currency. Sadly, this was discontinued for reasons now debated.
@HannibalHanslaughter
@HannibalHanslaughter 7 лет назад
the outro is so beautifull **-** I love this series on paper money
@Archgeek0
@Archgeek0 7 лет назад
Well this is just interesting. I always thought fractional reserve banking was stupid, dangerous, and greedy -- but I see it serves or at least once served a purpose: preventing a country from running out of exchange medium for the value its citizens produce. Perhaps it only gets troublesome when combined with compound interest and speculative stock markets.
@SirAroace
@SirAroace 7 лет назад
Maybe the execution is more the problem then the idea, 10% reserve seem way to low.
@ifly6
@ifly6 7 лет назад
It's too high. Most countries have required reserve ratios at around 3 pc.
@SirAroace
@SirAroace 7 лет назад
ifly6 that is just asking for a crash
@celinak5062
@celinak5062 7 лет назад
Daniel Wilson +
@3366yerffej
@3366yerffej 7 лет назад
The next episode is one of the saddest stories of history. Most will never understand why or how. Thanks for the great episode.
@stevendenney5721
@stevendenney5721 7 лет назад
I really like your videos, keep it up!
@benjamingriffin7951
@benjamingriffin7951 7 лет назад
This is one of EC's most interesting series.
@iiiiitsmagreta1240
@iiiiitsmagreta1240 7 лет назад
Whoa, I'm really early! Um... I don't have a joke, so just ignore me.
@Healermain15
@Healermain15 7 лет назад
Very well. Nothing to see here citizens, move along!
@owltoe0164
@owltoe0164 7 лет назад
K
@RichardTongeman
@RichardTongeman 7 лет назад
If we've invented money then why can't we afford to spend more money on science research?
@Creaform003
@Creaform003 7 лет назад
Richard Tongeman because printing money and giving it to science would create inflation, also throwing money at science wont necessarily improve it, the same scientists might simply charge more for the same research. This is why research run privately is usually more productive and cheaper. Giving tax incentives on profit invested in research for more flexible copyright on the discovery might improve research however and allow those discoveries to be better used by the public.
@hanssmirnov9946
@hanssmirnov9946 7 лет назад
Scientists have been getting a lot of money for global warming research. A good way to get grants is to use global warming buzzwords, and try to relate your research to it, as a lot has been put aside to support anyone researching such. Other researchers... well, NASA works on a shoestring budget, they're mostly self funded through stuff like velcro.
@daltont3878
@daltont3878 6 лет назад
Also taxation is theft and maybe not everyone wants their money spent on nebulous "science" research, whatever that may be. If you want to see scientific research advance, I suggest donating money. Or let the free market do its thing, people will pay for science that has value because they want it, for example the microwave or computers.
@MyStupidOrange
@MyStupidOrange 7 лет назад
Sneaky Book of Mormon reference? Love it!
@montynitschke6527
@montynitschke6527 7 лет назад
Keep up the good work!
@BananenBrot484
@BananenBrot484 5 лет назад
Ask Jesus for more bread and Fish 😂👍🏼
@MrMegaPussyPlayer
@MrMegaPussyPlayer 7 лет назад
Don't forget the exciting future where the economy crashes because banks demanding negative interest. (Which are current suggestions in the EU from the banks .... negative interest I mean) Means when you have money on the bank you not only loosing money because of inflation and not only have to pay fees for handling the money ... you also have to pay interest ... instead the bank has to pay interst to you .... Which would lead from all people I know (and probably from the rest as well) to pull their money instantly out of the bank and store it in their mattress. And don't get me wrong if you get a loan you have to pay interest as well .... that is if after that stunt the bank is still able to
@hanssmirnov9946
@hanssmirnov9946 7 лет назад
Even when they own everything, they still want more: money.visualcapitalist.com/all-of-the-worlds-money-and-markets-in-one-visualization/
@MrMegaPussyPlayer
@MrMegaPussyPlayer 7 лет назад
I may cite the wolf of Wallstreet here ... _"More is Never Enough."_
@mankytoes
@mankytoes 7 лет назад
This might shock you, it shocked me, but there are places where you get no interest, and have to pay to have a bank account, so essentially negative interest. They usually aren't exactly thriving economies, but they aren't failing either. Think of the rise in burglaries if most people had tens of thousands in cash money hidden. It would piss me off, but for a small price, I'd still keep it in the bank.
@hanssmirnov9946
@hanssmirnov9946 7 лет назад
mankytoes People treat banks like snake oil. Without it, everything will fall apart. In truth, as you point out, places without standard banks are not hellish nightmares, but reasonable places to live. Possibly more reasonable, if they lack those crashes of economy that come from playing with fake numbers.
@MrMegaPussyPlayer
@MrMegaPussyPlayer 7 лет назад
mankytoes ... erm, I meant negative interest in addition to the fees you have to pay (and a hefty interest if you not in the black, though) And the fees can be as high as 25€ per month (plus fees for transactions and other stuff) Hans Smirnov They are snakeoil. Do you know what (if we assume a theoretical case here) a bank can lend out if they only own 100 (insert currency here) ... if you have bet less then 100 then you are wrong. If you have bet 100 then you are still wrong. If you have bet 1000 then it is also false. If you have bet 10,000 then you got it right.
@TheLazyLazer
@TheLazyLazer 7 лет назад
this is a really cool series.
@Limbomber
@Limbomber 7 лет назад
that last frame drawing is pretty neat
@Ant2242
@Ant2242 7 лет назад
All countries had unified currency that they all believed in. The "Central bank" solving all the problems of paper currency has never and will never happen. Literally every single problem that plagued the first paper currencies STILL continue to this day. I do love that even you admit that they have to "hoard real money" for their companies to be solvent. Banks don't keep the economy strong nor stable. That is the people themselves. Their financial decisions, their individual solvency. Furthermore the people of the United States have the right to create a paper currency. It's called supplemental currency. The states can only create currency in gold or silver and are specifically barred from creating paper money. Also whatever is created Cannot Compete with the United States Dollar.
@BressanFranco
@BressanFranco 7 лет назад
"The dollar standard" worst thing to happen
@Lightscribe225
@Lightscribe225 7 лет назад
And ironically maybe something that saves Zimbabwe.
@hanssmirnov9946
@hanssmirnov9946 7 лет назад
I'd argue that fractional reserve, or being able to use debt as money were the worst things.
@pukirocks
@pukirocks 7 лет назад
i love this show
@russellstauffer2994
@russellstauffer2994 7 лет назад
I can't wait to see where Walpole comes into all this!
@PreacherTHC
@PreacherTHC 7 лет назад
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.... I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson
@graphikally
@graphikally 7 лет назад
fiat currency. Making our economy function by the sheer collective belief in a concept that's physically ungrounded from reality. The next step is to realize that it can be abandoned and replaced with the desire to better the strength of ones community.
@freemanaccount5146
@freemanaccount5146 7 лет назад
I can get behind that. Its an improvement, anyway.
@doct1400
@doct1400 7 лет назад
I think the problem here is that so many people don't understand that fundamentally gold was little different. Historically it had few uses outside of ornamation. Even today when it's great for electronics the majority of it is tied up in being pretty because we simply don't NEED that much of it.
@Lightscribe225
@Lightscribe225 7 лет назад
Not happening so long as humans have this tricky thing called 'ambition'.
@archer1949
@archer1949 7 лет назад
You have far more faith in humanity than reality indicates.
@doct1400
@doct1400 7 лет назад
Faith is a poor term for it. I think in general humans will always act in their own rational self interest unless given a damn good reason not too. The exceptions tend to be people who have enough not to have to do that (charity) and people who's lives are so fucked up it's not worth it.
@ionlymadethistoleavecoment1723
This series reminds me a lot of Planet Money's story on Greece.
@nathanfarnaby8109
@nathanfarnaby8109 7 лет назад
An interesting point I noticed on holiday to the UK a few years back (2009?). The Scottish accepted the English money just about anywhere in Scotland while the Scottish money was accepted in northern England but was less accepted the further south you went (to the point where no-one would trade in the far south) despite it still being legal currency of equal value.
@DakuHonoo
@DakuHonoo 7 лет назад
i love your videos and this series but this was the least informative one yet
@hanssmirnov9946
@hanssmirnov9946 7 лет назад
Also the most misleading. Fractional reserve is the worst thing to happen to the economy in history, aside from being able to treat debt as money which came after. Gambling on the success and failure of companies being made part of the economy is another good one.
@hanssmirnov9946
@hanssmirnov9946 7 лет назад
Domo N Car Were you talking about fractional reserve, or Jesus? Both statements would have similar proof from what you said. Why is this leading so many people to have a better lifestyle? Why do the people I see work eighty hours a week to maintain their lifestyle? Why are they having to raise minimum wage? Why is it so hard to get a place to live and afford good schooling for your children? None of these modern problems seem to reflect what you are saying. Nor does the Great Depression, or the other economic recessions and crises Wall Street has caused which lead to some houses being vacated only to remain such for years, simply because no tenants could afford them. I remember seeing the option to buy houses for less than a thousand dollars. I didn't buy them, as it appeared to have a scam behind it, taking advantage of those taking advantage of the recession. Where is this happy world you have told me about?
@hanssmirnov9946
@hanssmirnov9946 7 лет назад
Domo N Car The government provides ratty housing if you are going to starve, where you are in danger of being raped or attacked by the drug dealers and criminals who deal on the street corners in the government housing areas. Ask the women who have to live there, they have to live with the fact that once in a while men come to rape them. Tell them how happy they should be that their children are growing up into poverty, that they're growing up surrounded by crime and will likely become criminals themselves. Tell them they should be happy and grateful. You might as well tell the slave he should be happy he gets bread. "You should be happy the government provides for your needs." You truly are saying that slaves should have been grateful to their masters. Because you say we owe the government even for building roads, something that has been the case since Ancient times. So w should be grateful we get to work 80 hour jobs to survive, and that we aren't left on the street to starve and freeze like the homeless that people show only contempt for. Something that would've been envied a hundred years ago? Two hundred? You show the benefits of that American education system where you can complete high school without becoming fully literate in English. Roads and schooling and orphanages and public services for the poor did exist in the 19th century. Roads in fact go back thousands of years. You pitiless person. You call the world happy, because you're *_blind_* to people suffering in it. People suffer, but you're too busy being happy to notice. But yes you are correct. None of this unofficial slavery, where people work 80 hours a week for poor housing, schooling, healthcare, and safety, would be possible without the banking system and its ability to make profit on something it never did.
@soulzero22
@soulzero22 7 лет назад
My mom loves these.
@Ninjastahr
@Ninjastahr 5 лет назад
I think we need a video on the modern international currency exchange, it'd be very informational
@b3nzayizkoolyo
@b3nzayizkoolyo 7 лет назад
The most enjoyable part of this video is probably the rendition of Simple Gifts
@hale-xw8ok
@hale-xw8ok 7 лет назад
Thank you so much for the video. In my country, materials about the history of money (not just money but a lot of other stuff too) are so few that the whole picture of money (and other stuff) cant be understood. In addition, despite the internet, i also have no idea what books to look for the information. Thanks to you guys, now i know "the travels of marco polo", " the wealth of nation ", "sir robert peel's act of 1844, regulating the issue of bank notes" as helpful references .
@wojtekthebear4958
@wojtekthebear4958 7 лет назад
They did explain fractional reserve banking wrong though. If you want to learn more about it, here's a credible source (www.frbatlanta.org/education/classroom-economist/fractional-reserve-banking/economists-perspective-transcript). Can't think of anything more credible than the central bank of the US.
@hale-xw8ok
@hale-xw8ok 7 лет назад
Wojtek the Bear thank you
@MassDynamic
@MassDynamic 5 лет назад
8:53 precisely how faith works.
@NotSoHeavyD3
@NotSoHeavyD3 7 лет назад
Please tell me you're going to talk about the "Tinkerbell Effect" in the next video in the series. BTW yet another fascinating video. Definitely enjoying all of these extra histories.
@Higgy867
@Higgy867 7 лет назад
MY GOD do I have to REALLY!! have to pay attention to get through this one
@grafpudding6247
@grafpudding6247 7 лет назад
i just love the music this time
@levilukeskytrekker
@levilukeskytrekker 7 лет назад
Great new video!
@Noneofyourbusiness2000
@Noneofyourbusiness2000 4 года назад
"One great inovation, the central bank." I'm twitching from hearing such stupidity.
@ReuelRamos
@ReuelRamos 7 лет назад
Cool ending music :)
Далее
다리에 힘이 풀려버린 슈슈 (NG Ver.)
00:11
Просмотров 2,1 млн
Спецэффекты в Симс 4
00:36
Просмотров 107 тыс.
Simulating the Evolution of Rock, Paper, Scissors
15:00
A brie(f) history of cheese - Paul Kindstedt
5:34
Просмотров 16 млн
The Genius Design of Dutch Money
13:08
Просмотров 1,4 млн
Why are So Many Chinese Banks Disappearing?
8:55
Просмотров 141 тыс.
Why Can't We Just Print Money to Pay Off Debt?
10:09
Просмотров 4,1 млн